SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900HX paired with the AMD Radeon 780M is a study in contrasts: a 24-core desktop-class CPU powerhouse strapped to a 15-watt integrated GPU. This is a laptop configuration built for maximum processor throughput, not for discrete graphics performance. The data shows a system that will demolish CPU-bound workloads like compilation, rendering, and data analysis, while the gaming experience will be strictly limited by the integrated graphics. This analysis uses the FACT PACK exclusively; no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process. It is a Phoenix-class chip with a die size of 178 mm² and a massive transistor count of 25,390 million. The GPU has no dedicated VRAM; it uses System Shared memory, meaning the frame buffer is carved out of the system RAM, and the memory bus width is also System Shared. Consequently, memory bandwidth is System Dependent, which is a critical bottleneck for any gaming scenario.

Clock speeds are listed as a base of 800 MHz and a boost of 2900 MHz. The GPU contains 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 render output units (ROPs). For hardware-accelerated ray tracing, it has 12 dedicated RT cores. The absence of Tensor cores in the data sheet indicates that AI-accelerated features found in NVIDIA hardware are not present here. The theoretical pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 139.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 8.909 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 8.909 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio.

Benchmark results for the 780M show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 18602, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 33683. The average benchmark score is 17588, which places it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. This is a modest score, placing it in the mid-range of the database. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (average score 17551, deltaPct 0.2), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (average score 17639, deltaPct -0.3), and the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (average score 17666, deltaPct -0.4). The 780M is effectively on par with these cards, with a delta of less than half a percent in all cases. This means that despite having modern architecture, its raw compute performance is comparable to a much older discrete GPU. For rendering tasks that rely on the GPU, the 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 power is the headline number; it will handle light workloads, but the System Shared memory and lack of dedicated VRAM will severely hamper complex 3D rendering with large textures.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The Intel Core i9-13900HX posts a massive average benchmark score of 46098, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Radeon 780M, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 17588, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The combination of a top-decile CPU with a mid-pack integrated GPU results in a combinedPercentile of 75.

The CPU’s key benchmark scores are staggering. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multicore score of 27900 and a single-core score of 2056. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 14836 (multi) and 2094 (single). The PassMark multithread score is 43062, with a single-thread score of 4081. The 3DMark tests show a scaling pattern from 1102 (single thread) to 8929 (16 threads) and 11738 (max threads). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 is a direct measure of DX12 gaming capability, and it is very low compared to the CPU's 3DMark throughput. The data shows a system where the CPU will never be the limiting factor in a gaming workload; the GPU will saturate long before the CPU is stressed. For non-gaming tasks that are CPU-intensive, this is a top-tier performer. The CPU’s nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (avgScore 46062, deltaPct 0.1), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (avgScore 46030, deltaPct 0.1), and the AMD EPYC 4364P (avgScore 45970, deltaPct 0.3), indicating the i9-13900HX is within a fraction of a percent of these processors.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is the centerpiece of this build. It is a Raptor Lake-HX architecture chip, part of the Core 13th Gen series, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It is a mobile segment processor with a TDP of 55 W, and it features 24 cores and 32 threads. The base clock is 2.20 GHz, which can boost up to 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a large 36 MB shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), and it is multiplier unlocked for overclocking. It also includes the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU, though this build uses the AMD Radeon 780M instead.

The benchmark data shows a processor that excels in both single-thread and multithreaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 is exceptional, and the single-core score of 2056 is also very strong. This indicates that the CPU can handle both lightly-threaded tasks like gaming (when a discrete GPU is present) and heavily-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering with equal aplomb. The PassMark data reinforces this: the integer math score is 156175, floating-point math is 110470, and extended instructions score is 30550. Data encryption scores 32130, and data compression scores 531224. The multithread score of 43062 is 89th percentile, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database.

For real workloads, the high L3 cache and dual-channel memory support mean that data-heavy tasks like database management and scientific computing will benefit. The 24 cores and 32 threads will chew through parallel workloads. The single-thread score of 4081 in PassMark ensures that the CPU will not feel sluggish in everyday use or in lightly-threaded applications. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4364P, scores 45970, a delta of 0.3%, showing the i9-13900HX is competitive even against server-class parts in these aggregate benchmarks.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance here is unequivocal: the GPU is the bottleneck for any graphics-intensive task. The CPU’s 89th percentile standing versus the GPU’s 61st percentile creates a massive delta. In gaming, the CPU is capable of feeding frames at a rate far in excess of what the Radeon 780M can render. The GPU’s low 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480, combined with its System Shared memory, will limit frame rates in all 3D applications.

Evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that in CPU-bound tasks, the system will perform in the top 11% of all systems. In GPU-bound tasks, it will perform in the top 39% of all systems. The bottleneck is severe. For example, in a game that is CPU-light but GPU-heavy, the 780M will be at 100% utilization while the i9-13900HX sits idle, waiting for the GPU to deliver a frame. Conversely, in a simulation or physics-based game that stresses the CPU, the i9-13900HX’s PassMark physics score of 2645 will power through calculations, but the GPU will struggle to visualize the results. The FPS scaling will be dictated entirely by the GPU’s ability to process draw calls and fill pixels. The system is balanced for productivity, where the CPU does the heavy lifting, but it is entirely unbalanced for gaming, where the GPU is the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 75 reflects this: it is a high-performing system on average, but the average is skewed heavily by the CPU.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data shows that the AMD Radeon 780M has an average benchmark score of 17588, which is in the 61st percentile, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 480. These figures suggest that the GPU is capable of entry-level 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings in esports titles, but it will struggle with modern AAA games.

Given the GPU’s FP32 performance of 8.909 TFLOPS and its System Shared memory, expect playable frame rates (30-60 FPS) in older or less demanding games like CS:GO, League of Legends, or Valorant at 1080p with settings turned down. For more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, the estimates are much lower, likely in the 20-30 FPS range at 1080p on the lowest settings. The 12 RT cores are present, but with this level of raw compute, ray tracing will be largely unusable at playable frame rates. The CPU will not be a factor here; the i9-13900HX’s single-thread score of 4081 and max-thread score of 11738 in 3DMark indicate it can handle any game logic or physics calculations, but the GPU will cap the visual fidelity and frame rate. The 780M’s performance is on par with the AMD Radeon HD 7790 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in average score, but the RTX 4060 has dedicated VRAM, which would give it a significant advantage in real-world gaming that the shared-memory 780M cannot match.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This configuration is not for gamers. The 61st percentile GPU ranking and the absence of measured FPS data make it clear that this is not a gaming machine. Instead, this build is for users who need extreme CPU performance in a laptop form factor and do not require dedicated graphics.

Content Creators: Video editors working with 4K footage will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900, which will accelerate rendering and export times. The PassMark data compression score of 531224 is excellent for archiving projects.

Software Developers: The 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a 3DMark max-thread score of 11738, will compile large codebases significantly faster than most laptops. The support for ECC memory is a boon for reliability in long-running build processes.

Data Scientists and Analysts: The PassMark integer math score of 156175 and floating-point math score of 110470 will handle complex data manipulation and statistical modeling. The high L3 cache is beneficial for datasets that fit in memory.

Students and Office Workers: The single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4081) ensures a snappy experience in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU’s 89th percentile standing means the machine will stay responsive even with many applications open.

Small Business Workstations: For tasks like financial modeling, database management, and virtualization, the CPU’s high core count and 55 W TDP make it a powerful mobile workstation. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and 2D applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is based on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket; the CPU is not upgradable. The system supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth connection for future peripherals. The GPU has a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 15 W, but the suggestedPsu field is null, meaning no specific PSU requirement is listed for the discrete GPU; this is an integrated part, so the system relies on the laptop’s power adapter.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to ensure the memory is running in dual-channel mode at the highest supported speed, as the GPU's System Shared memory bandwidth is System Dependent. Since the GPU is an IGP, the only path to better graphics is an external GPU enclosure (eGPU) connected via the PCIe lanes, though the CPU only lists 20 lanes. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, suggesting overclocking headroom, but this is constrained by the laptop’s thermal solution. The production status is Active for both parts, meaning they are still in the market, but the socket is a dead end for CPU upgrades. The most impactful upgrade, given the data, is maximizing RAM speed and capacity to feed the i9-13900HX’s demanding multithreaded workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-13900HX's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 46098, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 780M compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The Radeon 780M has an average benchmark score of 17588, while the RTX 4060 has an average score of 17639, a delta of -0.3%. They are statistically equivalent in compute benchmarks.

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon 780M includes 12 RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What type of memory does the i9-13900HX support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, making it non-upgradeable.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The combinedPercentile for the build is 75, indicating it outperforms 75% of all CPU/GPU combinations in the database.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX has a TDP of 55 W.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not viable. The GPU’s 61st percentile score and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 indicate that the Radeon 780M cannot push high frame rates. Expect low settings at 1080p for esports, but no high-refresh gaming is possible without a discrete GPU.

Streaming: The CPU is overqualified for streaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 allows for software encoding (x264) at high quality without impacting game performance, but the GPU’s low performance means the game being streamed will be limited to simple titles.

Video Editing: This is a strong suit. The high multicore scores (Cinebench R23 27900, PassMark multithread 43062) will accelerate export times and effects rendering. The integrated GPU is sufficient for the preview timeline in 1080p, but 4K previews will be less smooth.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles on CPU) will be excellent, leveraging the 24 cores and 32 threads. GPU-based rendering will be slow due to the 780M’s 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 performance and System Shared memory, which will limit texture sizes and scene complexity.

Software Development: Compilation times will be minimal. The 3DMark max-thread score of 11738 and the PassMark integer math score of 156175 indicate this CPU will handle large builds with ease. The support for ECC memory adds stability for long-running test suites.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark 4081) makes everyday applications like word processors and browsers exceptionally responsive. The 89th percentile CPU ranking ensures multitasking between documents, spreadsheets, and web research is fluid, and the low-power GPU keeps the system cool and quiet for library use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

AMD Radeon 780M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds