SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

20,534 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile represents a specific configuration found in high-performance laptops. The CPU is a 24-core Raptor Lake-HX processor with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the GPU is an Ampere-based mobile part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, which contains no measured FPS results for this exact combination. Consequently, all discussions of frame rates are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct gaming measurements.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, housing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1110 MHz and a boost clock of 1560 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer sits on a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is a critical resource for texture streaming and high-resolution rendering, as it directly affects how quickly data can be fed to the shading units.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 5120 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. For hardware-accelerated ray tracing, there are 40 RT cores, while 160 tensor cores handle AI-driven workloads such as DLSS. The pixel rate is 124.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 249.6 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 15.97 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is identical at 15.97 TFLOPS (1:1), which is notable for workloads that can leverage reduced precision.

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU scores 2380 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which reflects modern API performance. The Geekbench results show 92939 in OpenCL and 86768 in Vulkan, indicating strong cross-platform compute capability. PassMark results are mixed: G3D score is 15309, but GPU compute is lower at 6827. The DirectX tests show 160 for DX9, 113 for DX10, 138 for DX11, and 64 for DX12, with G2D at 641. The average benchmark score is 20534, placing the GPU at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 3070 Mobile sits within 0.6% of the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (which scores 20662) and within 0.2% of the Intel Arc A750 (20582). The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, a 0.1% difference, and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480. This tight grouping suggests the RTX 3070 Mobile is positioned at a specific performance tier where minor architectural differences dictate ranking.

For rendering workloads, the 40 RT cores and 160 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced scenes and AI denoising, respectively. The FP32 throughput of 15.97 TFLOPS is relevant for traditional rasterization and compute shaders, while the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents bottlenecks in high-detail scenes. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, though larger datasets may exceed this limit. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features, and Vulkan 1.4 support broadens API flexibility.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 6857 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2380 indicate a pairing capable of sustaining high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p, though exact FPS figures are not available. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking suggests it can handle competitive settings, but for demanding AAA titles at maximum details, the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 15.97 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will be the limiting factors.

Streaming: The CPU's 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, as evidenced by the PassMark multithread score of 43062 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8929 indicates strong multi-threaded performance for simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding. The GPU's tensor cores could offload AI-based encoding tasks, though this depends on software support.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 531224 and floating-point math score of 110470 are relevant for codec operations and effect processing. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 14836 suggests efficient timeline rendering, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth support GPU-accelerated effects. The 40 RT cores may accelerate certain preview renders, but the 65th percentile GPU ranking indicates mid-tier acceleration.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 positions it strongly for CPU-based rendering, with the PassMark extended instructions score of 30550 showing AVX-512-class capability. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 15.97 TFLOPS and 160 tensor cores accelerate GPU-based renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM could limit scene complexity. The combined percentile of 77 indicates a balanced system for moderate rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 156175 and random string sorting score of 59199 reflect strong compilation and data processing capabilities. The 24-core configuration with 32 threads handles parallel builds efficiently, as shown by the 3DMark max-threads score of 11738. The GPU's compute scores, including 92939 in OpenCL, support parallel processing tasks like unit testing on GPU.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 4081 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1102 indicate responsive everyday computing. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 296 confirms snappy application launches. The GPU's G2D score of 641 handles 2D desktop composition, while the CPU's 55 W TDP suggests reasonable power efficiency for prolonged battery operation, though the discrete GPU will draw additional power.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Using the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2380 and its 65th percentile ranking, we can estimate that at 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3070 Mobile would deliver playable frame rates in most titles, likely exceeding 60 FPS in well-optimized games. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 15.97 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest that at 1440p, frame rates would drop, with demanding titles hovering near 40-50 FPS. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit bus become limiting, and estimates place performance below 30 FPS in AAA games.

The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900, ensure that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6857 indicates that even in games optimized for eight cores, the CPU provides ample headroom. However, without measured FPS data, these estimates should be treated as directional rather than precise. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 64 in PassMark is notably low, which may suggest suboptimal DX12 optimization in certain workloads, but this is a synthetic metric and may not reflect real-world DX12 game performance.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU percentile of 89 versus the GPU percentile of 65 indicates a significant imbalance in this pairing. The processor is among the top 11% of all CPUs, while the graphics card sits at the 65th percentile. This suggests that in gaming workloads, the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as its lower relative performance will cap frame rates before the CPU's capabilities are fully utilized.

For CPU-bound tasks like compiling code, data compression, or physics calculations, the processor dominates. The PassMark find prime numbers score of 190 and physics score of 2645 indicate strong computational throughput, with the CPU likely being the limiting factor only in scenarios that exceed the GPU's VRAM capacity. The 3DMark scores scale from 1102 in single-thread to 11738 in max-threads, showing a 10.6x scaling efficiency, which means the CPU can handle highly parallel workloads effectively.

In mixed workloads like gaming while streaming, the CPU's 32 threads can handle the encoding load without significantly impacting game performance, as evidenced by the PassMark multithread score of 43062. The GPU's tensor cores could theoretically offload some AI tasks, but the 65th percentile ranking means the GPU may struggle to keep up with CPU-driven frame generation. The combined percentile of 77 reflects a system where the CPU is over-provisioned relative to the GPU, making the GPU the clear limiting factor in graphics-intensive applications.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a Raptor Lake-HX processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring 24 cores and 32 threads. The base clock is 2.20 GHz, boosting to 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm², and the CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, while the CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor with exceptional multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 places it among the top desktop-class performers in that metric, while the single-core score of 2056 indicates strong per-thread performance. The PassMark multithread score of 43062 and the 3DMark max-threads score of 11738 corroborate this. For real workloads, this translates to rapid compilation times, efficient video encoding, and smooth multitasking across dozens of applications.

The PassMark data encryption score of 32130 and extended instructions score of 30550 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance, relevant for security software and scientific computing. The floating-point math score of 110470 and integer math score of 156175 show balanced arithmetic capability. The 3DMark scaling from 2 threads (2143) to 16 threads (8929) demonstrates near-linear scaling up to 16 threads, with diminishing returns to 32 threads (11738). This suggests that workloads with 16 or fewer threads are optimally served, while highly parallel tasks still benefit from the full 24-core configuration.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This CPU-GPU pairing is suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over GPU-intensive tasks, given the 89th percentile CPU versus 65th percentile GPU. Gamers targeting 1080p resolution with high refresh rates will find the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4081) sufficient for driving high FPS in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2380 supports medium-to-high settings. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, so users should expect to adjust settings.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900, which accelerates export times. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth support GPU-accelerated effects, but the 65th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier rendering GPU. Software developers will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 156175 and data compression score of 531224, which speed up builds and data processing. Students and office workers will find the CPU's single-thread performance ample for productivity applications, though the discrete GPU is overkill for such tasks. Small business workstations handling databases or virtualization will leverage the 32 threads and ECC memory support, but the GPU's modest compute score (PassMark GPU compute 6827) limits its use for AI inference.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop configuration is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 46098, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46062) and 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030). It is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G (46187) and 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 4364P (45970).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3070 Mobile has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, achieved through 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 40 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing, along with 160 tensor cores for AI acceleration.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the Intel Arc B570 in average benchmark score?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 20534, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc B570's 20556.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the Intel Core i9-13900HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile. The CPU ranks at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 77. This places the system in the upper-midrange tier of laptop configurations, with the processor being the standout component.

The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, position it as a high-end mobile processor. The GPU, with 8 GB VRAM and 5120 shading units, is a capable mid-range mobile graphics solution. The pairing is typical of a "creator" laptop, where CPU-heavy tasks like rendering and compilation take precedence over GPU-bound gaming. The CPU's launch MSRP was $668, though this is a historical reference and not a current price indicator. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, suggesting this configuration may be from a previous generation laptop lineup.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 46098, placing it at the 89th percentile. Key scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900, a PassMark multithread score of 43062, and a 3DMark max-threads score of 11738. Single-thread performance is represented by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2056 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4081. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8929 and 8-thread score of 6857 demonstrate strong scalability.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20534, placing it at the 65th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2380, and Geekbench scores are 92939 in OpenCL and 86768 in Vulkan. PassMark G3D is 15309, with GPU compute at 6827. The nearest rivals are all within 0.6% of the GPU's average score, indicating a tightly contested performance tier.

Combined, the CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 65th percentile yield a system percentile of 77. This means the pair outperforms 77% of all recorded configurations, but the GPU is the weaker link. For users who need CPU compute power, this is an excellent pairing; for those prioritizing GPU performance, the 65th percentile GPU may be a limitation. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score, showing it is clustered with other high-end processors.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a laptop-specific package, meaning the processor is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU is limited to PCIe 4.0 speeds, though the bandwidth difference is unlikely to be a bottleneck for the RTX 3070 Mobile.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the GPU's TDP is 115 W, totaling 170 W for the core components. The suggested PSU field is null, so no specific power supply recommendation is available from the data. However, given the combined TDP, a laptop battery and power adapter must accommodate at least this draw, plus other system components. The GPU has no power connectors listed, indicating it draws power through the motherboard slot, which is typical for mobile GPUs.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performing mobile part, given that the CPU at the 89th percentile has significant headroom. However, because this is a laptop (BGA socket), neither the CPU nor GPU is field-upgradeable. The only feasible upgrades are memory (DDR4 or DDR5) and storage, which would not address the GPU bottleneck. The CPU's support for ECC memory suggests it could be used in professional workstations, but the laptop form factor limits expansion. The GPU's end-of-life status indicates that newer mobile GPUs offer better performance per watt, but replacing the entire laptop would be the only way to achieve that.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds