SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Core i9-13900F presents a stark contrast in compute capability when paired with the Quadro RTX 4000. The CPU's benchmark results place it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51730, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile with an average score of 17789. This 30-point percentile gap indicates that the processor is capable of far more work than the graphics card can feed or process in most graphics-bound scenarios.

The 3DMark thread-scaling data reveals the CPU's behavior under varying load. Single-thread performance scores 1145, while doubling to two threads reaches 2265, nearly perfect linear scaling. Four threads hit 4393, eight threads reach 7426, and sixteen threads achieve 9957. The maximum thread score of 13985 shows that scaling efficiency diminishes beyond sixteen threads, which is typical for a hybrid architecture with both performance and efficiency cores. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 against a single-core score of 5778 demonstrates that the chip thrives in heavily parallel workloads, but the single-thread results remain strong enough for everyday responsiveness.

The bottleneck analysis hinges on workload type. In CPU-bound tasks such as data compression (PassMark score 635147), encryption (38214), and integer math (188022), the i9-13900F operates near its full potential, and the Quadro RTX 4000 is largely irrelevant. Conversely, in graphics-bound scenarios — gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering — the RTX 4000's 61st percentile position will cap frame rates and render times well before the CPU's 91st percentile becomes a limiting factor. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6176 versus the CPU's multithread score of 49693 further illustrates this disparity; the GPU is not the compute powerhouse in this pairing.

The FPS scaling picture is incomplete because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, the benchmark scores imply that at lower resolutions and settings, the GPU will be the bottleneck in gaming workloads, while at higher resolutions, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced. For productivity tasks like video encoding or software compilation, the CPU will dominate the workload, and the GPU will sit mostly idle. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this imbalance — a very strong processor held back by a mid-tier workstation GPU.

---

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900F a high-performance desktop processor?

A: Yes. It ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51730. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and Geekbench multicore score of 19680 place it firmly in the high-end desktop segment.

Q: How does the i9-13900F compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The data shows them as near-equals. The Ryzen 9 5950X has an average score of 51947, which is 0.4% higher than the i9-13900F's 51730. This difference is within measurement noise.

Q: Does the Quadro RTX 4000 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes. The GPU includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, built on the Turing architecture. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), indicating ray tracing and mesh shader capabilities.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Quadro RTX 4000?

A: It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1625 MHz, which translates to 13 Gbps effective.

Q: Can the i9-13900F use ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the power requirement for the Quadro RTX 4000?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 160 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU rating is 450 W.

Q: Is the Quadro RTX 4000 still in production?

A: No. The production status is listed as end-of-life, with a release date of November 12, 2018. Its predecessor was Quadro Volta, and its successor is Workstation Ampere.

---

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13900F delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is the standout figure, supported by a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 17189 and a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4125. The Geekbench multicore result of 19680 corroborates these findings. In single-thread tests, the CPU scores 5778 in Cinebench R23, 2426 in R20, and 582 in R15, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2533 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1145.

The PassMark suite reveals specialized strengths. Data compression scores 635147, floating-point math reaches 131007, and integer math hits 188022. Extended instructions score 36525, while random string sorting achieves 70441. Data encryption posts 38214, and physics simulation scores 2766. The multithread score of 49693 and single-thread score of 4406 place the CPU in the 91st percentile overall, with an average benchmark score of 51730. Relative to rivals, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51947 (0.4% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (0.7% higher), the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121 (0.7% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51310 (0.8% lower).

The Quadro RTX 4000's benchmark results are more modest. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1873. Geekbench OpenCL reaches 74540, and Vulkan scores 78844. The PassMark G3D score is 15117, with G2D at 846. DirectX 12 performance scores 52, DirectX 11 scores 128, DirectX 10 scores 108, and DirectX 9 scores 205. GPU compute via PassMark scores 6176. These results place the GPU in the 61st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 17789. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17666 (0.7% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 at 17639 (0.9% higher), the AMD Radeon 780M at 17588 (1.1% higher), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17551 (1.4% higher).

The combined picture is a desktop system at the 76th percentile overall. The CPU vastly outperforms the GPU in raw compute terms — the PassMark multithread score of 49693 dwarfs the GPU's compute score of 6176 — which means this pairing is CPU-dominant for non-graphics tasks. For graphics workloads, the GPU's 61st percentile will be the limiting factor.

---

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who need maximum CPU throughput for professional workloads while requiring workstation-grade graphics reliability. The i9-13900F's 91st percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running complex simulations, and researchers performing numerical analysis. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928, handle heavily parallel compute tasks with ease.

Content creators working in video editing will benefit from the CPU's passmark data compression score of 635147 and floating-point math score of 131007. The Quadro RTX 4000, while not top-tier, provides certified drivers and 8 GB of VRAM that suit professional 3D modeling and CAD applications. Gamers seeking high-refresh-rate 1080p or 1440p play will find the CPU capable of pushing high frame rates, though the GPU will limit performance in demanding titles. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the CPU's multithread capabilities for compilation and simulation, while the GPU handles visualization tasks. Small business workstations running database applications or financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's strong integer math score of 188022 and encryption score of 38214.

The launch MSRP of the CPU is $524, and the GPU launched at 899 USD. This is not a cost-optimized build; it prioritizes CPU compute power with a competent workstation GPU.

---

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-S, uses a hybrid design that combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the core distribution. The die size is 257 mm², and the processor uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support enabled. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The TDP is rated at 65 W, and the processor is unlocked — the multiplier is not locked, allowing overclocking.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark results show a progression from 1145 single-thread to 2265 two-thread, 4393 four-thread, 7426 eight-thread, 9957 sixteen-thread, and 13985 max-thread. This scaling indicates efficient use of available cores up to sixteen threads, with diminishing returns beyond that point. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is nearly seven times the single-core score of 5778, which is strong scaling for a hybrid architecture.

Real-world implications are significant. The PassMark data encryption score of 38214 suggests strong AES performance for secure communications and VPN workloads. The extended instructions score of 36525 indicates robust SIMD processing for scientific computing. The find prime numbers score of 204 is low relative to other tests, but this is a single-threaded test that does not leverage the CPU's core count. The floating-point math score of 131007 and integer math score of 188022 demonstrate balanced ALU and FPU performance, suitable for both financial modeling and engineering simulation.

---

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 5778 in Cinebench R23 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 can feed high frame rates, but the GPU's 61st percentile position will cap performance. Expect the Quadro RTX 4000 to be the bottleneck in most titles, limiting frame rates to what an 8 GB, 416.0 GB/s memory configuration can sustain.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by the 3DMark max-thread score of 13985 and PassMark multithread score of 49693, handle x264 encoding alongside gaming without significant frame drops. The GPU's lack of a dedicated NVENC encoder specification in the FACT PACK means CPU-based encoding is the safer path.

Video editing: The PassMark data compression score of 635147 and floating-point math score of 131007 suggest strong performance in codec processing and effect rendering. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate timeline preview and GPU-accelerated effects, though the 61st percentile GPU score indicates it is not a top-tier editor.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar applications will be extremely fast, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 being a direct indicator. GPU rendering with the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be slower than the CPU for most scenes, given the GPU's lower relative percentile.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 3DMark 16-thread score of 9957 and the PassMark integer math score of 188022. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking means build times will be significantly shorter than on average hardware. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers.

Student and office work: For documentation, spreadsheets, and web applications, the CPU's single-thread score of 4406 in PassMark is more than sufficient. The GPU's G2D score of 846 handles 2D desktop acceleration competently. This is an overpowered configuration for basic office tasks, but it ensures no slowdowns under heavy multitasking.

---

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. The dual-channel memory bus means two DIMMs are optimal for bandwidth. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes, which supports modern NVMe SSDs and high-end GPUs, though the Quadro RTX 4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 and will not saturate the available bandwidth.

The TDP of 65 W for the CPU and 160 W for the GPU suggests a total system power draw that fits within the GPU's suggested PSU rating of 450 W, though a higher-wattage PSU would provide headroom for overclocking or additional drives. The CPU's boost clock of 5.60 GHz and unlocked multiplier allow for tuning, but the 65 W TDP may limit sustained all-core overclocks without adequate cooling.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-performing GPU. The current Quadro RTX 4000 sits at the 61st percentile, while the CPU is at the 91st percentile. Upgrading to a GPU in a higher percentile bracket would balance the system for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure forward compatibility with future GPUs, though the current GPU's PCIe 3.0 interface will not bottleneck a modern replacement. The Socket 1700 platform does not offer a CPU upgrade path beyond 13th-generation parts, so future CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change.

---

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900F, a 13th-generation Raptor Lake processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, a Turing-architecture workstation GPU. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread part with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while the GPU provides 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth. The system ranks in the 76th percentile overall, reflecting a strong CPU paired with a mid-tier GPU.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51730 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 17789 places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 76 indicates that the system is above average, but the GPU drags down the overall ranking. For CPU-intensive workloads, this build is excellent; for graphics-intensive workloads, it is adequate but not exceptional. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, while the CPU is active, suggesting the GPU is the older component in this pairing.

---

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the CPU's single-thread performance — a 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4406 — the i9-13900F is capable of driving high frame rates in most games. The GPU, however, will be the limiting factor. The Quadro RTX 4000's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and DirectX 12 score of 52 indicate modest gaming performance relative to modern gaming GPUs. Its nearest rival is the GeForce RTX 4060, which scores 17639 on average, only 0.9% higher, suggesting the RTX 4000 is roughly on par with that GPU in synthetic benchmarks.

At 1080p, expect playable frame rates in most titles, with the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth being sufficient for high textures. At 1440p, frame rates will drop noticeably, and at 4K, the GPU will struggle with demanding titles. The RT cores support ray tracing, but the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits ray-traced workloads. Competitive esports titles running at low settings will see the highest frame rates, while AAA single-player games at ultra settings will require reduced resolutions or graphics presets to maintain smooth play. These are estimates; actual performance varies by game and driver optimization.

---

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a Turing-architecture workstation GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process node. The chip, codenamed TU104, contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1005 MHz and a boost clock of 1545 MHz. Memory runs at 1625 MHz, providing 13 Gbps effective data rate across 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute configuration includes 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU features 36 RT cores for ray tracing and 288 tensor cores for AI acceleration. Pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 14.24 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The TDP is 160 W, requiring a single 8-pin power connector, and the card occupies a single slot with a length of 241 mm (9.5 inches) and height of 111 mm (4.4 inches). Display outputs include 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C.

Benchmark results show a GPU performing at the 61st percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 is modest, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 74540 and 78844, respectively, indicate reasonable compute throughput. PassMark G3D scores 15117, but DirectX 12 performance is weak at 52, suggesting poor optimization for modern graphics APIs. The GPU compute score of 6176 is low compared to the CPU's compute capabilities, reinforcing that this GPU is not a compute powerhouse. For rendering workloads, the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 and 14.24 TFLOPS FP16 provide adequate performance for professional 3D applications, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity in high-resolution rendering. The tensor cores support AI-accelerated features like denoising, and RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, though the modest FP32 throughput will constrain ray-traced performance.