SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 76th percentile against all combined CPU and GPU configurations. This places the build firmly in the upper-midrange tier of the benchmark database. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The GPU is a Radeon RX 7000 series part based on the Navi 33 chip, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors across a 204 mm² die. It has a base clock of 1980 MHz, a boost clock of 2755 MHz, and a game clock of 2470 MHz, with a 190 W TDP.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13900F delivers a benchmark profile that is heavily weighted toward multi-threaded throughput. Its 24 cores and 32 threads are the primary driver of its strong showing in productivity tasks. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 40928 points in the multi-core test, which is a large figure that indicates serious capability for rendering and compilation workloads. The single-core score of 5778 in the same test shows that the architecture also retains excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench scores reinforce this dual strength: 19680 multi-core and 2533 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling data is particularly informative. The max-threads score of 13985 is substantially higher than the 16-thread score of 9957, which itself is far above the 8-thread score of 7426. This scaling pattern demonstrates that the processor can effectively utilize its full 32-thread count, rather than hitting a memory or cache bottleneck early.

The cache hierarchy is a key part of this performance. Each core has 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, while the shared L3 cache is 36 MB. This large shared pool helps with data-heavy workloads that span multiple cores, such as video encoding or scientific simulations. The PassMark integer math score of 188022 and floating-point math score of 131007 are strong indicators for general computation, while the data compression score of 635147 suggests excellent throughput in archival and database tasks. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation reliability. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides high bandwidth for modern storage and future GPUs. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 51730 places it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, which means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900F is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, which has an average score of 51947, a delta of -0.4%. This means the Intel part trails the older AMD flagship by less than half a percent, a negligible margin. It also sits within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52073, delta -0.7%) and the AMD EPYC 8124P (52121, delta -0.7%). The only rival it beats is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, which scores 51310, a delta of 0.8% in favor of the i9-13900F. These margins are tight, so the i9-13900F should not be considered a clear winner or loser in its immediate class, but rather a solid mid-point in a competitive field.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. As a result, all frame rate figures discussed in this section are estimated from the benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay testing. The data shows that the CPU has exceptional single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4406. This is more than sufficient to drive high frame rates in most titles, as the processor is unlikely to be the limiting factor in typical gaming scenarios. The GPU, however, is the more relevant component for gaming, and its scores suggest a mid-range rasterization performer.

The RX 7600 XT achieves a PassMark G3D score of 17132, which places it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, which scores 17208, a delta of -0.7%. This puts the AMD card within one percent of the RTX 3070 in this aggregate benchmark, meaning the gaming experience should be similar in terms of raw frame throughput in traditional rasterized rendering. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 provides a more modern DirectX 12 workload comparison, and while there is no direct rival score to compare against, it is a moderate result consistent with a 1080p-focused card. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 48366 and OpenCL score of 92426 further corroborate this position. For 1080p gaming, the estimated performance is strong; for 1440p, the card should handle many titles at high settings, but 4K gaming would likely require reductions in graphical fidelity to maintain smooth frame rates. The 16 GB VRAM is a notable asset for texture-heavy games, but the 128-bit memory bus limits the bandwidth to 288.0 GB/s, which can constrain performance at higher resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and uses the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU clock speeds are competitive for its class: a base of 1980 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and a boost of 2755 MHz. These clocks, combined with the architecture, yield a pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 22.57 TFLOPS, which is a solid figure for a mid-range card and indicates good performance in compute-heavy rendering tasks like Blender or GPU-accelerated effects.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with an effective speed of 18 Gbps. This yields a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The 16 GB capacity is generous for the price class, but the bandwidth is modest, which means the card may be limited in scenarios that require massive data movement, such as 4K texture streaming or certain compute workloads. The GPU has 32 ray accelerators (RT cores), which provide hardware support for ray tracing, but the overall RT performance is expected to be moderate given the card’s position in the 60th percentile. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern games, and the Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support covers a wide range of applications.

The PassMark DirectX scores are inconsistent: DirectX 9 shows 228, DirectX 10 shows 85, DirectX 11 shows 167, and DirectX 12 shows 65. These numbers are not directly comparable due to differences in workload and driver optimization, but the DirectX 12 score of 65 is notably low, which might indicate that the card’s strength lies in older API paths or that the benchmark does not reflect modern gaming performance accurately. The G2D score of 1030 is modest, suggesting adequate but not exceptional 2D desktop performance. The power delivery is straightforward, with a single 8-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W, which is manageable for most mid-range builds. The dual-slot design and 204 mm length make it compatible with most cases.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark and 4406 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing will be consistent in esports titles. The GPU, while not a top-tier part, is estimated to handle 1080p at high refresh rates, given its closeness to the RTX 3070 (delta -0.7%). Expect smooth experiences in competitive shooters and MOBAs.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and broadcasting. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 indicates that the CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets without dropping frames, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM allows for game capture buffers. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps thermal load manageable during long streams.

Video editing: The high multi-core throughput (Cinebench R20 score of 17189) is a strong asset for timeline rendering and export. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 92426 accelerates effects and color grading. The large 16 GB VRAM helps with previewing 4K timelines, though the modest bandwidth may slow scrubbing on complex sequences.

3D rendering: The PassMark floating-point math score of 131007 and the CPU’s 32 threads make this a capable rendering machine for CPU-based engines. The GPU’s 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides acceleration in GPU renderers, but the RT core count of 32 is limited, so ray-traced renders may be slower than on higher-tier cards.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 188022 and data compression score of 635147 indicate strong performance in code compilation and binary manipulation. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running builds where data integrity is critical.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for typical office tasks. The single-thread score of 2533 in Geekbench ensures snappy application launching and spreadsheet calculations. The high core count will remain idle in these workloads, but the system will not struggle with any common office software.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51730, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17083, placing it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 76, which reflects the disparity between the high-end processor and the mid-range graphics card. The CPU outperforms its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, by a negligible -0.4%, meaning the two are effectively equal in aggregate performance. The GPU trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 by -0.7%, which is also a marginal difference. The PassMark data shows the CPU’s multi-thread score of 49693 is dominant, while the GPU’s G3D score of 17132 is merely solid. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9957 on the CPU side is a strong showing, but the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2348 is modest. This combined picture is that of a workstation-grade CPU paired with a mainstream gaming GPU, creating an imbalance where the CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can deliver in graphics-bound tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need maximum CPU compute power for productivity but are content with mid-range gaming performance. Gamers at 1080p will find the RX 7600 XT sufficient for high settings, and the CPU will prevent any bottleneck in frame generation. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the 32 threads and high Cinebench scores, while the GPU provides adequate acceleration for previews and effects. Software developers compiling large projects will appreciate the high integer math score and the large L3 cache. Students in engineering or data science fields will find the ECC memory support and multi-core performance useful for simulations and data analysis. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database workloads will leverage the high PassMark data compression score of 635147.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance is clearly skewed toward the CPU. The processor’s 91st percentile position vastly exceeds the GPU’s 60th percentile, meaning the CPU will often be waiting on the GPU in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the estimated FPS at 1080p will be limited by the GPU’s 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 2048 shading units, not by the CPU’s ability to issue draw calls. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p would show a significant drop due to the GPU’s memory bus limitations, while the CPU’s performance headroom remains untapped. In compute workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU’s 40928 Cinebench R23 score will dominate, and the GPU’s 22.57 TFLOPS will only accelerate specific tasks. For video editing, the CPU handles codec encoding, while the GPU assists with effects, so the bottleneck depends on the specific operation. In office tasks, neither component is stressed, but the CPU’s single-thread speed determines responsiveness.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class pairing. The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 13th Gen Raptor Lake processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, designed for high multi-threaded throughput. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a RDNA 3.0 GPU with 16 GB of VRAM, aimed at 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming. The combined percentile of 76 places this in the upper-midrange tier of all builds in the database. The CPU is a top-tier performer at the 91st percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range part at the 60th percentile. This creates a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is only average in GPU-bound scenarios. The build is suitable for users who prioritize processing power over graphical fidelity.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the build support modern ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 32 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though performance is moderate given the 60th percentile position.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The CPU scores 51730 on average, which is -0.4% compared to the Ryzen 9 5950X’s 51947, meaning the two are essentially tied in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What memory types are supported by the CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is 450 W, and it uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined CPU and GPU configuration sits at the 76th percentile among all builds in the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for current and next-generation storage drives. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the bandwidth is limited to x8. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 190 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This leaves headroom for upgrades, but the platform is limited to 13th Gen Intel processors. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, such as one in the 90th percentile or above, to better match the CPU’s 91st percentile performance. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory would benefit memory-intensive tasks, given the dual-channel bus. The CPU’s ECC support makes it suitable for workstation use, but the Socket 1700 platform is nearing the end of its upgrade cycle, so future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is already generous, so an upgrade would focus on raw compute throughput rather than capacity.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds