SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

This mobile pairing combines Intel's top-tier 13th Gen HX-series processor with NVIDIA's entry-level Ada Lovelace GPU, creating a laptop configuration where the CPU dramatically outclasses the GPU in raw compute capability. The processor sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 46,098, while the graphics chip lands in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 19,049. This imbalance defines the entire character of the platform: it is a productivity and multi-threaded workload monster paired with a competent but not exceptional gaming GPU, making it best suited for users who need serious processing power but only moderate graphics performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4050 Mobile is the limiting factor here. With a Passmark G3D score of 14,423 and an FP32 throughput of 8.986 TFLOPS, the GPU sits at the 63rd percentile, meaning it can handle esports titles and older games at high frame rates, but modern AAA games at high refresh rates will require reduced settings or lower resolutions. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,102 in 3DMark and 2,056 in Cinebench R23 ensures no bottleneck at the processor level, but the GPU simply cannot push frames fast enough for 144Hz+ gaming in demanding titles.

Streaming: The combination of Intel's UHD Graphics 770 iGPU and the RTX 4050's 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores provides a solid foundation for streaming workflows. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 43,062 means x264 encoding at high presets is viable, while the GPU's NVENC-based encoding (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture with tensor cores) offers an alternative that offloads the work entirely from the 24-core processor. The 8.986 TFLOPS FP16 performance (1:1 ratio) indicates capable compute for encoding tasks.

Video editing: This is where the platform shines. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27,900 places it well ahead of comparable mobile processors, and the Passmark integer math score of 156,175 suggests rapid timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU's 192.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 6 GB GDDR6 VRAM will handle 1080p and some 1440p editing timelines, though 4K work with heavy effects may strain the 96-bit memory bus. The combination of 24 cores and 32 threads with the GPU's compute capabilities makes this a strong choice for content creators who prioritize CPU-heavy workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star performer here, with a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4,494.5 and R20 multicore of 14,836. For CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray, this processor will crush most mobile rivals, sitting at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. GPU rendering is less impressive: the RTX 4050's 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 and Passmark GPU compute score of 5,947 mean it will render, but slower than dedicated workstation GPUs. Users should plan for CPU-centric rendering pipelines to maximize this platform's potential.

Software development: The 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with 36 MB of shared L3 cache, make this an exceptional compilation machine. The Passmark data compression score of 531,224 and extended instructions score of 30,550 indicate strong performance for code compilation, especially with parallel build systems. The dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms roughly 89% of all CPUs in general compute.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic productivity, but the headroom means the system will remain responsive for years. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,102 and 2-thread score of 2,143 handle typical office workloads with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a power-efficient fallback for simple tasks, potentially extending battery life when the discrete GPU is not needed. However, the 55W TDP of the CPU alone suggests this is not a lightweight ultrabook replacement, and the 50W TDP GPU adds to the thermal load.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 46,098, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46,062 (0.1% faster), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46,030 (0.1% faster), and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G scores 46,187 (0.2% slower). This clustering indicates the 13900HX is right at the peak of mobile CPU performance, trading blows with newer architectures. The AMD EPYC 4364P, a server chip, scores 45,970 (0.3% slower), showing this mobile processor rivals desktop-class silicon in aggregate throughput.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 19,049 places it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6600 at 19,036 (0.1% faster), a desktop graphics card, which is remarkable for a mobile chip. The NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19,030, 0.1% faster) and Tesla K20m (19,089, 0.2% faster) are older workstation parts from different eras. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18,954 (0.5% slower), meaning the 4050 Mobile essentially matches a professional Ada Lovelace workstation GPU in aggregate benchmarks.

The combined picture is clear: this is a lopsided pairing where the CPU operates at the 89th percentile but the GPU sits at the 63rd percentile. The combined percentile of the build is 76, pulled down significantly by the GPU. In CPU-heavy benchmarks like Cinebench R23 multicore (27,900) and Passmark multithread (43,062), this system will outperform nearly everything in its class. In GPU-bound scenarios, it will land in the upper-midrange, competitive with desktop graphics cards from several generations ago but not with current high-end mobile GPUs.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4050 Mobile is built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD107 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It packs 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1455 MHz and boosts to 1755 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). Memory configuration is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, yielding 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute configuration includes 2,560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. This translates to a pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 8.986 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning no FP16 advantage for AI workloads. The GPU features 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a mixed picture. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,748 and Vulkan score of 75,235 indicate strong compute performance in synthetic workloads. However, the Passmark DirectX scores are erratic: DirectX 9 at 184, DirectX 11 at 130, DirectX 12 at 61, and DirectX 10 at 79. These numbers suggest older DirectX APIs perform relatively better, which may indicate driver overhead in newer APIs or architectural trade-offs. The Passmark G3D score of 14,423 and G2D score of 633 are more reliable indicators of overall graphics capability.

For rendering, the 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 places it in the range of desktop GPUs from a few generations ago. The 192.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM are adequate for 1080p rendering with moderate texture budgets, but the 96-bit bus limits higher-resolution work. The tensor cores enable DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported games, partially offsetting the raw performance deficit. The 50W TDP and IGP slot width indicate this is designed for thin-and-light gaming laptops, not for sustained heavy GPU workloads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need serious CPU horsepower but can accept midrange graphics. Content creators working in video editing, 3D modeling, or software development will find the 24-core processor ideal for rendering, compiling, and encoding tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27,900 and Passmark multithread of 43,062 put it at the top of mobile CPU performance, rivaling desktop processors. For these users, the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking is sufficient for previewing work and light GPU acceleration.

Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings will find this acceptable, especially those playing esports titles or older games where the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1,102, Cinebench R23 single-core 2,056) ensures high frame rates. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p textures well but will struggle with 1440p or 4K in demanding titles. Ray tracing is possible thanks to the 20 RT cores, but performance will be limited by the overall compute throughput.

Students and professionals in engineering, data science, or research will benefit from the CPU's Passmark integer math score of 156,175 and floating-point math of 110,470. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations. Small business workstations running virtualization, database workloads, or complex spreadsheets will see excellent performance, with the Passmark data compression score of 531,224 indicating strong throughput for data-heavy applications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant for high-performance mobile systems. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel and measures 257 mm². The base clock is 2.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it carries a 55W TDP. The socket is Intel BGA 1964, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. The processor was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $668.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool benefits workloads with shared data access patterns, such as databases or parallel rendering. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, giving laptop manufacturers flexibility in memory choice. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for consumer mobile processors and valuable for workstation use. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and potentially external GPU enclosures.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the absolute top of mobile processing. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4,494.5 and R20 multicore of 14,836 are exceptional for a laptop chip. The R23 multicore score of 27,900 rivals desktop processors from the same generation. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with R15 single-core at 296, R20 at 2,094, and R23 at 2,056. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show efficiency: 2-thread score of 2,143, 4-thread of 4,012, 8-thread of 6,857, 16-thread of 8,929, and max-thread of 11,738. This scaling curve indicates the architecture handles increasing thread counts well, though the gains diminish beyond 16 threads due to power and thermal constraints in mobile form factors.

Passmark results reinforce the CPU's strengths. The multithread score of 43,062 and single-thread of 4,081 are both strong. Integer math at 156,175 and floating-point math at 110,470 show balanced arithmetic capability. Data encryption at 32,130 and extended instructions at 30,550 indicate solid security and SIMD performance. The find prime numbers score of 190 and physics score of 2,645 are lower relative to other metrics, suggesting these specific workloads are not the CPU's primary strength.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile package — there is no CPU upgrade path without replacing the motherboard or entire laptop. The GPU is also soldered, as indicated by the IGP slot width and "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs. This means the platform is closed for component-level upgrades beyond memory and storage.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. Users upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 will see bandwidth improvements, though the FACT PACK does not specify memory bandwidth numbers. Storage expansion is limited only by the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which support the fastest NVMe drives. The 20 lanes from the CPU allow for multiple high-speed storage devices or a fast external GPU connection.

The GPU's suggested PSU is null, and its TDP is 50W. The CPU TDP is 55W, giving a combined typical power draw of around 105W for the two primary components. This is modest for a high-performance laptop, meaning the existing power supply in a laptop chassis should have headroom. For external GPU expansion, the PCIe Gen 5 connection from the CPU could support a more powerful desktop GPU, though the laptop's display outputs being "Portable Device Dependent" complicates external display setups.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported capacity (though the FACT PACK does not specify a maximum) and adding the fastest NVMe storage available. For users who outgrow the RTX 4050's performance, an external GPU enclosure connected via the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes could provide desktop-class graphics performance, though this requires a compatible laptop with the necessary ports.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance between CPU and GPU is stark. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 63rd percentile. This means in CPU-bound workloads — compilation, rendering, video encoding, scientific computing — the platform will perform at near the top of the mobile market. In GPU-bound workloads — gaming, GPU rendering, machine learning inference — it will perform in the upper-midrange.

The bottleneck analysis depends entirely on the workload. For gaming, the RTX 4050 Mobile is the clear limiting factor. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14,423 and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 mean that even with the CPU's strong single-thread performance, frame rates will be capped by the GPU in most modern titles. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,102 is more than sufficient to feed the GPU, so there is no CPU-induced frame pacing issues. However, at lower resolutions or with older games, the CPU's performance advantage becomes irrelevant because the GPU cannot exceed its inherent limits.

For productivity, the CPU is the star and the GPU is sufficient. The Passmark multithread score of 43,062 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 27,900 indicate the CPU will not bottleneck any software workflow. The GPU's compute score of 5,947 in Passmark GPU compute is adequate for acceleration in Adobe applications or similar software, but users should not expect the GPU to accelerate every task. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this lopsided nature — the platform is better than 76% of all systems in aggregate, but this average hides the extreme spread between CPU and GPU capability.

FAQ

Q: Is this configuration suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB GDDR6 VRAM on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth, and its Passmark G3D score of 14,423 places it at the 63rd percentile. This is insufficient for 4K gaming in modern titles, though it may handle 4K in older or less demanding games at lower settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 46,098 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46,062, 0.1% faster) and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46,030, 0.1% faster). It is 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G (46,187) and 0.3% faster than the AMD EPYC 4364P (45,970).

Q: Can the GPU handle ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4050 Mobile includes 20 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, the limited 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance means ray-traced games will require significant settings reductions or DLSS upscaling to maintain playable frame rates.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. The FACT PACK does not specify memory bandwidth numbers, but the dual-channel bus provides adequate throughput for the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No. The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile package. The GPU is also soldered. Upgrades are limited to memory and storage, with PCIe Gen 5 connectivity from the CPU supporting fast NVMe drives.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 19,049 is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (19,036, 0.1% faster), a desktop card. It also matches the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19,030, 0.1% faster) and Tesla K20m (19,089, 0.2% faster), both older workstation parts.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 76, meaning this configuration outperforms 76% of all systems in the benchmark database. This is pulled down by the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking, despite the CPU's 89th percentile ranking.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing. All frame rate expectations below are estimates based on the benchmark scores of both components and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the RTX 4050 Mobile's Passmark G3D score of 14,423 and 63rd percentile ranking, this GPU is comparable to a desktop AMD Radeon RX 6600 (which scores 19,036 on average, 0.1% faster). At 1080p with high settings, modern AAA titles should achieve 60-80 FPS in most cases, with esports titles like competitive shooters reaching 120-180 FPS due to the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,102). The 6 GB VRAM may cause texture pop-in or reduced texture quality in the most demanding titles at 1080p, but is generally sufficient for this resolution.

At 1440p, expect 40-60 FPS in demanding titles with reduced settings. The 192.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 96-bit bus will limit performance in memory-heavy scenes. Ray tracing at any resolution will be challenging, as the 20 RT cores must work with only 8.986 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, so DLSS upscaling (supported via the 80 tensor cores) will be essential for playable RT performance. The CPU will never be the bottleneck in gaming scenarios — its single-thread and multi-thread scores are far beyond what any game requires, ensuring consistent frame pacing and no processor-related stutters.