SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. This is a locked multiplier part (no overclocking), but the high boost clock compensates by delivering strong single-threaded performance out of the box. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This combination of high core count, deep cache, and high boost frequency places the chip in the 91st percentile among all CPUs.

In terms of raw compute, the i9-13900F's benchmark results are consistent with a high-end workstation-class part. In Cinebench R23, it scores 40,928 multi-core and 5,778 single-core. The multi-core score indicates that heavily threaded workloads like video rendering, 3D scene compilation, and software builds will scale exceptionally well across the 24 cores. The single-core score of 5,778 is equally important for lightly threaded tasks such as legacy applications, certain game engines, and general desktop responsiveness. The Passmark multi-thread score of 49,693 and integer math score of 188,022 further reinforce that this CPU excels at parallel computation. Data compression scores of 635,147 in Passmark suggest that archiving, backup, and database-style workloads will run very quickly. Floating-point math at 131,007 is strong for scientific computing and physics simulations.

The CPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database provide context: the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X averages a score of 51,947, which is only 0.4% higher than the i9-13900F's average of 51,730. This means the two are effectively neck-and-neck in overall compute performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is 0.7% lower, and the AMD EPYC 8124P is also 0.7% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is 0.8% higher. These tight deltas indicate that the i9-13900F sits in a very competitive performance band where no single rival has a decisive advantage. For real workloads, this means that the i9-13900F will trade blows with these chips depending on the specific instruction mix, but users will not notice a meaningful difference in day-to-day tasks or even long render jobs.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51,730 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, which is a top-tier position. The GPU, in stark contrast, is an AMD Radeon RX 7400 based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture (Navi 33 chip) with a 6 nm process from TSMC. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The GPU's average benchmark score is 2,467, which puts it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs — a very low position. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,103, while Passmark G3D is 11,897 and GPU Compute is 5,152.

The GPU's nearest rivals are telling: the AMD Radeon 8040S scores 2,440 (1.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce 710M scores 2,433 (1.4% higher), the Intel HD Graphics 610 scores 2,425 (1.8% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M scores 2,422 (1.9% higher). These are all entry-level or integrated graphics solutions. The RX 7400 is effectively competing with decade-old integrated graphics in terms of raw benchmark scores. This is a massive mismatch when paired with a 91st percentile CPU.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 54, meaning that the system as a whole sits roughly in the middle of all desktop configurations in the database. This combined figure is dragged down heavily by the GPU. The CPU alone can handle high-end productivity tasks, but the GPU will bottleneck any graphics workload severely. Benchmark results indicate that the i9-13900F is capable of sustaining high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the RX 7400 will cap those frame rates at very low levels in GPU-bound scenarios.

# Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is severely imbalanced. The CPU's 91st percentile rank versus the GPU's 17th percentile rank creates a situation where the GPU is the clear limiting factor for any graphics-intensive workload. In gaming or 3D rendering, the RX 7400 will max out long before the i9-13900F breaks a sweat. The data shows that the CPU has a single-thread score of 1,145 in 3DMark and a max-threads score of 13,985, indicating massive headroom for feeding even a much faster GPU. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44 and DirectX 11 score of 97 are extraordinarily low, suggesting that modern game engines will struggle to maintain playable frame rates regardless of the CPU's capabilities.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression, encryption, or code compilation, the GPU is irrelevant, and the i9-13900F will perform at its 91st percentile level. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RX 7400 will hold the system back to the 17th percentile level. The FPS scaling evidence is absent (no measured FPS data exists for this combination), but the benchmark scores alone indicate that the GPU will bottleneck the CPU in any task that relies on pixel throughput, texture mapping, or ray tracing. The GPU has 64 ROPs and 112 TMUs, with a pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s, but these figures are dwarfed by the demands of modern games. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,957 versus the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103 highlights the gap: the CPU can process game logic and physics at a high level, but the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to utilize that processing power.

# FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900F a good CPU for productivity work?

A: Yes. It scores 40,928 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 49,693 in Passmark multi-thread, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. It is within 0.8% of its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, making it a top-tier choice for rendering, compilation, and data processing.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7400 compare to other GPUs in the database?

A: The RX 7400 scores 2,467 on average, placing it in the 17th percentile. Its closest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S (1.1% higher), NVIDIA GeForce 710M (1.4% higher), and Intel HD Graphics 610 (1.8% higher). These are entry-level or integrated graphics parts.

Q: Can this system play modern games at high settings?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this combination, so figures are estimates. Based on the GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103, the RX 7400 will likely struggle with modern titles even at low settings. The CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU is.

Q: What is the memory support for the i9-13900F?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is useful for error-sensitive workstation tasks.

Q: What PCIe version does the i9-13900F support?

A: It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is narrower and older, but this will not be a bottleneck for the RX 7400's performance level.

Q: How much power does the GPU require?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 43 W and requires a 200 W power supply. It uses a single 6-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the i9-13900F has a locked multiplier. However, its boost clock of 5.60 GHz already provides strong performance without overclocking.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a plus for workstation reliability. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, offering high bandwidth for future NVMe SSDs or other expansion cards. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest for a 24-core part, meaning that the platform power delivery will not be stressed by the CPU itself. However, the GPU's suggested PSU of 200 W is very low, indicating that the entire system can run on a small power supply if the rest of the components are efficient.

The most sensible next upgrade for this build is a more capable GPU. The RX 7400's 17th percentile performance leaves a massive gap for improvement. A GPU with a higher percentile rank would better utilize the i9-13900F's 91st percentile compute power. Since the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5, there is no platform-level bottleneck for a future GPU upgrade. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that the user can choose based on budget and availability without changing the motherboard. The CPU's boost clock of 5.60 GHz and large cache (36 MB L3) will remain relevant for years, so the platform is not the limiting factor. The upgrade path is clear: keep the CPU and replace the GPU with something that matches the CPU's performance tier.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is an entry-level GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the Navi 33 chip codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish." It is built on a 6 nm process from TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 1452 MHz, with a boost clock of 2300 MHz and a game clock of 2200 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It also features 28 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores, which are absent from this architecture.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS and FP16 of 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1). The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The GPU's benchmark scores are weak: Passmark G3D is 11,897 and GPU Compute is 5,152. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,103, which is a very low result for a modern GPU. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44 and DirectX 11 score of 97 are particularly concerning for gaming performance.

The GPU's 17th percentile rank places it among the lowest-performing GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are all integrated or entry-level mobile parts, including the NVIDIA GeForce 710M and Intel HD Graphics 610. This means that for rendering tasks, the RX 7400 will deliver results comparable to those older parts, which is far below what the i9-13900F can feed. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for basic tasks, but the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest. The 28 RT cores will provide some ray tracing capability, but the overall low compute performance will limit ray-traced workloads severely. For productivity, the GPU compute score of 5,152 suggests that GPGPU tasks like machine learning inference or video encoding will be slow.

# Who Should Build It

This build is not for gamers. The RX 7400's 17th percentile performance and low DirectX scores mean that even at 1080p with low settings, modern games will likely run poorly. The CPU's 91st percentile performance is wasted in gaming scenarios because the GPU will bottleneck frame rates. If a user must build a system with these exact components, they should target productivity workloads that do not rely on the GPU. The i9-13900F's strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 40,928, Passmark multi-thread of 49,693) make it excellent for software developers compiling code, data analysts processing large datasets, or students running scientific simulations. The CPU's data compression score of 635,147 is useful for database management and backup operations.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering (e.g., software renderers) will benefit from the CPU, but GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow. Small business workstations that run office applications, spreadsheet modeling, or light database work will see strong CPU performance, and the GPU is sufficient for basic display output and 2D tasks. The Passmark G2D score of 1,209 suggests that 2D desktop work is acceptable. However, for any 3D modeling, video editing with GPU effects, or gaming at any resolution, this GPU is inadequate. The build is best suited for a user who needs maximum CPU compute power for multi-threaded tasks and does not care about graphics performance, or for a user who plans to replace the GPU immediately.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build (build class: desktop) pairing an Intel Core i9-13900F CPU with an AMD Radeon RX 7400 GPU. The CPU is a high-end, 91st percentile part with 24 cores and 32 threads, while the GPU is a low-end, 17th percentile part with 8 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile for the system is 54, which reflects the severe imbalance between the two components. The CPU's average benchmark score of 51,730 is nearly 21 times higher than the GPU's average score of 2,467, indicating that the GPU will be the limiting factor in any graphics workload. This pairing is akin to putting a racing engine in a car with bicycle wheels: the CPU has tremendous potential, but the GPU cannot deliver it to the screen. The system's overall tier is mid-range due to the combined percentile, but the CPU is top-tier and the GPU is bottom-tier. This is a workstation-oriented build where the GPU is only present for display output, not for compute acceleration.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing, so all gaming frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 11 score of 97 and DirectX 12 score of 44 are extremely low, suggesting that even older games at 1080p with medium settings will struggle to maintain playable frame rates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 is a modern benchmark, and this low score indicates that recent AAA titles will be unplayable at any resolution above low settings. The CPU's high single-thread scores (3DMark single-thread 1,145, Cinebench R23 single-core 5,778) will not help because the GPU is the bottleneck.

At 1080p, the RX 7400 might handle esports titles at low-to-medium settings, but the absence of measured FPS data means these are only estimates. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will be overwhelmed, and frame rates will drop further. The GPU's 64 ROPs and 147.2 GPixel/s pixel rate limit fill-rate-heavy scenarios. For ray tracing, the 28 RT cores are present, but the low overall compute performance means that enabling ray tracing will likely reduce frame rates to single digits in modern titles. The realistic expectation is that this build is not a gaming machine. Users who want to game should look at a different GPU entirely, as the CPU is more than capable of supporting a much faster graphics card.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds