SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

33,170 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile: A Benchmark Analysis

This mobile pairing combines Intel's top-tier Raptor Lake-HX processor with NVIDIA's entry-level Ampere GPU, creating a system where CPU capability dramatically outstrips graphics performance. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 78th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 84 for the laptop platform. The data clearly indicates a processor-first design, where compute-intensive tasks will see exceptional results but gaming performance will be constrained by the GPU's specifications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, supported by a 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support extends to both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC capability included. The CPU connects via Intel BGA 1964 socket and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results reveal a processor with exceptional multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27900 places this chip firmly in high-end desktop replacement territory, while the single-core score of 2056 demonstrates strong per-thread performance. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 1102 in single-thread to 11738 in max-thread workloads, with intermediate scores of 4012 at 4 threads, 6857 at 8 threads, and 8929 at 16 threads. This scaling pattern indicates efficient utilization of additional cores, though the jump from 16 to 24 threads yields a smaller relative gain (from 8929 to 11738), suggesting diminishing returns at the highest thread counts.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded strength: a multi-thread score of 43062 versus a single-thread score of 4081. The integer math score of 156175 and floating-point math score of 110470 indicate robust arithmetic throughput, while data compression at 531224 and random string sorting at 59199 show strong memory-bound performance. The extended instructions score of 30550 and data encryption score of 32130 suggest capable SIMD and cryptography workloads.

The average benchmark score of 46098 places this CPU in the 89th percentile overall. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (0.1% ahead at 46062), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (0.1% behind at 46030), AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G (0.2% behind at 46187), and AMD EPYC 4364P (0.3% ahead at 45970). These extremely tight margins—all within 0.3%—indicate that the i9-13900HX sits in a performance tier where architectural differences are negligible in aggregate scoring.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit frame rates at high settings, particularly at resolutions above 1080p. The CPU's single-thread score of 2056 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can feed frames quickly, but the RTX 3050 Mobile's 5.501 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the limiting factor.

Streaming: The 24-core, 32-thread configuration provides ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and broadcast software. The multi-thread score of 43062 in PassMark indicates the CPU can handle encoding workloads without stealing significant resources from the game itself, though the GPU's older NVENC implementation from the 30-series remains adequate.

Video Editing: Timeline scrubbing and effect rendering benefit from the strong multi-core scores—the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 27900 is exceptional for a mobile platform. The data encryption score of 32130 and extended instructions score of 30550 suggest efficient handling of codec operations, though the GPU's 4 GB VRAM may constrain GPU-accelerated effects at higher resolutions.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14836 and R15 multi-core score of 4494.5 demonstrate excellent CPU-based rendering performance. For GPU rendering, the RTX 3050 Mobile's 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores provide entry-level acceleration, but the 5.501 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means CPU rendering may actually be preferable for many scenes.

Software Development: Compilation workloads will benefit from the 32 threads and high multi-core performance. The PassMark integer math score of 156175 indicates strong arithmetic throughput for building large codebases, while the 36 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data structures.

Student and Office Work: The single-thread performance of 4081 in PassMark and 1102 in 3DMark single-thread ensures responsive daily use. The 89th CPU percentile means this processor is dramatically over-specified for document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing, making it a future-proof choice for users who occasionally tackle heavier workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 46098 places it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, scores 46062 (0.1% higher), while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030 (0.1% lower). The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G trails by 0.2% with a score of 46187, and the AMD EPYC 4364P leads by 0.3% at 45970. These margins are statistically insignificant, meaning the i9-13900HX delivers performance equivalent to its nearest competitors in aggregate workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 33170 places it at the 78th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA T550 Mobile, scores 33161 (0.0% difference), while the AMD Radeon Pro 570 scores 33207 (0.1% higher). The NVIDIA P104-100 scores 32982 (0.6% lower), and the NVIDIA T600 Mobile scores 32849 (1.0% lower). The GPU's individual benchmark results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 421, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 50038, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 49051.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU by a significant margin—the CPU sits 11 percentile points higher than the GPU. This imbalance suggests that CPU-bound workloads will deliver exceptional results, while GPU-bound tasks will perform at entry-level standards. The combined percentile of 84 reflects the overall system tier, weighted toward the stronger CPU component.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over gaming performance. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will benefit from the 89th-percentile CPU performance. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27900 makes this suitable for professionals who need desktop-class compute in a mobile form factor.

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 156175 and the multi-thread score of 43062, which indicate rapid build times. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU performance sufficient for simulation and data analysis, though the GPU may limit graphics-intensive applications.

Small business workstations requiring heavy spreadsheet processing, database operations, or financial modeling will benefit from the data compression score of 531224 and the overall 89th CPU percentile. Gamers, however, should look elsewhere—the GPU's 78th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will constrain modern titles at high settings, particularly at 1440p or 4K resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel BGA 1964 socket is a mobile-specific package, meaning the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC capability for reliability-sensitive workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides modern connectivity for storage and expansion, though the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The CPU's 55 W TDP suggests modest cooling requirements for the processor, while the GPU's 45 W TDP keeps total system power manageable. The GPU has no suggested PSU requirement listed, and its IGP slot width with no power connectors indicates it draws power from the motherboard rather than a dedicated connector. This makes the platform suitable for thin-and-light laptop designs, though sustained multi-threaded workloads may benefit from enhanced cooling solutions.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom. The RTX 3050 Mobile's 4 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary bottlenecks for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. However, given the mobile form factor, such an upgrade is typically not feasible—users should consider this a fixed platform and select the configuration accordingly.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All FPS discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 421 indicates entry-level DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 49051 suggests similar capability in Vulkan titles.

At 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA games will likely run at 30-50 FPS depending on title optimization. The 4 GB VRAM will cause texture quality reductions in memory-intensive games, and the 128-bit memory bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance at higher resolutions. Esports titles and older games will perform better, but the GPU's 78th percentile indicates it trails the majority of discrete mobile GPUs.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (2056 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, and the 32 threads prevent background tasks from causing stutter. However, the GPU's 5.501 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is the definitive limiting factor in gaming scenarios. Users seeking high-refresh gaming should consider this configuration only for less demanding titles or lower graphical settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900HX scores 46098 on average, sitting within 0.3% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46062), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030), AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G (46187), and AMD EPYC 4364P (45970).

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3050 Mobile have?

A: The GPU includes 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i9-13900HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory capability included.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The laptop configuration has a combined percentile of 84, reflecting the CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 78th percentile positions.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i9-13900HX includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, providing basic display output when the discrete GPU is unavailable.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The processor boosts up to 5.40 GHz from a base clock of 2.20 GHz.

Q: Is measured gaming FPS data available for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing; all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This laptop-class system pairs the Intel Core i9-13900HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ampere-based chip with 4 GB GDDR6 memory and a 45 W TDP. The build class is laptop, indicating a mobile form factor.

The overall tier from the percentiles shows a system at the 84th combined percentile, with the CPU at 89th and GPU at 78th. This places the platform in the upper-midrange of laptop systems overall, driven primarily by the exceptional CPU performance. The GPU represents the entry point of NVIDIA's 30-series mobile lineup, providing adequate but not exceptional graphics capability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU's 89th percentile versus the GPU's 78th percentile creates a 11-point gap, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor in most workloads. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, the system performs at the 89th percentile level. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, performance drops to the 78th percentile level.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this analysis—the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain frame rates in modern titles. The CPU has substantial headroom to feed the GPU, meaning frame rates will be limited by the GPU's pixel rate of 42.98 GPixel/s and texture rate of 85.95 GTexel/s rather than CPU processing. Users should expect GPU-bound behavior in graphics-intensive applications, with the CPU rarely becoming the bottleneck outside of extremely thread-heavy scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is based on the GA107 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process with 8,700 million transistors and a die size of 200 mm². The transistor density of 43.5M per mm² indicates a moderately dense design. Clock speeds are 1065 MHz base and 1343 MHz boost, with memory operating at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. For accelerated workloads, it includes 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Compute performance is rated at 5.501 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 42.98 GPixel/s and texture rate of 85.95 GTexel/s. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 421 places this GPU at the 78th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33170. The nearest rivals—NVIDIA T550 Mobile (33161, 0.0% difference), AMD Radeon Pro 570 (33207, 0.1% higher), NVIDIA P104-100 (32982, 0.6% lower), and NVIDIA T600 Mobile (32849, 1.0% lower)—show this GPU sits in a tightly contested mid-range tier.

For rendering workloads, the 16 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing acceleration, while the 64 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-accelerated features. However, the 4 GB VRAM is a significant constraint for modern content creation, limiting texture sizes and scene complexity. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, with the GeForce 20 Mobile as its predecessor, suggesting this is a mature architecture with established driver support.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds