SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900F and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE pairing combines a high-core-count desktop processor with a mid-range RDNA 3 graphics card. This analysis relies strictly on the benchmark database scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this specific combination; all performance expectations are estimated from the CPU and GPU percentile rankings and synthetic test results.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a combined percentile of 87, which places it above the vast majority of systems in the database, indicating a high-tier desktop configuration.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Core i9-13900F has an average benchmark score of 51730, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X’s average score of 51947. It also trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX by 0.7% and the AMD EPYC 8124P by 0.7%, but leads the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T by 0.8%.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance standing relative to its nearest competitors?

A: The Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723. It sits 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, 1.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, and 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for each component?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F has a launch MSRP of $524, and the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a launch MSRP of 279 USD.

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, meaning overclocking via multiplier adjustment is not supported on this specific model.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900F posts an average benchmark score of 51730, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, putting it just behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (51947, -0.4%) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52073, -0.7%). The performance gap is negligible; the data shows the i9-13900F effectively trades blows with these rivals. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928, a massive figure that underscores its capability in heavily parallelized tasks. Single-thread performance is also robust, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2533 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5778.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE achieves an average benchmark score of 42723, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, scores 43223, which is a 1.2% difference. The RX 7650 GRE also trails the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile by similar margins of 1.2% and 1.3%, respectively. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the GPU scores 2336, and in Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 83109. The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU that has a slight edge over the GPU, creating a configuration where the graphics card is the primary performance limiter in graphics-intensive tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor communicates with the system via an Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark data indicates this is a powerhouse for productivity. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 shows exceptional scaling across its 32 threads, placing it in the 91st percentile. This translates to rapid rendering and video encoding. In contrast, the 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5778 confirm strong per-core performance, which is vital for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The Passmark data further details its strengths: integer math scores 188022, floating-point math scores 131007, and extended instructions score 36525, all indicating high throughput in scientific and financial computing. The data compression score of 635147 is particularly high, while the find prime numbers score of 204 is a lower result, showing that not all workloads benefit equally from the architecture. The 65 W TDP is a key spec, suggesting the processor can be kept cool with standard air coolers, despite its high core count and boost clocks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The i9-13900F sits in the 91st percentile for CPUs, while the RX 7650 GRE sits in the 83rd percentile for GPUs. This 8-percentile gap indicates that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336 is solid, but the CPU’s 3DMark max threads score of 13985 and 16-thread score of 9957 are disproportionately higher. For example, in a game that uses 16 threads, the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU, as the 3DMark 16-thread score of 9957 is far above what is needed to feed the RX 7650 GRE. However, the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4406 is not as dominant, which could cause minor limitations in very lightly-threaded titles at high frame rates. The estimated FPS scaling, based on these scores, suggests that lowering resolution or graphical settings will yield diminishing returns because the GPU’s 83rd percentile position will cap frame rates before the CPU’s 91st percentile becomes a constraint. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is also a potential bottleneck at higher resolutions, as it may fill up before the CPU or GPU compute units are fully utilized.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The graphics card has 32 RT cores for ray tracing and operates with a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost clock of 2695 MHz. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2250 MHz, providing 18 Gbps effective speed and a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s across a 128-bit interface.

The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 22.08 TFLOPS, with a texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s. In benchmark tests, it scores 2336 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) and 83109 in Geekbench OpenCL. The 83rd percentile ranking places it in the same performance tier as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, which is 1.2% faster. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may limit performance at 1440p with high-resolution textures. The 32 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, but the 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests that rasterization performance is the card’s primary strength. The dual-slot, 204 mm length design and 1x 8-pin power connector make it a physically flexible option for many cases, and the 450 W suggested PSU requirement is modest.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system is well-suited. The GPU’s 83rd percentile and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2533) will drive high frame rates in esports titles. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for this resolution, and the CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7426 ensures no bottleneck in most modern titles.

For streaming, the CPU’s 32 threads are a major asset. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 allows for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay without significant performance drops. The GPU’s 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 22.08 TFLOPS will handle the rendering side, making this a capable single-PC streaming setup.

Video editing benefits from the CPU’s high multi-core scores. The Passmark multithread score of 49693 and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4125 will accelerate timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 83109 also assists with GPU-accelerated effects, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a limit for very complex projects.

For 3D rendering, the CPU is the star. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17189 and R23 multi-core score of 40928 will significantly reduce render times in CPU-based renderers. The GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 performance is also useful for GPU-accelerated renderers, placing it in a good position for hybrid rendering workloads.

Software development will see mixed results. The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 188022 and data encryption score of 38214 are excellent for compiling large codebases and running virtual machines. The single-thread performance is sufficient for IDE responsiveness, though the GPU’s 83rd percentile is not a factor in most development tasks.

For student and office work, this is overkill. The CPU’s 91st percentile ensures that any spreadsheet, document, or web browsing task is instantaneous. The GPU’s 83rd percentile is irrelevant for these tasks, but the system will handle any accidental 3D workload or CAD application with ease.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory, though the dual-channel bus means performance will scale with the memory type chosen. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, ensuring high bandwidth for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s lanes and does not present a bottleneck. The CPU’s TDP of 65 W and the GPU’s TDP of 170 W suggest that a 450 W PSU is the minimum requirement, but the data indicates a 500-550 W unit would provide more comfortable headroom for overclocking the GPU or adding peripherals. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, such as one in the 90th+ percentile, to better match the CPU’s 91st percentile performance. The platform is mature, so a drop-in CPU upgrade to a higher-boost model within the LGA 1700 socket would also be feasible, though the 13th gen architecture is the final generation for this socket.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop-class system pairing the Intel Core i9-13900F, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, a 8 GB RDNA 3 graphics card. The combined percentile of 87 places this system in the upper echelon of desktop configurations. The CPU is clearly the dominant component, ranking in the 91st percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51730. The GPU, while ranking in the 83rd percentile with an average score of 42723, is a solid mid-to-high-end part but is the weaker link in this pairing. The system’s overall tier is high-end, but it is a CPU-first build where the processor’s multi-core capabilities (Cinebench R23 multi-core 40928) outshine the graphics card’s rendering throughput (3DMark Steel Nomad 2336). This is a workstation-class CPU with a gamer-friendly GPU, making it a versatile but slightly unbalanced platform.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a content creator or professional who needs extreme CPU compute power but only requires moderate GPU performance. Gamers playing at 1080p will find the GPU’s 83rd percentile sufficient for high refresh rates, and the CPU’s 91st percentile ensures no frame drops in CPU-bound titles. Video editors and 3D artists will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928, which dramatically shortens render times, while the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS handles previews and GPU acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the Passmark integer math score of 188022 and the 32 threads. Students and small business workstations will find this system excessively powerful, but it will handle any task without breaking a sweat, including future software demands. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is the limiting factor for 1440p or 4K gaming, so users targeting those resolutions should consider a different GPU, but for 1080p gaming and productivity, this pairing is a strong choice.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds