SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 presents a distinctive mobile-class GPU configuration built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors packed into a 379 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 121.1M per mm², reflecting a mature and dense design. The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. This bandwidth figure is substantial for a 150 W part, positioning it well for high-resolution texture streaming and large dataset manipulation in professional visualization workloads.

The shading engine comprises 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. The core clock operates at a 930 MHz base and boosts to 1680 MHz. These clocks, while modest compared to desktop counterparts, are constrained by the 150 W TDP envelope typical of embedded or mobile implementations. The pixel rate reaches 188.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate 510.7 GTexel/s, indicating that fill-rate-bound operations such as heavy post-processing or multi-sample anti-aliasing will perform adequately but not exceptionally. FP32 throughput is rated at 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 32.69 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio—this parity suggests the architecture does not rely on shader-rate doubling for half-precision work, which matters for AI inference where FP16 is common.

Ray tracing hardware includes 76 RT cores, while the tensor core count is 304. The RT core count is high relative to the shader count, suggesting the design dedicates significant silicon to ray traversal and BVH processing. Tensor cores at 304 units provide the foundation for DLSS, denoising, and other AI-accelerated features. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is fully compliant with modern graphics APIs including mesh shaders, variable-rate shading, and ray tracing. Display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, confirming this is an embedded part intended for integration into laptops or mobile workstations rather than standalone desktop cards. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which provides adequate bandwidth for most workloads, though PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU side offers headroom for future expansion.

The GPU's benchmark scores are listed as zero, with no measured FPS data available for this exact combination. The percentile versus all GPUs is 50, placing it at the median of the GPU performance distribution. The average benchmark score is zero, and there are no nearest rivals listed. This absence of data means quantitative GPU performance comparisons cannot be made directly. However, the architectural specifications—particularly the 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth—indicate strong suitability for 1440p and 4K rendering workloads where memory capacity is often the limiting factor. The RT core count and tensor core count suggest that ray-traced scenes and DLSS-enhanced rendering will be handled competently, though exact frame rates remain unknown given the lack of measured data.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-13900F delivers a robust set of benchmark scores across multiple suites. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 9,957 for 16 threads, 2,265 for 2 threads, 4,393 for 4 threads, 7,426 for 8 threads, 13,985 for max threads, and 1,145 for single thread. These scores show a scaling pattern from single-thread to multi-thread that reflects the hybrid core design, with the max-thread score being roughly 12.2 times the single-thread score. In Cinebench, the R15 multi-core score is 4,125 and single-core is 582; R20 multi-core reaches 17,189 with single-core at 2,426; R23 multi-core hits 40,928 with single-core at 5,778. The R23 multi-core score is particularly notable—it represents a 7.1x improvement over the single-core score, indicating excellent multi-threaded scaling across the 24 cores and 32 threads.

Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 19,680 and a single-core score of 2,533. PassMark tests reveal specific workload characteristics: data compression scores 635,147, data encryption 38,214, extended instructions 36,525, prime number finding 204, floating point math 131,007, integer math 188,022, multi-thread 49,693, physics 2,766, random string sorting 70,441, and single-thread 4,406. The integer math score of 188,022 is notably higher than floating point math at 131,007, suggesting the CPU excels in integer-heavy tasks like database operations and code compilation. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 51,730, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51,947, which is 0.4% higher than the i9-13900F. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52,073, 0.7% higher. The AMD EPYC 8124P also scores 52,121, 0.7% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51,310, which is 0.8% lower. This places the i9-13900F in a tightly contested band—it is essentially performance-equivalent to four rival CPUs, with deltas under 1% in all cases. The 91st percentile ranking means the CPU outperforms about 91% of all CPUs in the benchmark database, making it a high-end desktop processor.

The GPU, as noted, has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, though this percentile is based on zero scores and thus indicates a data gap rather than true mid-tier performance. The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pairing is 71, which reflects the CPU's strong showing dragging the average up despite the GPU's unknown performance. The combined picture is one of a very capable CPU paired with a GPU whose performance is unquantified in the database. For workloads that are CPU-bound, this system will perform at a high level; for GPU-bound tasks, the actual performance cannot be stated with certainty from the available data.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake desktop processor with 24 cores and 32 threads. It uses the Raptor Lake-S architecture on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2000 MHz and the boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz. The TDP is rated at 65 W, which is moderate for a 24-core part, though this likely reflects a power-limited configuration rather than the full thermal envelope. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory support is enabled, which is valuable for workstation reliability. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU only.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The L3 cache size is generous and should help with multi-threaded workloads that share data. The multiplier is not unlocked, meaning overclocking is not possible on this part—it is a locked CPU. The release date was January 3, 2023, and the launch MSRP was $524. The production status is active, and the part number is SRMB7.

Benchmark results indicate strong single-thread performance: the 3DMark single-thread score of 1,145 and Geekbench single-core of 2,533 are competitive for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,778 is high, suggesting excellent per-core IPC. Multi-threaded performance is where this CPU shines: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,928 and PassMark multi-thread score of 49,693 place it in the top tier. The 3DMark max-thread score of 13,985 shows good scaling from 16 threads (9,957) to 32 threads, representing a 40.5% improvement.

For real workloads, the PassMark results are informative. The data compression score of 635,147 indicates strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption at 38,214 shows competent cryptographic throughput. Extended instructions score 36,525, reflecting good SIMD performance for vectorized code. The floating point math score of 131,007 is solid, while integer math at 188,022 is exceptional—this suggests the CPU is particularly well-suited for integer-heavy workloads like text processing, database queries, and compilation. The physics score of 2,766 is modest, which may reflect the test's sensitivity to clock speed rather than core count. Random string sorting at 70,441 indicates good algorithmic performance.

The percentile versus all CPUs is 91, meaning this processor outperforms 91% of CPUs in the database. The average benchmark score of 51,730, with nearest rivals within 0.8%, confirms this is a high-end part. For content creation, the high multi-threaded scores translate to faster video rendering, 3D scene compilation, and batch processing. For software development, the integer math and compression scores support faster builds, code analysis, and version control operations. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with working sets that exceed 16 MB, common in modern game engines and scientific computing.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The Intel Core i9-13900F with its 91st percentile CPU performance is an appropriate choice for users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput in a desktop form factor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,928 and PassMark multi-thread score of 49,693 indicate that this system can handle demanding parallel workloads. Video editors and 3D artists working with large scenes will benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, as render times scale with thread count. The 36 MB L3 cache supports large working sets, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running renders.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the integer math score of 188,022 and data compression score of 635,147. Build times for projects with many translation units are heavily dependent on multi-core performance, and this CPU's 24 cores provide ample parallel compilation capacity. The single-thread score of 4,406 in PassMark ensures that interactive editing and IDE responsiveness remain high.

Data scientists and analysts processing large datasets will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities. The floating point math score of 131,007 supports numerical computations, while the extended instructions score of 36,525 accelerates SIMD-heavy operations common in scientific computing. The 91st percentile ranking means this CPU is in the top 9% of all CPUs, making it suitable for professional workstations where time is money.

Gamers at high refresh rates will find the CPU's single-thread performance adequate, though the GPU's unquantified performance makes definitive gaming recommendations impossible. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,145 and Geekbench single-core of 2,533 suggest competent gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p, but the lack of measured FPS data means specific resolution targets cannot be guaranteed. Students and small business workstations will find the CPU's performance more than sufficient for typical office workloads, though the $524 launch MSRP positions it as a premium component rather than a budget option.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system's balance is characterized by a stark contrast between CPU and GPU data availability. The CPU is well-characterized with a 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile based on zero data points. This asymmetry means that for CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform at a high level, but for GPU-bound workloads, performance cannot be accurately predicted.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,928 places it in the upper echelon of desktop processors. In contrast, the GPU's unknown performance means that in gaming scenarios, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor for most titles, especially at higher resolutions where the 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are necessary but the actual frame rate depends on shader and RT core performance. The CPU's high single-thread score of 1,145 in 3DMark suggests it can feed the GPU adequately at lower resolutions, but without measured FPS data, the exact bottleneck point cannot be determined.

For rendering workloads, the CPU's 24 cores will accelerate CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores will handle GPU-accelerated ray tracing and AI denoising. The balance here depends on the software: CPU-based renderers will be CPU-bound, while GPU-based renderers will be GPU-bound. The combined percentile of 71 suggests the system overall is above average, but this is skewed by the CPU's strong showing.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured FPS data. However, the CPU's benchmark scores indicate it has sufficient headroom to drive a GPU in most scenarios. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,957 and max-thread score of 13,985 show that the CPU can handle the multi-threaded game logic and physics workloads common in modern titles. The PassMark physics score of 2,766 is relatively low, which could indicate a bottleneck in physics-heavy games, though this test's methodology may not be representative of modern game physics engines.

# Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports 13th-generation Raptor Lake processors. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and performance needs. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. ECC memory support is available, which is a plus for workstation use.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, which is relatively low for a 24-core processor, suggesting that a modest air cooler may suffice for stock operation, though the boost clock of 5.60 GHz may require better cooling for sustained performance. The GPU's TDP is 150 W, and the suggested PSU is listed as null, meaning no specific recommendation is available. The combined TDP of 215 W (65 W CPU plus 150 W GPU) is modest by desktop standards, so a typical 500-650 W power supply should provide adequate headroom for this configuration, though this is a qualitative assessment since no PSU wattage is specified in the data.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to add a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 91st percentile performance is likely to outpace the GPU in most workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures compatibility with future high-bandwidth cards, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Upgrading to a higher-end GPU would be the most impactful change, given the CPU's headroom. The 36 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support are already solid, so memory upgrades would only help if more capacity is needed for large datasets. The socket 1700 platform is not forward-compatible with newer Intel generations, so a future CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i9-13900F scores 51,730 on average, which is 0.4% lower than the Ryzen 9 5950X's 51,947.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is enabled on the i9-13900F.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock?

A: The boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this system?

A: No, no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP?

A: The GPU's TDP is 150 W.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900F desktop CPU with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 GPU in a desktop class configuration. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance. The GPU is an embedded Ada Lovelace part with 16 GB VRAM and a 50th percentile ranking, though this percentile is based on zero benchmark scores and should be interpreted as a data gap rather than a true performance indicator. The combined percentile for the system is 71, reflecting the CPU's strong performance pulling the average upward despite the GPU's unknown capabilities.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51,730 places it within 0.8% of four rival CPUs, making it a highly competitive desktop processor. The GPU's architectural specifications—including 76 RT cores, 304 tensor cores, and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32—suggest it is a capable part, but without measured scores, its exact tier cannot be established. This system is best described as a high-end CPU paired with a professional-grade embedded GPU, suitable for CPU-bound workloads where the processor's 24 cores can be fully utilized.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion here is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative rather than quantitative. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,145 and Geekbench single-core of 2,533 indicate strong per-core performance, which is essential for gaming frame rates. The 16-thread score of 9,957 suggests the CPU can handle the multi-threaded workloads of modern game engines, including physics and AI.

The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the actual frame rate depends on the shader and RT core performance, which is unquantified. The 76 RT cores suggest capable ray tracing performance, and the 304 tensor cores enable DLSS for performance enhancement. At 1080p, the CPU is likely to be the primary driver, and its high single-thread scores should produce good frame rates. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and its performance cannot be estimated with confidence due to the absence of benchmark data. The pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s provide upper bounds on fill-rate-limited scenarios, but real-world game performance will vary.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,145 provides a solid foundation, but the GPU's unquantified performance makes 144 Hz or 240 Hz gaming uncertain. At 1080p, the CPU can likely sustain high frame rates, but the GPU's actual capability is unknown.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads are more than sufficient for simultaneous game encoding and streaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 38,214 and extended instructions score of 36,525 support efficient encoding workloads.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,928 accelerates export times and effect rendering. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM handles large timelines and 4K previews, though the lack of measured GPU scores means acceleration benefits are unverified.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will leverage the 24 cores effectively, with the R23 multi-core score of 40,928 providing a strong baseline. GPU-based renderers will use the RT cores and tensor cores, but performance is unquantified.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 188,022 and data compression score of 635,147 indicate fast compile times and efficient version control operations. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory stalls during builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance is more than adequate for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 91st percentile ranking ensures responsiveness even with many applications open, though the CPU's $524 launch MSRP makes this an expensive choice for basic office tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds