SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HK + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HK

37,425 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

43,667 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i9-13900HK combined with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. This exact pairing has no recorded frame rate data across any game title or resolution, so all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component, not direct measurements from game testing.

The GPU delivers a Passmark G3D score of 27,212, placing it at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. The CPU contributes a Passmark Single Thread score of 3,810 and a Passmark Multi Thread score of 28,194, both indicating strong per-core and multi-core capabilities. For estimating 1080p gaming performance, the combination of a top-tier mobile GPU with a high single-thread CPU suggests the system can achieve very high frame rates in most titles, likely exceeding the refresh rates of typical 144Hz laptop panels in many competitive shooters and action games.

At 1440p, the RTX 4090 Mobile's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth should sustain high frame rates, though the gap between CPU-bound and GPU-bound scenarios narrows. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 32.98 TFLOPS provides ample raw compute for demanding titles, and the 76 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing without the severe performance penalties seen in older architectures. For 4K gaming, the 16 GB VRAM capacity and 256-bit memory bus position this as one of the few mobile solutions capable of handling ultra-high resolutions with high texture quality settings.

The CPU's boost clock of 5.40 GHz is critical for gaming scenarios where frame times depend on single-core performance, and the Passmark Single Thread score of 3,810 confirms this strength. However, since the data is not measured, these estimates carry uncertainty; actual game performance depends heavily on thermal headroom, power limits, and driver optimization in specific laptop chassis.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is built on the AD103 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1335 MHz and a boost clock of 1695 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a mobile part and supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes without memory bottlenecks.

The GPU contains 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The 76 RT cores handle ray tracing workloads, and 304 tensor cores accelerate AI-driven features like DLSS and other neural network operations. Pixel rate is rated at 189.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate at 515.3 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rendering. The FP32 performance of 32.98 TFLOPS matches the FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for compute-heavy applications that can leverage mixed-precision workflows.

In benchmark results, the GPU achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 180,831 and a Vulkan score of 170,774. Passmark results show DirectX 12 at 107, DirectX 11 at 262, and DirectX 9 at 310 — these numbers suggest the GPU performs relatively better in legacy APIs, though the modern API scores remain competitive. The Passmark G3D score of 27,212 places it at the 84th percentile, with the nearest rival being the NVIDIA RTX A6000 at an average score of 44,075, which is 0.9% higher. The Quadro M6000 trails at 43,301 (0.8% lower), and the RTX 5050 Mobile is nearly identical at 43,268 (0.9% lower).

The TDP of 120 W is significant for a mobile GPU, and it uses no power connectors since it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) package — meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and power delivery is handled by the laptop's system design. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which provides ample bandwidth for GPU-to-CPU communication. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensures compatibility with modern game engines and graphics features.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,025 and single-core score of 1,843.5 demonstrate balanced performance across heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 9,548 and single-core score of 1,347 follow a similar pattern. The older Cinebench R15 results show 2,398 multi-core and 263 single-core. These scores place the CPU at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,425.

The nearest CPU rivals show tight competition: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H scores 37,522 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i5-13600K scores 37,685 (0.7% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F scores 37,313 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37,161 (0.7% lower). This clustering indicates the i9-13900HK sits in a highly competitive mid-to-high tier where small percentage differences separate performance tiers.

Passmark results for the CPU show integer math at 94,120, floating point math at 68,020, and extended instructions at 19,534. Data compression scores 329,454, data encryption scores 19,198, and random string sorting scores 36,662. The find prime numbers test scores 110, physics scores 1,896, and multithread scores 28,194. The single-thread score of 3,810 is a strong indicator for responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 43,667 places it at the 84th percentile. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, reflecting that both components perform in the upper tier of their respective categories. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 27,212 is the headline figure, while the compute score of 12,347 shows strong parallel processing capability. The combined picture reveals a system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other in benchmark terms — both sit within 1 percentage point of the 85th percentile mark, suggesting a well-matched pair.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in their percentile rankings — the CPU at 85 and the GPU at 84 — which suggests neither component will consistently bottleneck the other across a wide range of workloads. However, the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. In gaming scenarios, the GPU's 84th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,810 mean that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance may become the limiting factor in high-refresh-rate scenarios, as the GPU has sufficient headroom to render frames faster than the CPU can feed draw calls.

At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU's rendering workload increases, and the 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth become the primary determinants of performance. The CPU's multi-core score of 28,194 in Passmark multithread is sufficient to keep up with the GPU's demands in most modern titles, but CPU-heavy simulations or physics-based games could still see the i9-13900HK become the constraint. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K would show diminishing gains at higher resolutions, consistent with a GPU-bound scenario, but without measured FPS data, this is inferred from the benchmark scores rather than observed.

In non-gaming workloads, the balance tips toward the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,025 indicates strong all-core performance, while the GPU's compute score of 12,347 in Passmark shows respectable but not dominant compute capability. For tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that use both CPU and GPU, the system should exhibit balanced utilization, with the CPU handling scene logic and the GPU accelerating rendering. The Passmark data compression score of 329,454 and floating point math score of 68,020 suggest the CPU is well-suited for data-heavy workflows, while the GPU's 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates parallel compute tasks.

The power envelope plays a role in bottleneck dynamics. The CPU has a 45 W TDP, while the GPU has a 120 W TDP — the GPU demands nearly three times the power budget, which in a laptop chassis means thermal constraints could cause the GPU to throttle before the CPU in sustained workloads, making the GPU the effective bottleneck in long rendering sessions even if raw benchmark scores suggest parity.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The combination of the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock and the GPU's 27,212 Passmark G3D score supports high frame rates in competitive titles. At 1080p with competitive settings, the system should push well beyond 144 FPS in most esports titles, though the exact headroom depends on the specific game engine and thermal management of the laptop chassis.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. The Passmark multithread score of 28,194 indicates strong multi-tasking capability, and the GPU's 304 tensor cores can accelerate NVENC-based encoding workloads, offloading the streaming overhead from the CPU.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,025 supports fast timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K and even 8K video timelines with multiple effects layers, while the FP32 performance of 32.98 TFLOPS accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and color grading.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 76 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders, and the FP32 throughput of 32.98 TFLOPS handles complex scenes. The CPU's multi-core performance ensures that CPU-based rendering engines have sufficient compute, though GPU-based renderers will see the most benefit from this pairing.

Software Development: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,810 ensures fast compilation of single-file changes and responsive IDE interactions. The multi-core score of 28,194 in Passmark multithread accelerates parallel builds, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code. Data encryption score of 19,198 and extended instructions score of 19,534 support cryptography and SIMD-heavy workloads common in modern development.

Student and Office Work: The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU handles basic display output and 2D workloads, while the discrete GPU remains idle for power savings. The CPU's 14 cores ensure smooth multitasking across document editing, web browsing, and communication tools, and the Passmark G2D score of 984 on the GPU side indicates competent 2D rendering for general desktop use.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or smooth 1440p gaming are the primary audience, given the GPU's 84th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread performance. The system is also well-suited for gamers who want to enable ray tracing without sacrificing frame rates, as the 76 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for this workload. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM capacity ensures texture quality settings can be maxed out, though the GPU may not sustain ultra-high frame rates at this resolution in the most demanding titles.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or motion graphics will benefit from the balanced CPU-GPU performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,025 supports heavy multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU's 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and renders. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for working with large textures, complex 3D scenes, or high-resolution video timelines.

Developers who compile large codebases or run virtual machines will find the 14-core CPU with 20 threads useful for parallel builds and multi-VM testing. The Passmark data compression score of 329,454 indicates strong performance for file archiving and data processing tasks common in development workflows. Students and small business users who need a powerful laptop for coursework, research, or professional applications will benefit from the system's responsiveness, but the high TDP of 120 W on the GPU means battery life will be limited under load — this is not a device for all-day unplugged use.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HK is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H variant for mobile platforms. It operates with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 45 W TDP. The chip is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², and it fits into the Intel BGA 1744 socket. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking in systems with adequate cooling.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This 24 MB L3 is substantial and helps reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving system builders flexibility in memory selection. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, providing basic display output and hardware acceleration for media playback. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which is typical for consumer mobile processors.

In Passmark benchmarks, the CPU scores 3,810 in single-thread and 28,194 in multithread. The integer math score of 94,120 and floating point math score of 68,020 indicate strong arithmetic performance. Data compression at 329,454 is exceptionally high, suggesting the CPU excels at file compression and decompression tasks. The encryption score of 19,198 shows competent cryptographic performance, and the extended instructions score of 19,534 indicates good SIMD throughput for vectorized workloads.

The CPU's 85th percentile ranking places it among the top tier of all CPUs, and the nearest rivals are within 0.7% in average benchmark score. This tight clustering means the i9-13900HK offers performance essentially equivalent to desktop parts like the Intel Core i5-13600K, which scores 37,685 (0.7% higher), while being a mobile chip. The release date is January 3, 2023, and the launch MSRP is $697.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — this means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The GPU is also an IGP (integrated graphics processor) package, soldered to the motherboard with no power connectors. Consequently, the upgrade path for this system is limited to components that are not permanently attached: memory, storage, and potentially the display or battery.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, so users can upgrade to higher-capacity or faster memory kits depending on what the laptop motherboard supports. The PCIe interface for the CPU is Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means storage devices using PCIe Gen 5 could theoretically achieve higher bandwidth, but the CPU's 8 lanes constrain the number of Gen 5 devices that can be connected. The suggested PSU is not provided in the data, and the GPU TDP is 120 W with the CPU at 45 W — the total system power draw will depend on other components, but the lack of a suggested PSU figure means the laptop's power adapter is custom-designed for the chassis.

A sensible next upgrade would be increasing memory capacity to the maximum supported by the platform, as the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows for up to 64 GB or 128 GB depending on the motherboard. For storage, adding a fast NVMe drive would complement the Gen 5 PCIe lanes, though Gen 4 drives would still perform well within the available bandwidth. The GPU and CPU are not upgradeable, so users looking for more graphics performance would need to consider a new laptop with a newer GeForce 50 Mobile series GPU, which is the successor to this RTX 4090 Mobile.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, meaning this system outperforms approximately 85% of all laptop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H has an average benchmark score of 37,522, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-13900HK's score of 37,425. This difference is negligible in real-world performance.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking if the laptop's cooling and power delivery systems permit it.

Q: What is the release date and launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The CPU was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $697.

Q: Are there any measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the process node for the GPU?

A: The GPU is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900HK with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in a laptop class configuration. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU is a top-tier mobile graphics solution from the GeForce 40-series, based on Ada Lovelace architecture. Both components were released in early January 2023, with the GPU preceding the CPU by one day.

The system achieves a combined percentile of 85, with the CPU at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 84th percentile among their respective categories. This places the pairing in the upper tier of laptop configurations, suitable for demanding gaming, content creation, and professional workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 37,425 and the GPU's average score of 43,667 indicate that both components perform near the top of their class, with nearest rivals within 0.9% in benchmark scores. The data confirms this is a high-performance laptop pairing, though the lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance must be inferred from synthetic benchmarks rather than observed game testing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HK + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HK

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds