SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop configuration that combines a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a mid-range RDNA 2 graphics card. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands in the 70th percentile, and the combined system ranks in the 81st percentile. This pairing offers substantial compute horsepower for productivity and multitasking, but the graphics card is the clear constraint in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and features a base clock of 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is notably modest for a 24-core part, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also includes ECC memory support and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The cache hierarchy comprises 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, with a die size of 257 mm².

Benchmark results show a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1145 in single-thread to 2265 in 2-thread, 4393 in 4-thread, 7426 in 8-thread, 9957 in 16-thread, and peak at 13985 in max-thread testing. This scaling indicates that the hybrid core layout is efficient at distributing work across all available threads. Cinebench results reinforce this picture: the R23 multicore score of 40928 is roughly 7 times the R23 single-core score of 5778, demonstrating that the 24 cores are fully utilized in heavily threaded workloads. The Geekbench multicore score of 19680 versus a single-core score of 2533 follows a similar pattern.

PassMark results provide additional insight into specialized workloads. The multithread score of 49693 and the integer math score of 188022 show strong general-purpose compute capability. The floating-point math score of 131007 and the extended instructions score of 36525 suggest that the CPU handles scientific and SIMD-heavy tasks well. Data compression scores of 635147 and random string sorting of 70441 indicate solid performance in data manipulation tasks. The data encryption score of 38214 is comparatively lower, which is typical for a consumer CPU without dedicated encryption acceleration.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900F is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, which has an average score of 51947, a difference of -0.4%. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073, also -0.7% away, while the AMD EPYC 8124P is at 52121, -0.7% different. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T trails slightly at 51310, which is 0.8% behind. This places the i9-13900F in a competitive position among high-end desktop and workstation processors, with no single rival holding a decisive advantage.

For real workloads, the 24-core setup means the i9-13900F excels at video rendering, 3D modeling, software compilation, and other parallel tasks. The high boost clock of 5.60 GHz ensures that single-threaded applications like older games or certain office tools still respond quickly. The 65 W TDP is notable because it suggests the chip can deliver this performance within a power envelope that is easier to cool than many other 24-core parts, though the data does not specify cooler requirements.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process. The GPU contains 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die, with a transistor density of 46.7 million per mm². It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU also includes 32 ray accelerators, which provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced lighting effects. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Clock speeds are set at 1968 MHz base, 2359 MHz game clock, and 2589 MHz boost. These clocks translate to a pixel rate of 165.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 331.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 10.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 21.21 TFLOPS using the 2:1 ratio. The card has a 160 W TDP, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and carries a suggested PSU rating of 450 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and occupies a dual-slot form factor with dimensions of 190 mm length, 110 mm height, and 40 mm width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 6600 XT scores 1804. Geekbench results show a Metal score of 88720, OpenCL score of 80503, and Vulkan score of 72417. PassMark G3D score is 16461, with a GPU compute score of 7520. The DirectX 11 score of 163 is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 61, which may reflect the benchmark’s sensitivity to driver overhead or workload characteristics. The DirectX 10 score is 109, DirectX 9 is 194, and G2D is 912.

The GPU’s nearest rival by average benchmark score is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 at 24277, which is 0.7% behind the RX 6600 XT’s 24442 average. The Intel Arc A350M scores 24647, 0.8% ahead, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 24236, 0.8% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170, 1.1% behind. This clustering suggests that the RX 6600 XT performs at a level comparable to older high-end cards, though it lacks the newer feature set of more recent generations.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and moderate 1440p textures, but the 128-bit bus limits performance in memory-heavy scenes. The 32 ray accelerators enable ray tracing, but the overall compute throughput of 10.60 TFLOPS means ray-traced effects will require significant compromises in resolution or quality settings.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51730, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 24442, placing it in the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 81, indicating that this pairing sits above the majority of desktop configurations.

In 3DMark CPU tests, the i9-13900F scores 13985 in max threads, which is 12.2 times the single-thread score of 1145. The scaling from 8 threads (7426) to 16 threads (9957) shows a 34% improvement, and from 16 to max threads (13985) a further 40% gain. This demonstrates that the processor can feed a substantial amount of data to the GPU in gaming scenarios, though the GPU itself becomes the bottleneck.

Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 is among the highest in the database, while the single-core score of 5778 ensures that lighter tasks do not suffer. The Geekbench multicore score of 19680 reinforces the CPU’s position as a top-tier multi-threaded performer. In PassMark, the multithread score of 49693 and the single-thread score of 4406 indicate that the CPU maintains strong performance across both parallel and serial workloads.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1804 is modest, but its Geekbench OpenCL score of 80503 suggests reasonable compute capability for non-gaming tasks. The PassMark G3D score of 16461 is the primary indicator of gaming performance, and it places the GPU in the 70th percentile. The combined picture is a system where the CPU far outclasses the GPU: the CPU is in the 91st percentile while the GPU is in the 70th, meaning that in GPU-bound tasks, the system will perform at the level of the RX 6600 XT, not the i9-13900F.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the RX 6600 XT is the limiting component in this pairing. The CPU’s 91st percentile rank versus the GPU’s 70th percentile rank means that in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the system’s performance will be constrained by the graphics card. The i9-13900F can process far more data than the RX 6600 XT can render, so frame rates will be dictated by the GPU’s output.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or AI-driven game logic, the i9-13900F’s PassMark physics score of 2766 and its 32 threads provide ample headroom. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 9957 suggests it can handle complex simulations without becoming a limiting factor. However, in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or ray tracing, the RX 6600 XT’s 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 GB VRAM will cap performance.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not directly measured for this pairing, can be inferred from the percentile gap. A GPU in the 70th percentile paired with a CPU in the 91st percentile will typically produce frame rates that are within a few percent of what the GPU alone would achieve, because the CPU is never the bottleneck. The reverse is not true: workloads that rely on the CPU alone, such as video encoding or software compilation, will run at the CPU’s full potential, delivering performance comparable to systems with far more expensive GPUs.

