SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900HX + AMD Radeon 860M

The Intel Core i9-13900HX paired with the AMD Radeon 860M is a laptop-class combination that presents an unusual performance profile: a 24-core, 32-thread flagship mobile processor from the Raptor Lake-HX generation, coupled with an integrated RDNA 3.5 graphics solution that occupies the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This pairing places the system at the 81st combined percentile, indicating a configuration where the CPU is the dominant component by a significant margin. The i9-13900HX sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46098, while the Radeon 860M delivers an average score of 26401. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame rate discussions in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a Raptor Lake-HX architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, featuring a die size of 257 mm². The chip integrates 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The thermal design power is rated at 55 W, which is notable for a mobile processor of this class, indicating substantial headroom for sustained multi-core workloads when cooling allows. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, providing a large pool of fast memory for frequently accessed data.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support included. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth access to storage and other peripherals. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, though this is secondary to the discrete-class AMD Radeon 860M in this configuration. The chip uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, is production-active, and was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $668. The multiplier is unlocked, offering overclocking potential on supported platforms.

Benchmark results show a CPU that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1102 in single-thread to 2143 in 2-thread, 4012 in 4-thread, 6857 in 8-thread, 8929 in 16-thread, and 11738 in max-thread tests. This scaling pattern indicates strong multi-core efficiency, with the max-thread score representing a 10.6x improvement over single-thread performance. Cinebench results reinforce this picture: R15 multicore scores 4494.5 against a single-core score of 296, R20 multicore reaches 14836 against 2094 single-core, and R23 multicore hits 27900 against 2056 single-core.

PassMark results show a processor that excels in compute-heavy tasks. The multithread score is 43062, with integer math at 156175 and floating-point math at 110470. Data compression reaches 531224, while data encryption scores 32130. Extended instructions score 30550, random string sorting hits 59199, and physics processing reaches 2645. The single-thread PassMark score is 4081. These numbers indicate a processor that handles both integer and floating-point workloads with high throughput, making it suitable for a wide range of computational tasks.

The nearest rival comparisons show a tight cluster of competitors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062, just 0.1% behind the i9-13900HX. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030, also 0.1% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G scores 46187, which is 0.2% ahead, and the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970, 0.3% behind. This clustering indicates that the i9-13900HX delivers performance nearly identical to a range of newer and server-class alternatives, making the choice between them dependent on platform features rather than raw throughput.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900HX achieves an average benchmark score of 46098, placing it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. This is a high-tier position that indicates the processor outperforms the vast majority of available CPUs. The nearest rival comparison shows the i9-13900HX is essentially tied with several competitors: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is 0.1% behind, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is 0.1% behind, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is 0.2% ahead, and the AMD EPYC 4364P is 0.3% behind. These sub-1% deltas mean the i9-13900HX sits in a performance tier where generation and architecture differences have minimal impact on overall compute capability.

The AMD Radeon 860M achieves an average benchmark score of 26401, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This is a mid-to-high tier position for an integrated graphics solution. The Geekbench results show an OpenCL score of 22759 and a Vulkan score of 30043, indicating strong API-specific performance. The nearest rivals for the GPU include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with a score of 26421 (0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 with a score of 26331 (0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary with a score of 26553 (0.6% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 with a score of 26683 (1.1% ahead). This clustering places the Radeon 860M in a competitive position against both entry-level discrete GPUs and older high-end cards.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 81, reflecting that the CPU is the primary driver of overall system performance while the GPU holds the system back from higher tiers. The combined picture is one of a processor that can handle demanding computational workloads with ease, while the graphics solution provides adequate but not exceptional rendering capability. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, scientific computing, and multi-threaded productivity, the system will perform at a high level. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the system will be limited by the integrated graphics.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900HX compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900HX scores 46098 on average, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4364P. These deltas indicate performance parity within a tight cluster of competitors.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and how does it compare to discrete options?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 26401. It is effectively tied with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (0.1% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (0.3% behind), while trailing the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary by 0.6% and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 by 1.1%.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support and does it support ECC?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. ECC memory support is included, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class platforms.

Q: What is the thermal design power of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX has a TDP of 55 W, while the AMD Radeon 860M has a TDP of 15 W. The combined thermal envelope is modest for the CPU's performance class, though sustained loads may push cooling solutions.

Q: What is the release timeline for these components?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $668. The AMD Radeon 860M was released on February 28, 2025, and has no launch MSRP listed.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and what features does it support?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture on TSMC's 4 nm process. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is compatible with modern graphics APIs including ray tracing and mesh shaders.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its single-threaded performance?

A: The 3DMark max-thread score of 11738 is 10.6 times higher than the single-thread score of 1102. Cinebench R23 shows a multicore score of 27900 against a single-core score of 2056, a 13.6x scaling factor, indicating excellent multi-core efficiency.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the Intel Core i9-13900HX and the AMD Radeon 860M is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs with an average score of 46098, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile with an average score of 26401. This gap means the GPU is the limiting factor for graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU will rarely be a bottleneck in any scenario. The combined percentile of 81 reflects this imbalance, placing the system below what the CPU alone would achieve.

For gaming workloads, the GPU will be the primary constraint. The Radeon 860M's position in the 72nd percentile places it in a range where it can handle competitive and esports titles at moderate settings but will struggle with demanding AAA games at high resolutions or maximum graphical presets. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4081 in PassMark and 2056 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame delivery will not be CPU-limited in most scenarios, but the GPU's raw throughput will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

For compute workloads, the CPU will dominate the performance picture. The i9-13900HX's multi-threaded scores, particularly the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 and the PassMark multithread score of 43062, indicate that CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data processing, and scientific computing will run at high speed. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS is modest compared to the CPU's compute capabilities, meaning tasks offloaded to the GPU may not see significant acceleration.

The FPS scaling picture, estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured data, suggests that the GPU will be the limiting factor across all gaming scenarios. The CPU's ability to maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios is strong, particularly in the 2-thread and 4-thread 3DMark scores of 2143 and 4012, which indicate responsive single-thread performance. However, the GPU's position relative to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (0.3% behind) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (0.1% ahead) suggests that frame rates will align with entry-level discrete GPU expectations rather than high-end gaming performance.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The chip is identified as Krackan Point and belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. The GPU operates with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, providing a wide dynamic range for power management. Memory is system shared, meaning the GPU uses the host system's RAM, with bandwidth described as system dependent.

The GPU contains 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It includes 8 ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 compute performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 3.072 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio, indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration. The TDP is 15 W, which is low for a component in this performance tier, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 for its bus interface.

The Geekbench results show an OpenCL score of 22759 and a Vulkan score of 30043, with an average benchmark score of 26401. The Vulkan score being significantly higher than OpenCL suggests the driver and hardware are better optimized for Vulkan workloads, which is relevant for gaming and compute applications that use this API. The GPU's percentile position of 72 indicates it outperforms the majority of GPUs, including many older discrete cards, but the nearest rival comparison shows it is tightly clustered with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, both of which are within 0.3% of the Radeon 860M's score.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8 RT cores provide a baseline capability for modern graphics features. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest game engines and effects, though the modest shading unit count and system-shared memory will limit performance at high resolutions and detail settings. The 15 W TDP indicates the GPU is designed for efficient operation within a laptop thermal envelope, trading raw performance for power efficiency.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket that is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The CPU is soldered to the motherboard, meaning any CPU upgrade would require a new laptop. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support available. This memory flexibility means the system can be configured with either memory type, though DDR5 is the more modern choice for performance.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth access to storage and other peripherals. This supports the latest NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures, though the integrated nature of the GPU means external graphics would be the only way to improve graphics performance beyond the Radeon 860M. The CPU's TDP of 55 W, combined with the GPU's TDP of 15 W, gives a combined thermal envelope of 70 W, which is manageable for a laptop cooling solution.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and has no dedicated power connectors, drawing power from the system. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the low TDP of both components means the system does not require a high-capacity power supply. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on memory capacity and speed, as the system-shared GPU memory benefits from faster and larger RAM configurations. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes would also provide tangible benefits for load times and data-intensive workloads.

The production status for both components is Active, meaning they are still in current production. The CPU was released in January 2023 and the GPU in February 2025, so the platform is relatively recent and should have ongoing driver support. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU offers overclocking potential, though this is limited in a mobile form factor by thermal constraints.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 860M's 72nd percentile ranking and 26401 average score indicate it can handle competitive titles at moderate settings, but the estimated FPS (no measured data exists) will be limited at high refresh rates. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4081, ensures minimal CPU bottlenecking, but the GPU will cap frame rates below what high-refresh displays can utilize.

Streaming: The i9-13900HX's 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial headroom for encoding and streaming workloads while gaming. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 43062 and data encryption score of 32130 indicate it can handle real-time encoding tasks. The GPU's modest compute performance will require lower gaming settings to maintain stream quality.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 and PassMark floating-point math score of 110470 provide strong performance for video processing and effect rendering. The GPU's 512 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate some effects, but system-shared memory will limit high-resolution editing workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU's high multi-threaded performance, particularly the 3DMark max-thread score of 11738, makes it suitable for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU's 8 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable some GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest for production rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with the PassMark integer math score of 156175, provide strong compilation performance. The data compression score of 531224 indicates efficient handling of build artifacts. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and basic graphics debugging.

Student and office work: The system's combined percentile of 81 places it well above average for productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance of 4081 in PassMark ensures responsive application usage, while the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking handles office graphics, video playback, and light creative work without issue.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900HX, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX mobile processor, with the AMD Radeon 860M, an RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU. The build class is laptop, indicating a mobile form factor with integrated components. The CPU operates at a 55 W TDP with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the GPU operates at a 15 W TDP with a boost clock of 3000 MHz.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 46098 places it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, making it a high-tier processor suitable for demanding computational workloads. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26401 places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, positioning it as a mid-to-high tier integrated solution. The combined percentile of 81 reflects a system that is overall well above average, though the GPU holds the system back from the CPU's performance tier.

This pairing is unusual in that the CPU is a flagship mobile processor while the GPU is an integrated solution. The system is best suited for CPU-intensive workloads where the GPU's limitations are less relevant. The 24-core CPU with 32 threads and 36 MB of L3 cache provides exceptional multi-threaded performance, while the Radeon 860M with 512 shading units and 8 RT cores provides adequate graphics for everyday use and light gaming.

Who Should Build It

The target users for this CPU+GPU pairing are professionals and power users whose workloads are CPU-bound. Software developers will benefit from the i9-13900HX's 24 cores and 32 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 156175 and data compression score of 531224 indicating strong compilation and build performance. Students in engineering and scientific fields will find the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities useful for simulations and data analysis, while the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking handles visualization tasks.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering and processing will find this system well-suited. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 and the PassMark floating-point math score of 110470 support video encoding, batch processing, and render farm workloads. The GPU's 8 RT cores provide some acceleration for modern effects, though the system-shared memory will limit high-resolution texture work.

Small business workstations that require heavy computation, such as financial modeling or data processing, will benefit from the CPU's 89th percentile ranking and the ECC memory support. The system's laptop form factor makes it portable, while the CPU's performance ensures that demanding workloads are handled efficiently. Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings will find the GPU's performance acceptable for competitive titles, though the estimated FPS (no measured data exists) will not satisfy high-refresh or ultra-settings demands.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows — so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The Radeon 860M's average benchmark score of 26401 and 72nd percentile ranking place it in a performance tier that aligns with entry-level discrete GPUs, based on its near-tie with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (0.1% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (0.3% behind).

For competitive and esports titles at 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest playable frame rates, likely in the 60-90 FPS range for games like Counter-Strike or Valorant. For more demanding AAA titles at 1080p with medium settings, the GPU's 512 shading units and 16 ROPs will limit performance, with estimated frame rates in the 30-60 FPS range depending on the title's optimization. At 1440p or with ultra settings, frame rates will drop significantly, and the system-shared memory bandwidth will become a limiting factor.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4081 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2056, ensures that the GPU is the bottleneck in all gaming scenarios. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2143 and 4-thread score of 4012 indicate responsive frame delivery in lightly-threaded game engines. However, the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking and its position relative to the NVIDIA RTX A4000 (1.1% behind) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (0.6% behind) suggest that performance will align with mid-range GPUs from several generations ago, making this system suitable for 1080p gaming at moderate settings rather than high-refresh or high-resolution play.