SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-13900F's core and thread configuration?

A: The i9-13900F features 24 cores and 32 threads, based on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 65W TDP.

Q: How does the i9-13900F compare to its nearest CPU rivals in average benchmark scores?

A: The i9-13900F scores 51,730 on average, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (51,947), 0.7% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52,073) and AMD EPYC 8124P (52,121), but 0.8% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T (51,310). This puts it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the Quadro RTX 5000's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: What are the Quadro RTX 5000's key specifications for ray tracing and AI?

A: The Turing-based GPU includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, with 3072 shading units. It delivers 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Q: Does the i9-13900F support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900F supports ECC memory. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types, with dual-channel memory bus support.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combination of the Intel Core i9-13900F and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 sits at the 79th percentile overall for desktop builds, based on the benchmark scores of both components.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific configuration?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows in the data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS figures discussed must be treated as estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the i9-13900F show a processor that scales strongly with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1,145 in single-thread, 2,265 in 2-thread, 4,393 in 4-thread, 7,426 in 8-thread, 9,957 in 16-thread, and 13,985 in max-thread tests. The scaling from 2 to 4 threads nearly doubles (2,265 to 4,393), and from 4 to 8 threads it jumps by roughly 69%, demonstrating efficient utilization of its hybrid core layout.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R15 multicore score of 4,125 compares to 582 single-core; R20 scores are 17,189 multicore and 2,426 single-core; R23 scores are 40,928 multicore and 5,778 single-core. These numbers place the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51,730. Relative to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900F trails the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by a razor-thin 0.4% margin, and it sits 0.7% behind both the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX and AMD EPYC 8124P. It edges out the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T by 0.8%. This is a desktop CPU that trades blows with high-end server and workstation parts.

On the GPU side, the Quadro RTX 5000 delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 and a Vulkan score of 92,309. In PassMark tests, it scores 15,616 in G3D and 6,525 in GPU compute. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21,629, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a tight competitive field: the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB scores 21,856 (1% higher), the RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21,379 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21,237 (1.8% lower). This means the Quadro RTX 5000 is positioned around the GTX 1060 class in raw average performance, despite being a workstation-oriented card.

Combining these two components yields a build at the 79th percentile overall. The pairing of a 91st-percentile CPU with a 67th-percentile GPU creates a system that is heavily CPU-favored in benchmark terms. The CPU's average score is more than 2.3 times the GPU's average score on a raw numeric basis, indicating that this configuration will excel in compute-heavy workloads while the GPU remains the more modest performer relative to its own peer group.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Its hybrid design combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support for workstation reliability.

In PassMark tests, the CPU shows its strengths across different workload types. Integer math scores 188,022, floating-point math scores 131,007, and extended instructions score 36,525. Data compression hits 635,147, while data encryption scores 38,214. The multithread score is 49,693, and single-thread is 4,406. Physics scores 2,766, and random string sorting scores 70,441. These numbers indicate a CPU that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy tasks with ease, though the physics score relative to the multithread score suggests gaming physics workloads are not the primary strength.

Geekbench results show a multicore score of 19,680 and single-core of 2,533. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40,928 is particularly notable — it is roughly 7 times the single-core score of 5,778, showing excellent scaling across the 24 cores. The 3DMark max-thread score of 13,985 versus the single-thread score of 1,145 confirms this scaling pattern, with a ratio of approximately 12:1 from single to max threads.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking places it among the top tier of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, a 16-core/32-thread part, which it essentially matches (0.4% difference). This indicates that the i9-13900F's hybrid architecture delivers comparable multi-threaded throughput to a high-core-count Zen 3 part, while its 5.60 GHz boost clock provides strong single-thread performance. For real workloads, this translates to excellent performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, code compilation, and scientific computing — tasks that can utilize 32 threads effectively. The 65W TDP is notably modest for a 24-core part, suggesting efficient power management.

# Gaming Performance

The data contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i9-13900F paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. Therefore, all gaming performance figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component, not from actual game testing.

The CPU's 91st-percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance (1,145 in 3DMark single-thread, 5,778 in Cinebench R23 single-core) indicate it will not bottleneck gaming workloads. The 5.60 GHz boost clock is among the highest available, and the 24-core configuration ensures headroom for background tasks while gaming.

The GPU is the more constrained component. The Quadro RTX 5000's 67th-percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 21,629 put it in the same class as the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (which scores 1% higher) and the RTX A4000 Mobile (which scores 1.2% lower). For 1080p gaming, this GPU would likely deliver playable frame rates at high settings in most titles, but it would not be considered a high-refresh-rate or 1440p/4K gaming card. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is generous, but the underlying TU104 chip with 3072 shading units is from the Turing generation, which is now several generations old.

At 1080p ultra settings, expect this pairing to achieve smooth performance in esports titles, but demanding AAA games may require settings reductions to maintain 60 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU would become the limiting factor, with frame rates likely dropping below 60 FPS in graphically intense scenes. At 4K, the Quadro RTX 5000 would struggle, as its pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s are modest by modern standards.

Given the CPU's strength, the system would benefit from a GPU upgrade to unlock higher frame rates. The CPU could easily drive a much more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need exceptional CPU compute power but have modest GPU requirements. The i9-13900F's 91st-percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40,928 and PassMark multithread score of 49,693 indicate strong performance in CPU-bound tasks like compiling large codebases, batch photo processing, and multi-stream video encoding.

For developers, the 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample parallelism for build tools, virtualization, and containerized workloads. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute jobs. Students in engineering, data science, or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU's compute power for simulations and analysis, though they would need to be mindful of the GPU's limitations for any CUDA-based coursework.

Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications — such as financial modeling, database processing, or CAD software that is single-threaded — would see strong performance from the 5.60 GHz boost clock. The Quadro RTX 5000's workstation heritage (with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and USB Type-C) supports multi-monitor professional setups, though its raw performance is in the 67th percentile, so GPU-accelerated rendering tasks would be slower than with higher-tier workstation cards.

Gamers at 1080p would find this build capable, but it is not optimized for high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming. The CPU will not limit frame rates, but the GPU's 67th-percentile standing means modern titles at ultra settings will not reach the frame rates that the CPU is capable of supporting. This build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU throughput over GPU performance.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is built on the Turing architecture using the TU104 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz and boosts to 1815 MHz. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

For ray tracing and AI workloads, the GPU includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. This gives it 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 22.30 TFLOPS of FP16 compute (at 2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. The card draws up to 230W via a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector configuration, with a suggested PSU of 550W.

Benchmark results show a GPU that is competent but not exceptional. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 and Vulkan score of 92,309 demonstrate solid compute capability. PassMark G3D score of 15,616 and GPU compute score of 6,525 place it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, scores 1% higher on average — a striking comparison that highlights how the Quadro RTX 5000's workstation features (RT cores, tensor cores, large VRAM) do not translate to higher raw performance in standard benchmarks.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant asset, allowing large scenes and textures to reside in memory. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports data-intensive tasks. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising and upscaling. However, the FP32 throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS is modest compared to newer workstation GPUs, and the DirectX 12 PassMark score of 59 suggests limited gaming-oriented performance. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern APIs.

This GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in Workstation Ampere. Its 67th-percentile ranking means it sits below the midpoint of current GPU performance distribution, making it a workstation card that prioritizes features and memory capacity over raw speed.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), enabling high-bandwidth connections to compatible GPUs and NVMe storage. The 65W TDP is modest, so most motherboards with Socket 1700 will handle power delivery without issue.

The Quadro RTX 5000 uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU's 230W TDP and suggested PSU of 550W mean that a system with this CPU (65W) and GPU (230W) has a combined TDP of 295W, leaving ample headroom within the 550W recommendation for other components. The GPU requires 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors, which are standard on modern power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be the GPU. The CPU's 91st-percentile performance and 5.60 GHz boost clock are strong enough to drive a significantly more powerful GPU without bottlenecking. Replacing the Quadro RTX 5000 with a newer, higher-performance card would improve gaming frame rates and GPU-accelerated compute workloads. The 550W suggested PSU would likely need to be upgraded if a higher-TDP GPU is installed, but the platform itself (Socket 1700) supports a wide range of GPU options.

Memory upgrades are also viable. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, and the choice of memory type will depend on the motherboard. For workloads that benefit from higher memory bandwidth, DDR5 would be preferable. The CPU's ECC memory support is a consideration for workstation users who require data integrity.

The platform itself is mature, as the CPU was released in January 2023. Users looking for a longer upgrade path might consider newer platforms, but the i9-13900F's performance remains competitive, sitting within 1% of its nearest rivals.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a 5.60 GHz boost clock, representing the high end of Intel's 13th generation. The GPU is a Turing-generation workstation card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and RT/tensor core support.

The combined percentile ranking for this pairing is 79th, driven primarily by the CPU's 91st-percentile standing. The GPU's 67th percentile is above the median but not exceptional. This creates a build that is significantly stronger in CPU-bound tasks than GPU-bound tasks. The CPU's average benchmark score of 51,730 is more than twice the GPU's 21,629, highlighting the performance imbalance.

In terms of overall tier, this system sits in the upper-midrange. It is not a top-tier gaming or workstation configuration, but it offers substantial compute power for CPU-intensive applications. The 79th combined percentile means it outperforms roughly four out of five desktop configurations in the database, making it a solid choice for users who need heavy multithreaded processing. The GPU, while not top-tier, provides workstation features like ECC support (on the CPU), RT cores, tensor cores, and 16 GB VRAM that are valuable for professional applications.

The build class is desktop, indicating a traditional tower or workstation form factor. The CPU's 65W TDP and GPU's 230W TDP make thermal management straightforward with standard cooling solutions. This is a configuration that balances workstation-grade CPU performance with professional GPU features, albeit with the GPU being the weaker link.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the i9-13900F and Quadro RTX 5000 is pronounced. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile with an average benchmark score of 51,730, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile with an average score of 21,629. This means the GPU is the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads.

For gaming, the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,145 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,778 indicate it can handle game logic and physics calculations without issue. The bottleneck will be the GPU's ability to render frames. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 and G3D score of 15,616 suggest that at higher resolutions and detail settings, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates. The CPU will be waiting on the GPU to finish rendering, meaning frame rates will be dictated by the GPU's performance.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or code compilation, the bottleneck reverses. The GPU's compute capabilities (Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999) are sufficient for many tasks, but the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads will be the primary driver. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40,928 indicates the CPU can process rendering tasks far faster than the GPU can accelerate them via CUDA or OpenCL. In these scenarios, the GPU sits idle while the CPU does the heavy lifting.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this analysis. Since no measured FPS data exists, we rely on the benchmark scores. The GPU's average score is only 41.8% of the CPU's average score (21,629 / 51,730). For a balanced system, these scores would be closer. This imbalance means that in gaming, the GPU will cap performance well below what the CPU can support. In compute workloads, the CPU will dominate, and the GPU's contribution will be secondary.

The 79th combined percentile reflects this imbalance — the system's overall standing is pulled down by the GPU. Users seeking better gaming performance should prioritize a GPU upgrade. Users focused on CPU compute will find the i9-13900F delivers excellent performance, and the Quadro RTX 5000's 16 GB VRAM and workstation features provide adequate support for GPU-accelerated tasks without being the primary bottleneck.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds