SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz and boosts up to 5.60 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. This is a locked multiplier part (no overclocking headroom), but the high boost clock compensates for that limitation in most workloads. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports the processor's ability to handle large working sets without constantly hitting memory.

The benchmark results paint a clear picture of a multi-threaded powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, the i9-13900F scores 40,928 in multicore and 5,778 in single-core. The multicore score is roughly 7x the single-core score, indicating excellent scaling across the 32 threads. This is a processor that thrives in heavily parallel workloads—rendering, video encoding, compilation—where the full thread count is utilized. The 3DMark multi-threaded scores reinforce this: 9,957 with 16 threads, 13,985 with max threads, but only 1,145 in single-thread and 2,265 with 2 threads. The scaling from 2 to 16 threads is nearly linear (2,265 to 9,957 is about 4.4x with 8x the threads), suggesting efficient thread scheduling and minimal contention.

In Geekbench, the multicore score of 19,680 versus single-core of 2,533 shows a ratio of about 7.8x, again confirming excellent parallel scaling. PassMark results are equally telling: integer math scores 188,022, floating-point math 131,007, and extended instructions (SIMD) 36,525. Data compression hits 635,147 and encryption 38,214, both indicating strong throughput for data-intensive tasks. The multithread score of 49,693 places this CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 91% of processors in the database.

The nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51,947 (0.4% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52,073 (0.7% higher), and the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52,121 (0.7% higher). The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51,310, which is 0.8% lower than the i9-13900F's average score of 51,730. These deltas are minuscule—essentially within noise—placing the i9-13900F in a dead heat with these four rivals. For real workloads, this means the i9-13900F is not the absolute fastest, but it trades blows with the best of the previous generation and some current generation parts.

The single-thread performance is also solid: Cinebench R15 single-core at 582, R20 at 2,426, and R23 at 5,778. Geekbench single-core at 2,533 and PassMark single-thread at 4,406 indicate that the 5.6 GHz boost clock delivers on its promise for lightly threaded workloads like gaming, web browsing, and office productivity. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,265 is relevant for older games that rely on two threads; it shows the CPU won't be a bottleneck there.

# FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i9-13900F?

A: The processor has 24 cores and 32 threads, using a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores (though the FACT PACK only lists the totals, not the split).

Q: How does the i9-13900F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in average benchmark score?

A: The i9-13900F averages 51,730, while the Ryzen 9 5950X averages 51,947, a difference of only 0.4%—making them essentially equal in performance.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of this CPU?

A: The maximum boost clock is 5.60 GHz, which helps achieve strong single-thread performance scores like 5,778 in Cinebench R23.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, which is notable for workstation or server-adjacent builds where data integrity is critical.

Q: What socket does the i9-13900F use?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th and 13th generation Intel Core processors.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP is $524.

Q: What is the TDP of the i9-13900F?

A: The TDP is 65 W, which is surprisingly low for a 24-core processor, suggesting efficient power management when not under full load.

Q: How does the i9-13900F perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: It scores 5,778 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4,406 in PassMark single-thread, placing it well within range of the fastest consumer CPUs for lightly threaded work.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so manual overclocking is not supported; however, the factory boost clock of 5.60 GHz is already high.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture of the Intel Core i9-13900F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is one of a high-end CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 76. This tells us that the CPU is the stronger component in absolute terms—it is a top-tier processor, while the GPU is a respectable but not exceptional mid-range card.

For the CPU, the defining score is the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 40,928, which is a figure that puts it ahead of virtually all consumer processors from previous generations. The PassMark multithread score of 49,693 and Geekbench multicore of 19,680 corroborate this. In single-threaded work, the CPU is also strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 5,778 and PassMark single-thread at 4,406. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,145 is lower in absolute terms but follows the same pattern—this is a CPU that wins on raw throughput.

The GPU's benchmark scores are more modest. The PassMark G3D score is 19,545, which places it in the 61st percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,302, indicating solid but not spectacular DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL scores 95,057 and Vulkan 48,643, showing that the GPU is better at compute tasks (OpenCL) than graphics (Vulkan), which is typical for NVIDIA cards. PassMark DirectX scores are: DX9 at 236, DX11 at 175, DX12 at 76, and DX10 at 103. The low DX12 score relative to DX9 is notable—it suggests that the GPU may be held back by its 8 GB VRAM or 128-bit memory bus in modern titles, though the score itself is a synthetic benchmark and not a direct FPS measurement.

Crucially, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. All performance discussions regarding gaming must be inferred from the benchmark scores, and any FPS figures are estimates, not measurements. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 61st percentile suggest that in gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor at high resolutions, while the CPU can easily feed frames at lower resolutions.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i9-13900F and RTX 4060 is asymmetrical. The CPU is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile. This creates a scenario where the CPU has far more headroom than the GPU in most workloads. In CPU-bound tasks like video encoding (Cinebench R23 multicore 40,928), 3D rendering, or software compilation, the i9-13900F will perform at its full potential. The GPU's compute score of 9,213 in PassMark GPU Compute is modest, and its FP32 throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS is respectable but far from the top tier.

For gaming, the bottleneck is the GPU. The RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are entry-level for modern AAA titles at 1440p or 4K. The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4,406) is more than sufficient to drive high frame rates at 1080p, but the GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 76 suggests it will struggle to maintain high FPS in the most demanding DX12 titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,302 is a baseline for DX12 performance; it indicates the GPU can handle 1080p gaming but will not push high refresh rates in demanding titles without dropping settings.

The FPS scaling story is one of GPU limitation. At 1080p, the CPU can likely push well over 144 FPS in esports titles, but the GPU will cap that at around 100-120 FPS depending on the game. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and at 4K, the 8 GB VRAM will be a severe constraint. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads are overkill for gaming alone, but they provide headroom for streaming, recording, or running background tasks while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 635,147 and encryption score of 38,214 mean the CPU can handle game capture and streaming encoding without dropping frame rates.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU versus the 115 W TDP of the GPU means the system's power draw is manageable, and the suggested PSU of 300 W is more than sufficient for this pairing, leaving headroom for other components.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD107 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die is small at 159 mm² but packs 18,900 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². This is a modern, efficient design. The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. It also features 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which are the dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads like DLSS. The base clock is 1,830 MHz, boosting to 2,460 MHz, and memory runs at 2,125 MHz (17 Gbps effective).

The memory configuration is the most significant limitation. The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. This is low for a modern GPU—it is half the bus width of higher-tier cards like the RTX 4070. In rendering workloads, this bandwidth constraint will show up in texture-heavy scenes or at high resolutions. The FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS is solid for compute tasks, and the FP16 performance is identical at 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is good for AI inference but not exceptional. The pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s, both of which are mid-range figures.

The benchmark scores reflect this positioning. The PassMark G3D score of 19,545 and average benchmark score of 17,639 place the GPU in the 61st percentile. The nearest rivals are interesting: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (a GPU from 2013) scores 17,666, which is 0.2% higher; the AMD Radeon 780M (an integrated GPU) scores 17,588, which is 0.3% lower; and two AMD Radeon Pro mobile GPUs (560 and 460) score 17,551 and 17,509, which are 0.5% and 0.7% lower, respectively. This means the RTX 4060 is performing at a level comparable to a decade-old desktop GPU and a modern integrated GPU in synthetic benchmarks—a sobering comparison that highlights how far integrated graphics have come, but also that the RTX 4060's raw compute is not its selling point.

The GPU's strengths lie in its modern feature set. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 mean it is fully compatible with current and future game engines. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores enable ray tracing and DLSS, which are absent from the older rivals. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95,057 is significantly higher than the Vulkan score of 48,643, suggesting that compute workloads (like rendering in Blender or physics simulation) will be more efficient than pure graphics. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 9,213 is about half the G3D score, indicating that compute is not this GPU's forte.

For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM is a hard cap. Large scenes or high-resolution textures will exceed this, forcing the user to reduce quality or use GPU memory optimizations. The 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming but will throttle performance at 1440p in memory-intensive titles.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. This is a significant advantage for upgrade flexibility—users can choose to keep older DDR4 modules or invest in newer DDR5. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which means it can accommodate the fastest NVMe SSDs and GPUs available. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a reduced lane count compared to the full x16; this is a potential bottleneck for the GPU's data transfer, though the bandwidth of PCIe 4.0 x8 is generally sufficient for mid-range cards.

The power requirements are modest. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 115 W. The suggested PSU is 300 W, which is low by modern standards—most gaming systems require 500-600 W, but this pairing can run on a smaller unit, making it suitable for compact builds or office environments with limited power delivery. The GPU requires a single 12-pin power connector, and it is a dual-slot card measuring 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

The upgrade path from this platform is limited. Since the i9-13900F is the top-tier CPU for the LGA 1700 socket (with the 13900K/KF being the only higher-binned variants, though the FACT PACK does not list them as rivals), the CPU is already near the ceiling. Users looking to upgrade would need to move to a new socket for a newer generation, or they could upgrade the GPU instead. The RTX 4060 is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. An upgrade to a higher-tier GPU (e.g., an RTX 4070 or above) would be the most sensible next step, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed a more powerful GPU. The 300 W PSU would need to be upgraded as well for a higher-end GPU, but the CPU's 65 W TDP leaves plenty of room for a mid-range GPU upgrade without changing the power supply.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 is a plus for existing users, but for new builds, DDR5 is the forward-looking choice. ECC memory support is available, which is rare for consumer platforms and could appeal to users running file servers or workstations. The CPU's 36 MB of L3 cache and high core count make it a strong choice for multi-tasking and heavy workloads, but the platform is nearing its end of life, so a future upgrade will require a motherboard replacement.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing is for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else but do not need top-tier GPU power. The 91st percentile CPU is ideal for content creators, software developers, and researchers who run multi-threaded workloads daily. The 61st percentile GPU is sufficient for 1080p gaming and light GPU compute, but it is not for 4K gaming or heavy rendering.

Gamers at 1080p who play competitive titles will find the CPU more than capable, and the GPU can handle most games at high settings with acceptable frame rates. However, those targeting 1440p or 4K high-refresh gaming will be held back by the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 272 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4,406) ensures that frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios like RTS games or simulation titles will be high, but the GPU will cap the maximum FPS.

Content creators who work in video editing (e.g., in Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve) will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40,928, which accelerates export times and timeline rendering. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 95,057 OpenCL score can assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit preview quality for high-resolution timelines. 3D artists using Blender or similar software will find the CPU's 24 cores excellent for physics simulation and final frame rendering, but the GPU's RT cores (24) and tensor cores (96) enable real-time ray tracing and denoising, though with limited memory.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the 32 threads and high L3 cache (36 MB). The PassMark integer math score of 188,022 and data compression score of 635,147 are directly relevant to build times and data processing. Students and small business workstations that run office applications, web development, or data analysis will find the CPU overkill but future-proof, while the GPU is sufficient for dual-monitor productivity setups.

# Build Overview

The Intel Core i9-13900F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop build that combines a top-tier 24-core CPU with a mid-range 8 GB GPU. The CPU is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 61st percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 76. This is a lopsided pairing—the CPU is a workstation-class part, while the GPU is entry-level for gaming.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51,730 places it within 0.8% of rivals that include the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, confirming it is a high-end processor. The GPU's average benchmark score of 17,639 places it within 0.7% of rivals like the AMD Radeon HD 7790 and AMD Radeon 780M, which are significantly older or integrated parts. The contrast could not be starker: the CPU competes with the best of the previous generation, while the GPU competes with parts that are nearly obsolete.

This build is best understood as a CPU-centric system where the GPU is an afterthought. It is ideal for users who need maximum compute throughput for professional workloads—rendering, simulation, development—but only occasional light gaming. The total TDP of 180 W (65 W CPU + 115 W GPU) and suggested 300 W PSU mean the system is energy-efficient and easy to cool, even in small form factor cases. The RTX 4060 is end-of-life, so buyers should be aware that a GPU upgrade will be necessary for future gaming demands, but the CPU will remain relevant for years.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the i9-13900F's single-thread score of 5,778 in Cinebench R23 ensures high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the RTX 4060's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 76 and 8 GB VRAM will limit maximum FPS to roughly 100-144 in modern titles, depending on settings. Esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant will run at very high FPS, but AAA games will require lowered settings to hit 144 Hz.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads—with a PassMark multithread score of 49,693—can handle x264 encoding at high quality without impacting game performance. The GPU's NVENC (via tensor cores) can also offload encoding, but the CPU is so powerful that software encoding is a viable option. The 36 MB L3 cache and data compression score of 635,147 help with simultaneous gameplay and streaming overhead.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40,928 will dramatically reduce export times in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's OpenCL score of 95,057 accelerates effects and color grading, but 8 GB VRAM may be insufficient for 4K timelines with heavy effects. The CPU's 32 threads handle multi-track timelines and background rendering efficiently.

3D rendering: In Blender or Maya with Arnold, the CPU's 24 cores shine—the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4,125 and R20 of 17,189 indicate strong performance in CPU-based render engines. The GPU's 24 RT cores and 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance enable GPU rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The 272 GB/s bandwidth will be a bottleneck for large textures.

Software development: Compiling large C++ or Rust projects will use all 32 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 188,022 and extended instructions score of 36,525 accelerating code generation. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces recompilation times by keeping hot code in cache. The CPU's 91st percentile means it outperforms most development workstations.

Student and office work: For document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU is massively over-provisioned, but the single-thread score of 4,406 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness. The GPU's 2D performance (PassMark G2D score of 1,037) is sufficient for multiple monitors and office applications. The 65 W CPU TDP means low power bills and quiet operation in a small form factor office PC.