SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HK + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HK

37,425 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900HK paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S is an unusual entry in the database: a 14-core mobile CPU from Intel's Raptor Lake-H family combined with a Strix Halo-based integrated GPU on a 4 nm TSMC process. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile against all CPUs, the GPU at the 89th percentile against all GPUs, and the pairing as a whole ranks at the 87th percentile — figures that place this combination firmly in upper-tier mobile territory. This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop), and the data indicates a machine designed to do serious compute work without a discrete graphics card in the traditional sense. Note that no measured frame-rate rows exist for this exact combination in the database; all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 87 sits between the CPU's 85 and the GPU's 89, which suggests a reasonably balanced pairing rather than one component massively outranking the other. That said, the GPU holds the slight edge in relative standing: at the 89th percentile versus the CPU's 85th, the Radeon 8050S is marginally the stronger member of the pair relative to its own product category.

The interesting bottleneck question with this configuration is the shared memory subsystem. The Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory — its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent" — meaning GPU performance scales directly with the speed and capacity of the system RAM the i9-13900HK is paired with. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, so a DDR5 configuration is the clear path to feeding the GPU's 2048 shading units effectively. In memory-bandwidth-sensitive scenarios, the shared-memory design is the most likely limiting factor, not the compute resources on either die.

On the CPU side, the single-thread scores (3810 in PassMark single-thread, 1843.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core) sit in the top decile territory implied by the 85th overall percentile, which means CPU-bound gaming situations — high-refresh, lower-resolution play where the renderer waits on draw calls — are unlikely to be limited by processor throughput. The bottleneck profile, insofar as the percentiles reveal one, tilts toward the GPU side at higher resolutions and toward the shared memory bus under heavy simultaneous CPU and GPU load, such as streaming while gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark record is extensive. In Cinebench, the i9-13900HK scores 2398 multi-core and 263 single-core in R15, 9548 multi-core and 1347 single-core in R20, and 16025 multi-core and 1843.5 single-core in R23. The jump from R15 to R23 multi-core scores tracks the expected scaling of a 14-core, 20-thread part, and the single-core figures confirm the 5.40 GHz boost clock is doing real work in lightly threaded loads.

PassMark results round out the picture: 28194 in the multithread test, 94120 in integer math, 68020 in floating point math, 329454 in data compression, 19198 in encryption, 19534 in extended instructions, 36662 in string sorting, and 1896 in physics. The average benchmark score of 37425 places it within a fraction of a percent of its nearest rivals: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (avgScore 37522, deltaPct -0.3), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F (37313, +0.3), the Intel Core i5-13600K (37685, -0.7), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37161, +0.7). In practical terms, the i9-13900HK trades blows with a desktop-class i5-13600K and sits essentially dead even with newer Core Ultra 5 silicon — a strong result for a 45 W mobile part.

On the GPU side, the Radeon 8050S records 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan, averaging 62108. Its rivals cluster tightly above it: the Radeon Pro W6600M (61896, deltaPct 0.3) is effectively a tie, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63693, -2.5), RX 7600M (63775, -2.6), and RX 9060 XT LP (63830, -2.7) all lead by roughly two and a half to three percent. The gap to the nearest faster rival is small enough that driver and thermal conditions in a given laptop chassis could plausibly close it.

The combined picture is a machine whose compute throughput rivals mid-range desktop CPUs while its graphics throughput sits just under dedicated mid-tier mobile and low-profile discrete cards — remarkable given the 8050S is an IGP-form-factor part with no power connectors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

Upgrade path is the weakest aspect of this configuration, and the data is blunt about why. The i9-13900HK uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket — a ball-grid-array package soldered to the board. There is no socket swap, no CPU replacement, no multiplier-overclocking route in a practical upgrade sense (though the chip is listed as multiplier unlocked, which matters only for OEM tuning headroom). The Radeon 8050S likewise occupies the IGP slot with no power connectors; it is not a replaceable card.

What remains upgradeable is memory and storage. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and because the GPU shares system memory, moving to faster DDR5 is the single most impactful upgrade available to this platform — GPU bandwidth is explicitly "System Dependent." PCIe connectivity is limited on the CPU side to Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), so a discrete GPU retrofit would be constrained by lane count, and the GPU's own listed bus interface of PCIe 5.0 x16 reflects its platform integration rather than an add-in slot.

Power headroom is defined by the two TDP figures: 45 W for the CPU and 55 W for the GPU, a combined 100 W for the compute silicon. No suggested PSU value exists because this is a laptop platform — power delivery is the chassis vendor's problem, not the builder's. A sensible "next upgrade" here is not component replacement but platform replacement: anyone needing meaningfully more multi-core throughput should look at the i5-13600K's segment upward, since that desktop part already matches this CPU's average score.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With the GPU at the 89th percentile and scores within about three percent of the RX 7600M and RX 9060 XT LP, the pairing targets high-refresh 1080p play rather than high-resolution max-settings gaming. The CPU's 3810 single-thread PassMark score means the processor will not be the limiter at high frame rates. No measured FPS figures exist for this combination, so these expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Streaming: Streaming combines CPU encoding and GPU rendering, and the 28194 PassMark multithread score with 20 threads leaves headroom for concurrent encode while gaming. The shared memory bus is the caution: simultaneous GPU rendering and CPU encode both draw on system bandwidth.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16025 and Geekbench OpenCL result of 65818 indicate capable timeline scrubbing and export performance, with the GPU's OpenCL compute available for accelerated effects. The 24 MB shared L3 cache helps timeline caching on larger projects.

3D rendering: Rendering leans on the 16025 R23 multi-core figure, which places this CPU at the 85th percentile — professional-quality viewport work and moderate render farms in miniature, though not workstation-class render throughput.

Software development: Compilation is integer- and thread-heavy; the 94120 integer math score and 329454 compression score point to fast builds and archive operations. The single-thread 3810 result keeps IDE responsiveness excellent.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for documents and browsing, but the encryption (19198) and string sorting (36662) PassMark results confirm snappy everyday responsiveness, and battery-sensitive office use benefits from the 45 W mobile TDP.

Who Should Build It

Strictly speaking, nobody "builds" this — it is a laptop platform (buildClass: laptop), soldered via BGA 1744, chosen rather than assembled. The buyer profile that matches the data is a mobile professional who needs desktop-i5-class CPU throughput (avgScore 37425, within 0.7 percent of the i5-13600K) and mid-tier discrete-class graphics (89th percentile, effectively tied with the Radeon Pro W6600M) in one chassis.

That maps to three groups. First, gamers who play at 1080p and prioritize frame rate over resolution, since the GPU's rival cluster (RX 7600M, RX 9060 XT LP) defines exactly that performance band. Second, content creators — video editors and light 3D artists — for whom the 16025 R23 multi-core score and 65818 OpenCL score provide a workable two-compute-engine pipeline. Third, developers and small-business workstation users who need the 20-thread compilation throughput and the 14-core multitasking headroom while traveling. Students in technical fields fit too, though the launch MSRP of $697 for the CPU alone signals this is a premium segment of the laptop market, not an entry-level machine.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon 8050S is architecturally interesting: a Strix Halo chip on AMD's RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process, with a 308 mm² die. It carries 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray-tracing cores. Tensor cores are not present in the data — the listed value is null — so any AI acceleration claims should be treated cautiously.

Throughput figures: 11.47 TFLOPS FP32, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio for the same 11.47 TFLOPS; pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s; texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s. Clocks run from a 1295 MHz base to a 2800 MHz boost — a wide range that gives the silicon substantial boost headroom when thermals allow. Memory is entirely system-shared with no dedicated VRAM, which is the defining constraint: bandwidth is "System Dependent," and the effective frame buffer is whatever system RAM the laptop ships with.

The 32 RT cores put hardware ray tracing on the spec sheet, but the benchmark results indicate where the chip lands in practice. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and Vulkan score of 58398, averaging 62108, place it 0.3 percent ahead of a Radeon Pro W6600M and 2.5 to 2.7 percent behind the Radeon Pro Vega 56, RX 7600M, and RX 9060 XT LP. For rendering workloads, this means GPU compute acceleration in OpenCL-enabled applications is genuinely usable, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 API support covers modern feature sets. The TDP is 55 W, and with no power connectors, the entire graphics subsystem draws from the platform's power budget.

Gaming Performance

The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame-rate discussion here is therefore estimation from the benchmark scores, not measurement.

What the scores permit is a banded expectation. The GPU's 89th percentile standing and its tight rival cluster — the RX 7600M at 63775 average score (2.6 percent ahead), the RX 9060 XT LP at 63830 (2.7 percent ahead), the Pro W6600M at 61896 (0.3 percent behind) — anchor the 8050S to a performance band that, in the wider database, corresponds to competent ultra-settings play at 1080p and reduced-settings play at higher resolutions. The 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 figure and 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate support that reading: fill-rate-heavy titles at 1080p should be comfortably within reach, while ray-traced effects will pull harder on the 32 RT cores and may demand settings reductions to hold frame rates.

On the CPU side, the 3810 single-thread PassMark score and 1843.5 R23 single-core result mean the processor will sustain high frame delivery; any frame-rate ceiling at 1080p comes from the GPU, not the i9-13900HK. These are estimates and should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger part of this pairing? A: By percentile, the GPU edges it: the Radeon 8050S sits at the 89th percentile versus the CPU's 85th, with a combined percentile of 87.

Q: Can the CPU or GPU be upgraded later? A: No. The i9-13900HK uses the Intel BGA 1744 soldered socket, and the 8050S is an IGP-form-factor part with no power connectors and system-shared memory. Only RAM (DDR4 or DDR5, dual-channel) is a practical upgrade.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals? A: Its average score of 37425 is within one percent of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (37522), Core Ultra 5 225F (37313), Core i5-13600K (37685), and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37161) — effectively a dead heat with desktop i5-13600K silicon.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM? A: No. Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system-shared or system-dependent; it uses the laptop's system memory, so DDR5 system RAM benefits GPU performance directly.

Q: Are the gaming frame rates on this page measured? A: No. The database has no measured FPS entries for this combination; frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and rival positioning.

Q: What is the total power draw of the compute silicon? A: The CPU is rated at 45 W TDP and the GPU at 55 W, for a combined 100 W across both chips.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and modern APIs? A: Yes — 32 RT cores, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 support listed.

CPU Analysis

The i9-13900HK is a Raptor Lake-H mobile processor from Intel's 13th Gen Core family, released January 3, 2023, on Intel's own 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. It carries 14 cores and 20 threads — a hybrid arrangement in the Raptor Lake mold — with a 2.60 GHz base clock and a 5.40 GHz boost. Cache is generous for the segment: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, plus 24 MB of shared L3. ECC is not supported, and the chip includes Iris Xe Graphics 96EU as its own integrated solution, which is redundant in this pairing given the stronger Radeon 8050S.

The benchmark data maps cleanly onto real workloads. The 16025 Cinebench R23 multi-core score reflects the full 14-core throughput for rendering and compilation; the 1843.5 single-core score and 5.40 GHz boost translate to snappy interactive performance. PassMark's granular results reinforce this: 94120 integer math for compilation-style loads, 329454 compression for archival work, 19198 encryption, and 19534 extended instructions showing SIMD throughput. The part number is SRMJ3, market segment is Mobile, and production status is Active. At the 85th percentile against all CPUs, this is upper-tier mobile silicon whose only structural limitation is the soldered BGA 1744 package.

Build Overview

This entry documents a laptop-class pairing: a 45 W, 14-core/20-thread Intel i9-13900HK joined with AMD's 55 W Radeon 8050S integrated graphics, both drawing from shared system memory. Its combined percentile of 87 places it in the upper tier of all combinations in the database — a machine whose CPU throughput matches desktop i5-13600K-class parts and whose graphics land within three percent of dedicated cards like the RX 7600M and RX 9060 XT LP. The CPU's launch MSRP of $697 frames the segment. It is not a modular build and not a desktop replacement for upgraders, but as an integrated mobile platform the data shows a balanced, high-percentile combination well suited to high-refresh 1080p gaming and compute-heavy portable work.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HK + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HK

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds