SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: A High-Core Desktop Pairing with a Mid-Range GPU

This build pairs Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake flagship-class processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-based RTX 3060 Ti, creating an unusual desktop configuration where CPU compute muscle vastly outweighs GPU rasterization throughput. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 59th percentile among all graphics cards, producing a combined system percentile of 75. The data shows a platform designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads that also retains respectable 1080p and 1440p gaming capability, though the GPU will frequently be the limiting factor in frame rate delivery.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-S architecture using Intel's 10 nm process. Its base clock runs at 2000 MHz with a boost clock reaching 5.60 GHz, and it draws a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support extends to both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects via Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in heavily threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 40928, while the single-core score is 5778. The 3DMark max-threads test produces a score of 13985, which scales dramatically from the 9957 score at 16 threads and the 7426 at 8 threads. This scaling pattern indicates strong multi-threading efficiency across the hybrid core layout. Geekbench results show 19680 multi-core and 2533 single-core, while PassMark multi-thread hits 49693 with a single-thread score of 4406.

The data places this CPU at the 91st percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51730. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 51947, a mere 0.4% difference — effectively a statistical tie. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T sits 0.8% higher at 51310, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX trails by 0.7% at 52073. This cluster of rivals within roughly 1% shows the i9-13900F is positioned at a performance plateau where generational improvements yield marginal gains.

For real workloads, the PassMark sub-tests provide granular insight. Integer math scores 188022, floating-point math reaches 131007, and data compression hits 635147. Extended instructions score 36525, and data encryption achieves 38214. Random string sorting produces 70441. These numbers indicate strong productivity performance across compilation, scientific computing, and data processing tasks, though the single-thread score of 4406 and the physics score of 2766 suggest that lightly threaded applications will not see the same dramatic advantage as heavily parallel workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses the GA104 chip on Samsung's 8 nm process, containing 17,400 million transistors across a 392 mm² die. The GPU has 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. It includes 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores, equipping it for ray tracing and DLSS-accelerated workloads. The base clock runs at 1410 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, while memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory sits on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Pixel rate reaches 133.2 GPixel/s, texture rate hits 253.1 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is rated at 16.20 TFLOPS with FP16 at the same 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The GPU's benchmark results place it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 16129. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 2626. PassMark G3D scores 20349, while GPU compute reaches 10006. Geekbench OpenCL produces 78927, and Vulkan scores 47784. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060, scores 16014 — just 0.7% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, 1.4% higher, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M matches that 1.4% margin at 16351. The AMD Radeon R9 370X trails by 1.7% at 15862. This tight clustering around the RTX 3060 Ti's score indicates the GPU sits in a dense mid-range performance band where competing products are nearly interchangeable.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity and 448 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p rendering with high textures, but the data suggests the GPU will struggle with 4K workloads and heavy ray tracing. The 38 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, yet the modest FP32 throughput of 16.20 TFLOPS limits compute-heavy rendering tasks. The 200 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU indicate modest power requirements, with a single 12-pin power connector and dual-slot form factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. ECC memory support adds workstation flexibility. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and current-generation GPUs. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is notably low for a 24-core processor. This modest power draw suggests the platform has significant headroom for cooling and power delivery upgrades. The GPU's 200 W TDP, combined with the CPU's 65 W, means the suggested 550 W PSU provides adequate headroom for the current configuration. However, if a user upgrades to a higher-tier GPU with a larger power draw, the PSU would likely need to be revisited.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the RTX 3060 Ti with a more powerful GPU to balance the system. The CPU's 91st percentile standing means it will not bottleneck modern graphics cards in most scenarios. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with future GPU generations, while the dual-channel memory controller accommodates both DDR4 and DDR5 — allowing users to choose based on existing memory inventory or performance priorities. The ECC support further extends the platform's life in workstation roles, though the unlocked multiplier is not available on this F-series part.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i9-13900F compare to its closest CPU rival?

A: The i9-13900F scores 51730 on average benchmark score, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X at 51947. This places them in a statistical tie, with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T 0.8% higher and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX 0.7% lower.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory. This flexibility allows users to choose between existing DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 for potentially higher bandwidth.

Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti a high-performance GPU by current standards?

A: The GPU sits at the 59th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 16129. It is 0.7% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 9060 but 1.4% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. This places it in the mid-range performance tier.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The RTX 3060 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with these lanes.

Q: What are the power requirements for this build?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 200 W TDP. The suggested PSU rating is 550 W, which provides adequate headroom for the current configuration.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 40928, and PassMark multi-thread scores 49693. The 3DMark max-threads score of 13985 shows strong scaling from the 8-thread score of 7426, indicating excellent multi-threading efficiency.

Q: What display outputs does the GPU provide?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, supporting multi-monitor setups with modern connectivity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is substantial. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 59th percentile creates a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming at high resolutions, the frame rate will be constrained by the RTX 3060 Ti's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 GB VRAM, not by the i9-13900F's compute capabilities.

The PassMark data illustrates the imbalance: the CPU scores 49693 in multi-thread while the GPU scores 20349 in G3D. This 2.4:1 ratio in favor of the CPU means that workloads relying on CPU compute — such as compilation, data processing, and physics simulation — will see the CPU perform near its potential, while graphics rendering tasks will be limited by the GPU.

For gaming, the bottleneck shifts based on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 4406 and the GPU's mid-range throughput may create a more balanced experience, though the GPU will still limit maximum frame rates in demanding titles. At 1440p and above, the GPU's 448 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB capacity become the limiting factors, with VRAM pressure potentially causing texture streaming issues in modern games. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2626 confirms the GPU's mid-range positioning for DirectX 12 workloads.

The combined system percentile of 75 reflects this imbalance — the build performs better than the average system but falls well short of the CPU's individual 91st percentile. Users seeking balanced performance would need a GPU with a higher percentile ranking, while users prioritizing CPU-bound workloads will find the current configuration acceptable.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users whose workloads emphasize CPU compute over GPU rendering. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, with PassMark integer math scoring 188022 and data compression at 635147. Data analysts and researchers running multi-threaded simulations will find the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 advantageous, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations.

Content creators focusing on video encoding or 3D rendering that leverages CPU computation will see strong performance, though GPU-accelerated rendering would be limited by the RTX 3060 Ti's mid-range compute. Students and small business workstations running virtual machines, database queries, or office productivity suites will find the CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking, with the GPU handling standard display output and light graphics tasks.

Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will appreciate the CPU's strong single-thread performance, though they should temper expectations for ultra-settings in the latest titles. The GPU's 59th percentile means it can handle esports and older games at high frame rates, but newer AAA titles at maximum settings will require reduced detail or lower resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 51730, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 51947 — a 0.4% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is 0.8% higher at 51310, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is 0.7% lower at 52073. The GPU's average score is 16129, at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060, scores 16014 — 0.7% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT both sit 1.4% higher at 16351 and 16361, respectively.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 and single-core score of 5778 demonstrate a strong balance between heavy multi-threading and responsive single-thread performance. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2626 and PassMark G3D score of 20349 place it firmly in the mid-range tier. The combined picture is a system with exceptional CPU headroom and adequate GPU capability — the CPU will handle any task thrown at it, while the GPU will manage mainstream gaming and graphics workloads without excelling.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core i9-13900F, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, an Ampere-based GPU. The system classifies as a desktop configuration with a combined percentile of 75. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking makes it one of the top processors available, while the GPU's 59th percentile positions it as a mid-range graphics solution. The overall tier is that of a powerful workstation-class CPU paired with a mainstream gaming GPU — a configuration suited for CPU-intensive professional workloads with secondary gaming capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's 4406 PassMark single-thread score ensures minimal frame pacing issues, while the GPU's 20349 G3D score can drive high frame rates in esports titles. However, the 8 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth may limit ultra-texture settings in newer games.

Streaming: The CPU's 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, with the 40928 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handling simultaneous game and encode workloads. The GPU's tensor cores can also accelerate encoding tasks, though the 200 W TDP limits sustained load.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 49693 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute assists with effects and transitions. The 8 GB VRAM may limit scrubbing in 4K timelines with heavy effects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 24 cores, achieving strong throughput in Cinebench R23's 40928 multi-core score. GPU rendering will be constrained by the RTX 3060 Ti's mid-range compute, making the CPU the preferred render engine.

Software development: The 188022 integer math score and 36525 extended instructions score indicate strong compilation performance. The 32 threads allow parallel build systems to scale effectively, while ECC memory support adds stability for long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across productivity suites, browsers, and communication tools. The GPU handles standard display output and light graphics tasks without strain, while the 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs manageable.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking and the CPU's 91st percentile indicate that the GPU will be the primary determinant of gaming performance. Based on the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2626 and PassMark G3D score of 20349, the RTX 3060 Ti is positioned for 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p at medium settings in most titles. The CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and 5778 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensure that CPU-bound scenarios, such as open-world games with heavy physics, will not create frame rate bottlenecks. The 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in games exceeding that capacity, and ray tracing performance will be limited by the 38 RT cores relative to the GPU's overall throughput. For esports titles, the GPU can likely achieve high refresh rates at 1080p, while AAA releases will require setting adjustments to maintain playable frame rates.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds