SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT pairing represents a formidable desktop build that combines a high-core-count Raptor Lake processor with a high-bandwidth RDNA 3.0 flagship GPU. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, which does not include measured FPS figures for this specific combination. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the synthetic CPU and GPU scores, not from direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel, featuring a die size of 257 mm². The core configuration is supported by a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. The base clock is listed at 2000 MHz, with a boost clock reaching up to 5.60 GHz. This processor is not multiplier-unlocked, indicating it is a locked SKU for users who prefer a straightforward, non-overclocked setup.

The CPU’s benchmark results demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded capability, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs tested. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is a standout figure, indicating that the processor can sustain heavy all-core workloads effectively. This is further corroborated by a Geekbench multicore score of 19680 and a Passmark multithread score of 49693. The scaling from 8 threads to max threads is instructive: the 3DMark score jumps from 7426 at 8 threads to 13985 at max threads, showcasing a near-linear scaling benefit from the additional cores and threads. For real-world workloads, this translates to significant throughput in video rendering, software compilation, and other parallel processing tasks.

Single-thread performance, while not the headline feature, remains robust. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5778 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2533 indicate that the processor handles everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications with ease. The Passmark single-thread score of 4406 reinforces this. The boost clock of 5.60 GHz is the key driver here, ensuring that the processor does not lag in tasks like web browsing or office productivity, even when most cores are idle.

The processor’s memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing for flexibility in platform configuration. It supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation reliability. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards. In summary, the i9-13900F is a balanced high-end CPU that leads with its multi-core muscle but retains strong single-core agility, making it suitable for a wide range of demanding applications.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a high-performance duo, with the CPU significantly outperforming the GPU in terms of percentile ranking. The i9-13900F holds a 91st percentile position among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51730. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, which is 0.4% slower, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, which is 0.8% slower. This places the i9-13900F in a tightly contested but leading position, just ahead of the Ryzen 9 5950X.

The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, presents a different story. It holds a 55th percentile position among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13745. This is a stark contrast to the CPU’s ranking. The GPU’s nearest rivals are surprising: the AMD Radeon 660M (0.5% slower) and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (0.5% slower). This suggests that the average benchmark score is heavily influenced by lower-end tests, as the GPU’s specific high-end scores are much more impressive. For instance, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 indicate strong modern API performance. However, the Passmark DirectX 9 score of 322 and DirectX 12 score of 110 are low, skewing the average.

The combined percentile for this build is 73, reflecting the CPU’s dominance over the GPU. The combined picture is one of a system where the processor is the star performer, while the graphics card, though capable, is not positioned as the absolute top-tier according to the aggregate metrics. The discrepancy highlights that while the CPU is a top-10% part, the GPU is more of an upper-midrange performer when averaged across all tests. Users should expect the CPU to be the primary driver of performance in multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU will deliver robust but not class-leading frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The i9-13900F’s strong single-thread score of 5778 in Cinebench R23 and a 3DMark 2-thread score of 2265 suggest excellent per-core performance that can drive high frame rates. The RX 7900 XT’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 indicates it can handle modern titles, but the GPU’s 55th percentile suggests it may not consistently hit the highest refresh rates at 4K in the most demanding games. At 1440p, the combination should be well-balanced for high-refresh gaming, with the CPU ensuring frames are delivered quickly.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads of the i9-13900F are ideal for simultaneous gameplay and encoding. The Passmark data compression score of 635147 and data encryption score of 38214 show robust throughput for encoding workloads. The CPU can handle the x264 encoding overhead without impacting game performance, as evidenced by its high multi-threaded scores. The 3DMark max threads score of 13985 confirms the headroom for background tasks.

Video Editing: Video editing software benefits from both high single-thread and multi-thread performance. The i9-13900F’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 17189 and Geekbench multicore score of 19680 indicate fast rendering and export times. The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth (as detailed in the GPU section) can accelerate effects and timeline scrubbing. This is a capable setup for 4K video editing, with the CPU handling the heavy lifting in encoding and the GPU assisting with real-time previews.

3D Rendering: This is where the i9-13900F shines. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is exceptional, placing it ahead of rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 0.4% in average score. The Passmark floating point math score of 131007 and integer math score of 188022 further demonstrate the raw compute power for rendering engines. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS can also accelerate GPU-based renderers, making this a dual-threat for 3D workloads.

Software Development: Compilation tasks are heavily multi-threaded, and the i9-13900F’s 32 threads will dramatically reduce build times. The Passmark find prime numbers score of 204 is a weaker result, but this is a niche test. The high L3 cache of 36 MB helps with frequently accessed data. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking ensures it is one of the best consumer processors for code compilation.

Student and Office Work: For standard productivity, this system is overkill but not wasteful. The single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches and responsive spreadsheets. The CPU’s low 65 W TDP means it runs efficiently in basic tasks. The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM is unused in office work, but the system handles such workloads with massive headroom, ensuring longevity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This dual-channel memory bus offers flexibility, but users should note that the platform’s memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is essential for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future GPUs.

The motherboard choice will dictate the memory type and PCIe allocation. A sensible next upgrade would be to ensure a motherboard that leverages the PCIe Gen 5 lanes for storage, as this will maximize data throughput for content creation. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a feature worth utilizing for workstation builds, as it enhances data integrity.

The GPU, the RX 7900 XT, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU has a suggested PSU of 700 W, while the CPU’s TDP is only 65 W. This leaves significant PSU headroom, as a 700 W power supply is recommended for the GPU alone, meaning a quality 700 W unit will comfortably power the entire system. The GPU is dual-slot and requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, which are standard.

