SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

87%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

11,627 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT — Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines a 24-core Intel desktop processor with a 16 GB Radeon RX 7000-series graphics card, forming a desktop-class build that sits at the 71st percentile overall. The CPU is a Raptor Lake-S part with a 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 51st percentile among all GPUs. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not from direct gameplay testing.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU combination, and the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24176 places it in the 51st percentile, a mid-pack result that suggests 1080p and 1440p gaming is the realistic target zone. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and 8-thread score of 7426 indicate strong per-core headroom, which matters for frame pacing in CPU-bound titles.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 7800 XT's 16 GB frame buffer and 624.1 GB/s memory bandwidth should handle most current titles comfortably, though the 51st percentile GPU ranking implies it is not a top-tier 4K card. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4406 and Geekbench single-core score of 2533 suggest no practical bottleneck at this resolution for most games. At 1440p, the GPU's 37.32 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 233.3 GPixel/s pixel rate should maintain smooth frame rates, but titles with heavy ray tracing may stress the 60 RT cores. At 4K, the 51st percentile GPU position indicates the card will likely fall short of 60 FPS in demanding titles at ultra settings, so players should expect to lower settings or use upscaling.

The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 13985 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 provide ample compute for game logic, physics, and background tasks, but the GPU's mid-pack percentile is the limiting factor for raw frame rates. For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and 1145 single-thread score should drive very high frame rates, but the GPU's 51st percentile ranking means it will not match the top 10% of graphics cards in sheer FPS output. Overall, the estimate is a capable 1080p and solid 1440p gaming machine, with 4K performance limited by the GPU's mid-pack standing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 51730, which places it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 51947, a delta of -0.4%, meaning the i9-13900F is essentially tied with that 16-core part. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (-0.7%) and the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121 (-0.7%), while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T trails at 51310 (+0.8% for the i9-13900F). This cluster of rivals all sit within 1% of each other, indicating the i9-13900F is a well-established high-end CPU with performance parity to several newer and server-class parts.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 11627, placing it at the 51st percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, scores 11680 (-0.5%), a remarkably close match for a card from a different generation and tier. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500M scores 11528 (+0.9%), the NVIDIA Tesla K20c scores 11479 (+1.3%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT scores 11842 (-1.8%). The GPU's position is firmly mid-pack, and the fact that it trades blows with a GTX 1660 in average score is a notable data point — despite the RX 7800 XT having 16 GB VRAM and RDNA 3.0 architecture, the aggregate benchmark average does not separate it from much older hardware.

The combined percentile of 71 reflects a system where the CPU is far stronger than the GPU. The CPU's 91st percentile versus the GPU's 51st percentile creates a lopsided profile. In CPU-bound workloads like Cinebench R23 multi-core (40928) or PassMark multi-thread (49693), the system performs at a high-end level. In GPU-bound tasks like 3DMark Steel Nomad (4157) or PassMark G3D (24176), the system performs at a mid-range level. The combined score of 71 indicates that the overall system is above average but not exceptional, dragged down by the GPU's middling percentile.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 provide the per-core speed needed for high frame rates at 1080p. However, the GPU's 51st percentile ranking means it will likely cap frame rates below what the CPU can deliver. Expect smooth 144 Hz gameplay at 1080p in most titles, but not at 4K.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 49693, handle encoding and streaming overhead without breaking a sweat. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 ensures simultaneous gaming and encoding is feasible. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM provides buffer headroom for game capture, but the 51st percentile GPU may struggle with high-bitrate streaming at high resolutions.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 19680 and PassMark integer math score of 188022 accelerate timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 37.32 TFLOPS FP32 and 583.2 GTexel/s texture rate assist with effects and previews. For 4K video editing, the CPU is overqualified, but the GPU's mid-pack percentile means GPU-accelerated effects will not be top-tier.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 and 3DMark max-threads score of 13985 make it a strong CPU-renderer. The GPU's 37.32 TFLOPS FP32 and 60 RT cores enable GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 51st percentile position means it is outclassed by higher-ranked cards. For Blender or similar, expect decent CPU rendering and moderate GPU acceleration.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 635147 and data encryption score of 38214 indicate fast compile times and secure data handling. The 3DMark 16-threads score of 9957 supports parallel builds. The CPU's 91st percentile makes it ideal for heavy compilation workloads, while the GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench 2533, PassMark single-thread 4406) handles office suites and web browsing effortlessly. The GPU is overkill for these tasks, but its 16 GB VRAM could be used for data visualization or light CAD work. The system is far more capable than needed, but the 65 W CPU TDP and 600 W suggested PSU keep power draw reasonable for a desktop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear CPU-favored imbalance. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile while the GPU sits at the 51st percentile, a 40-point gap. In CPU-bound workloads, the i9-13900F will not bottleneck — its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 and PassMark multi-thread score of 49693 are top-tier. The GPU is the limiting factor in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, as evidenced by its average benchmark score of 11627 that rivals a GTX 1660 (11680).

The FPS scaling story is inferred from benchmark scores. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and 8-thread score of 7426 suggest that at lower resolutions (1080p), the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, making the GPU the bottleneck. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and its 51st percentile ranking means it will be the limiting factor even more decisively. The CPU's 3DMark 2-threads score of 2265 and 4-threads score of 4393 indicate strong low-thread performance, so games that rely on a few cores will not be CPU-limited.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24176 versus its PassMark GPU compute score of 13473 shows a significant gap between rasterization and compute performance. This suggests the GPU is better suited for traditional rendering than for compute-heavy workloads. In a system where the CPU is 40 percentile points higher than the GPU, the bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the RX 7800 XT limits gaming frame rates, while the CPU limits nothing in most real-world scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a Raptor Lake-S part on a 10 nm Intel process, with a die size of 257 mm². It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5600 MHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC support enabled. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a high-end all-rounder. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 is 89% higher than the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17189, reflecting the CPU's scaling under extended loads. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5778 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for legacy applications and games. The Geekbench scores (2533 single, 19680 multi) confirm this dual strength. The PassMark suite shows specific strengths: integer math at 188022, floating point at 131007, and extended instructions at 36525. The data compression score of 635147 is particularly high, suggesting excellent throughput for archival and compression tasks.

The 91st percentile ranking means the i9-13900F outperforms 91% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, including the Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 8124P, are within 1% in average score, meaning the i9-13900F is not a performance outlier but rather a well-positioned high-end part. The 65 W TDP is notable — this is a power-efficient flagship, not a power-hungry one, and the performance per watt is strong given the 24-core configuration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a consumer desktop CPU. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the latest storage and expansion cards. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible and does not bottleneck the RX 7800 XT's 624.1 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, while the GPU's TDP is 263 W, and the suggested PSU is 600 W. This leaves headroom for overclocking or additional components, though the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not specify which memory type yields better results. The PCIe Gen 5 support means future GPUs or NVMe drives can leverage the increased bandwidth.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-ranked GPU, as the CPU has 40 percentile points of headroom over the current card. The 91st percentile CPU can drive a top-tier GPU without bottlenecking, so upgrading the RX 7800 XT to a GPU in the 90th percentile or higher would balance the system. Alternatively, adding a second RX 7800 XT is not supported by the FACT PACK (no multi-GPU data), so a single-GPU upgrade is the clear path. The 600 W PSU suggestion provides enough headroom for a more power-hungry GPU, but the exact wattage of a replacement is not in the data.

FAQ

Q: Does the i9-13900F have integrated graphics?

A: The FACT PACK lists `integratedGraphics` as null, meaning no integrated GPU is present. A discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's performance tier relative to all CPUs?

A: The i9-13900F is at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51730. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 51947, a delta of -0.4%, so the i9-13900F is statistically tied with that CPU.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7800 XT have, and what memory type?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The memory clock is 2438 MHz, effective 19.5 Gbps.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No. The `multiplierUnlocked` field is false, so the CPU does not support unlocked multiplier overclocking. The boost clock is fixed at 5.60 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking, and what does it mean?

A: The RX 7800 XT is at the 51st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 11627. It is closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (11680, -0.5%), indicating mid-pack performance.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU has `eccMemory` set to true, making it suitable for workstation-class reliability. The memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile is 71, reflecting the CPU's high 91st percentile and the GPU's mid 51st percentile. The system is above average overall but not in the top tier.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT. The CPU is a 24-core Raptor Lake-S part at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a RDNA 3.0 card at the 51st percentile. The combined percentile of 71 places this system in the upper-midrange tier overall. The CPU is clearly the dominant component, with an average benchmark score of 51730 that places it among high-end desktop and server parts. The GPU's average score of 11627 places it at the median of all GPUs, which is a surprising result for a 16 GB card with modern architecture.

The build's class is desktop, and it is suitable for a dual-purpose machine: the CPU handles compute-heavy tasks at a high level, while the GPU provides solid but not exceptional rasterization. The 65 W CPU TDP and 263 W GPU TDP, with a 600 W suggested PSU, make this a power-efficient combination compared to higher-end builds. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU and PCIe 4.0 on the GPU, ensuring modern connectivity. The system is not a top-tier gaming rig due to the GPU's 51st percentile, but it is a competent workstation with gaming capabilities.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU compute power over GPU rasterization. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find the RX 7800 XT sufficient for most titles at ultra settings, as the 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth handle modern textures, but the 51st percentile GPU ranking means 4K gaming will require settings reductions. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 and PassMark multi-thread score of 49693, while the GPU's 37.32 TFLOPS FP32 provides moderate acceleration.

Software developers and data analysts will find the CPU's PassMark data compression score of 635147 and encryption score of 38214 valuable for build servers and secure workloads. Students and office workers will be over-served by this build, but the 65 W CPU TDP keeps operational costs low. Small business workstations that run CPU-bound simulations or compile large codebases will see strong performance from the 91st percentile CPU. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is useful for machine learning inference at modest scales, but the 51st percentile compute score suggests it is not a primary compute card. The system is best suited for users who need a high-end CPU and are willing to accept a mid-pack GPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is based on the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU has 3840 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with 60 RT cores for ray tracing. The base clock is 1295 MHz, the boost clock is 2430 MHz, and the game clock is 2124 MHz. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth.

The benchmark scores reveal a mixed profile. The PassMark G3D score of 24176 is respectable, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 13473 is notably lower, indicating the card is better at rasterization than compute. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4157 is a moderate result. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 54228 is strong, while the OpenCL score of 18290 is lower. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 249 outperforms the DirectX 12 score of 93, which is unusual and suggests driver or architecture quirks. The DirectX 10 score of 121 and DirectX 9 score of 304 indicate backward compatibility is solid.

The 51st percentile ranking places the RX 7800 XT exactly at the median of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the GTX 1660, has an average score of 11680, which is only 0.5% higher. This is a striking data point: a 2023 RDNA 3.0 card with 16 GB VRAM and 60 RT cores is statistically tied in average benchmark score with a 2019 GTX 1660. The pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 583.2 GTexel/s are strong for 1440p, but the FP32 throughput of 37.32 TFLOPS is not exceptional for a high-end card. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin power connectors and a 600 W suggested PSU makes it a straightforward installation in most desktop cases.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds