SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

22,435 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of Intel's Core i9-13900HX with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is an unusual one: a flagship-tier mobile CPU from the Raptor Lake-HX family driving a mid-range Blackwell GPU. The data shows a clear asymmetry. The processor sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the graphics solution lands in the 67th percentile of all GPUs — a combined percentile of 78 for the laptop class. In practice this means almost no workload will be limited by the processor; the RTX 5060 Mobile is the component that sets the ceiling for gaming and rendering throughput. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database — all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly recorded gameplay.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5060 Mobile is built on TSMC's 5 nm process using the GB206 die, part of NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It is a physically compact part: 181 mm² of silicon carrying 21,900 million transistors, which works out to a density of 121.0M transistors per square millimetre. That density figure is the clearest sign of a modern, efficient design rather than a brute-force one.

The hardware inventory is mid-range by count but contemporary in capability. There are 3328 shading units, 104 texture mapping units, 48 render output units, 26 RT cores, and 104 tensor cores. Raw throughput lands at 9.684 TFLOPS FP32, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio for the same figure. Pixel fill rate is 69.84 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 151.3 GTexel/s. The clock structure runs from a 952 MHz base to a 1455 MHz boost.

Memory is where the design is most distinctive. The 8 GB of GDDR7 runs at an effective 24 Gbps across a 128-bit bus, producing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a lot of bandwidth for a 128-bit interface and represents the single biggest generational advantage of GDDR7 here — the card punches above its bus width on data delivery. The 8 GB capacity, however, is the constraint that will define long-term behavior in rendering and gaming at high settings, where modern engines routinely exceed that allocation.

The benchmark scores translate these specifications into placement. The PassMark G3D score of 18852 and the average benchmark score of 22435 place the GPU in the 67th percentile — solidly upper-middle. The nearest rivals list makes the position concrete: the RTX 5060 Mobile sits within a fraction of a percent of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (which scores 0.5% higher), 1.2% ahead of the Radeon RX 5700, 1.3% ahead of the Radeon RX 6700S, and just 1.3% behind the GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. That cluster tells the story: this is a GPU performing in the same band as previous-mainstream desktop and mobile parts, with generational efficiency gains rather than a large leap in absolute output.

For rendering specifically, the compute-oriented numbers matter. Geekbench OpenCL returns 96969 and Vulkan 96451 — nearly identical, indicating consistent API performance without driver quirks favoring one path. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3013.5 and the PassMark GPU Compute score of 7607 confirm usable general-purpose compute, while the 104 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for AI-assisted rendering workloads and denoising. Software support is current: DirectX 12 Ultimate (feature level 12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. At a 67th-percentile GPU paired with an 89th-percentile CPU, the frame-rate ceiling at 1080p and 1440p is set almost entirely by the GPU. Esports titles should reach very high refresh rates, while demanding AAA games at ultra settings will lean on the GPU's 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 4081 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1102 indicate it will never be the limiter in high-FPS scenarios. All frame figures here are estimates, as no measured data exists for this pairing.

Streaming. The 24-core, 32-thread CPU is the star here. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27900 leaves enormous headroom for encoding alongside gameplay, and the 36 MB of shared L3 cache absorbs the context-switching that streaming introduces. The GPU handles the game; the CPU handles everything else without breaking stride.

Video editing. GPU-accelerated effects benefit from the 104 tensor cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, but timeline scrubbing and export depend on the CPU — and the i9-13900HX's PassMark multithread score of 43062 places it in the top decile of all processors. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory interface is the one soft spot for very high-bitrate footage.

3D rendering. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 96969 and Vulkan score of 96451 show the GPU is a capable GPU-render engine for its tier, but the 8 GB VRAM cap will throttle complex scenes. CPU-based rendering is stronger: Cinebench R20 multi-core at 14836 and R15 multi-core at 4494.5 confirm sustained all-core throughput. Hybrid pipelines — CPU for the scene, GPU for denoising via tensor cores — play to both components' strengths.

Software development. Compiling is one of the clearest demonstrations of the scaling data. The 3DMark thread scaling runs 2143 (2 threads), 4012 (4 threads), 6857 (8 threads), and 11738 at max threads — nearly linear scaling from two threads to all 32. Large codebases compile fast. PassMark random string sorting at 59199 and integer math at 156175 reinforce strong general-purpose throughput.

Student and office work. Frankly, this pairing is overkill for documents and browsing, but the data shows why it never strains: the single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2056 means snappy application responsiveness, and the PassMark physics score of 2645 indicates effortless everyday multitasking. Battery-sensitive light work can also fall back to the integrated UHD Graphics 770.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die fabricated in-house. It runs a 2.20 GHz base clock with boost reaching 5.40 GHz, and its multiplier is unlocked — noteworthy for a mobile part. The TDP is rated at 55 W.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — an unusual, workstation-relevant capability for a mobile chip. PCIe connectivity is full-spec: 20 lanes of Gen 5 from the CPU alone.

Benchmark results place it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 46098. The rival picture is remarkably tight: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 averages 46062 (0.1% apart), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 averages 46030 (0.1% apart), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G averages 46187 (0.2% higher), and the AMD EPYC 4364P averages 45970 (0.3% lower). The i9-13900HX is statistically indistinguishable from these parts on aggregate — a strong result given they represent newer generations.

For real workloads, the thread-scaling data is the key evidence. From 2 threads to 4, the 3DMark CPU score nearly doubles (2143 to 4012); from 4 to 8 it comes close to doubling again (4012 to 6857); max-threads reaches 11738, a 5.5x multiple of the 2-thread result on 16x the threads. That is strong but not perfect scaling, consistent with a hybrid core layout. The single-thread PassMark of 4081 paired with a multi-thread result of 43062 yields a thread-throughput ratio that favors heavily parallel tasks. Specialized PassMark results round out the picture: 531224 in data compression, 32130 in encryption, 30550 in extended instructions, 190 in prime finding, 110470 in floating point math, and 156175 in integer math.

Upgrade Path and Platform

This is a laptop-class build, which reshapes the usual upgrade conversation. The CPU is soldered to Intel BGA 1964 — there is no socket, and no CPU upgrade path exists. The GPU is integrated into the platform (IGP slot classification, no power connectors, bus handled internally via PCIe 5.0 x16), so it too is fixed. The realistic upgrade surface is memory and storage: dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 support means moving to faster DDR5 modules is the most impactful change available, and 20 lanes of CPU PCIe Gen 5 provide modern bandwidth for storage devices.

On power: the CPU carries a 55 W TDP and the GPU a 45 W TDP, for roughly 100 W of combined silicon budget before platform overhead. No suggested PSU figure is provided for the mobile GPU because none applies — the chassis and its cooling solution, not a user-selected PSU, determine sustained performance here. A sensible "next upgrade" is therefore a newer chassis rather than a component swap: the GPU's successor is not yet listed, but the pairing's combined 78th percentile suggests replacing the whole platform when the 8 GB VRAM ceiling starts to bite. The RTX 5060 Mobile's production status is Active and the predecessor line points to the GeForce 40 Mobile generation, indicating this is a current-generation mid-cycle part, not an end-of-line one.

Who Should Build It

Given the fixed nature of the platform, "build" here means "buy the laptop that contains it." The measured data maps cleanly onto user groups. High-refresh 1080p and 1440p gamers get a GPU within 1.3% of the RTX 4060 Mobile and 0.5% of the RX 7700 XT — capable of high settings at mainstream resolutions, less so of ultra at higher ones with 8 GB of VRAM. Content creators get the bigger win: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27900 and PassMark multithread of 43062 place the machine firmly in mobile workstation territory for editing and encoding. Developers and data-science users benefit from the near-linear thread scaling (2143 to 11738 across the 3DMark thread tests) and ECC memory support, the latter being genuinely rare and valuable for long-running computation. Students in engineering or 3D programs get a machine that handles both simulation and viewport work. Small businesses deploying CAD or analysis workstations will appreciate the 89th-percentile CPU and modern API support through DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. What none of these users get is a GPU flagship — the 67th percentile makes that explicit.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database; the data is estimated, not recorded. The frame-rate picture must therefore be drawn from benchmark scores. The GPU's average score of 22435, PassMark G3D of 18852, and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 3013.5 position it alongside the Radeon RX 7700 XT (within 0.5%) and the RTX 4060 Mobile (1.3% higher) — parts known for high-frame-rate 1080p play and solid 1440p performance at adjusted settings. The 384.0 GB/s of GDDR7 bandwidth and 151.3 GTexel/s texture rate support high-detail rendering, while the 69.84 GPixel/s pixel rate is the constraint to watch at very high resolutions and refresh rates. Ray tracing is hardware-supported through 26 RT cores, with 104 tensor cores available for AI upscaling. The CPU contributes a PassMark physics score of 2645 and 3DMark max-threads score of 11738, which together indicate frame-time stability will be excellent — any stutter will originate on the GPU side, most likely when scenes exceed 8 GB of VRAM at ultra settings.

Benchmark Performance

The numbers, exactly. CPU: 3DMark single-thread 1102, 2-thread 2143, 4-thread 4012, 8-thread 6857, 16-thread 8929, max-threads 11738. Cinebench R15: 4494.5 multi / 296 single. Cinebench R20: 14836 multi / 2094 single. Cinebench R23: 27900 multi / 2056 single. PassMark: 43062 multithread, 4081 single-thread, 2645 physics, plus the specialized subtests listed above. GPU: PassMark G3D 18852, GPU Compute 7607, G2D 876, DirectX tests ranging from 87 (DX12) to 203 (DX9), Geekbench OpenCL 96969, Geekbench Vulkan 96451, and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 3013.5. Average scores are 46098 for the CPU and 22435 for the GPU, producing percentile placements of 89 and 67 respectively, with a combined laptop-class percentile of 78.

The combined picture is one of deliberate imbalance. A CPU in the 89th percentile attached to a GPU in the 67th means the system's aggregate capability is processor-led. For anything that scales with threads — compilation, encoding, simulation, compression at 531224 PassMark — this laptop performs like a premium workstation. For anything that scales with GPU output, it performs like a well-executed mid-range machine. The combined 78th percentile averages those two realities almost exactly.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 5060 Mobile compare to its rivals?

A: Its average score of 22435 sits 0.5% behind the Radeon RX 7700 XT, 1.2% ahead of the RX 5700, 1.3% ahead of the RX 6700S, and 1.3% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile — effectively identical performance to that cluster.

Q: Is the i9-13900HX still competitive against newer chips?

A: Yes. Its 46098 average is within 0.1% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 0.2% behind the Ryzen AI 5 440G, and 0.3% ahead of the EPYC 4364P — statistically a tie with all four.

Q: Does 8 GB of VRAM limit this build?

A: It is the GPU's main constraint. Bandwidth is excellent at 384.0 GB/s thanks to GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, but capacity will cap texture-heavy ultra-settings workloads in modern games and large 3D scenes.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No. It uses the Intel BGA 1964 package, which is soldered. Memory (DDR4/DDR5, dual-channel) and storage on the CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes are the practical upgrade paths.

Q: Can this machine stream while gaming?

A: Comfortably. The 32-thread CPU posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core of 27900 and PassMark multithread of 43062, leaving large reserves for encoding alongside gameplay that the 67th-percentile GPU handles.

Q: Are the gaming frame rates on this page measured?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing; all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and percentile placements.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC is supported — a rare feature on mobile silicon that adds reliability for workstation and computational workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The verdict is unambiguous: the GPU is the bottleneck in every graphics-bound workload. The evidence is in the percentile gap — 89 for the CPU versus 67 for the GPU — and the numbers behind it. In any game, the RTX 5060 Mobile's 1455 MHz boost ceiling, 3328 shading units, and 8 GB framebuffer will saturate long before the i9-13900HX runs out of threads. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1102 and PassMark single-thread of 4081 are both top-tier figures that guarantee no CPU-side frame pacing issues; every dropped frame in a graphically demanding title traces back to the GPU.

The reverse holds for parallel workloads. When the CPU is fully loaded — a Cinebench R23 run at 27900, a PassMark compression test at 531224 — the GPU contributes little; its compute scores of 7607 (PassMark GPU Compute) and 96969 (OpenCL) are respectable but not the reason this system posts high aggregate results. In mixed workloads like streaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the pairing is actually well matched: the CPU's excess capacity absorbs the overhead while the GPU delivers its 67th-percentile output.

The one caveat is VRAM. The 8 GB capacity is a second, workload-dependent bottleneck layered on top of the raw GPU throughput limit — a scene that fits in memory renders at the chip's full capability, while one that doesn't falls off a cliff regardless of the 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth behind it. For a balanced next machine, the data points one direction: keep CPU class, raise GPU class.