SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in this build is an Ampere-generation card built on Samsung's 8 nm process, with a GA104 chip containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It ships with 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that positions it well for 1440p rendering but one that will feel constrained in heavy 4K texture workloads. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective, and the card's base and boost clocks are 1575 MHz and 1770 MHz respectively. With 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, the RTX 3070 Ti offers substantial raw rasterization throughput, evidenced by its 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute and matching 21.75 TFLOPS FP16 performance.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware are present in the form of 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. This is not a top-tier Ampere configuration, but it is sufficient for DLSS-enabled titles and moderate ray-traced effects. The pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s indicate that the card can feed high-resolution displays without bottlenecking the shading units in most scenarios. In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 23,356 in Passmark G3D, which places it at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 29,945 puts it in close competition with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (29,928, a 0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30,095, -0.5% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (29,783, 0.5% delta). The only rival with a more notable gap is the AMD Radeon RX 6700 at 30,433, which leads by 1.6%.

For rendering workloads, the RTX 3070 Ti's 8 GB VRAM is the limiting factor. At 1080p and 1440p, most current titles will fit within that frame buffer, but 4K texture packs and certain compute-heavy renders will spill over. The card's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API coverage means it is fully compatible with modern rendering pipelines. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,478 indicates solid performance in modern DX12 titles, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 119,718 and 139,541 respectively show strong compute throughput for GPU-accelerated tasks. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 192 versus DirectX 12 score of 91 highlights that this architecture performs better in older API workloads, which is a consideration for legacy applications.

# Balance and Bottleneck

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900F with the RTX 3070 Ti, and the data shows a CPU-heavy imbalance. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 51,730, while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile with an average score of 29,945. The combined percentile for this pairing is 83, which reflects that the processor is significantly stronger than the graphics card in relative terms. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all FPS discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay data.

The CPU's margin over its nearest rivals is small — it trails the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by only 0.4% (51,947 vs 51,730) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX by 0.7% (52,073), while leading the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T by 0.8% (51,310). This tells us the i9-13900F is a top-tier processor that will rarely be the limiting factor. The GPU, by contrast, is mid-pack relative to its peers, meaning that in most gaming and rendering scenarios, the RTX 3070 Ti will determine the frame rate ceiling.

In CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation or data compression, the i9-13900F's Passmark physics score of 2,766 and data compression score of 635,147 will keep things moving without stutter. In GPU-bound scenarios — high-resolution gaming, ray tracing, or GPU compute — the RTX 3070 Ti's 75th percentile ranking will cap performance. The practical bottleneck is the GPU, especially at 4K where the 8 GB VRAM and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth will be stressed. At 1080p, the CPU's strength may actually create a mild inverse bottleneck, where the processor can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, but this is rarely a problem in real-world use.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU versus the 290 W TDP of the GPU makes the power balance clear: the GPU draws over four times the power of the CPU, reinforcing that the graphics card is the performance limiter in sustained workloads. For users who prioritize frame rates, upgrading the GPU would yield a larger performance jump than upgrading the CPU, which is already near the top of its class.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the RTX 3070 Ti's Passmark G3D score of 23,356 and 75th percentile ranking suggest it can drive high refresh rates in most titles, though the 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in some modern games. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 5,778 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing remains consistent.

Streaming: The i9-13900F's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming overlays while gaming. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 49,693 indicates it can handle simultaneous game rendering and x264 encoding without dropping frames, though the GPU's NVENC hardware could also be used to offload this task.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40,928 and Geekbench multicore score of 19,680 make quick work of 4K video exports and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects and color grading, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit the complexity of GPU-accelerated effects in long timelines.

3D rendering: In Blender or similar applications, the CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and high multithread scores (Passmark integer math at 188,022 and floating point math at 131,007) will handle CPU-based rendering efficiently. The GPU's OpenCL score of 119,718 supports GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM is a hard cap for large scenes.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the CPU's 32 threads and Passmark data compression score of 635,147, which speeds up build times. The GPU's compute capabilities are less relevant here, but the overall system responsiveness from the 91st percentile CPU makes for a snappy development environment.

Student and office work: For document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, this build is massively over-provisioned. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,406 in Passmark single-thread tests ensures that even the most demanding office applications feel instant, and the GPU is entirely unnecessary for these tasks but does not hinder them.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers and content creators who want high CPU performance without sacrificing GPU capability. The 91st percentile CPU ranking means the i9-13900F is suitable for users who run CPU-intensive applications like video encoding, 3D modeling, or software compilation, while the 75th percentile GPU handles mainstream gaming at 1080p and 1440p. The combined percentile of 83 indicates a well-above-average overall system, but not a top-tier enthusiast rig.

For gamers at 1080p and 1440p, this build delivers high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU ensuring no bottleneck in CPU-heavy games. At 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 75th percentile ranking will struggle with ultra settings, so this is not a 4K-focused build. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 24 cores beneficial, but should be aware of the GPU's VRAM limitation for large scenes. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's multithread performance and data compression scores. For small business workstations running data analysis or virtualization, the 32 threads and ECC memory support (the CPU supports ECC) provide reliability and throughput. Students and office workers will find this system overkill, but it will handle any academic or administrative task without breaking a sweat.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900F delivers an average benchmark score of 51,730, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are clustered tightly: the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51,947 (-0.4% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52,073 (-0.7% delta), the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52,121 (-0.7% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51,310 (+0.8% delta). This indicates that the i9-13900F is essentially tied with the best of its generation, with less than 1% separating it from its closest competitors.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores an average of 29,945, landing at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile at 29,928 (+0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30,095 (-0.5% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti at 29,783 (+0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 at 30,433 (-1.6% delta). The GPU is competitive with these cards, though the RX 6700 holds a slight edge.

Together, this pairing achieves a combined percentile of 83, which reflects the CPU's dominance and the GPU's solid mid-upper range performance. There are no measured FPS values for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so performance in games must be estimated from these scores. The CPU's 3DMark scores show scaling from 1,145 (single-thread) to 13,985 (max threads), while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,478 indicates capable DX12 gaming performance. The Passmark GPU compute score of 11,601 shows that the GPU is also competent for compute tasks, though not exceptional.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, placing it above 83% of all tested desktop systems.

Q: How does the i9-13900F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i9-13900F scores 51,730 on average, which is 0.4% lower than the Ryzen 9 5950X's 51,947 — a negligible difference in real-world performance.

Q: What is the RTX 3070 Ti's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The card has 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900F supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti had a launch MSRP of 599 USD.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing, so performance estimates are based on benchmark scores only.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and die size?

A: The i9-13900F is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm².

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename). It runs on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The CPU is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) and supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation use. The TDP is rated at 65 W, which is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, and the launch MSRP was $524.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1,145 (single-thread) to 2,265 (2 threads), 4,393 (4 threads), 7,426 (8 threads), 9,957 (16 threads), and 13,985 (max threads). This near-linear scaling indicates that the core design has minimal contention overhead. Cinebench R23 scores of 5,778 (single-core) and 40,928 (multi-core) confirm the CPU's strength in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads. Geekbench scores of 2,533 (single-core) and 19,680 (multi-core) align with these results.

Passmark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression at 635,147, data encryption at 38,214, extended instructions at 36,525, floating point math at 131,007, integer math at 188,022, and random string sorting at 70,441. The multithread score of 49,693 and single-thread score of 4,406 round out the picture. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking places it among the top processors available, with its nearest rivals all within 1% of its average score. For real-world workloads, this means the i9-13900F can handle any CPU-bound task — from video encoding to 3D rendering to software compilation — without being the limiting factor.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cheaper DDR4 modules or faster DDR5 modules depending on their budget and performance needs. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a modern GPU and a high-speed NVMe SSD. The platform's ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use, though it requires compatible motherboards and registered memory modules.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes (the slot runs at Gen 4 speeds, but this does not bottleneck the RTX 3070 Ti's 608.3 GB/s bandwidth). The GPU's suggested PSU is 600 W, while the CPU's TDP is 65 W — a combined power draw that leaves ample headroom for a 600 W power supply, even with other system components. The GPU uses a single 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height, so case compatibility is straightforward for most mid-tower and full-tower cases.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the obvious candidate. The RTX 3070 Ti's 8 GB VRAM and 75th percentile ranking are the system's weakest points, so upgrading to a GPU with more VRAM and higher compute throughput would yield the largest performance gain. The CPU, at the 91st percentile, has headroom to support a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Alternatively, adding more memory (the CPU supports DDR5) or a faster NVMe SSD would improve load times and system responsiveness, but the core performance bottleneck is the GPU.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in a desktop configuration (buildClass: desktop). The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor that ranks at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card that ranks at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 83 places this system in the upper tier of desktop builds, though it is not a flagship configuration.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51,730 and the GPU's average score of 29,945 together create a system that excels in CPU-intensive workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, while offering solid — but not exceptional — gaming performance. The i9-13900F's 65 W TDP and the RTX 3070 Ti's 290 W TDP mean that the system's power consumption is dominated by the GPU, which is typical for a desktop gaming or workstation build. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is the most significant limitation, capping performance in 4K gaming and large compute workloads. Overall, this is a balanced desktop system for users who need top-tier CPU performance with good GPU acceleration, rather than a pure gaming or pure compute machine.