For a future upgrade, the primary consideration is the GPU, as the CPU is already near the top of its performance class. The RX 7900 XT’s production status is end-of-life, so users may consider a successor in the Navi IV generation when it becomes available. However, the current GPU’s 20 GB VRAM is ample for several years. The CPU’s socket is not forward-compatible with newer Intel generations, so a CPU upgrade would require a platform change. The most sensible next upgrade for this system is a GPU replacement to address the bottleneck in gaming performance.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The following are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

The gaming performance of this system is estimated to be very strong, driven primarily by the CPU’s excellent single-thread capabilities. The i9-13900F’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2265 and single-thread score of 1145 suggest that it can handle the game logic and draw calls without bottlenecking. The boost clock of 5.60 GHz is a key factor for frame pacing.

For the GPU, the RX 7900 XT’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is a modern, DirectX 12 test that indicates strong performance in current titles. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 is also impressive, suggesting excellent API utilization. However, the GPU’s overall 55th percentile is dragged down by older DirectX tests, which are less relevant for modern gaming.

At 1080p, the CPU will likely be the primary determinant of frame rates, and the i9-13900F’s single-core performance should allow the GPU to reach its maximum output. At 1440p, the system is expected to be well-balanced, with the GPU becoming the more significant factor. At 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and the RX 7900 XT’s 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth will be beneficial for high-resolution textures. The estimated frame rates in demanding AAA titles at 4K would be high but not necessarily the absolute maximum, given the GPU’s mid-pack percentile ranking. In less demanding esports titles, the system should easily deliver multi-hundred FPS at 1080p and 1440p, given the CPU’s high clock speeds and the GPU’s raw compute power.

Who Should Build It

This system is tailored for a specific type of user: the content creator who also games. The i9-13900F’s 24 cores and 32 threads make it a professional-grade tool for 3D rendering, video editing, and software development. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is a clear indicator of this capability, placing it in the top percentile for these workloads. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of consumer processors.

For gamers, the system is best suited for those playing at 1440p or 4K with high refresh rate monitors. The RX 7900 XT’s 20 GB VRAM is future-proof for high-resolution textures, and the GPU’s 800.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures fast data transfer. The CPU’s single-thread performance will prevent bottlenecks at lower resolutions, making this a flexible gaming platform.

Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the compilation speed and multi-threaded performance for simulations. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support will find the i9-13900F a reliable foundation. The GPU’s compute capabilities, such as the 51.48 TFLOPS FP32, can also accelerate professional applications like CAD or machine learning inference, though the driver support is a consideration. This build is not for budget-conscious users, as the performance comes at a premium, but for those who need the CPU’s raw power, it is a compelling choice.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Plum Bonito, and uses the Navi 31 chip. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with a massive 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The GPU features 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 render output units. It also includes 84 ray tracing cores, which support the DirectX 12 Ultimate API.

Memory is a key strength: the GPU is equipped with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 2500 MHz, with an effective data rate of 20 Gbps. The base clock is 1387 MHz, with a boost clock of 2394 MHz and a game clock of 2025 MHz. The pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s.

In terms of compute performance, the GPU delivers 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 103.0 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (at a 2:1 ratio). This is a significant amount of raw compute for rendering and compute workloads. The GPU’s benchmark scores are mixed: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is strong, but the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 110 is inexplicably low, which drags down the average. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 12756 and Vulkan score of 71068 are more representative of its actual capability.

The GPU’s 55th percentile ranking is misleading. It is likely pulled down by the low DirectX scores, which may be due to driver issues or specific test configurations. In real-world rendering scenarios, the RX 7900 XT’s high bandwidth and compute throughput make it a capable card for 4K gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 20 GB VRAM is a distinct advantage over many rivals, allowing for larger textures and datasets. For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 performance will speed up both real-time and offline renderers. The GPU is a dual-slot card, measuring 276 mm in length, and requires a 700 W PSU, which is a standard recommendation for this class of hardware.

FAQ

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-13900F?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-13900F is $524.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT?

A: The launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is 899 USD.

Q: How does the i9-13900F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in average benchmark score?

A: The i9-13900F has an average benchmark score of 51730, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X’s score of 51947.

Q: Does the RX 7900 XT support the DirectX 12 Ultimate API?

A: Yes, the RX 7900 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), as well as OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the total L3 cache available on the i9-13900F?

A: The i9-13900F has a shared 36 MB L3 cache.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the RX 7900 XT?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 7900 XT is 700 W.

Q: Is the measured FPS data available for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the data indicates that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all FPS figures are estimates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i9-13900F and the RX 7900 XT is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The CPU holds a 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at a 55th percentile. This disparity suggests that in most workloads, the CPU will not be the limiting factor. In multi-threaded tasks like 3D rendering and video encoding, the CPU is the dominant performer, and the GPU’s role is secondary. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 far exceeds the demands of these workloads, meaning the CPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck.

In gaming, the bottleneck is more complex. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1145, means it can feed frames to the GPU quickly. However, the GPU’s lower percentile ranking suggests it may be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU may still have headroom, but the GPU’s performance will cap the frame rate. At 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and its 55th percentile ranking indicates it may struggle to maintain the highest frame rates in the most demanding titles.

The FPS scaling in the benchmark data is not available for games, but the synthetic scores imply that the GPU’s performance does not scale as well as the CPU’s. The Passmark G3D score of 29009 is reasonable, but the low DirectX 12 score of 110 is a red flag for modern games. This suggests that the GPU may have driver or optimization issues that could cause inconsistent performance. The CPU is the clear performance leader in this pairing, and users should be aware that the GPU will be the component that limits gaming frame rates, especially in CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions. The system is well-balanced for productivity, but less so for pure gaming, where the GPU’s mid-pack ranking will be the primary constraint.