SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900E pairs a 24-core Raptor Lake CPU with NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 flagship, the RTX 5080. This combination targets a desktop build where multi-threaded throughput meets high-end rasterization and ray tracing. The CPU’s benchmark profile, however, is unusual: it sits in the 65th percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 8676, placing it near mobile ultra-low-power parts despite its desktop core count. The GPU, by contrast, is a top-tier performer, hitting the 87th percentile with an average score of 56083. This is a pairing of a workstation-class processor with a premium gaming GPU, and the data suggests the balance tilts heavily toward graphics-bound workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5200 MHz, with a 65 W TDP that suggests power efficiency is a priority over raw sustained clocks. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache pool helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, which is critical for database workloads and large simulation datasets. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support, making this a flexible option for systems that need error-correcting memory for long-running compute tasks.

Benchmark results paint a mixed picture. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 34244, which is a strong absolute number for rendering and heavy parallel workloads. However, the Geekbench multi-core score is only 8337, and the average benchmark score of 8676 places the CPU at the 65th percentile. The nearest rivals are telling: the Intel Core i7-8565U scores 8665 (0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-8365U scores 8708 (-0.4% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7601 scores 8619 (0.7% delta). These are all lower-tier or older parts, indicating that the 13900E’s average score is dragged down by single-core and mixed workloads. The single-core scores are modest: Cinebench R23 single-core is 4834, and Geekbench single-core is 1646. This means that while the CPU can throw 32 threads at a problem, its per-thread performance is not exceptional. For real workloads, this translates to excellent multi-threaded rendering — the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3451 and R20 multi-core of 14382 confirm scaling — but less impressive performance in lightly-threaded tasks like legacy single-threaded applications or some older games. The boost clock of 5200 MHz helps single-thread bursts, but the 65 W TDP likely limits sustained multi-core boost behavior.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a 5 nm chip from TSMC with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². It features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1875 MHz, effective 30 Gbps. With 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, the raw rasterization throughput is high: the pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio, which is useful for AI inference and scientific computing. Ray tracing and tensor hardware are present with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, respectively. The base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The card draws 360 W TDP and requires a 750 W suggested PSU, using a single 16-pin power connector. It is a dual-slot design measuring 304 mm in length, and outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark scores reflect the GPU’s strength. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 8637, which is strong for a modern DX12 title. Geekbench OpenCL scores 235901, and Vulkan scores 255450, showing excellent compute and cross-API performance. The Passmark G3D score of 36565 is high, but the Passmark DX10 (208), DX11 (324), and DX12 (151) scores are oddly low, likely due to driver or workload specifics in that older benchmark suite. The GPU compute score of 21789 confirms strong general compute. The average benchmark score of 56083 places it at the 87th percentile, with rivals like the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757, 0.6% delta), the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, 0.7% delta), and the RX 9070 GRE (57367, -2.2% delta). This suggests the RTX 5080 is slightly above these rivals in aggregate, but the delta is small — within 2.3% — meaning the competition is tight. For rendering, the 960 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM are the key enablers for 4K texture loads and ray-traced scenes, while the 336 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and other AI-based denoising.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, and these are qualitative expectations. The GPU’s high percentile (87th) and strong 3DMark Steel Nomad score indicate that the RTX 5080 can push high frames at 1440p and 4K, provided the CPU can keep up. The CPU’s 65th percentile, however, is a bottleneck for high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions where per-core speed matters more.

At 1080p, the CPU’s modest single-core scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 4834) will likely limit maximum FPS in esports titles, as the 13900E’s 5200 MHz boost cannot compensate for the lower IPC compared to newer or higher-clocked desktop parts. Expect that the GPU will be underutilized in some scenarios, with frame rates lower than what the RTX 5080 alone could deliver. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the data suggests the 16 GB VRAM and 960 GB/s bandwidth will handle high-resolution textures without stutter, but the CPU’s 65th percentile position still suggests occasional dips in CPU-heavy scenes. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the RTX 5080’s 87th percentile performance should deliver playable-to-high frame rates in most AAA titles, assuming the game is not heavily single-thread dependent. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637 indicates strong DX12 scaling, which bodes well for modern engines. In summary, expect 1080p performance to be CPU-limited, 1440p to be balanced, and 4K to be GPU-bound with the RTX 5080 showing its full capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s 65th percentile and moderate single-core scores suggest this is not the ideal pairing for 240 Hz or 360 Hz gaming at 1080p, where the RTX 5080’s power would be wasted. Benchmark results indicate the GPU’s 87th percentile can handle 1440p high-refresh (144 Hz) in many titles, but the CPU’s average benchmark score of 8676 relative to rivals points to a potential frametime inconsistency.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads are a strong asset for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 means simultaneous game capture and x264 encoding will not overwhelm the CPU, though the 65 W TDP might limit sustained encoding speeds. The GPU’s tensor cores can also offload encoding tasks, making this a viable setup.

Video Editing: Multi-core scores like Cinebench R20 multi-core 14382 and R15 multi-core 3451 indicate strong export times in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing, and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is ample for 4K color grading. The overall CPU percentile, however, is lower than dedicated workstation chips, so rendering timelines will be faster than average but not top-tier.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 is solid for CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray, but the 65 W TDP may cause thermal throttling on long renders. The GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates GPU-based renderers like Octane, making this a capable hybrid setup.

Software Development: The 24 cores and 32 threads compile large codebases efficiently, as the Geekbench multi-core score of 8337 suggests parallel compilation jobs will scale. ECC memory support is a plus for server-side development or database work. The modest single-core score of 1646 Geekbench may slow down some IDE operations, but overall, this is a productive dev machine.

Student and Office Work: For typical office tasks, this is overkill. The CPU’s 65th percentile and the GPU’s 87th percentile are far beyond what word processing or spreadsheets require. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps idle power low, but the 360 W GPU TDP means the system draws significant power under load, which is unnecessary for this scenario.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s exact scores are: Cinebench R15 multi-core 3451 and single-core 487, R20 multi-core 14382 and single-core 2030, R23 multi-core 34244 and single-core 4834, Geekbench multi-core 8337 and single-core 1646. The average benchmark score is 8676, placing it at the 65th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-8565U with an average score of 8665 (0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-8365U at 8708 (-0.4% delta), the AMD EPYC 7601 at 8619 (0.7% delta), and the Intel Core i7-10510U at 8580 (1.1% delta). This indicates that the 13900E’s average performance is nearly identical to these lower-core-count or older parts, which is surprising for a 24-core desktop chip. The multi-core scores are strong, but the average is dragged down by the single-core results.

The GPU’s exact scores are: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 8637, Geekbench OpenCL 235901, Geekbench Vulkan 255450, Passmark DX10 208, DX11 324, DX12 151, DX9 389, G2D 1415, G3D 36565, and GPU Compute 21789. The average benchmark score is 56083, placing it at the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8060S with an average score of 55757 (0.6% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55698 (0.7% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54828 (2.3% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE at 57367 (-2.2% delta). The combined picture is a system where the GPU is clearly the stronger component: the GPU’s 87th percentile is 22 points higher than the CPU’s 65th percentile. The combined percentile is 76, which reflects the CPU dragging the overall score down. In practical terms, this system will perform like a high-end gaming machine in GPU-bound scenarios, but it will not feel like a top-tier CPU system in CPU-heavy tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though only in dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported, which is rare for consumer platforms and useful for workstation tasks. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is sufficient for the RTX 5080’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic display output if the discrete GPU fails. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, but the GPU requires a 360 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 750 W. This means the total system power draw is manageable with a quality 750 W power supply, but there is little headroom for overclocking or adding additional high-power components. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited; the boost clock of 5200 MHz is the ceiling. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer CPU on the same socket, but the data shows the 13900E is already at the high end of the 13th-gen lineup in core count, so the only meaningful upgrade would be to a different platform entirely, which would also require new memory and a new motherboard. For the GPU, the RTX 5080 is near the top of its generation, so the next upgrade would be a future GeForce 60-series card, but the 750 W PSU would likely need to be upgraded for those parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the dominant component. The RTX 5080’s 87th percentile versus the CPU’s 65th percentile means that in most gaming scenarios, the CPU will be the limiting factor at lower resolutions. The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, points to this: at 1080p, the CPU’s single-core score of 1646 Geekbench will cap framerates below what the GPU could deliver. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and the bottleneck shifts toward the GPU, which is where the system performs best. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or database queries, the CPU’s 65th percentile is the limiting factor, especially compared to higher-percentile desktop CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 is strong, but the average benchmark score of 8676 is dragged down by single-core performance, meaning mixed workloads will see uneven results. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding with GPU acceleration, the RTX 5080’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 960 GB/s bandwidth will dominate, and the CPU’s 24 cores will be sufficient to feed the GPU without being a major bottleneck. The balance is skewed: this is a GPU-first system where the CPU is a supporting actor, not the star.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s biggest weakness based on benchmark data?

A: The average benchmark score of 8676 places it at the 65th percentile, nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-8565U, which scores 8665. The single-core scores are modest, with a Geekbench single-core score of 1646, indicating that lightly-threaded tasks do not benefit from the 24-core design.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU’s average score is 56083, which is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698), but 2.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367). The deltas are small, indicating close competition.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, estimated from the GPU’s 87th percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637, the RTX 5080 is well-suited for 4K. The 16 GB VRAM and 960 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures, though the CPU’s 65th percentile may cause minor dips in CPU-intensive scenes.

Q: Is ECC memory supported?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is listed in the specifications. This makes the platform suitable for workstation tasks that require error correction, though it requires a motherboard that also supports ECC.

Q: What is the power supply requirement?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 750 W, and the GPU TDP is 360 W. The CPU TDP is 65 W, so a 750 W PSU is sufficient for the system, with little headroom for additional high-power components.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-core performance compare to its single-core performance?

A: The multi-core scores are strong: Cinebench R23 multi-core is 34244, while single-core is 4834. The gap is large, but the average benchmark score of 8676 is low because the single-core results pull the average down relative to other CPUs.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The boost clock is 5200 MHz, and the 65 W TDP limits sustained performance, so manual overclocking is not an option.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize GPU compute and gaming at high resolutions. Gamers targeting 4K or high-refresh 1440p will benefit from the RTX 5080’s 87th percentile performance, as the 16 GB VRAM and 960 GB/s bandwidth handle the most demanding titles. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated renderers will appreciate the 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute, while the CPU’s 24 cores provide enough multi-threaded power for video encoding and 3D scene preparation. Software developers building large projects will find the 32 threads useful for compilation, and the ECC support adds reliability for long-running build servers. Students and office workers, however, are over-served by this hardware; the CPU’s 65th percentile and GPU’s 87th percentile far exceed the needs of word processing or spreadsheet work. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database servers could use the multi-core CPU and ECC memory, but the GPU is unnecessary unless the workload involves AI inference or rendering. In short, this is a system for GPU-bound workloads where the RTX 5080 is the centerpiece, and the CPU is a capable but not exceptional companion that handles background tasks without bottlenecking the graphics card at 4K.