SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

27,425 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

The Intel Core i9-13900F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT represents a desktop-class combination that sits at the 82nd percentile overall, placing it firmly in the upper tier of system configurations. The CPU, a 24-core Raptor Lake-S part, delivers a 91st percentile ranking against all CPUs, while the GPU, built on RDNA 2.0 architecture, achieves a 72nd percentile against all GPUs. This pairing couples a top-tier processor with a mid-to-high-range graphics card, creating a system where the CPU can feed the GPU without bottlenecking in most scenarios. Notably, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination in the FACT PACK — the benchmark database lacks measuredFpsUltraByGame rows — so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and comparative performance deltas.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900F compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i9-13900F has an average benchmark score of 51730, which is 0.4% lower than the Ryzen 9 5950X's 51947. This makes the two effectively tied in overall performance, with the Intel part being marginally behind by a negligible margin.

Q: What is the RX 6700 XT's closest GPU competitor, and how does it compare?

A: The RX 6700 XT's average benchmark score of 27425 is exactly 0% different from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile's score of 27435, making them statistically identical. It also trails the RTX 3090 by 0.5% (which scores 27565) and beats the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell by 1.1% (which scores 27135).

Q: What memory types does the Core i9-13900F support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-oriented builds that require error correction in memory-intensive workloads.

Q: What is the PCIe capability of the Core i9-13900F?

A: The processor provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes directly from the CPU. This is separate from the GPU's own PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, meaning the system can support both a high-bandwidth GPU and Gen 5 NVMe storage simultaneously.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded workloads compared to multi-threaded ones?

A: The single-thread performance is strong with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1145 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5778. Multi-threaded performance scales dramatically, with the 3dmark_max_threads score reaching 13985 and Cinebench R23 multicore at 40928, reflecting the 24-core, 32-thread configuration's ability to handle heavy parallel workloads.

Q: What is the production status of the RX 6700 XT?

A: The GPU is marked as end-of-life, having been released on March 2, 2021. It is part of the Radeon RX 6000 series and uses the Navi 22 chip on a 7 nm TSMC process node.

Q: Does the RX 6700 XT support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 40 ray accelerators (RT cores). It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compliant with modern graphics APIs.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT comes equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2321 MHz, a game clock of 2424 MHz, and a boost clock of 2581 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The chip itself contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process with a transistor density of 51.3M per mm². The shading unit count sits at 2560, complemented by 160 texture mapping units and 64 raster operation units. Pixel fill rate reaches 165.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 413.0 GTexel/s, while FP32 compute is rated at 13.21 TFLOPS and FP16 at 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Benchmark results place the GPU at the 72nd percentile against all GPUs, with an average score of 27425. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2435, while Geekbench results show 130896 in Metal, 44152 in OpenCL, and 93500 in Vulkan. Passmark results indicate a G3D score of 19786 and a GPU compute score of 9336. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 6700 XT is effectively tied with the RTX 4070 Mobile (0% delta), slightly behind the RTX 3090 by 0.5%, and ahead of the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell by 1.1%. For rendering workloads, these scores suggest the GPU can handle 1440p gaming comfortably and can manage entry-level 4K in less demanding titles. The 12 GB VRAM capacity, while not the largest available, is sufficient for high-resolution textures at 1440p and moderate 4K usage, though the bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s may become a limiting factor in extremely texture-heavy scenes. The ray tracing hardware, while present via 40 RT cores, does not match the performance of NVIDIA's dedicated RT implementations, so ray-traced workloads will show more significant performance dips relative to rasterized performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is native to the Raptor Lake platform. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, giving builders flexibility depending on motherboard choice and budget constraints — though pricing is not discussed here. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself, which enables high-speed NVMe storage. ECC memory support is present, a feature that appeals to workstation users who need data integrity. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, which is notably low for a 24-core processor, though this represents the base power draw rather than peak boost behavior. The GPU, by contrast, has a TDP of 230 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W, meaning a system with both components would need a power supply that can handle the combined draw of a 65 W CPU and a 230 W GPU plus the rest of the system — the 550 W suggestion assumes a reasonably efficient platform. The RX 6700 XT is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with power delivered via a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connector configuration.

For a sensible next upgrade path, the GPU is the more likely candidate for replacement given its end-of-life status and 72nd percentile ranking. The CPU, at the 91st percentile, still has significant headroom and can support a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The platform itself supports PCIe Gen 5, so a future GPU upgrade could leverage that bandwidth if the card supports it, though the current RX 6700 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Memory upgrades are also possible, with the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allowing for capacity increases, though the exact bandwidth figures are not specified in the data. The 65 W CPU TDP means cooling requirements are modest, so a capable air cooler would suffice — the data does not specify cooler dimensions but the low TDP suggests thermal headroom is not a concern. Overall, a user looking to extend the system's lifespan would benefit most from a GPU upgrade, as the CPU's benchmark scores indicate it can keep pace with much more powerful graphics cards.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data available for the Intel Core i9-13900F and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination — the FACT PACK contains no rows for measuredFpsUltraByGame, and this is stated clearly here. All frame rate expectations are therefore estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and comparative performance analysis. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking, combined with its 12 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, suggests it is well-suited for 1440p gaming at high to ultra settings in most titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2435 and Passmark G3D score of 19786 indicate solid DirectX 12 performance, which is the primary API for modern AAA games. At 1080p, the RX 6700 XT should deliver high frame rates in esports titles, while at 1440p, it can maintain playable frame rates in demanding single-player games, though the exact figures depend on the title and optimization.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1145 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 5778, ensures that even CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions will not be severely hampered. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor, and users should expect lower frame rates compared to 1440p, though the 12 GB memory capacity helps prevent VRAM-related stuttering in most current titles. Ray tracing performance, while supported by the 40 RT cores, will be significantly lower than rasterized performance, so users who prioritize ray-traced effects may need to reduce resolution or settings. The absence of measured FPS data means these are educated estimates, but the benchmark scores align with the GPU's known class of performance relative to its rivals — the RX 6700 XT is within 0.5% of the RTX 3090's average score, though that comparison does not directly translate to identical gaming FPS due to driver and architecture differences.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system's balance is characterized by a significant disparity between CPU and GPU percentiles: the i9-13900F sits at the 91st percentile, while the RX 6700 XT sits at the 72nd. This 19-percentage-point gap indicates that the CPU is substantially more capable than the GPU, meaning the GPU will be the limiting factor in most GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions and graphics rendering. The CPU's multi-threaded performance, with a 3dmark_max_threads score of 13985 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928, far exceeds what the GPU can pair with in terms of frame generation, so in gaming scenarios, the GPU will be at full utilization while the CPU remains underutilized. This is not necessarily a negative — it means the system has headroom for GPU upgrades without requiring a CPU change.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation, data compression (Passmark data compression score of 635147), or encryption (Passmark data encryption score of 38214), the GPU's role becomes secondary, and the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads can operate at near-peak efficiency. The bottleneck in these scenarios is the CPU itself, which, despite its high ranking, is not infinitely fast — its nearest rival, the Ryzen 9 5950X, is 0.4% faster on average, indicating that the i9-13900F is at the top of its class but not the absolute fastest. For gaming, the FPS scaling is limited by the GPU's 72nd percentile — even with the CPU's 91st percentile, frame rates will not exceed what the GPU can physically render. The balance is therefore appropriate for a workstation that occasionally games, or a gaming system where the user plans to upgrade the GPU in the future. The 65 W CPU TDP versus the 230 W GPU TDP further emphasizes that the GPU is the power-hungry, performance-limiting component in the pair.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this combination is a desktop builder who prioritizes CPU performance for professional workloads but still wants a capable gaming experience. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, which deliver a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and a Geekbench multicore score of 19680. These users can rely on the GPU for GPU-accelerated tasks, with its OpenCL score of 44152 and Vulkan score of 93500 indicating solid compute capability. Gamers at 1440p resolution are a primary audience, as the RX 6700 XT's 12 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are well-matched to that resolution, and the CPU ensures no frame pacing issues from processor bottlenecks.

Students and small business users who run multi-threaded applications like data analysis, virtualization, or heavy spreadsheet workloads will find the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 49693 and integer math score of 188022 more than sufficient. The ECC memory support adds reliability for those who handle critical data. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads, with the find prime numbers score of 204 (a measure of integer performance) and random string sorting score of 70441 indicating strong general-purpose throughput. The system is not ideal for users who prioritize maximum gaming performance per dollar — the GPU is the weaker link — but for those who need a workstation-class CPU and a solid gaming GPU in one machine, this pairing is sensible. The build class is desktop, so it is not suitable for portable use, but it offers upgradeability for future GPU replacements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5600 MHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support enabled. It uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The launch MSRP is $524, and it was released on January 3, 2023. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible, but the high boost clock compensates with out-of-the-box performance.

Benchmark results show a 91st percentile ranking against all CPUs, with an average score of 51730. In 3DMark tests, it scores 9957 in 16-thread, 2265 in 2-thread, 4393 in 4-thread, 7426 in 8-thread, and 13985 in max-thread tests, with a single-thread score of 1145. Cinebench scores are 4125 in R15 multicore, 582 in R15 single-core, 17189 in R20 multicore, 2426 in R20 single-core, 40928 in R23 multicore, and 5778 in R23 single-core. Geekbench scores are 19680 multicore and 2533 single-core. Passmark results show a multithread score of 49693, single-thread score of 4406, floating point math of 131007, integer math of 188022, data compression of 635147, data encryption of 38214, extended instructions of 36525, physics of 2766, and random string sorting of 70441.

The nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (0.4% faster), Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (0.7% faster), AMD EPYC 8124P (0.7% faster), and Intel Core Ultra 9 285T (0.8% slower). For real workloads, this CPU excels in heavily parallel tasks — video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific computing, and virtualization will all see near-top-tier performance. The single-thread score is also strong, ensuring responsive everyday use and solid performance in lightly threaded applications. The locked multiplier is a minor limitation for enthusiasts, but the stock boost clock of 5600 MHz is already high, so manual overclocking would yield marginal gains at best.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900F and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT. The CPU is a 13th-gen Raptor Lake part with 24 cores and 32 threads, while the GPU is a RDNA 2.0-based Navi 22 chip with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile rank is 82, placing this system in the upper tier of all combinations tracked in the database. The CPU ranks at the 91st percentile, while the GPU ranks at the 72nd, creating a configuration where the processor is the standout component. The average benchmark scores are 51730 for the CPU and 27425 for the GPU, which when combined, yield a system that is well above average but not at the very top of the performance hierarchy.

The build class being desktop means it is intended for stationary use, with the GPU requiring a dual-slot footprint and the CPU needing a Socket 1700 motherboard. The system's overall tier is high-end for productivity — the CPU's 91st percentile makes it suitable for professional workloads — but mid-to-high-end for gaming, given the GPU's 72nd percentile. This is a pairing that makes sense for a user who does more CPU-intensive work than gaming, or who wants a gaming system with significant headroom for future GPU upgrades. The combined percentile of 82 indicates that the system outperforms the majority of configurations, though it is not in the top tier reserved for the most powerful CPU and GPU pairings.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900F delivers an average benchmark score of 51730, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 51947, which is 0.4% higher, making the two processors effectively equivalent in performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is 0.7% faster with a score of 52073, and the AMD EPYC 8124P is also 0.7% faster with a score of 52121, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is 0.8% slower at 51310. In individual benchmarks, the CPU shows strong scaling from 2 threads (2265 in 3dmark) to max threads (13985), with Cinebench R23 multicore reaching 40928. Passmark multithread is 49693, and Geekbench multicore is 19680.

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 27425, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, which scores 27435, a 0% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 scores 27565, which is 0.5% higher, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27839, which is 1.5% higher, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell scores 27135, which is 1.1% lower. In specific tests, the GPU scores 2435 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 130896 in Geekbench Metal, 44152 in OpenCL, and 93500 in Vulkan. Passmark scores include 19786 in G3D and 9336 in GPU compute.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is near the top of its class, with only a few rivals matching or slightly exceeding its average score, and a GPU that is solidly mid-to-high range, sitting close to the RTX 3090 in average score. The CPU's 91st percentile versus the GPU's 72nd percentile indicates that the CPU will not be the limiting factor in most workloads, and the system's overall 82nd percentile rank reflects a balanced but CPU-leaning configuration. The benchmark data is synthetic, so real-world application performance may vary, but the scores provide a reliable relative ranking.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the i9-13900F's strong single-thread score of 1145 in 3dmark ensures the CPU can feed frames quickly, but the RX 6700 XT's 72nd percentile will cap frame rates below what the CPU could theoretically support; users should expect high but not extreme refresh rates in competitive titles, with estimates based on the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 19786.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by a Passmark multithread score of 49693 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 40928, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, meaning streamers can use x264 encoding without significant FPS loss, though the GPU can also handle encoding via its compute capabilities.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 19680 and Passmark floating point math score of 131007 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 44152 can accelerate effects rendering and color grading in supported software, making this a capable editing workstation.

3D rendering: The CPU's max-thread 3dmark score of 13985 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 40928 make it a strong choice for CPU-based rendering engines, and the GPU's 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 compute can handle GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 12 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 188022 and data compression score of 635147 support fast compilation and build times, while the 32 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4406 in Passmark ensures responsive everyday applications, while the 65 W TDP means low power draw for prolonged use; the GPU is overkill for office tasks but provides headroom for occasional light gaming or creative work, with the system's 82nd percentile overall rank ensuring smooth multitasking.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds