SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900H

28,886 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10nm process with a die size of 257 mm². This is a high-end laptop chip, evidenced by its 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs in the benchmark database. The core configuration splits into performance and efficiency clusters, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz — the latter being a strong indicator of single-thread responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, which benefits workloads with moderate data reuse, such as web browsing, office suites, and compilation tasks. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving laptop OEMs flexibility in memory choices, though ECC memory is not supported — a limitation for certain workstation reliability scenarios.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores climb from 1,078 in single-thread to 2,002 in 2-thread, 3,591 in 4-thread, 5,395 in 8-thread, 7,063 in 16-thread, and peak at 7,670 in max-threads. This scaling pattern shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, which is typical for a hybrid architecture where efficiency cores contribute less per-thread performance than performance cores. For real-world workloads, this means the CPU excels at tasks that use 8 or fewer strong threads, while still providing respectable throughput for heavily parallel workloads.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 17,471 against a single-core score of 1,964.5 indicates strong multi-threaded capability — roughly 8.9x the single-core performance when all threads are engaged. R20 scores of 9,676 multicore and 1,365 single-core follow the same pattern, as do R15 scores of 2,666.5 multicore and 279 single-core. These numbers place the chip comfortably in the upper mid-range of mobile processors for content creation tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering.

PassMark tests provide additional nuance. The multithread score of 27,673 and single-thread score of 3,754 show a solid ratio of about 7.4x. The integer math score of 97,159 and floating-point math score of 69,611 indicate that the CPU handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy code well, though integer operations are notably stronger. Data compression (326,425) and encryption (18,974) scores are respectable for a mobile chip, while the random string sorting score of 35,637 suggests good memory subsystem performance during data movement tasks.

The average benchmark score is 28,886, which places the i9-13900H in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals. It sits 0% above the Intel Core i5-12600H (avg score 28,882), 0.2% above the Intel Core i7-12650H (avg score 28,815), 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (avg score 28,940), and 0.7% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H (avg score 29,093). These deltas are negligible — essentially a statistical tie — meaning the i9-13900H's performance class is well-established, but it doesn't offer a meaningful edge over its closest competitors in aggregate CPU benchmarks.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4nm process with a die size of 308 mm². It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and uses the Strix Halo chip. This is not a discrete graphics card — it's an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a 55W TDP and no power connectors, designed to be part of a laptop's unified design. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, which provides ample bandwidth for the GPU to communicate with the CPU and system memory.

Clock speeds are notable for an integrated solution: a base clock of 1,295 MHz and a boost clock of 2,800 MHz. The memory configuration is "System Shared" — meaning the GPU draws from the laptop's main system memory rather than having dedicated VRAM. This is a critical design choice that makes GPU memory performance "System Dependent," as the bandwidth will vary based on the memory type and configuration the laptop manufacturer pairs with this chip. In practical terms, this means the GPU's real-world performance can shift meaningfully depending on whether the laptop uses fast DDR5 or slower memory.

The compute configuration is substantial for an iGPU: 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU also includes 32 ray tracing cores, which provides hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in supported games and rendering applications. The FP32 compute rating is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no half-precision advantage for AI workloads that could benefit from FP16 throughput. Pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s, which are strong figures for an integrated part and suggest it can handle high-resolution texturing without becoming a bottleneck in lighter loads.

API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern games and applications that leverage the latest graphics features. The display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary by laptop design — some may offer HDMI, others DisplayPort over USB-C, and so on.

Benchmark results show a GPU that punches well above its integrated-class designation. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 65,818, and the Vulkan score is 58,398. The average benchmark score is 62,108, placing the Radeon 8050S at the 89th percentile among all GPUs — an exceptional position for an integrated solution. Its nearest rivals in the database are all discrete or professional mobile GPUs: the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (avg score 61,896, 0.3% ahead of the 8050S), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (avg score 63,693, 2.5% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (avg score 63,775, 2.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (avg score 63,830, 2.7% behind). Being within 3% of these discrete parts is a remarkable achievement for an iGPU, and it means the Radeon 8050S can genuinely compete with entry-level to mid-range discrete laptop GPUs in compute-heavy tasks.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from CPU and GPU benchmarks places this build at the 85th percentile overall. This is a high-performance laptop configuration that should handle demanding workloads without major compromises. The CPU's average benchmark score of 28,886 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 62,108 together create a system that is well above average for both processing and graphics tasks.

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussion must be estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing. The CPU's 81st percentile and GPU's 89th percentile positions suggest that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, which has implications for gaming performance discussed later.

For CPU-bound tasks, the i9-13900H's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17,471 places it in a competitive position for mobile workstations. The PassMark multithread score of 27,673 reinforces this, and the single-thread score of 3,754 indicates snappy responsiveness for everyday use. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 and Vulkan score of 58,398 demonstrate strong compute capability that extends beyond gaming into areas like GPU-accelerated rendering and machine learning inference.

The combination of a top-tier mobile CPU and a near-discrete-class integrated GPU means this system is balanced for most workloads, though the shared memory architecture of the GPU could be a limiting factor in memory-bandwidth-intensive scenarios. The CPU's dual-channel memory support is standard, but the GPU's reliance on system memory means that memory speed and capacity choices in the laptop configuration will directly affect graphics performance — a consideration that doesn't apply to discrete GPU laptops with dedicated VRAM.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need serious compute power in a laptop form factor without the weight and power draw of a separate discrete GPU. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking makes it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running complex computations, and students in engineering or computer science programs who need to run virtual machines or simulation software. The PassMark integer math score of 97,159 is particularly relevant for development workloads that involve heavy integer operations.

Content creators will find the i9-13900H's multi-threaded performance appealing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17,471 supports video editing timelines with multiple streams, and the PassMark floating-point score of 69,611 indicates capable handling of image processing and effects work. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute adds GPU acceleration options for rendering and effects that can offload work from the CPU.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolutions should find this system viable for many titles, given the GPU's 89th percentile position. The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support, though the shared memory bandwidth may limit RT performance in demanding scenes. Esports and competitive titles that favor high frame rates should run particularly well, as the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,754 in PassMark ensures that the processor won't bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

Small business workstations and office productivity are also well-served. The CPU's 2-thread score of 2,002 in 3DMark shows excellent responsiveness for spreadsheet, document, and web-based workflows. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU in the CPU provides a fallback display output even if the Radeon 8050S is not utilized by certain applications, adding redundancy.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a ball-grid-array package soldered to the motherboard. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense — it's a permanent part of the laptop's mainboard. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, so the primary upgrade path for users is increasing memory capacity or speed, which can benefit both the CPU and the GPU since the Radeon 8050S uses system shared memory.

PCIe support is Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU, which provides fast connectivity for NVMe storage and other PCIe devices. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, though as an IGP it's integrated into the chip package rather than being a separate card. This means users cannot upgrade the GPU independently — the graphics performance is locked to the chip.

The CPU's TDP is 45W, and the GPU's TDP is 55W, giving a combined thermal budget of about 100W for the compute components. There is no suggested PSU listed in the FACT PACK, which is typical for IGP systems where the power delivery is integrated into the laptop's mainboard design. Users should not expect to build this as a desktop system; it's exclusively a laptop configuration.

For a sensible next upgrade, users should focus on memory capacity and speed. Since the GPU shares system memory, upgrading from slower or lower-capacity RAM to faster, higher-capacity modules could improve both CPU and GPU performance. The dual-channel memory bus means that populating both channels with matched modules is essential for optimal bandwidth. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes are also viable, allowing users to add high-speed NVMe drives for faster load times and data access.

# FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900H good for gaming?

A: Yes, for a laptop CPU. Its 81st percentile ranking and single-thread PassMark score of 3,754 indicate strong gaming performance, and the 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The 14 cores and 20 threads also provide headroom for background tasks while gaming.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8050S compare to discrete laptop GPUs?

A: The Radeon 8050S sits at the 89th percentile among all GPUs and is within 3% of discrete competitors like the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, Radeon Pro Vega 56, Radeon RX 7600M, and Radeon RX 9060 XT LP in average benchmark score. It's an integrated GPU that performs like an entry-level discrete part.

Q: Can this laptop handle video editing?

A: Yes. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17,471 and the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute provide strong performance for video editing and rendering. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and effect processing.

Q: What memory should this system use?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. Since the GPU uses System Shared memory, faster memory will improve both CPU and GPU performance. Users should prioritize dual-channel configurations with matched modules for best bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No. The Intel BGA 1744 socket is a ball-grid-array package soldered to the motherboard. This is a laptop platform, so the CPU and GPU are permanently integrated.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon 8050S includes 32 ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in games and rendering applications that support DirectX 12 Ultimate or Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does this CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-12600H?

A: The i9-13900H and i5-12600H have nearly identical average benchmark scores: 28,886 versus 28,882, a 0% difference. They are effectively performance peers in aggregate benchmarks, despite the i9 having more cores and a higher boost clock.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU in this system is unusual because the GPU's memory bandwidth is shared with the CPU. The CPU's 81st percentile and GPU's 89th percentile positions suggest that the GPU is relatively stronger, but the shared memory architecture means the GPU's performance is tied to the system memory configuration. In workloads that are memory-bandwidth-intensive, the GPU could be limited by the dual-channel memory bus, potentially creating a situation where the CPU's strong compute performance is underutilized while the GPU waits on memory.

For gaming at high frame rates, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,754 PassMark single-thread, 1,078 3DMark single-thread) ensures that it can feed the GPU in most scenarios. However, in esports titles where frame rates exceed 144 FPS, the CPU's multi-thread scaling — showing strong 8-thread performance (5,395 in 3DMark) but diminishing returns beyond that — could become a factor if the game engine uses more than 8 threads inefficiently.

For compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17,471 and the GPU's 65,818 Geekbench OpenCL score provide complementary strengths. Rendering tasks that use the CPU will see strong performance, while GPU-accelerated rendering can leverage the Radeon 8050S's 11.47 TFLOPS. The bottleneck here is more likely to be thermal or power limits, given the combined 100W TDP of CPU and GPU in a laptop chassis.

The data shows that the GPU's nearest rivals all have higher average scores (ranging from 61,896 to 63,830), meaning the Radeon 8050S is slightly below those parts in raw compute. This is offset by the fact that those rivals are discrete GPUs with dedicated VRAM, while the 8050S uses system memory. In practice, the GPU may perform closer to its rivals in compute workloads that aren't memory-bandwidth-limited but fall behind in scenarios that require large data transfers.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900H processor with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. The system sits at the 85th combined percentile, indicating a high-performance configuration that outperforms the majority of systems in the benchmark database. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake mobile processor with a 45W TDP, and the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated part with a 55W TDP, making this a cohesive mobile solution that doesn't require a separate discrete graphics card.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 28,886 places it in a statistical tie with several mid-range desktop and mobile processors, including the Intel Core i5-12600H, Intel Core i7-12650H, AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, and Intel Core Ultra 5 135H. The GPU's average benchmark score of 62,108 puts it at the 89th percentile, outperforming most integrated graphics solutions and rivaling entry-level discrete GPUs. The overall system is well-suited for users who want strong compute and graphics performance in a portable form factor.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance (3,754 PassMark) and the GPU's 89th percentile position suggest this system can drive high frame rates in many titles, particularly at 1080p. The 32 ray tracing cores add RT capability, though the shared memory bandwidth may limit performance in RT-heavy scenes. Esports titles should run well above 60 FPS, but users should temper expectations for the most demanding AAA games at maximum settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, and the PassMark data compression score of 326,425 indicates strong throughput for stream encoding. The GPU's Vulkan score of 58,398 supports hardware acceleration in compatible streaming software. This is a capable streaming setup for a laptop without a discrete GPU.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17,471 and the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute make this a viable video editing machine for 1080p and some 4K timelines. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with preview rendering, and the GPU can accelerate effects and exports in software that supports OpenCL.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will leverage the 20 threads effectively, with Cinebench scores indicating strong performance for their class. GPU-based rendering via OpenCL (65,818 Geekbench score) adds acceleration for compatible renderers. The shared memory architecture may be a limitation for very large scenes that exceed memory bandwidth.

Software Development: The integer math score of 97,159 and multithread score of 27,673 support compilation of large codebases, and the 20 threads allow for parallel build processes. The 81st percentile CPU ranking means this system will handle development tools, virtual machines, and containerized workloads without feeling sluggish.

Student and Office Work: The 2-thread 3DMark score of 2,002 and single-thread score of 1,078 indicate excellent responsiveness for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The integrated GPU handles desktop compositing and video playback easily, and the CPU's boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensures snappy application launches. This system is overkill for basic office tasks but will never feel underpowered.