SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

77 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 23% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This Intel Core i9-13900E and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation combination is a desktop-class workstation with a system combined percentile of 58, placing it just above the median of all tracked builds. The CPU ranks in the 65th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications rather than direct measurements.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i9-13900E?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 58, meaning the system outperforms 58% of all benchmarked desktop configurations.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E supports ECC memory (as listed in the fact pack).

Q: What is the GPU's architecture?

A: The GPU is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture (chip AD103) with a 5 nm process from TSMC.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E boosts up to 5.20 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute throughput?

A: The GPU delivers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results are substantial. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 34244 and the single-core score is 4834. Geekbench multicore is 8337 and single-core is 1646. The average CPU benchmark score across all tests is 8676, which places it in the 65th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival CPUs—Intel Core i7-8565U, i5-8365U, AMD EPYC 7601, and i7-10510U—have average scores within 1% of the i9-13900E, indicating that the i9-13900E sits in a tightly packed performance band around the 8600–8700 average score mark.

The GPU, on the other hand, has no benchmark scores recorded in the FACT PACK; its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile against all GPUs is 50, meaning it sits exactly at the median of GPU performance. Combined, the system's percentile is 58, which is lower than the CPU's percentile alone (65) but higher than the GPU's (50). This suggests the CPU is the stronger component in the pairing, while the GPU is a more average performer that still contributes to a system above the midpoint.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile gap is instructive: the CPU outperforms the GPU relative to their respective pools. With a CPU percentile of 65 and a GPU percentile of 50, the CPU is likely to be the less restrictive component in most workloads. For tasks that are heavily CPU-bound—such as code compilation, multithreaded rendering, or office productivity with many concurrent processes—the GPU will not be the limiting factor. Conversely, for graphics-intensive applications like modern 3D games at high resolution, the GPU's median performance will cap the overall system output, even though the CPU can keep up with high frame rates.

The CPU's raw multicore score of 34244 in Cinebench R23 indicates sustained thread performance, while its single-core score of 4833 suggests strong per-core efficiency. The GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are respectable but not exceptional; they align with a mid-tier desktop GPU. The absence of measured FPS data prevents a direct bottleneck analysis, but the percentile relationship implies that in mixed workloads the CPU will rarely stall the GPU, and the GPU will be the primary constraint in tasks that rely on shading, ray tracing, or tensor operations.

Who Should Build It

This build is suitable for users who need a high-core-count CPU and a GPU with substantial VRAM for moderate graphics compute. The 24-core, 32-thread CPU with ECC memory support targets professional workstation roles: content creators who edit large 4K/8K video, software developers who compile large codebases, engineers running simulations, and small business workstations that handle multi-threaded office applications. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are enough for 3D modeling, texture-heavy assets, and AI inference workloads using Tensor Cores. Because the CPU ranks in the 65th percentile, it will handle heavy multitasking, while the GPU's median ranking means it is adequate for mid-range graphics tasks rather than extreme high-end gaming or rendering. Students and home office users would find the build overkill, but they would still benefit from the fast response and large core count if their tasks involve compilation or video editing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support included. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU-only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the platform can handle future PCIe 5.0 GPUs, but the current GPU operates at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The CPU's TDP is 65 W and the GPU's TDP is 120 W, so a power supply with adequate headroom is required, but the exact PSU recommendation is not provided in the FACT PACK. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-end model when needed, since the socket and PCIe interface are current. Memory could be upgraded to a faster DDR5 kit, though the maximum supported speed is not listed. The platform is active and supports the latest technologies, so the build has a clear upgrade path for both CPU and GPU within the same socket and interface.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip using a 5 nm process from TSMC. It contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. It includes 76 RT cores and 304 Tensor cores, which accelerate ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The memory subsystem is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 930 MHz and the boost clock reaches 1680 MHz; the memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 compute are both 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its TDP is 120 W and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU's performance is median among all GPUs (50th percentile), which suggests it is capable of 1080p and 1440p gaming and general workstation tasks, but not top-tier 4K high-refresh rendering. The 16 GB VRAM is advantageous for large texture sets and multiple displays.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 4833 in Cinebench R23 is strong, and the GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS should handle many games at 1440p with high settings. However, since no measured FPS data exists, these are estimates. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for modern titles, and the RT and Tensor cores support ray tracing and DLSS, which can boost frame rates.

Streaming: The 24-core CPU can handle both the game and encoding simultaneously without stutter. The GPU's Tensor cores could also be used for NVENC-based encoding, though the specific encoder is not listed. The system would handle 1080p streaming with ease.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore of 34244 indicates fast export and rendering in multi-threaded editors. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM helps with timeline previews and effects, and its 576 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 4K editing.

3D rendering: The CPU's multicore score is high for CPU-based renderers, while the GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS and RT cores accelerate real-time viewports and GPU renderers. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for complex scenes.

Software development: The 24 cores and 32 threads compile large projects quickly; the CPU's 65th percentile and high multicore scores support parallel builds. The GPU is not a bottleneck for code compilation.

Student and office work: The system is overpowered for typical tasks, but the CPU's single-core performance (4833 in R23 single) ensures snappy response, and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is irrelevant for office use. The combined percentile of 58 is more than enough for any academic workload.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900E (24 cores, 32 threads) with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation (16 GB GDDR6). The combined percentile is 58, meaning the system is above the median of all desktop configurations. The CPU alone sits in the 65th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. The build is best described as a high-core-count CPU with a mid-range GPU, suitable for workstation tasks that need both CPU and GPU compute but do not demand the absolute fastest graphics. The CPU's 65th percentile places it comfortably above average, while the GPU's 50th percentile is exactly average, resulting in a system that excels in multi-threaded CPU workloads and handles graphics tasks adequately.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, including ECC. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU-only) and integrates UHD Graphics 770. The TDP is 65 W. The CPU's benchmark scores are strong: Cinebench R23 multicore 34244, single-core 4833, Geekbench multicore 8337, single-core 1646. The average score of 8676 places it in the 65th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-8565U (avg 8665, delta 0.1%), i5-8365U (avg 8708, delta -0.4%), AMD EPYC 7601 (avg 8619, delta 0.7%), and i7-10510U (avg 8580, delta 1.1%). These small deltas indicate that the i9-13900E is at the same performance tier as these other CPUs, though it has far more cores and threads. The high multicore scores make it excellent for parallel workloads, while the single-core performance is sufficient for daily interactive tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4833 suggests it can feed the GPU efficiently at high frame rates. The GPU, with 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 GB VRAM, is likely capable of 1080p high settings at high refresh rates and 1440p at medium-high settings. At 4K, the GPU's median percentile (50) suggests it will struggle to maintain high refresh rates, and the CPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck. Since the GPU has no benchmark scores, these are qualitative expectations only. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for modern titles, and the RT and Tensor cores support ray tracing and DLSS, which can improve effective performance in supported games. For users seeking exact FPS numbers, direct testing would be required, but the hardware specifications provide a clear picture: the CPU is above average, the GPU is average, so gaming performance will be solid at mainstream resolutions but not extreme at 4K.