For content creators, this means that CPU-heavy tasks like 3D rendering in Cinebench will run at the i9-13900F’s 40928 R23 multicore score, which is exceptional. But GPU-accelerated renderers that use the graphics card will be limited by the RX 6600 XT’s compute scores. The system is well-balanced for productivity where the CPU dominates, but poorly balanced for gaming where the GPU is the primary driver.

Who Should Build It

This system is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Game developers who compile large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, as compilation tasks scale well with thread count. The PassMark integer math score of 188022 and floating-point score of 131007 indicate strong performance in numerical computing, making this a viable option for engineers and scientists running simulations.

Content creators who work in video editing will see fast export times thanks to the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928, though they may need to rely on CPU-based encoding rather than GPU acceleration. 3D modelers using CPU-based renderers will find the system highly capable, but those using GPU renderers will be limited by the RX 6600 XT’s 10.60 TFLOPS.

Students in computer science or data science programs will find the CPU’s 32 threads sufficient for parallel programming assignments and machine learning workloads that run on the CPU. Small business workstations that handle spreadsheets, databases, and office applications will run these tasks with ease, given the PassMark data compression score of 635147 and multithread score of 49693.

Gamers at 1080p will find the RX 6600 XT capable of running most titles at high settings, but the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor. Gamers at 1440p or higher resolutions will be more constrained by the GPU, and those seeking high-refresh-rate esports performance may benefit from a stronger GPU. The system is not ideal for 4K gaming, as the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will struggle with high-resolution textures.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6600 XT have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The i9-13900F is in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51730.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 6600 XT’s average score of 24442 is 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900F supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s boost clock?

A: The RX 6600 XT has a boost clock of 2589 MHz and a game clock of 2359 MHz.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, as indicated by the multiplierUnlocked field being false.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 81.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the RX 6600 XT’s PassMark G3D score of 16461 and its 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput should handle most competitive titles at high frame rates, though the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking means it will never hold the system back. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will become more limiting, and frame rates will drop accordingly, but the system remains viable for moderate settings.

Streaming is a strong use case for this pairing, as the i9-13900F’s 24 cores can handle both game encoding and streaming software simultaneously. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 ensures that the CPU can encode video while the GPU renders frames, though the GPU’s 70th percentile performance may require lower in-game settings to maintain smooth output.

Video editing workloads will benefit from the CPU’s 32 threads, as export and rendering tasks scale well with thread count. The 3DMark max-thread score of 13985 and PassMark multithread score of 49693 indicate that the CPU can handle 4K video timelines, though GPU-accelerated effects will run at the RX 6600 XT’s level.

3D rendering in CPU-based engines like Cinebench will be exceptional, with the R23 multicore score of 40928 placing the system among the top tier. GPU-based renderers will be limited by the RX 6600 XT’s compute score of 7520 in PassMark, making this a CPU-first rendering system.

Software development is a natural fit, as compilation and code analysis tasks are highly parallel. The PassMark integer math score of 188022 and data compression score of 635147 show that the CPU can handle build servers or large codebases with ease, while the GPU provides adequate acceleration for UI rendering and minor graphical tasks.

Student and office work will be more than satisfied, as the CPU’s single-thread score of 4406 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness for word processors, spreadsheets, and web browsers. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for daily use, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows flexible memory configurations.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900F, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, an RDNA 2 graphics card. The CPU is in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU is in the 70th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 81. The CPU launched at an MSRP of $524, and the GPU launched at an MSRP of 379 USD, though current pricing is not specified in the data. The i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a 65 W TDP, while the RX 6600 XT has a 160 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested PSU. This is a desktop-class system that prioritizes CPU compute power over GPU rendering capability, making it a productivity-first configuration that can handle gaming at moderate settings.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, so the following expectations are qualitative and based on the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 6600 XT’s PassMark G3D score of 16461 suggests that most modern titles will run at playable frame rates, likely in the 60-90 FPS range for demanding games and higher for esports titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, with no CPU-related stutters. At 1440p ultra, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting, and frame rates are expected to drop into the 40-60 FPS range for AAA titles, requiring reduced settings for smoother play. At 4K, the RX 6600 XT is likely to struggle, with frame rates falling below 30 FPS in many titles, as the 128-bit memory bus cannot sustain the bandwidth needed for high-resolution textures. Ray tracing performance will be limited by the 32 ray accelerators and 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, so enabling ray-traced effects will significantly reduce frame rates at any resolution. Overall, the system is best suited for 1080p gaming, where the CPU’s headroom ensures the GPU is the only constraint on performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds