SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, and what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop GPU built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 33 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The die measures 204 mm² and packs 13,300 million transistors, giving it a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². This is a compact, efficient design aimed at mainstream 1080p gaming rather than flagship compute workloads.

Memory configuration is modest by modern standards: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This yields a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. That bandwidth figure is adequate for 1080p gaming and light 1440p work, but it will become a limiting factor in texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs installed. The 8 GB capacity is the more pressing constraint — modern titles at maximum settings can exceed this, causing stutter or texture pop-in when VRAM spills over into system memory.

The GPU's compute resources are clearly defined: 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. Clock speeds are a base of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 21.75 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (with a 1:1 ratio), which is a strong figure for a mainstream card but far below what workstation-class GPUs deliver.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 32 RT cores. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it is fully modern in API support. However, the RT core count is modest, and benchmark data suggests that ray-traced workloads are not this card's strength. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 places it in the lower half of the GPU performance distribution, and the PassMark DirectX 11 score of 172 and DirectX 12 score of 58 are both low absolute numbers. The PassMark G3D score of 16634 is more representative of raw rasterization power, while the PassMark GPU compute score of 8790 indicates moderate compute throughput.

There are no tensor cores on this GPU — AMD relies on shader-based compute for AI workloads, which is less efficient than dedicated tensor hardware. For rendering tasks, the data shows a card that excels at traditional rasterization but struggles with ray tracing and heavy compute. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 is about 13% below the nearest rival NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's score of 15199 (deltaPct -0.2), indicating that in pure DX12 rasterization, the RX 7600 is essentially tied with that older card. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 and Vulkan score of 34401 show a wide gap between compute-oriented and graphics-oriented workloads, with Vulkan being significantly weaker — a pattern that suggests driver-level optimization favors OpenCL compute.

The GPU sits at the 57th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 57% of the field but is clearly not a high-end part. Its average benchmark score of 15171 is within a few points of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199, deltaPct -0.2), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X (15082, deltaPct 0.6), the AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics (15270, deltaPct -0.7), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (15063, deltaPct 0.7). This clustering shows that the RX 7600 is in a performance tier where small architectural differences matter more than raw silicon size.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 74, placing it in the upper quartile of all desktop builds. The CPU, an Intel Core i9-13900F, is the dominant contributor to this ranking. Its average benchmark score is 51730, and it sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs — a very strong showing. The GPU, by contrast, is at the 57th percentile, a mid-pack result. This imbalance is the defining characteristic of this build.

Looking at the CPU benchmark scores in detail: in 3DMark, the i9-13900F scores 9957 with 16 threads, 2265 with 2 threads, 4393 with 4 threads, 7426 with 8 threads, 13985 with max threads, and 1145 with a single thread. The scaling from 2 to 4 to 8 threads is nearly linear (2265 to 4393 to 7426), indicating excellent thread scaling in synthetic workloads. The jump from 8 to 16 threads is less steep (7426 to 9957), and the max thread score of 13985 shows that the full 24-core/32-thread configuration adds meaningful but diminishing returns.

In Cinebench, the multicore scores are 4125 (R15), 17189 (R20), and 40928 (R23). The single-core scores are 582 (R15), 2426 (R20), and 5778 (R23). The R23 multicore score of 40928 is exceptionally high, rivaling many workstation processors. The Geekbench multicore score is 19680 and single-core is 2533. PassMark results show a multithread score of 49693 and a single-thread score of 4406. The PassMark integer math score of 188022 and floating-point math score of 131007 indicate strong arithmetic throughput, while the data compression score of 635147 and random string sorting score of 70441 show fast memory and cache handling.

The CPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database are all within 1% of its score: the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (avgScore 51947, deltaPct -0.4), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (avgScore 52073, deltaPct -0.7), the AMD EPYC 8124P (avgScore 52121, deltaPct -0.7), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T (avgScore 51310, deltaPct 0.8). This means the i9-13900F is statistically indistinguishable from a high-end previous-generation Ryzen and several current-generation Ultra and EPYC parts — it is not a top-of-the-line CPU anymore, but it is firmly in the upper echelon.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 15171 places it at the 57th percentile. Its nearest rivals are all within 1%: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199, deltaPct -0.2), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X (15082, deltaPct 0.6), the AMD Radeon 680M (15270, deltaPct -0.7), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (15063, deltaPct 0.7). The RX 7600 is therefore a solidly mid-range GPU, but it is paired with a top-10% CPU. The combined picture is a system that will be CPU-bound in nearly every gaming scenario and massively CPU-bound in productivity tasks.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename). It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2000 MHz and the boost clock is 5600 MHz — a 5.6 GHz boost is the headline figure for single-threaded workloads. The TDP is 65 W, which is remarkably low for a 24-core part, and it fits the Intel Socket 1700. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Cache is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache hierarchy is a key reason the CPU performs so well in data-heavy workloads like the PassMark random string sorting score of 70441 and data compression score of 635147. The processor was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $524. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported — a minor limitation for enthusiasts, but the boost clock of 5.6 GHz is already at the high end.

The benchmark scores tell a story of a CPU that is excellent at both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded tasks. The single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark and 5778 in Cinebench R23 are strong, but not class-leading. The multicore scores are where this CPU shines: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is nearly seven times the single-core score, demonstrating exceptional scaling across its 24 cores. The PassMark multithread score of 49693 and the 3DMark max-threads score of 13985 both confirm this.

In real workloads, this CPU will handle anything thrown at it. The 91st percentile ranking means it outperforms 91% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores nearly identically (deltaPct -0.4), which is a useful reference point: the i9-13900F is a previous-generation top-tier part that remains competitive with modern mid-range and high-end offerings. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is slightly slower (deltaPct 0.8), while the Core Ultra 5 235HX and EPYC 8124P are slightly faster (both deltaPct -0.7). This clustering means the i9-13900F is not a performance leader in 2025, but it is far from obsolete.

For software development, the high thread count and fast single-thread speed mean quick compilation times and responsive IDEs. For video editing and 3D rendering, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is a strong indicator of render performance. For office and productivity work, the PassMark single-thread score of 4406 ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The 65 W TDP is a notable advantage — it allows for a capable air cooler in a standard desktop case, keeping noise and heat manageable.

# Balance and Bottleneck

This build is severely imbalanced. The CPU is at the 91st percentile while the GPU is at the 57th percentile — a 34-point gap. In practical terms, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost every graphics-intensive workload, while the CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is nearly double what would be needed to feed a mid-range GPU at 1080p. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 16634 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2310 are the bottlenecks. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU can easily generate frames faster than the GPU can render them, so the frame rate will be determined by the GPU's rasterization and shading throughput. At 1440p, the GPU becomes even more of a bottleneck as resolution scaling increases the pixel fill rate demand, pushing the pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s to its limits.

In productivity tasks, the balance shifts. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 49693 and Geekbench multicore score of 19680 dominate tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and data analysis. The GPU's compute score of 8790 in PassMark is modest, so GPU-accelerated compute tasks will not benefit from the CPU's strength. However, the GPU's OpenCL score of 88051 is respectable, so some compute workloads will see reasonable acceleration.

The FPS scaling picture is clear: in CPU-bound scenarios (e.g., esports titles at low settings, or games with heavy physics calculations), the i9-13900F will deliver maximum frame rates, but the RX 7600 will cap the actual FPS at whatever its rasterization speed allows. In GPU-bound scenarios (e.g., AAA titles at high settings, or 4K gaming), the GPU will be the sole limiting factor, and the CPU's power will be irrelevant. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this imbalance — the build is better than a typical mid-range system, but far from the top tier that a 91st percentile CPU might suggest.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need extreme CPU performance for productivity but are willing to compromise on GPU performance for gaming. The 91st percentile CPU makes it ideal for content creators, software developers, and students in STEM fields who run multi-threaded applications daily.

Content creators: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 means video editing timelines will render fast, and 3D modeling applications will respond smoothly. The 8 GB GPU VRAM is sufficient for 1080p video editing and moderate 3D scenes, but not for heavy 4K compositing.

Software developers: The high thread count (32 threads) and fast single-core speed (PassMark single-thread 4406) make compilation, code analysis, and virtual machine management efficient. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Students and researchers: For data processing, the PassMark data compression score of 635147 and integer math score of 188022 indicate fast data manipulation. The 65 W TDP means the system can run in a dorm room without special cooling.

Small business workstations: The CPU handles spreadsheets, databases, and office suites with ease, while the GPU provides adequate acceleration for presentation graphics and light video conferencing effects.

Gamers: This is not a high-refresh 1440p system. At 1080p, the RX 7600 will deliver playable frame rates in most titles, but the CPU will never be the bottleneck. Gamers who prioritize esports titles at high refresh rates will benefit from the CPU's single-thread performance, but the GPU will limit maximum FPS in most cases.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows. All FPS figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's 57th percentile ranking and its PassMark G3D score of 16634, this system is a competent 1080p gaming machine. At 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 7600 should deliver smooth frame rates in most titles, with the CPU ensuring minimum frame times are low. Expect 60+ FPS in well-optimized AAA games and much higher in esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, where the CPU's single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark will push frame rates well above 144 FPS at low-to-medium settings.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will constrain performance, with frame rates dropping to 40-60 FPS in demanding titles at ultra settings. Lowering settings to medium or high will bring frame rates back to playable levels, but the CPU's power will remain underutilized. At 4K, this system is not recommended — the GPU's pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s is insufficient for high-refresh 4K gaming.

The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, scores nearly identically (deltaPct -0.2), so frame rates should be similar to that card. The AMD Radeon 680M integrated GPU is also within 1% (deltaPct -0.7), which is surprising but indicates that the RX 7600's advantage over integrated graphics is minimal in synthetic tests — though the discrete card's dedicated VRAM and higher sustained clocks will help in real games.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the CPU's single-thread strength (3DMark single-thread 1145, PassMark single-thread 4406) will drive high frame rates, but the GPU caps the maximum. Expect 144+ FPS in esports titles, but not in AAA games at ultra settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads handle encoding without a dedicated capture card. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 ensures that game capture and encoding will not impact gaming performance, though the GPU's modest VRAM may limit quality settings.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 19680 and PassMark multithread score of 49693 make 4K timeline editing and export fast. The GPU accelerates effects and color grading via OpenCL (score 88051), but the 8 GB VRAM limits heavy compositing.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 17189 and R23 score of 40928 indicate strong CPU rendering performance. GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower due to the RX 7600's mid-range compute (PassMark GPU compute 8790), but it is usable for previews.

Software development: The high thread count and fast single-thread speed (PassMark single-thread 4406) make compilation and test execution quick. The data compression score of 635147 speeds up source control operations and build artifact handling.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP and ECC memory support make it a reliable, low-power platform for spreadsheets, document editing, and web research. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but it handles video conferencing and presentation graphics without issue.

# FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900F a good CPU for this GPU?

A: The CPU is at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 57th percentile. This means the CPU is far more powerful than the GPU, so the GPU will be the limiting factor in gaming. For productivity tasks, the CPU is excellent.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7600 have, and is it enough?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming at high settings, but may be limiting for 1440p with high-resolution textures.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5600 MHz. Its PassMark single-thread score is 4406, indicating strong single-threaded performance.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported. The boost clock of 5600 MHz is the maximum speed.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 165 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to the RTX 3050 OEM?

A: The RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171, while the RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, a deltaPct of -0.2. They are statistically tied in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 74, meaning this system outperforms 74% of all desktop builds. However, the CPU alone is at the 91st percentile, and the GPU at the 57th, showing a significant imbalance.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900F (24 cores, 32 threads, Raptor Lake architecture, 10 nm process) with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (RDNA 3.0, Navi 33 chip, 6 nm process). The CPU is a high-end part from the Core 13th Gen series, released January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $524. The GPU is a mid-range part from the Radeon RX 7000 series, released May 24, 2023, with a launch MSRP of 269 USD.

The overall tier from the percentiles is upper-mid-range: the combined percentile of 74 places it above three-quarters of all systems, but the gap between the CPU's 91st percentile and the GPU's 57th percentile makes it a lopsided configuration. The CPU is a top-tier productivity workhorse with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and a PassMark multithread score of 49693, while the GPU is a solid mainstream gaming card with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2310 and a PassMark G3D score of 16634. This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads — content creation, software development, data analysis — and are willing to accept mid-range gaming performance. For pure gaming, a more balanced pairing would be preferable, but for mixed productivity and light gaming, this build offers exceptional CPU power at a moderate GPU cost.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds