SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HK + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HK

37,425 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900HK and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile represent a flagship-class laptop pairing from the 2023 mobile generation. This combination targets high-end gaming and professional content creation, but the data shows some surprising balance characteristics. The CPU holds an 85th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 81st percentile among all graphics cards, placing the combined system at an 83rd percentile overall. This analysis examines what those scores mean for real workloads, where bottlenecks appear, and who should consider this build.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HK is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boosts up to 5.40 GHz, which is a substantial single-core capability for a mobile part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This configuration supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, making the platform flexible for system builders.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in multi-threaded throughput. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 16025 in multi-core and 1843.5 in single-core. The single-core score of 1843.5 places it among the top mobile processors for lightly-threaded tasks, while the multi-core result shows strong scaling from the hybrid core arrangement. Cinebench R20 results show 9548 multi-core and 1347 single-core, while R15 shows 2398 multi-core and 263 single-core. These numbers indicate consistent performance across rendering workloads of varying complexity.

PassMark results add depth to the picture. The multi-thread score of 28194 with a single-thread score of 3810 suggests that the processor maintains high efficiency in both threaded and single-threaded scenarios. Integer math scores 94120, floating-point math scores 68020, and extended instructions score 19534, showing strong computational breadth. Data compression scores 329454, while data encryption scores 19198 — the latter being modest relative to the other integer workloads, which may indicate a bottleneck in encryption-specific instructions. Physics simulation scores 1896, which is low compared to the other numbers, suggesting that the CPU's physics performance lags behind its general compute capabilities.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900HK sits in a tight pack. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H by 0.3%, leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F by 0.3%, trails the Intel Core i5-13600K by 0.7%, and leads the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H by 0.7%. These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the i9-13900HK is effectively performance-equivalent to these desktop and mobile parts in average benchmark scores. The practical difference between them is negligible for real-world use, so buyers should not over-weight the CPU choice when comparing these specific alternatives.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i9-13900HK and the RTX 4080 Mobile is unusual. The CPU's average benchmark score is 37425, while the GPU's average is 38135 — a difference of roughly 1.9% in favor of the GPU. This near-parity in raw average scores suggests that neither component dominates the other in synthetic workloads. However, the percentile ranks tell a slightly different story: the CPU at the 85th percentile against all CPUs, and the GPU at the 81st percentile against all GPUs, means the CPU is relatively stronger within its own market category.

For gaming workloads, the data indicates that the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, but the CPU could constrain frame rates at lower resolutions or in CPU-bound titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 3810 in PassMark and 1843.5 in Cinebench R23 are strong, but not top-tier, so very high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p may see CPU limitations in certain scenarios. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24926 is substantial, but the lack of measured FPS data for this pair means we cannot quantify the exact scaling.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-thread score of 28194 in PassMark and 16025 in Cinebench R23 indicate that the processor can feed the GPU in compute tasks, but the GPU's compute score of 11191 in PassMark GPU Compute suggests that the GPU will be the bottleneck in heavily parallel workloads like rendering or machine learning. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallelism for most applications, but the GPU's 7424 shading units and 232 tensor cores offer more raw compute throughput for tasks that can leverage them.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 37425, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16025 and single-core score of 1843.5 are the most relevant for rendering and general application responsiveness. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28194 and single-thread score of 3810 corroborate these results across a different benchmark suite. The CPU's nearest competitors are all within 0.7% of its average score, making it a solid but not standout performer in its price and performance class.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 38135, placing it at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score of 24926 is the headline number, with a GPU compute score of 11191. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score reaches 159575 and the Vulkan score reaches 145807, showing strong cross-API performance. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (0.4% lower), the RTX 5080 Mobile (0.6% higher), the RTX 4070 (1.3% lower), and the Tesla P4 (1.3% higher). These are mostly mobile parts, and the deltas are small, indicating that the RTX 4080 Mobile sits in a competitive mid-to-high tier.

Combined, the system's 83rd percentile rank reflects a balanced but not exceptional pairing. The CPU and GPU average scores are within 2% of each other, so neither component is dramatically stronger or weaker than the other. This means the system will perform consistently across a wide range of applications, without a single obvious bottleneck in most tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components, not direct measurements. The reader should treat these as approximations for planning purposes, not as verified results.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24926 and the CPU's single-thread score of 3810, this system should handle modern titles at high settings in 1440p and 4K. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides enough capacity and throughput for high-resolution textures, and the 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute rate suggests strong rasterization performance. The CPU's boost clock of 5.40 GHz and 24 MB L3 cache should keep frame times consistent in most games.

At 1080p, the CPU may become the limiting factor in esports titles or games with heavy physics simulation, given its 1896 PassMark physics score. At 1440p and above, the GPU's workload increases, shifting the bottleneck toward the RTX 4080 Mobile. For ray-traced games, the 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware acceleration, which should deliver playable frame rates at reduced resolutions. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure broad API coverage for modern titles. Expect 60+ FPS at 1440p ultra in most games, with 4K requiring occasional settings adjustments to maintain smooth performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3810 and boost clock of 5.40 GHz support high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's 24926 G3D score will become the primary limiter at 1440p and above. For 240Hz 1080p panels, the CPU may hold back the GPU in some scenarios; for 144Hz 1440p, the GPU will keep up.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide enough headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, but the GPU's NVENC (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture and 232 tensor cores) is more efficient for this task. The 19198 encryption score suggests moderate performance for stream encryption, but the GPU handles this better.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16025 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's 11191 compute score handles effects and GPU-accelerated encoding. The 432.0 GB/s GPU bandwidth is sufficient for 4K multi-stream editing.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16025 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 provides a solid baseline for CPU-based renderers, but the GPU's 24926 G3D score and 7424 shading units will significantly outperform the CPU for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for most scenes but may limit very large ones.

Software development: The CPU's 329454 data compression score speeds up build times and package management, while the 94120 integer math score handles compilation efficiently. The 20 threads allow parallel builds, and the 3810 single-thread score keeps IDE responsiveness high.

Student and office work: This is substantial overkill for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's 3810 single-thread score and the GPU's 929 G2D score are far beyond what these tasks require. The system will excel at multitasking, but the power consumption and thermal profile are excessive for basic productivity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire motherboard or laptop. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, so users can choose between these memory types when configuring the system, but they cannot mix them. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for the CPU only, which is sufficient for a high-end GPU but not for multiple expansion cards.

The GPU is a mobile part with a 110W TDP and no power connectors, as it is soldered to the motherboard. The suggested PSU field is null, so no specific power supply recommendation exists in the data. The CPU has a 45W TDP, and the combined system TDP is approximately 155W, which is typical for a high-performance laptop. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is one generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability, but this does not significantly impact performance for a single GPU.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on memory and storage rather than the core components. Adding more DDR5 memory would improve multitasking and data-heavy workloads, given the dual-channel bus. The 24 MB L3 cache and 14 cores will remain relevant for several years, so users should invest in faster storage (NVMe) and additional RAM rather than seeking a new CPU or GPU. The platform's production status is Active, so drivers and BIOS updates should continue.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need high performance in both CPU and GPU tasks without compromise. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the RTX 4080 Mobile's 24926 G3D score and 12 GB VRAM, which handle high settings and ray tracing. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will leverage the CPU's 16025 multi-core score and the GPU's 11191 compute score for accelerated workflows. Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and 94120 integer math score, while the 329454 compression score speeds up package management.

Students and professionals in engineering or data science will find the system capable of running simulation software and machine learning frameworks. The 232 tensor cores and 24.72 TFLOPS FP16 performance support moderate-scale AI workloads. Small business workstations that need to handle CAD, video production, or database applications will find the combination robust, though the power draw and heat output may require a well-ventilated environment. The system is not ideal for users who prioritize battery life or portability, as the 45W CPU and 110W GPU TDPs demand significant cooling and power.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900HK faster than the Intel Core i5-13600K?

A: No, the i9-13900HK trails the i5-13600K by 0.7% in average benchmark score (37425 vs 37685), making the desktop chip slightly faster in synthetic tests.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 Mobile have?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Based on the GPU's 24926 PassMark G3D score and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance, it should handle 4K at high settings in most games, but ultra settings may require adjustments. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The i9-13900HK uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the motherboard.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4080 Mobile has 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the i9-13900HK compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H?

A: The i9-13900HK leads the Ryzen 7 7735H by 0.7% in average benchmark score (37425 vs 37161), a negligible difference for real-world use.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, but the two types cannot be mixed.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the AD104 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5nm process at TSMC. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1290 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K textures.

The GPU's compute resources are substantial: 7424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. It achieves a pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 performance both at 24.72 TFLOPS. The 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all modern graphics APIs.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 24926, placing it at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The GPU compute score of 11191 is lower, indicating that raw compute performance is not as strong as rasterization. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score of 159575 and Vulkan score of 145807 show strong cross-platform performance. The GPU's average benchmark score of 38135 puts it within 1.3% of the RTX 4070 and Tesla P4, and it actually trails the RTX 5080 Mobile by 0.6% — a surprising result given the generational gap, but the data shows the 4080 Mobile holds its own. The 110W TDP is modest for this performance class, making it suitable for high-end laptops that balance power and thermals.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HK + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HK

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds