SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT: A High-End Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake flagship-class processor with AMD's RDNA 2-based top-tier GPU, placing the build at the 90th percentile overall. The CPU and GPU each sit in the upper echelon of their respective categories — the i9-13900F at the 91st percentile among all CPUs and the RX 6950 XT at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. While no measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination, benchmark scores provide a reliable basis for estimating real-world performance across workloads. The data indicates a desktop system capable of handling demanding gaming, content creation, and professional tasks, though the GPU's 16 GB frame buffer and the CPU's 65 W TDP create an interesting balance of capabilities and constraints.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6950 XT's PassMark G3D score of 28070 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, indicating strong rasterization performance that supports high-refresh gaming at demanding resolutions. The CPU's single-thread score of 5778 in Cinebench R23 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 ensure that frame pacing remains consistent in scenarios where the CPU must feed the GPU quickly. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps maintain throughput at high resolutions, though the lack of measured FPS data means precise frame rate expectations should be tempered with the understanding that these are estimates based on synthetic benchmarks.

Streaming: The i9-13900F's 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 49693 and the 3DMark max-threads score of 13985 indicate that the CPU can handle the parallel load of a game plus a software encoder. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and its 80 RT cores suggest hardware-accelerated ray tracing is available, though the RDNA 2 architecture's ray tracing performance is not the primary strength. For streaming, the CPU's high multi-threaded throughput is the main asset, allowing software encoding without severe frame rate penalties.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and the GPU's 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance creates a capable video editing platform. Timeline scrubbing and effects rendering benefit from the GPU's compute capabilities, evidenced by its PassMark GPU compute score of 14199 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 205998. The CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency during multi-track editing sessions. The 16 GB GDDR6 frame buffer on the GPU allows for larger project previews and smoother timeline performance with high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 13985 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 17189 demonstrate strong multi-threaded rendering capability. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RX 6950 XT's 5120 shading units and 320 texture mapping units deliver substantial compute throughput, with the FP16 performance of 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1) providing additional headroom for reduced-precision workloads. The GPU's 128 ROPs and 295.7 GPixel/s pixel rate support high-resolution output. The CPU's 65 W TDP means power draw is modest for rendering tasks, though the GPU's 335 W TDP is substantial — the suggested PSU of 700 W indicates the overall system power envelope is significant.

Software development: The i9-13900F's PassMark data compression score of 635147 and data encryption score of 38214 indicate strong performance in compilation and cryptographic workloads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9957 shows that parallel compilation tasks scale well up to 16 threads, while the single-thread score of 1145 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The CPU's support for ECC memory is an unusual feature for a desktop processor, potentially appealing to developers who value data integrity. The 32 threads allow for extensive parallel builds, though the 65 W TDP suggests sustained all-core workloads may see clock reductions.

Student and office work: The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2533 and PassMark single-thread score of 4406 ensure snappy response in everyday applications. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2265 and 4-thread score of 4393 indicate that typical office workloads, which often rely on a few threads, are well-served. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample buffering for productivity applications. This pairing is overkill for basic tasks, but the headroom ensures that future software demands are met without degradation. The GPU's 16 GB frame buffer is irrelevant for office work but does not detract from the system's capability in this domain.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51730 places it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 51947, a delta of -0.4%, indicating the two processors are statistically tied. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (-0.7%) and the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121 (-0.7%), both marginally ahead. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51310 (+0.8%), meaning the i9-13900F is slightly ahead of that rival. This clustering shows the i9-13900F sits in a competitive band where no single rival dominates.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 58392 places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P102-100 at 58528 (-0.2%), the Intel Arc A570M at 58239 (+0.3%), the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58657 (-0.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58085 (+0.5%). These deltas are all within one percent, indicating the RX 6950 XT is positioned in a tightly contested performance tier.

The combined percentile of 90 for this pairing indicates that the CPU and GPU are well-matched in overall capability. The CPU's specific benchmark results — Cinebench R23 multicore of 40928 and single-core of 5778 — show a 7.1x ratio between multi-core and single-core performance, indicating strong scaling. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 and PassMark G3D score of 28070 provide a composite picture: this is a system where the CPU leads slightly in relative standing (91st percentile vs. 88th percentile for the GPU), but both components are in the top tier. The PassMark physics score of 2766 for the CPU and the GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 114 illustrate the distinct strengths of each component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the memory bandwidth for the platform is not specified in the data. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connections to modern storage and expansion cards. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible and does not bottleneck in most workloads.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is notably low for a 24-core processor, suggesting that the system's power headroom is primarily determined by the GPU. The RX 6950 XT has a 335 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 700 W. This means a sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom in its power envelope. The platform's support for DDR5 memory means a memory upgrade to higher-frequency modules could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the exact gains are not quantified in the data.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, limiting overclocking potential, but its boost clock of 5.60 GHz is already high. The GPU is end-of-life, so future upgrades would involve newer architectures. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU side ensures that future GPUs with Gen 5 interfaces will be accommodated, though the current GPU uses Gen 4. The 20 CPU PCIe lanes provide adequate bandwidth for a high-end GPU and NVMe storage, though expansion options are limited compared to HEDT platforms.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 91st percentile standing versus the GPU's 88th percentile suggests the CPU is slightly more capable relative to its peers than the GPU. This implies that in CPU-bound workloads, the GPU may become the limiting factor, while in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU has some headroom. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 9957 and max-threads score of 13985 indicate strong multi-threaded performance that can feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 28070, while strong, is not in the top 10% of GPUs, meaning it will likely be the constraint at very high resolutions or with demanding graphical settings.

The CPU's single-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R23 single-core of 5778 and 3DMark single-thread of 1145, is sufficient to drive high frame rates in most games. However, in scenarios where the GPU is not fully utilized — such as esports titles at lower resolutions — the CPU's single-thread performance may become the limiting factor. The FPS scaling between these components cannot be measured directly, as no measuredFps data exists for this combination. The balance is generally favorable, with the CPU providing enough throughput to keep the GPU busy in most workloads, but the GPU's 88th percentile standing means it is the more likely bottleneck in graphically intensive tasks.

The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2265 for the CPU and the GPU's PassMark DirectX 9 score of 303 illustrate the difference in legacy workload handling. For modern workloads, the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample parallelism, while the GPU's 5120 shading units offer substantial compute throughput. The bottleneck analysis suggests that neither component severely constrains the other, but the GPU's 16 GB frame buffer and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting in future titles with higher VRAM demands.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F features 24 cores and 32 threads based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2000 MHz, boosting to 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support being an unusual feature for a desktop processor.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is strong, while the single-core score of 5778 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance. The PassMark integer math score of 188022 and floating-point math score of 131007 show balanced compute capabilities. The PassMark find prime numbers score of 204 is relatively low, indicating that certain specialized workloads may not benefit from the architecture's strengths.

The 3DMark thread-scaling results — 2265 for 2 threads, 4393 for 4 threads, 7426 for 8 threads, 9957 for 16 threads, and 13985 for max threads — show near-linear scaling up to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that point. This suggests that the processor's hybrid architecture, while not explicitly detailed in the data, provides strong performance across a range of thread counts. The PassMark multithread score of 49693 and physics score of 2766 round out the CPU's profile, indicating strong performance in physics simulations and general multi-threaded tasks. The 65 W TDP is notably low for this core count, suggesting efficient power management.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1440p or 4K: The RX 6950 XT's 16 GB frame buffer and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with the CPU's strong single-thread performance, make this pairing suitable for high-resolution gaming. The GPU's 88th percentile standing indicates it can handle demanding titles at these resolutions, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact settings and frame rates are estimates.

Content creators: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and the GPU's 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide a solid foundation for video editing, 3D rendering, and graphic design. The 32 threads handle multi-tasking well, while the GPU's compute capabilities accelerate effects and encoding.

Software developers: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 635147 and encryption score of 38214 indicate strong performance in compilation and security-related tasks. The ECC memory support adds data integrity for long-running builds, and the 32 threads allow for parallel compilation.

Students and office workers: While this pairing is overkill for basic tasks, the CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2533 ensures responsive performance in everyday applications. The headroom allows for future software demands, and the system can handle occasional gaming or content creation without issue.

Small business workstations: The CPU's 65 W TDP and ECC support make this a viable option for small business servers or workstations that require reliability. The GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate certain professional applications, and the 16 GB VRAM is ample for most business workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile is 90, placing it in the top 10% of all desktop builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i9-13900F scores 51730 on average, which is 0.4% below the Ryzen 9 5950X's 51947, making them statistically equivalent.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RX 6950 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900F supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop processor.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W, based on the GPU's 335 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP.

Q: Are there measured frame rate results for this specific combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's process node and manufacturer?

A: The RX 6950 XT uses TSMC's 7 nm process, with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900F with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. The CPU, released in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $524, is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU, released in May 2022 with a launch MSRP of 1,099 USD, is an end-of-life RDNA 2.0 part based on the Navi 21 chip. The pairing achieves a 90th percentile combined ranking, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 88th percentile.

The CPU's nearest rivals are all within one percent in average score, indicating a tightly contested performance tier. The GPU's nearest rivals similarly cluster within one percent. This build represents a high-end desktop configuration where both components are in the upper tier of their respective categories, though neither is the absolute top performer. The 65 W CPU TDP and 335 W GPU TDP create a system that requires a 700 W power supply, indicating a significant but manageable power envelope.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU is based on the Navi 21 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. The base clock is 1860 MHz, with a boost clock of 2310 MHz and a game clock of 2100 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz, effectively 18 Gbps.

The GPU's compute resources include 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, 128 ROPs, and 80 RT cores. The pixel rate is 295.7 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 739.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 23.65 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The triple-slot cooler requires 2x 8-pin power connectors.

Benchmark results show the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 28070 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 205998 and Vulkan score of 165212 demonstrate strong compute performance across APIs. The PassMark GPU compute score of 14199 indicates substantial general-purpose computing capability. The GPU's 88th percentile standing reflects its position in the upper tier of graphics cards, though its nearest rivals are all within one percent in average score, suggesting a competitive but not dominant position. The 16 GB VRAM and high memory bandwidth make it well-suited for high-resolution rendering and large texture workloads, while the 80 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing support, though the RDNA 2 architecture is not known for RT leadership.