SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050: Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines a 24-core, 32-thread Intel desktop processor with an entry-level NVIDIA GeForce 50-series GPU, creating a system with a stark performance skew. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 66th percentile, indicating a build where compute-heavy workloads will vastly outperform graphics-intensive tasks. The Core i9-13900F, with its 65W TDP and Raptor Lake architecture, delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance, while the RTX 5050, built on Blackwell 2.0 with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, provides adequate but not exceptional graphics capability. This is a desktop-class build with a combined percentile rank of 79, meaning it outperforms roughly four out of five systems in the benchmark database.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is not optimized for high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. The RTX 5050's PassMark G3D score of 17326 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (which scores 20713, a 1.6% delta), indicating mid-range 1080p performance. For 144Hz or 240Hz displays, the GPU will likely be the limiting factor, especially in newer titles where the 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth may prove restrictive. The CPU's single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark, however, ensures minimal bottleneck at the processor level for frame pacing.

Streaming: The i9-13900F's 32 threads provide substantial headroom for encoding while gaming. With a PassMark multithread score of 49693 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928, the CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets alongside game logic. The RTX 5050's 80 tensor cores and 20 RT cores support NVENC-based encoding, though the GPU's overall compute throughput (13.17 TFLOPS FP32) is modest. Streamers targeting 1080p60 output will find this adequate, but 1440p streaming may strain the GPU during gameplay.

Video Editing: Multi-track timelines in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU's massive parallel throughput. The Geekbench multicore score of 19680 and 3DMark max-thread score of 13985 indicate strong rendering capability for exports and effects processing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing timelines, but 4K projects with heavy color grading may exceed its capacity. The PassMark data compression score of 635147 suggests efficient handling of codec-heavy workflows.

3D Rendering: This is the build's strongest workload category. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 17189 and R15 multicore score of 4125 place it in the top tier for CPU-based rendering in Blender or Maya. The GPU, with an OpenCL score of 90334 and Vulkan score of 89381, can accelerate viewport rendering, but its 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance means GPU-render farms would favor other cards. For single-system rendering, the CPU will dominate the workload.

Software Development: Compilation and code analysis tasks will be exceptionally fast. The PassMark integer math score of 188022 and extended instructions score of 36525 indicate rapid handling of build pipelines and unit tests. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache reduce memory latency for iterative compile cycles. The GPU's role here is minimal, making this pairing suitable for developers who occasionally game or use GPU-accelerated libraries.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively overprovisioned for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2265 and single-thread score of 1145 ensure snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The GPU's PassMark G2D score of 1113 supports smooth 2D rendering for productivity suites. Students or office workers would pay for far more compute than typical workflows require, though the system will never feel sluggish.

FAQ

Q: Is the Core i9-13900F a good match for the RTX 5050?

A: The data shows a significant imbalance. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This means the processor can handle far more graphics work than the RTX 5050 can deliver, creating a CPU-heavy system where many gaming scenarios will be GPU-limited.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5050 have and is it enough?

A: The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. For modern games at 1080p ultra settings, this is workable but can be limiting in titles with large texture packs. At higher resolutions, the VRAM capacity may force texture quality reductions.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 79, meaning this system outperforms 79% of all tracked builds in the database. This is lower than the CPU's individual 91st percentile because the GPU's 66th percentile drags the overall score down.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), and the processor has a fixed base clock of 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Users cannot manually overclock this chip beyond its factory turbo behavior.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i9-13900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported, which is useful for workstation-style applications where data integrity is critical.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 21035 is within 1.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713), 0.6% below the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153), and 1.6% below the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379). This places it squarely in the mid-range graphics tier.

Q: What is the power requirement for this GPU?

A: The RTX 5050 has a TDP of 130 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU rating is 300 W, which is modest for a desktop system with a high-core-count CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. The i9-13900F's average benchmark score of 51730 places it just 0.4% below the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (51947) and 0.8% above the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T (51310). In contrast, the RTX 5050's average score of 21035 is roughly 1.6% below the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713) and 1.6% above it depending on the comparison. This creates a situation where the CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them.

In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. The RTX 5050's 32 ROPs and 80 TMUs, combined with its 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, limit pixel and texture throughput. Even with the CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1145), frame rates will cap at whatever the GPU can produce. The PassMark physics score of 2766 and DirectX 12 score of 66 confirm that the GPU is not built for high-end gaming physics or modern API-heavy titles.

In compute workloads, the CPU dominates. The PassMark multithread score of 49693 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 show that the CPU can process threads at a rate the GPU cannot match for general-purpose computation. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 9184 is respectable for its class, but it is not in the same league as the CPU's parallel processing capability. For tasks like video encoding, the CPU's 32 threads will handle the bulk of the work, with the GPU providing minor acceleration.

Memory bandwidth is another balancing factor. The GPU's 320.0 GB/s bandwidth is moderate for 2025, while the CPU supports dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory with no specified bandwidth limit in the data. In practice, the CPU's memory subsystem will not bottleneck the GPU's frame delivery, but the GPU's bandwidth may limit texture streaming in open-world games.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over gaming performance. The 91st percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for professionals in 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation. Developers working with large codebases will benefit from the 188022 PassMark integer math score, while data scientists using Python or R will appreciate the 131007 floating-point math score. The ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation-class applications.

Gamers who play at 1080p with medium-to-high settings, rather than ultra, will find this build workable. The RTX 5050's 66th percentile GPU ranking suggests it can handle esports titles and older AAA games at playable frame rates. However, gamers seeking 1440p or 4K performance should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-resolution, high-detail gaming.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications—like After Effects, Premiere Pro, or Cinema 4D—will see excellent performance. The PassMark data encryption score of 38214 and random string sorting score of 70441 indicate strong performance in data-heavy workflows. Video editors working with 1080p or light 4K footage will find the system responsive, though GPU-accelerated effects may be slower than on systems with higher-tier GPUs.

Small business workstations that run virtualization, database servers, or financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's 32 threads. The PassMark data compression score of 635147 suggests fast database operations. The GPU's role in such environments is minimal, but its presence enables CUDA-accelerated applications if needed.

Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the system overkill for coursework but capable of running simulations, compiling large projects, and handling GPU-accelerated research workloads. Office users will experience no lag in productivity applications, though the system's performance is far beyond what such tasks require.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. As such, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17326 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 provide a baseline for expectations.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 5050 is likely to deliver playable frame rates in esports titles like CS2, Valorant, and Rocket League, where the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1145) can push frame rates above 144 FPS. For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, the GPU's 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB VRAM will likely cap performance at 40-60 FPS on ultra, requiring settings reductions to hit 60 FPS consistently.

At 1440p, the GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors. Texture streaming and high-resolution assets will strain the 8 GB VRAM, leading to potential stuttering or texture pop-in. Frame rates at 1440p ultra are estimated to drop by 30-40% compared to 1080p, placing many modern titles in the 30-50 FPS range. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (which scores 1.6% higher), is known for similar 1440p limitations.

At 4K, this system is not recommended for gaming. The GPU's pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s are insufficient for 4K ultra settings in most titles. Even with DLSS or FSR upscaling, the 8 GB VRAM will likely exceed capacity in modern games at 4K, causing significant performance degradation. The CPU's power is irrelevant at this resolution since the GPU becomes the sole bottleneck.

Ray tracing performance will be limited by the 20 RT cores and 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. Titles with heavy ray-traced effects will see substantial frame rate drops, and the 8 GB VRAM may be insufficient for ray-traced textures at higher resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, housing 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die. The chip, designated GB207, operates at a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz, with memory clocked at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest for the 50-series generation.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, yielding a pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 13.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 13.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration. The 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores provide ray tracing and AI acceleration, but their throughput is limited by the overall chip size.

Benchmark results show the RTX 5050's strengths and weaknesses. The PassMark G3D score of 17326 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334 are respectable for a 66th-percentile GPU. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 66 and DirectX 11 score of 150 indicate that modern API workloads are not this card's forte. The Vulkan score of 89381 is slightly lower than OpenCL, suggesting better compute performance than graphics-specific tasks.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (avg score 20713, 1.6% higher), AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, 0.6% higher), and AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237, 1.0% higher) all outperform it slightly. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379, 1.6% higher) also edges it out. This places the RTX 5050 at the lower end of the mid-range graphics spectrum, suitable for 1080p gaming and light GPU compute.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 is adequate for basic 3D viewport acceleration but will lag in GPU-based renderers like Octane or Redshift. The 80 tensor cores support DLSS and AI-based features, which can improve gaming frame rates at the cost of image quality.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It features a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 65W TDP that is notably low for a 24-core chip. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, along with ECC memory for reliability.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache. This large cache allocation helps reduce memory latency in multi-threaded workloads. PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage. The processor was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $524, and it remains in active production.

Benchmark results demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and R20 multicore score of 17189 place it in the top tier of desktop processors. The 3DMark max-thread score of 13985 and PassMark multithread score of 49693 reinforce this. Single-thread performance is also strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 5778 and Geekbench single-core at 2533, though the 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 is less impressive.

The CPU's nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (avg score 51947, 0.4% higher), Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52073, 0.7% higher), and AMD EPYC 8124P (52121, 0.7% higher) all perform within 1% of the i9-13900F's average score of 51730. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T (51310, 0.8% lower) trails slightly. This indicates that the i9-13900F remains competitive despite being a previous-generation part.

For real workloads, the CPU excels in compilation, rendering, and data processing. The PassMark integer math score of 188022 and floating-point math score of 131007 suggest excellent scientific computing capability. The data encryption score of 38214 and extended instructions score of 36525 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance. The find prime numbers score of 204 is a weak point, suggesting slower integer-heavy algorithms.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs a 13th-generation Intel Core i9 processor with a 50-series NVIDIA GeForce GPU, creating a system skewed heavily toward CPU-centric workloads. The i9-13900F's 91st-percentile CPU ranking and the RTX 5050's 66th-percentile GPU ranking produce a combined percentile of 79, indicating a system that outperforms most builds but is not top-tier overall.

The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with its 5.60 GHz boost clock, make it a powerhouse for multi-threaded applications. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p gaming and light creative work but will struggle with higher resolutions or demanding graphics tasks. The 65W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP keep power requirements moderate, with a suggested PSU rating of 300W.

This pairing is best understood as a workstation-class CPU with a mainstream GPU bolted on. Users who need maximum CPU throughput for rendering, compilation, or virtualization will find the i9-13900F exceptional, while the RTX 5050 provides basic graphics capability for everyday use and light gaming. The system is not balanced for gaming, where the GPU will consistently be the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 51730, placing it in the 91st percentile of all processors. Its best scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 40928, PassMark multithread at 49693, and Geekbench multicore at 19680. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21035, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with top scores of 90334 in Geekbench OpenCL and 17326 in PassMark G3D.

The combined percentile of 79 reflects the CPU's dominance in the pairing. The nearest CPU rivals perform within 1%: the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51947 (-0.4% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (-0.7% delta), and the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121 (-0.7% delta). The GPU's nearest rivals are similarly close, with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at 21153 (-0.6% delta) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile at 21379 (-1.6% delta).

The overall picture is a system with exceptional CPU compute capability and modest GPU performance. The i9-13900F's 40928 Cinebench R23 multicore score indicates it can handle the most demanding rendering and encoding workloads, while the RTX 5050's 2502 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score shows it is suited for entry-level gaming and basic GPU-accelerated tasks. The data confirms that this build is optimized for CPU-bound workflows, with gaming and GPU rendering as secondary considerations.