SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti form a desktop pairing that sits at the 87th percentile overall, indicating a high-tier combination for demanding workloads. The processor, part of the Raptor Lake generation, delivers strong multi-threaded performance, while the graphics card, based on the Ampere architecture, provides substantial rendering capability. This analysis examines the benchmark data to characterize the system's strengths and limitations across various computing tasks, with the caveat that no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, making all gaming frame rate figures estimates derived from synthetic scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process from Intel. It features a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1145 in single-thread to 2265 in 2-thread, 4393 in 4-thread, 7426 in 8-thread, 9957 in 16-thread, and peak at 13985 in max-thread tests. This scaling pattern indicates efficient utilization of the 24 cores and 32 threads, with the max-thread score being roughly 12 times the single-thread score. The Cinebench R23 results reinforce this picture: a multicore score of 40928 versus a single-core score of 5778, showing a ratio of about 7 to 1, which is typical for a high-core-count desktop part.

The processor's average benchmark score is 51730, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 51947, a delta of -0.4%, meaning the i9-13900F is essentially tied with that competitor. Other close rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX at 52073 (-0.7%), the AMD EPYC 8124P at 52121 (-0.7%), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T at 51310 (+0.8%). These small deltas indicate that the i9-13900F sits in a competitive performance band where differences between top chips are minimal.

For real workloads, the data suggests strong performance in multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the 24 cores and 32 threads can be fully utilized. The single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark and 5778 in Cinebench R23 indicates solid performance in lightly-threaded tasks such as gaming and general desktop responsiveness, though the unlocked multiplier is false, meaning overclocking is not supported. The Passmark integer math score of 188022 and floating-point math score of 131007 further confirm the processor's capability in compute-heavy applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5778, is sufficient to drive high frame rates. Combined with the RTX 3080 Ti, the system is well-positioned for 1440p or 4K gaming at high refresh rates, though exact FPS figures are not measured for this pairing.

Streaming: The 24-core, 32-thread configuration with a max-thread 3DMark score of 13985 provides ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The Passmark data compression score of 635147 suggests efficient handling of real-time video encoding tasks.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and the Geekbench multicore score of 19680 indicate strong performance in rendering timelines and exporting projects. The Passmark extended instructions score of 36525 supports SIMD-heavy video filters and effects.

3D rendering: With a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 17189 and a Passmark multithread score of 49693, the processor handles ray tracing and complex scene rendering effectively. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large geometry data sets.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 188022 and the random string sorting score of 70441 point to efficient code compilation and data manipulation. The 32 threads allow parallel builds, and the 91st percentile CPU ranking indicates it outperforms the majority of processors in these tasks.

Student and office work: The processor's single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4406 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2533, handles everyday productivity tasks with ease. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption moderate for prolonged use in academic or office settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i9-13900F?

A: The processor has 24 cores and 32 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How does the i9-13900F compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i9-13900F scores 51730 on average, while the Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51947, a delta of -0.4%, meaning they are statistically tied in overall benchmark performance.

Q: What memory types does the i9-13900F support?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s, using 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti sits at the 83rd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 41187.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is unlocked false, meaning the processor's clock speeds are fixed.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU complement each other across different workload types. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking suggest that the processor has a slight performance advantage over the graphics card in their respective fields. This means that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or data compression, the i9-13900F is likely to be the stronger component, while the RTX 3080 Ti will be the limiting factor in GPU-bound tasks like rasterization or ray tracing.

The Passmark physics score of 2766 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 9957 indicate that the CPU can handle complex game logic and AI computations without becoming a bottleneck. In contrast, the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 26896 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 192697 show strong graphics throughput, but the GPU's percentile is lower than the CPU's, suggesting that at lower resolutions or less demanding graphical settings, the CPU may outperform the GPU's capabilities, leading to a GPU bottleneck.

The FPS scaling cannot be directly measured for this pairing, but the benchmark scores provide indirect evidence. The CPU's max-thread 3DMark score of 13985 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 indicate that in multi-threaded scenarios, the CPU has more headroom. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 110 is notably lower than its DirectX 11 score of 223, suggesting that the GPU may be more efficient in older API workloads. For gaming, the GPU is likely the primary bottleneck at high resolutions, while the CPU may limit performance at lower resolutions or high frame rate targets.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-13900F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all gaming frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of both components. These estimates should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than precise measurements.

Based on the CPU's single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2533, and the GPU's rendering capabilities, with a Passmark G3D score of 26896 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 192697, the system is expected to deliver high frame rates in most titles. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, paired with the GPU's 10240 shading units, should support high-refresh gaming at 1440p and playable frame rates at 4K in many games. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with 912.4 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for modern game textures and assets.

The lack of measured FPS data means that specific game-by-game performance cannot be stated with certainty. However, the combined percentile of 87 for the overall system indicates that this pairing is in the top tier of desktop builds, and the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking suggests it will handle demanding graphical workloads effectively. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures that it will not hold back the GPU in most gaming scenarios, except possibly in extremely CPU-intensive simulations or strategy games.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who require high performance across both CPU-intensive and GPU-intensive tasks. Gamers aiming for high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the RTX 3080 Ti's 83rd percentile ranking and the i9-13900F's 91st percentile ranking, which together provide a balanced platform for modern titles. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads make it suitable for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and the Geekbench multicore score of 19680.

Students and professionals in technical fields will find the system capable for data analysis, programming, and office productivity, with the Passmark floating-point math score of 131007 and the integer math score of 188022 indicating strong computational performance. The CPU's ECC memory support makes it suitable for workstations where data integrity is critical, such as financial modeling or scientific computing. Small business workstations that require multitasking and virtualization will benefit from the 32 threads and the 91st percentile CPU ranking, which places it ahead of 91% of all processors.

The GPU's 12 GB of VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth support large datasets in machine learning inference and creative applications like photo and video editing. The dual-slot design and 285 mm length make it compatible with most mid-tower cases, though the 750 W suggested PSU should be considered for system builders. The overall 87th percentile combined ranking indicates that this is a high-tier system suitable for enthusiasts and professionals who need top-tier performance without the absolute highest-end components.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is compatible with 13th Gen Core processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory selection based on platform and budget. ECC memory support is enabled, which is a rarity for consumer platforms and adds value for workstation use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the graphics card is not fully utilizing the CPU's PCIe bandwidth.

The GPU has a TDP of 350 W and a suggested PSU of 750 W, leaving headroom for additional components such as storage drives or expansion cards. The GPU uses a single 12-pin power connector, which may require an adapter depending on the PSU's connector availability. The CPU's 65 W TDP is relatively low for a 24-core processor, indicating that the platform's power delivery is not heavily taxed by the processor, allowing more headroom for the GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer generation GPU, as the RTX 3080 Ti is marked as end-of-life and has a successor in the GeForce 40 series. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking suggests it has longevity, and the 36 MB of L3 cache and 32 threads provide ample headroom for future software. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means that future high-bandwidth devices, such as NVMe SSDs or GPUs, can be accommodated. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that builders can carry over existing DDR4 modules or upgrade to DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the memory bus is dual-channel, limiting the maximum theoretical bandwidth.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. The system sits at the 87th combined percentile, placing it in the upper tier of all desktop configurations. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Raptor Lake generation, while the GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 10240 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The pairing targets high-performance gaming and content creation workloads, with the CPU's 91st percentile ranking providing strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking delivering solid graphics throughput.

The build is characterized by a balance between CPU and GPU capabilities, with the processor having a slight edge in its respective percentile ranking. The system's overall performance tier is high, suitable for demanding applications such as 4K gaming, video editing, and 3D rendering. The CPU's 36 MB of L3 cache and the GPU's 912.4 GB/s memory bandwidth ensure that data-intensive workloads are handled efficiently. The build class is desktop, and the production status is active for the CPU and end-of-life for the GPU, meaning the GPU may be harder to source new but is still a capable performer.

The system's combined percentile of 87 indicates that it outperforms the vast majority of desktop builds in benchmark scores. The CPU's average benchmark score of 51730 and the GPU's average score of 41187 contribute to a total system score that is competitive with other high-end configurations. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact pairing means that real-world gaming performance must be inferred from the synthetic scores, but the high percentiles suggest strong gaming capability.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900F achieves an average benchmark score of 51730, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 51947, a delta of -0.4%, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (-0.7%) and the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121 (-0.7%). The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51310, a delta of +0.8%, meaning the i9-13900F is slightly ahead of that chip. These tight deltas indicate that the i9-13900F is in the top performance band for CPUs.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti achieves an average benchmark score of 41187, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 with a score of 40870 (delta of +0.8%), the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB with 41707 (-1.2%), the NVIDIA Tesla M40 with 41897 (-1.7%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 with 40377 (+2%). The GPU's percentile is lower than the CPU's, indicating that the graphics card is a relative weaker point in the system, but still in the top 17% of all GPUs.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is slightly less dominant. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is nearly 2.4 times its single-core score of 5778, demonstrating excellent scaling across cores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 192697 indicate strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 26896 is notably high, while its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 110 is comparatively low, suggesting potential API-specific performance variations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is based on the Ampere architecture, built on an 8 nm process from Samsung with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. It features a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 19 Gbps effective. The GPU has 10240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 80 ray tracing cores and 320 tensor cores. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s.

The GPU's compute capabilities include an FP32 throughput of 34.10 TFLOPS and an FP16 throughput of 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1), which is notable for non-double-precision workloads. The pixel rate is 186.5 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 532.8 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern APIs and features like ray tracing and variable rate shading.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs well in general graphics tasks. The Passmark G3D score of 26896 is the strongest indicator of overall GPU performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 170037 and Vulkan score of 192697 demonstrate strong compute and graphics throughput. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 shows good DirectX 12 performance. However, the Passmark DirectX scores are mixed: DirectX 10 scores 184, DirectX 11 scores 223, DirectX 12 scores 110, and DirectX 9 scores 274. This suggests that the GPU is more optimized for older APIs in some tests, or that the test methodology weights certain features differently.

The GPU's 83rd percentile ranking indicates it outperforms 83% of all GPUs, making it a strong choice for high-resolution gaming and rendering. The 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most modern games at 4K resolution, and the 912.4 GB/s bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and high-resolution assets are handled efficiently. The 80 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 320 tensor cores support DLSS and other AI-based features. The GPU's TDP of 350 W and suggested PSU of 750 W indicate that it requires a robust power supply, but the dual-slot design and 285 mm length make it compatible with most standard cases.