SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a desktop pairing that leans heavily on processor muscle. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile against all processors, while the GPU holds the 67th percentile against all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 79 reflects a system where the graphics card is the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, but the processor is the dominant force in productivity and content creation tasks. The data shows a clear hierarchy: the Core i9-13900F is a top-tier compute engine, while the RX 7700 XT is a capable mid-range rasterizer.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the two components dictates the bottleneck profile. The Core i9-13900F scores 13,985 in the 3dmark_max_threads test, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the RX 7700 XT achieves a Passmark G3D score of 22,547, which lands in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. This 24-percentile gap means the GPU will consistently be the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes paramount.

Benchmark scaling reinforces this conclusion. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,145 in 3dmark_single_thread and 4,406 in Passmark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance, which is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios. However, the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 79 and 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 3,316 are modest figures that cap frame generation. In CPU-light games at 1080p, the processor will have headroom, but in GPU-heavy titles at 1440p or 4K, the RX 7700 XT will be the bottleneck.

The balance shifts completely in compute workloads. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,928 dwarfs the GPU’s Passmark GPU Compute score of 12,912. For video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the i9-13900F is the workhorse, and the GPU’s relative weakness in compute is irrelevant. The system is therefore unbalanced by design: it is a CPU-first platform with a GPU that complements rather than dominates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which future-proofs storage and expansion options. The i9-13900F has a TDP of 65 watts, a figure that is notably low for a 24-core processor, but the GPU’s TDP of 245 watts and its suggested PSU of 550 watts define the system’s power envelope. The 2x 8-pin power connectors on the GPU require a power supply with sufficient headroom, and the 550-watt suggestion is the baseline for a stable system.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking leaves significant headroom for graphics improvements. The RX 7700 XT’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and a future GPU swap would not require a platform change. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility, but the dual-channel bus limits memory bandwidth to what the processor can handle. The ECC memory support is a niche feature for workstation users who require error correction.

The platform’s longevity is tied to the Socket 1700, which is a mature socket with a well-established ecosystem. The production status of both components is active, and the release dates of 2023-01-03 for the CPU and 2023-09-05 for the GPU indicate a relatively recent pairing. The lack of an integrated graphics solution on the CPU means the discrete GPU is mandatory, which reinforces the need for a working graphics card at all times.

FAQ

Q: What is the most likely bottleneck in this system for gaming?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the bottleneck. The GPU’s 67th percentile ranking against all GPUs is significantly lower than the CPU’s 91st percentile, and the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 79 indicates modest graphics performance.

Q: Can the CPU handle DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, providing flexibility for different motherboard and memory configurations.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 watts, which accounts for the GPU’s 245-watt TDP and the CPU’s 65-watt TDP. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The Core i9-13900F has an average benchmark score of 51,730, which is 0.4 percent lower than the Ryzen 9 5950X’s 51,947. The two processors are effectively tied in performance.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for ray tracing workloads?

A: The RX 7700 XT has 54 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but its 67th percentile ranking and Passmark DirectX 12 score of 79 suggest ray tracing performance is not a primary strength.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-13900F is $524.

Q: Does the GPU support modern display outputs?

A: Yes, the RX 7700 XT includes 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, which covers current display connectivity standards.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. The i9-13900F’s 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,928, make it ideal for content creators who render video, compile code, or run complex simulations. The 91st percentile CPU ranking places it among the top processors for multi-threaded workloads, and the Passmark data compression score of 635,147 and integer math score of 188,022 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find the RX 7700 XT adequate for high settings, but the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier card. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern titles, but the CPU will often be waiting on the GPU. This pairing is less suitable for 4K gaming, where the GPU’s pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s will be stretched thin.

Developers and small business workstations benefit from the CPU’s ECC memory support and multi-threaded capabilities. The Passmark find prime numbers score of 204 and extended instructions score of 36,525 are modest, but the overall multithread score of 49,693 shows strong throughput. Students in engineering or data science fields would appreciate the CPU’s compute power, though they would need to pair it with a more capable GPU for graphics workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1435 MHz, the boost clock is 2544 MHz, and the game clock is 2171 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

The chip has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The RT cores number 54, but there are no tensor cores listed, which is consistent with AMD’s architecture. The pixel rate is 244.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 549.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 35.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 35.17 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio.

Benchmark results show the GPU’s strengths and weaknesses. The Passmark G3D score of 22,547 places it in the 67th percentile, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 138,383 is robust. The 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 3,316 is a modern DirectX 12 test that shows the card’s capability in current APIs. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 232 and DirectX 12 score of 79 are lower, indicating that the card is better suited to newer APIs. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, has an average score of 22,435, which is 0.5 percent lower, making the two cards comparable.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores and the components’ percentile positions. The data is not measured, and the gaming performance figures are qualitative estimates.

The RX 7700 XT’s Passmark G3D score of 22,547 and 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 3,316 suggest it can handle 1080p gaming with high settings in most titles. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern textures at 1080p, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth texture streaming. At 1440p, the GPU will still deliver playable frame rates, but the 67th percentile ranking means it will not match top-tier cards in demanding titles.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,406 in Passmark and 1,145 in 3dmark_single_thread ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. The 24-core processor provides ample multi-threaded headroom for background tasks while gaming. In CPU-intensive games at 1080p, the i9-13900F will be the stronger component, but the GPU’s pixel and texture rates will limit overall performance. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and the CPU’s advantage is largely irrelevant.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process by Intel. The base clock is 2000.00 MHz, and the boost clock is 5.60 GHz, which is a significant turbo range. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm², and the CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700.

The benchmark scores demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,928 is a strong result, and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,189 confirms this. The Geekbench multi-core score of 19,680 is also solid. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 13,985 shows scaling across all cores, while the 3dmark_16_threads score of 9,957 indicates that the processor handles moderate thread counts well.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,778 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,533 are top-tier figures. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 1,145 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,406 confirm that the Raptor Lake architecture delivers high per-core throughput. The Passmark integer math score of 188,022 and floating point math score of 131,007 show strong compute capability.

The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, has an average score of 51,947, which is 0.4 percent higher than the i9-13900F’s 51,730. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is 0.7 percent higher, and the AMD EPYC 8124P is also 0.7 percent higher. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is 0.8 percent lower. This places the i9-13900F in a tight cluster of high-performance processors.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a flagship-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU. The Core i9-13900F is a 24-core processor with a 91st percentile ranking, making it a top choice for compute-heavy workloads. The Radeon RX 7700 XT is a 67th percentile GPU, which is respectable but not flagship-level. The combined percentile of 79 places this system in the upper tier of desktop builds, but the GPU is the clear weak point.

The class is desktop, and the build is intended for users who need maximum CPU performance. The GPU is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it is not designed for 4K or high-refresh-rate gaming at maximum settings. The CPU’s 65-watt TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core chip, which makes cooling easier, while the GPU’s 245-watt TDP and 550-watt PSU suggestion define the system’s power requirements.

The overall tier is upper-mid-range to high-end, driven primarily by the CPU. The GPU’s 67th percentile ranking is the limiting factor, but the CPU’s 91st percentile ensures that the system excels in productivity and content creation. This is a build that prioritizes processing power over graphics fidelity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51,730, which places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X at 51,947, a delta of -0.4 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is also close at 52,073, a delta of -0.7 percent. The AMD EPYC 8124P is at 52,121, also -0.7 percent, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is at 51,310, a delta of +0.8 percent. The CPU’s performance is tightly clustered with these rivals.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 22,549, which places it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is the closest rival at 22,435, a delta of +0.5 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is at 22,729, a delta of -0.8 percent, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is at 22,895, a delta of -1.5 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 is at 22,170, a delta of +1.7 percent.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-10 percent performer, while the GPU is a solid mid-pack card. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,928 and the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 22,547 highlight the disparity. In mixed workloads, the CPU will dominate, and the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-bound tasks. The overall combined percentile of 79 reflects a system that is better than most, but not exceptional in graphics performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds