SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F anchors this desktop build with a 24-core, 32-thread configuration running on the Raptor Lake architecture. This is a hybrid design, though the FACT PACK does not specify the P-core/E-core split; what matters is the aggregate throughput. The processor clocks from a 2000.00 MHz base to a 5600 MHz boost, which explains its strong single-thread showing. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache, paired with 2 MB L2 per core and 80 KB L1 per core, provides substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 91st percentile among all processors. The average benchmark score of 51730 is remarkably close to its nearest rivals: the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51947 (a mere 0.4% difference), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (0.7% higher). The data suggests this is a mature, well-balanced part rather than a class leader. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it posts 40928 points, while single-core reaches 5778. The Geekbench multi-core score of 19680 and single-core of 2533 reinforce the picture of a processor that excels in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal how performance grows with thread count. From 2265 at 2 threads, it climbs to 4393 at 4 threads, 7426 at 8 threads, 9957 at 16 threads, and peaks at 13985 at max threads. The scaling is not perfectly linear — doubling from 8 to 16 threads yields a 34% increase, while going from 16 to max threads adds 40% — which indicates some diminishing returns as memory bandwidth and scheduler overhead become factors. Still, the absolute numbers are high. PassMark scores support this: integer math hits 188022, floating-point math reaches 131007, and multithreaded performance is 49693. Single-thread PassMark is 4406, which is competitive for everyday responsiveness.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, which gives builders flexibility but also means memory bandwidth can vary significantly depending on the chosen platform. ECC memory support is present, a feature that typically appeals to workstation users who need data integrity. The 65 W TDP is notable for a 24-core part — this is an F-series chip without integrated graphics, and the power envelope suggests Intel tuned it for efficiency rather than absolute peak clocks. The 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry, with a die size of 257 mm², is the physical basis for this performance. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is ample for a high-end GPU and a fast NVMe drive.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark and 5778 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for frame pacing in games that rely on one or two threads. The 91st percentile CPU standing means this processor will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, though the GPU will dictate ultimate frame rates.

Streaming: The 32 threads provide substantial headroom for encoding video while gaming simultaneously. PassMark data compression score of 635147 and data encryption of 38214 suggest the CPU can handle the background workloads of streaming software without stealing cycles from the game. The multi-threaded PassMark of 49693 confirms there is plenty of parallel muscle.

Video editing: Cinebench R20 multi-core of 17189 and R15 multi-core of 4125 indicate strong rendering performance for timeline previews and exports. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the 32 threads will accelerate effects processing that is optimized for multi-core CPUs. The Geekbench multi-core of 19680 places this firmly in content-creation territory.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 is the standout figure here. For CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D, this processor will complete frames quickly. The PassMark floating-point math score of 131007 shows strong FPU performance, which is directly relevant to 3D calculations.

Software development: The high thread count accelerates compilation of large codebases. PassMark integer math of 188022 and random string sorting of 70441 indicate fast handling of string manipulation and integer-heavy workloads, which are common in parsing, code generation, and build tools. The single-thread score of 4406 in PassMark ensures snappy IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical productivity tasks. The 2-thread 3DMark score of 2265 and single-thread Geekbench of 2533 mean spreadsheet calculations, document editing, and web browsing will feel instant. The 65 W TDP keeps power draw modest for all-day use, though the lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Core i9-13900F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: 51730 for the Intel part versus 51947 for the AMD part, a delta of only -0.4%. In practical terms, they are performance peers, with the Intel chip having a slight edge in some workloads and the AMD chip in others.

Q: What does the 91st percentile rating mean for this CPU?

A: It means the Core i9-13900F outperforms 91% of all CPUs in the benchmark database. It is a high-end desktop processor that sits comfortably above the mid-range, though it is not in the top tier of all-time performers.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so users cannot adjust the clock multiplier to push beyond stock speeds. The boost clock of 5.60 GHz is the maximum achievable.

Q: What memory types are compatible with this processor?

A: The Core i9-13900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. This gives builders the choice between using older, more affordable DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 modules with higher bandwidth potential.

Q: What is the significance of the 65 W TDP for a 24-core CPU?

A: The 65 W TDP is relatively low for a 24-core processor, suggesting Intel configured this chip for efficiency. This means it can be cooled with a capable air cooler and will not demand an extreme power supply, though peak power draw under full load may exceed the TDP figure.

Q: How well does this CPU handle heavily threaded workloads?

A: Exceptionally well. The PassMark multithread score is 49693, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 places it in the top tier for rendering and scientific computing. The 32 threads provide ample parallelism for most professional workloads.

Q: Does the lack of integrated graphics matter?

A: Yes, for troubleshooting. This is an F-series chip with no iGPU (integratedGraphics is null), so a discrete GPU is required for display output. If the discrete GPU fails, there is no fallback for video output.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is aimed at a specific user: someone who wants high-end desktop performance without chasing the absolute fastest parts available. The 91st percentile CPU and 81st percentile GPU combine for an 86th percentile overall build. Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolution will find this pairing capable, as the CPU's strong single-thread performance will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. The 32 threads are useful for gamers who also stream or record gameplay, since encoding can run on spare cores without compromising frame rates.

Content creators are the primary audience. Video editors working in 4K will appreciate the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 for rendering previews and final exports. 3D artists using CPU-based renderers will see fast iteration times. Software developers compiling large projects will benefit from the 32 threads and the PassMark integer math score of 188022. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find this overkill for coursework but future-proof for advanced projects. Small business workstations handling data processing — the PassMark data compression score of 635147 is relevant here — will run without complaint.

The lack of integrated graphics means this is not a build for office workers who only need email and spreadsheets; those users would be paying for performance they never utilize. Instead, this targets users who push their systems daily with demanding applications. The 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP mean the system can be built in a compact desktop chassis with a 550 W power supply, which the GPU's suggested PSU rating recommends.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51730 places it in the 91st percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 51947 with a delta of -0.4%, meaning the i9-13900F is essentially tied with a previous-generation flagship. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (0.7% higher), and the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121 (0.7% higher), while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51310 (0.8% lower). This clustering around the 51k-52k mark suggests the i9-13900F is in a sweet spot of performance that many other high-end parts also occupy.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, has an average benchmark score of 37648 and sits in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at 37628 (0.1% higher), followed by the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 37507 (0.4% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile at 38135 (1.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 at 37157 (1.3% higher). The RTX 4070 is thus a solid mid-high-range GPU, but it is not a top-tier performer — the delta to the RTX 4080 Mobile, which is a laptop part, is only 1.3%, indicating the 4070 desktop is closely matched to a mobile flagship.

The combined percentile for this build is 86. This means the pairing outperforms 86% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its class (91st vs 81st percentile), suggesting the processor has more headroom than the GPU. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3854, and in Geekbench Vulkan it reaches 174152. The PassMark G3D score is 26927, with a GPU compute score of 14720.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD104 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². This is a modern, efficient design. The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. It includes 46 RT cores for ray tracing and 184 tensor cores for AI acceleration, making it a capable card for both real-time ray tracing and DLSS-based upscaling.

Memory configuration is 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The memory clock is 1313 MHz, translating to 21 Gbps effective. This is sufficient for 1440p gaming and most 4K titles, though the 192-bit bus is narrower than higher-end cards, which may limit performance in memory-bandwidth-intensive scenarios. The GPU clocks at 1920 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost, which is a healthy boost target.

Compute performance is quantified at 29.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), meaning the card does not have special FP16 acceleration. Pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s. These figures indicate strong rasterization throughput. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the tensor cores support DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported games. The card uses 200 W TDP and requires a 550 W power supply. It is a dual-slot card, 240 mm long (9.4 inches), 110 mm tall (4.3 inches), and 40 mm wide (1.6 inches), with a single 16-pin power connector.

The GPU's benchmark scores tell a story of solid mid-range performance. The PassMark G3D score of 26927 and GPU compute of 14720 indicate good general compute capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 154858 and Vulkan score of 174152 show strong API-specific performance. However, the GPU is only in the 81st percentile, meaning roughly one in five GPUs outperforms it. This is not a flagship card; it is a competent upper-mid-range offering.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates an asymmetric pairing. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile, while the GPU sits in the 81st percentile. This means the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU when compared to their respective peers. In gaming workloads, this typically results in the GPU being the limiting factor — the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. For a user seeking maximum frame rates, the RTX 4070 will cap performance before the i9-13900F does.

However, this imbalance is not necessarily a problem. In productivity workloads like 3D rendering, video editing, and software compilation, the CPU is the primary workhorse, and here the i9-13900F's 91st percentile standing ensures it will handle these tasks admirably. The GPU's 81st percentile is still strong for GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding and effects processing, but it will not match the CPU's relative capability.

The combined percentile of 86 reflects this balance: the build is better than the GPU alone would suggest, but not as good as the CPU alone would imply. The FPS scaling in games will follow the GPU's performance curve, meaning users should expect frame rates typical of an 81st-percentile GPU. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as high-frequency simulation games or heavy physics — the CPU's headroom will be visible. In GPU-bound scenarios — most modern AAA titles at high resolutions — the GPU will set the pace.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP mean the total system power draw is manageable, and the 550 W suggested PSU provides sufficient headroom. There is no evidence of a thermal bottleneck between the two components, as the CPU's low TDP allows for smaller coolers.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. The CPU is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake part, released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $524. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card, released on 2023-04-11 with a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The GPU is marked as end-of-life in the production status, with the GeForce 50-series as its successor.

The combined build percentile of 86 places this system in the upper echelon of desktop configurations. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 81st percentile indicate a high-end CPU paired with a solid mid-high-end GPU. This is not a budget build, nor is it an extreme enthusiast build; it is a well-rounded system for users who need substantial compute power without paying for the absolute fastest components.

The CPU's launch MSRP of $524 and the GPU's launch MSRP of 599 USD suggest this is a premium pairing, though the data does not speculate on current street prices. The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary system intended for home or office use. The production status of the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, which may affect availability.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data does not include any measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. These estimates should be treated as approximations, not definitive measurements.

Given the GPU's 81st percentile standing and its performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (score 3854), the RTX 4070 is expected to deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, with playable 4K performance in less demanding games. The PassMark G3D score of 26927 supports this assessment. The CPU's single-thread performance — 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 5778 — ensures that the processor will not hold the GPU back in CPU-light games.

At 1080p, where CPU performance often matters more, the i9-13900F's strong single-core scores will enable high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in esports titles. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a factor, and the 12 GB VRAM with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth will handle most games at high or ultra settings. At 4K, the GPU's 81st percentile suggests users may need to adjust settings to medium or high in demanding titles to maintain 60 FPS. The RT cores and tensor cores provide headroom for ray tracing and DLSS, which can offset the GPU's mid-range standing in supported games.

The lack of measured FPS data means these are qualitative expectations. Users should consult specific game benchmarks for this GPU to get precise figures, but the overall picture is of a system capable of smooth high-refresh gaming at 1440p, with 4K gaming possible with settings adjustments.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, giving builders the option to use either memory type. The platform provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a modern GPU and a Gen 5 NVMe SSD, though the RTX 4070 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, which is modest for a 24-core part. This means the existing cooling solution and power supply have headroom. The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, and the total system power draw will be well within that figure, leaving room for additional drives or peripherals. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, so builders need to ensure their power supply has the appropriate cable or adapter.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means an upgrade could involve moving to a newer DDR5 platform, but that would require a motherboard change. The CPU itself is near the top of the 13th-generation lineup, so a CPU upgrade within the same socket would only yield marginal gains — the i9-13900F is already at the high end. The more sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as the RTX 4070 is in the 81st percentile while the CPU is in the 91st. A future GPU upgrade would better balance the system and unlock the CPU's full gaming potential.

The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a future GPU using Gen 5 would be backward compatible, though it would run at Gen 4 speeds unless the motherboard supports Gen 5. The 20 CPU lanes are adequate for one GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The ECC memory support is a niche feature that adds value for workstation use cases. The production status of the CPU is active, meaning it is still available for new builds, while the GPU is end-of-life, suggesting buyers should look for remaining stock or consider the successor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds