SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

18,159 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile pairing is a study in contrasts: a top-tier 24-core processor from 2023 paired with a mid-range 2021 graphics chip, both confined to a laptop chassis. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile of all processors, while the GPU lands in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs, creating a system where the processor is the clear star. This analysis interprets the benchmark data strictly from the FACT PACK, avoiding speculation beyond the provided figures.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents a system where the CPU is overwhelmingly the dominant component, and the GPU is the limiting factor for most graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46098, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the GPU’s average benchmark score is 18159, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. This 89th vs. 62nd percentile gap is substantial, indicating a significant imbalance in raw compute capability.

Bottleneck analysis hinges on workload type. For CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, and physics simulation, the i9-13900HX will not be the constraint. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 43062 and 3DMark max-threads score of 11738 demonstrate immense parallel processing headroom. The GPU, however, will limit frame rates in gaming. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 13230 is its strongest result, but its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 58 suggests that modern API workloads may not fully utilize its potential, potentially creating a scenario where the CPU waits on the GPU to render frames.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the FACT PACK, as no measured FPS data exists for this combination. However, the benchmark scores imply a clear trend: at lower resolutions and graphical settings, the CPU’s high single-thread score of 1102 in 3DMark and 2056 in Cinebench R23 will push frame rates high, but the GPU will become the bottleneck as resolution and detail settings increase. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by 2023 standards, further cementing its role as the limiting factor in modern, VRAM-hungry titles at 1440p or 4K. In productivity tasks that leverage GPU compute, such as OpenCL workloads (Geekbench OpenCL score of 79483), the GPU will be the ceiling, while the CPU handles the orchestration and data preparation.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are consistently strong across all tests. In Cinebench R23, it scores 27900 multi-core and 2056 single-core, with the multi-core figure being approximately 13.6 times higher than the single-core score, reflecting its 24-core, 32-thread configuration. The 3DMark results show a clear scaling pattern: 2143 for 2 threads, 4012 for 4 threads, 6857 for 8 threads, 8929 for 16 threads, and 11738 for max threads. This indicates excellent thread scaling, with performance nearly tripling from 2 to 24 threads.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more modest. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1821, which is a low figure for a modern GPU, suggesting it is not optimized for the latest DirectX 12 Ultimate features. Geekbench scores of 79483 (OpenCL) and 80344 (Vulkan) are more respectable, indicating solid compute performance for a laptop part. PassMark scores show a mixed picture: G3D at 13230 is decent, but DirectX 11 at 110 and DirectX 12 at 58 are low, suggesting driver or hardware limitations in legacy and modern API paths.

The combined percentile for this build is 76, which places it above most systems but below the top tier. The CPU’s nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (avg score 46062, deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (avg score 46030, deltaPct 0.1), and AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G (avg score 46187, deltaPct -0.2). The i9-13900HX is essentially performance-equivalent to these newer chips, being within 0.3% of all of them. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (avg score 18189, deltaPct -0.2) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER (avg score 18093, deltaPct 0.4), meaning the RTX 3060 Mobile trades blows with desktop GPUs from several generations prior.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, built on Intel’s 10nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This is a flagship mobile part, indicated by its 89th percentile ranking and its launch MSRP of $668.

Benchmark results reveal its character. The PassMark data compression score of 531224 is exceptional, indicating the CPU can handle archiving and file compression tasks with ease. Data encryption scores 32130, and extended instructions score 30550, both strong for cryptography and SIMD-heavy workloads. The floating-point math score of 110470 and integer math score of 156175 show a balanced ALU/FPU design. The find prime numbers score of 190 is a lower score, but this is a single-threaded integer test that does not leverage the CPU’s multi-core strength.

The single-thread performance is solid but not class-leading. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1102 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2056 are good, but the CPU’s real strength is multi-threaded throughput. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14836 and PassMark multi-thread score of 43062 place it in the top tier of laptop processors. For real workloads, this means the i9-13900HX excels at video rendering (Cinebench R15 multi-core 4494.5), 3D modeling, software compilation, and scientific simulations that scale across many threads. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it has ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation tasks that require error correction.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more powerful in this laptop?

A: The CPU is significantly more powerful. It ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 46098, while the GPU ranks in the 62nd percentile with an average score of 18159. This means the processor is the dominant component.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900HX compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900HX is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, and AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G. The deltaPct is 0.1, 0.1, and -0.2 respectively, meaning performance differences are within a fraction of a percent.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile is in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 18159 is comparable to the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18189, deltaPct -0.2) and slightly ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER (18093, deltaPct 0.4).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer mobile processor.

Q: Does the RTX 3060 Mobile support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1821 is low, suggesting it may not excel in the most demanding DirectX 12 Ultimate titles.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The pairing of the i9-13900HX and RTX 3060 Mobile results in a combined percentile of 76. This indicates the overall system is better than 76% of all builds, but lags behind the top-tier configurations.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate amount of VRAM for modern gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as indicated by the empty measuredFpsUltraByGame field. Consequently, all frame rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical test results. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so treat the following as analytical projections.

Based on the GPU’s benchmark scores, the RTX 3060 Mobile is a capable 1080p gaming solution. The PassMark G3D score of 13230 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 80344 suggest it can handle most titles at 1080p with high settings. However, the low DirectX 12 score of 58 in PassMark is concerning; it may indicate that the GPU struggles with the most modern APIs, potentially reducing performance in games that rely heavily on DirectX 12 features.

For 1080p gaming, this system should deliver playable frame rates in most esports and mid-range titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1102) ensures that frame pacing is smooth, but the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in newer games. At 1440p, the GPU will likely become the primary bottleneck, with frame rates dropping significantly. At 4K, the RTX 3060 Mobile is not a viable option for demanding titles, as the 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-resolution textures and effects. The GPU’s pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 171.0 GTexel/s are modest figures, further indicating its 1080p orientation.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is based on the Ampere architecture, fabricated on Samsung’s 8nm process node. The chip, GA106, contains 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It has 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The GPU includes 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS, though the benchmark scores do not quantify this specific performance.

The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1425 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU’s FP32 performance is 10.94 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 10.94 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration advantage. The TDP is 80 W, which is modest for a 30-series part.

Benchmark results show a mixed performance profile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1821 is the weakest result, suggesting poor optimization for the latest DirectX 12 Ultimate workload. PassMark scores are inconsistent: G3D at 13230 is decent, but DirectX 9 (146), DirectX 11 (110), and DirectX 12 (58) are low. This pattern suggests the GPU performs better in OpenCL/Vulkan workloads (Geekbench OpenCL 79483, Vulkan 80344) than in legacy DirectX paths. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5718 is solid for compute tasks. In rendering and content creation, this GPU will handle 1080p timelines and moderate 3D workloads, but it will be the limiting factor when compared to the CPU’s capabilities.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable; users are locked into the processor they purchase. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, so upgrading memory capacity is possible, but the maximum capacity is not specified in the FACT PACK. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a modern interface for fast NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures.

The GPU is also soldered to the motherboard, as indicated by its "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs and lack of power connectors. There is no upgrade path for the graphics card in this laptop. The suggested PSU is null, and the GPU TDP is 80 W, with the CPU TDP at 55 W. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the CPU’s memory bandwidth is a critical resource for its 24-core configuration. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would also improve system responsiveness, though the FACT PACK does not specify the number of M.2 slots.

Given the lack of upgradeability for the core components, the most practical "upgrade" is to external peripherals: a high-refresh-rate 1080p monitor to match the GPU’s capabilities, or a docking station with additional USB ports. However, the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs the storage subsystem, and the CPU’s DDR5 support allows for high-bandwidth memory configurations.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing a flagship-class mobile CPU with a mid-range mobile GPU. The system ranks in the 76th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms three-quarters of all builds but is not a top-tier gaming machine. The CPU is the standout component, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is more modest, ranking in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs.

The i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, placing it among the fastest laptop CPUs ever made. The RTX 3060 Mobile, by contrast, is an end-of-life Ampere GPU with 6 GB VRAM and a 62nd percentile ranking, making it comparable to desktop GPUs like the RTX 2060 SUPER. This pairing creates a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, but is merely adequate for modern gaming at 1080p.

The overall tier is upper-mid-range. The CPU pulls the system up significantly, but the GPU holds it back from being a true high-end gaming laptop. For users who prioritize processor performance over graphics, this is a sensible configuration. For gamers seeking high frame rates at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be a constant source of frustration.

Who Should Build It

This laptop is ideal for content creators and developers who need extreme CPU multi-threading for workloads like video rendering (Cinebench R23 multi-core 27900), data compression (PassMark 531224), and software compilation. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration and ECC memory support make it suitable for students and professionals running scientific simulations, virtualization, and heavy data analysis. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking ensures it will handle any productivity task thrown at it.

For gamers, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings. The RTX 3060 Mobile’s 6 GB VRAM and 62nd percentile ranking mean it will handle esports titles and older AAA games well, but it will struggle with the latest releases at high detail. Small business workstations that run CAD software, financial modeling, or database management will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded power, though the GPU is not necessary for these tasks.

The system is not recommended for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, as the GPU’s low 3DMark Steel Nomad score (1821) indicates poor DirectX 12 Ultimate performance. Similarly, users who require professional-grade GPU compute (e.g., machine learning training) will find the 6 GB VRAM insufficient. Instead, this build targets users who need a portable workstation with exceptional CPU performance and occasional gaming capability.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds