SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 890M

9,210 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This combination pairs Intel’s top-tier mobile HX processor with AMD’s most advanced integrated graphics, creating a unique laptop configuration that emphasizes CPU throughput while relying on an IGP for all visual output. The data shows a processor that ranks in the 89th percentile against all CPUs, paired with a graphics solution that sits in the 45th percentile against all GPUs. This document analyzes the benchmark results, architectural details, and performance implications for various workloads, using only the provided facts. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming frame rate discussions are framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation processors. The GPU operates at a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. Memory configuration is entirely system-dependent, with the GPU using shared system memory for both its frame buffer and bandwidth, meaning performance scales with the host system's memory speed and capacity. The chip contains 16 ray tracing cores, though it has no dedicated tensor cores listed. Pixel fill rate is 92.80 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 185.6 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In terms of raw compute, the Radeon 890M delivers 5.939 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The benchmark scores show a PassMark G3D score of 8076, which places it in the 45th percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-pack position, indicating that while the GPU is capable of handling lighter rendering tasks, it is not a high-performance solution for demanding 3D work. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 590, a relatively low figure that reflects the integrated nature of the chip. Geekbench scores are more favorable, with OpenCL at 37254 and Vulkan at 40808, suggesting that compute-oriented workloads may perform better than pure rasterization tasks. For rendering, the RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing, but the overall score profile suggests that complex ray-traced scenes will be challenging. The GPU's percentile position, just below the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and GTX 465, indicates it is roughly comparable to older discrete desktop graphics cards from a previous generation.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-13900HX achieves an average benchmark score of 46098, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 with an average score of 46062 (0.1% difference), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 with a score of 46030 (0.1% difference), and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G with a score of 46187 (-0.2% difference). This shows the i9-13900HX is statistically tied with these competitors, all within a 0.3% performance band. The CPU's multithreaded PassMark score is 43062, and its single-thread PassMark score is 4081. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 27900 and the single-core score is 2056.

The AMD Radeon 890M achieves an average benchmark score of 9210, placing it in the 45th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Vega 8 with a score of 9221 (-0.1% difference), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 with a score of 9273 (-0.7% difference), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 with a score of 9294 (-0.9% difference). The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 8076, and its PassMark GPU Compute score is 4157.

The combined percentile for this build is 67, reflecting the significant disparity between the CPU and GPU performance tiers. The processor is a top-tier mobile part, while the graphics solution is a mid-range integrated unit. This creates a system where CPU-bound tasks will see excellent performance, but anything requiring heavy GPU work will be constrained by the IGP. The data suggests that in a mixed workload, the CPU will frequently be waiting on the GPU to complete rendering tasks, leading to potential underutilization of the processor's capabilities in graphics-intensive applications. The gap between the CPU's 89th percentile and the GPU's 45th percentile is substantial, indicating a clear performance bottleneck on the graphics side.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. It features PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU. The processor has an unlocked multiplier, making it overclockable, and it includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The die size is 257 mm², and it was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $668.

Benchmark results show strong multithreaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 indicates serious capability for parallel workloads. The 3DMark max threads score of 11738 and 16-thread score of 8929 further confirm this. Single-thread performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2056 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4081. The PassMark multithread score of 43062 places it in the top tier of mobile processors. Data compression performance is notable at 531224, and encryption tasks score 32130. Floating-point math scores 110470, while integer math scores 156175, indicating balanced arithmetic capability across different data types.

For real workloads, this CPU excels at video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and any task that can utilize its 32 threads. The high boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensures snappy single-threaded performance for legacy applications and games that rely on fewer cores. The 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs available in the market. The tight race with the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 at the 0.1% delta level shows that while the i9-13900HX is competitive, it does not have a significant lead over the latest mid-range competitors. The 0.3% delta over the AMD EPYC 4364P, a server chip, is particularly interesting, indicating that this mobile processor can keep pace with certain desktop server parts in average benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-13900HX and AMD Radeon 890M. Therefore, all gaming frame rate figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than precise measurements.

The Radeon 890M's PassMark G3D score of 8076 and its 45th percentile ranking suggest it is a mid-range integrated GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590 indicates that modern DirectX 12 titles will run at low to medium settings at 1080p resolution. The GPU's performance is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, which was a mainstream desktop card from several generations ago. This suggests that esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends could achieve playable frame rates at medium to high settings, but AAA games will require significant graphical compromises. The DirectX 9 PassMark score of 97 and DirectX 11 score of 73 are relatively high compared to the DirectX 12 score of 37, indicating that older titles will perform better relative to their era than newer ones.

The CPU's performance is more than sufficient for gaming, with the single-thread score of 4081 and the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2143 ensuring that the processor will not be the limiting factor in most games. The combination suggests that at 1080p with low settings, the system could handle many games, but at 1440p or higher, the GPU will struggle. The ray tracing cores are present, but the low overall GPU scores mean that enabling ray tracing will likely result in very low frame rates, even at reduced resolutions. The lack of a discrete GPU option in this data means that users seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming should look elsewhere.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not viable with the Radeon 890M. The GPU's 45th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 8076 are insufficient to drive high refresh rate monitors in modern titles. The CPU could handle the frame generation, but the GPU would bottleneck severely, making this configuration unsuitable for competitive gaming at high frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The PassMark multithread score of 43062 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 ensure that game capture and encoding will not significantly impact overall system performance. However, the GPU's limitations will restrict the quality of the game being streamed.

Video Editing: The i9-13900HX excels here, with strong multithreaded scores that accelerate video encoding and rendering. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 and PassMark data compression score of 531224 indicate that timeline scrubbing and export tasks will be fast. The GPU's OpenCL score of 37254 can assist with effects and transitions, but heavy GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the 890M's 45th percentile performance.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will be exceptional, with the 32 threads providing excellent performance for software renderers. The 3DMark max threads score of 11738 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 14836 support this. However, GPU-based rendering with ray tracing will be slow, as the 890M's 590 Steel Nomad score and 45th percentile position indicate a lack of raw compute power for such tasks.

Software Development: The CPU is ideal for compilation tasks, with the PassMark integer math score of 156175 and extended instructions score of 30550 showing strong performance for code compilation and execution. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 4081 ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The GPU is not a factor in this scenario.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity. The CPU's 89th percentile performance ensures that document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work will be instantaneous. The GPU's PassMark G2D score of 979 is adequate for 2D desktop rendering and video playback, but the high CPU power may be wasted on such light tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-13900HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific soldered socket. This means the CPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire motherboard or system. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving users flexibility in memory selection, though the specific motherboard will dictate which type is supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which offer high bandwidth for future devices, though the GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a limitation for the integrated graphics.

The system's TDP is 55 W for the CPU and 15 W for the GPU, totaling 70 W. The suggested PSU field is null, but the low combined TDP indicates that power delivery is not a primary concern for this mobile configuration. The GPU has no power connectors and operates entirely on system power. For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck. Since the CPU is soldered, the only viable upgrade path is to add a discrete GPU if the laptop chassis supports it, or to move to a different system entirely. The memory configuration could be upgraded to higher-speed DDR5 to improve the GPU's system-shared memory bandwidth, which could yield modest gains in graphics performance. The CPU's performance is not a limiting factor in any scenario, so upgrades should focus on the graphics subsystem.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system exhibits a clear imbalance, with the CPU's 89th percentile ranking vastly outpacing the GPU's 45th percentile. In any graphics-intensive workload, the Radeon 890M is the definitive bottleneck. The GPU's average benchmark score of 9210 is only 20% of the CPU's average score of 46098, a ratio that underscores the performance disparity. For gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 4081 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2143 would allow for high frame rates, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 8076 and 590 Steel Nomad score cap the achievable FPS at low levels.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as compilation, encoding, and rendering, the CPU performs at its full potential, and the GPU is idle. The PassMark multithread score of 43062 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 demonstrate that the CPU can handle demanding tasks without assistance. The bottleneck shifts entirely to the GPU in any 3D rendering or gaming scenario. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, is a discrete card from a previous generation, suggesting that modern integrated graphics have caught up to older mid-range hardware, but still lag behind current discrete solutions.

There is no FPS scaling data available for this combination, as no measured FPS rows exist. The estimate from benchmark scores suggests that in games, the frame rate will be determined almost exclusively by the GPU, with the CPU rarely reaching full utilization. The combined percentile of 67 is dragged down by the GPU, indicating that the system is less balanced than the CPU alone would suggest. Users should be aware that this is a CPU-first configuration, and any upgrade path must address the graphics bottleneck to achieve a more balanced system.

FAQ

Q: What is the single most limiting factor for gaming performance in this configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M GPU is the primary bottleneck. Its 45th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 8076 are far below the CPU's 89th percentile, restricting gaming to low to medium settings at 1080p.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, and 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 4364P. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is 0.2% higher than the i9-13900HX.

Q: Is the GPU comparable to any discrete graphics cards?

A: The nearest rivals to the Radeon 890M are the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (-0.1% delta), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (-0.7% delta), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 (-0.9% delta), indicating it performs at the level of older discrete entry-level cards.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the combined power draw of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 15 W, for a combined TDP of 70 W. No suggested PSU is listed for this integrated configuration.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900HX has an unlocked multiplier, indicating it supports overclocking. The base clock is 2.20 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.40 GHz.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this specific system?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance statements are estimates based on the provided benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over graphics performance. The Intel Core i9-13900HX's 89th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers, data analysts, and researchers who need fast compilation and computation. The 24 cores and 32 threads, along with the PassMark multithread score of 43062, support heavy parallel processing tasks. Video editors and 3D artists using CPU-based renderers will find the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 highly beneficial for export and preview workflows.

For gamers, this setup is only appropriate for those who play at 1080p with low settings and are willing to accept the GPU's limitations. The Radeon 890M's 45th percentile ranking and 5.939 TFLOPS compute performance can handle esports titles and older games, but modern AAA titles will require significant compromises. Students and office workers would find this configuration overkill, as the CPU's power is wasted on basic tasks, though it ensures a smooth experience for any document or spreadsheet work. Small business workstations that run complex simulations or large databases would benefit from the CPU's PassMark data compression score of 531224 and encryption score of 32130.

The system is not a balanced gaming machine, and the combined percentile of 67 reflects this. Users who need a discrete GPU for rendering or gaming should consider a different configuration, as the integrated graphics cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire laptop. This build is for those who value raw CPU performance above all else and are willing to work within the GPU's constraints for visual output.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

AMD Radeon 890M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds