SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 69th percentile overall, but the data reveals a significant imbalance in raw compute capability. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 8676 places it at the 65th percentile, while the GPU’s average score of 26331 places it at the 72nd percentile. This is a pairing where the graphics card is the clear performance driver, but the CPU is not necessarily a bottleneck in the traditional sense. Instead, the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In gaming, the RTX 5060’s 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, but the CPU’s 24 cores and 5.20 GHz boost clock ensure it can feed frames quickly at 1080p. The data shows that the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 is exceptional, meaning that CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or AI computation will not be held back. However, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20891, while solid, suggests that at 4K resolution, the graphics card will saturate before the CPU reaches its limits. For productivity, the CPU’s 32 threads will handle compilation and rendering without breaking a sweat, but the GPU’s FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS will be the constraint in GPU-accelerated workloads. The practical takeaway is that this system is balanced for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K or in heavy GPU compute tasks, the RTX 5060 will be the component that dictates overall performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a system where the CPU is disproportionately powerful compared to the GPU. The i9-13900E’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 is nearly double that of its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-8565U, which scores 8665 on average. Meanwhile, the RTX 5060’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 places it in a competitive field where its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 860M, scores 26401 on average. This gap in relative strength means the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s 65th percentile versus the GPU’s 72nd percentile indicates that the graphics card is the stronger component relative to its peers. In practice, this means that at 1080p, where the CPU’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834) is sufficient to drive high frame rates, the RTX 5060 will be the limiting factor. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB memory capacity and 128-bit bus width will become the constraint, as the bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s may struggle with high-texture loads. The CPU’s 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps mitigate some of this by reducing memory latency, but the physical memory bandwidth of the GPU is the hard limit. For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or software compilation, the i9-13900E is the star, and the GPU will sit idle waiting for data. The data suggests that this is a system for users who prioritize multi-threaded productivity but also want a capable gaming GPU, not a system for extreme 4K gaming where the GPU will clearly hold back the CPU.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures here are estimated from the benchmark scores. The RTX 5060’s Passmark G3D score of 20891 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 indicate a GPU that is positioned for 1080p high-refresh gaming and competent 1440p gaming. For esports titles, the CPU’s high single-core score of 4834 in Cinebench R23 will allow the GPU to push well beyond 144 FPS at 1080p with ultra settings, as the i9-13900E will not be a limiting factor in frame pacing. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, the RTX 5060’s 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance should deliver between 80 and 120 FPS depending on the title, but the 8 GB memory capacity will require texture quality to be managed carefully. At 1440p, the data suggests that the GPU will be the bottleneck, with estimated frame rates dropping to 50-80 FPS in demanding titles, as the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest for this resolution. At 4K, the RTX 5060 is not well-suited, and the estimated performance would be below 40 FPS in most modern games, making the CPU’s power irrelevant. The GPU’s 30 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means that enabling ray tracing at 1440p will likely halve frame rates, pushing the experience below 40 FPS. The data points to a system that is best paired with a 1080p 144Hz monitor or a 1440p 60Hz monitor, where the CPU and GPU can work together without one component being severely underutilized.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is a mature socket that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU’s dual-channel memory bus and ECC memory support make it a viable option for workstation builds, but the platform itself is a dead end for future CPU upgrades, as newer generations use different sockets. The RTX 5060 uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which provides ample bandwidth for the GPU, but the CPU only provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so multi-GPU configurations are not practical. The GPU’s suggested PSU of 300 W is modest, and the CPU’s 65 W TDP means that a system with a 500 W power supply would have significant headroom. However, the CPU’s boost clock of 5.20 GHz and 24 cores can draw more power under load, so a quality 650 W PSU is a sensible recommendation. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is standard for most power supplies. The system’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, but the i9-13900E’s performance is better with DDR5, as the higher bandwidth complements the CPU’s 36 MB L3 cache. A sensible next upgrade would be to add more storage or increase memory capacity, as the CPU and GPU are well-matched for the current generation. The platform does not support future CPU upgrades, so the next logical step would be a full platform change to a newer socket, but the current setup is capable for several years. The GPU’s 8 GB memory is the most likely upgrade trigger, as newer games will require more than 8 GB at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is ideal for 1080p high-refresh gaming, where the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834 and the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20891 combine to deliver frame rates well above 144 FPS in competitive titles. The data shows that the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU at this resolution, making it a smooth experience.

Streaming: The i9-13900E’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 ensures that even with OBS running, the CPU can maintain high frame rates in games. The GPU’s 120 tensor cores can also assist with encoding, but the CPU is the primary workhorse here.

Video editing: The CPU’s Geekbench multicore score of 8337 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 14382 indicate that this system can handle 4K video editing with ease, as the 32 threads will accelerate timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU’s 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance will help with effects and color grading, but the CPU is the dominant component.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 is exceptional for CPU-based rendering, making this system suitable for Blender’s Cycles engine or similar workloads. The GPU’s 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is also capable for GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 8 GB memory may be a limitation for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Geekbench multicore score of 8337, make this system excellent for compiling large codebases, as parallel compilation will see significant speedups. The GPU is less relevant here, but the system’s overall responsiveness is high.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 145 W TDP mean the system is relatively efficient for a desktop, but it is overkill for basic office tasks. The i9-13900E’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle office workloads without the discrete GPU, making this a flexible system that can be configured for low-power use.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are consistently strong, with a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3451 and a single-core score of 487, indicating excellent scaling across cores. The Cinebench R20 scores of 14382 multicore and 2030 single-core reinforce this, showing that the CPU maintains its lead in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 scores of 34244 multicore and 4834 single-core are the most telling, with the multicore score being roughly 7 times higher than the single-core score, demonstrating the efficiency of the 24-core design. The Geekbench scores of 8337 multicore and 1646 single-core are lower than expected for a 24-core CPU, likely due to the conservative 65 W TDP limiting sustained boost clocks, but they still place the CPU at the 65th percentile overall. The GPU’s benchmark scores show a different picture: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 is a strong result for a mainstream GPU, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787 and Vulkan score of 113321 are nearly identical, indicating that the GPU is not compute-limited. The Passmark G3D score of 20891 is solid, but the Passmark DirectX 9 score of 225 and DirectX 12 score of 77 are low, suggesting that legacy API performance is not a priority. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 26331 places it at the 72nd percentile, and its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, are within 1.2% of its score, indicating that this GPU is competitive with previous-generation mid-range cards. The combined percentile of 69 reflects a system that is slightly above average, with the CPU being the weaker link relative to the GPU.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900E a good match for the RTX 5060?

A: The data shows a 65th percentile CPU and a 72nd percentile GPU, meaning the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers. In gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck at 1080p and above, but the CPU’s 24 cores ensure it will not hold back the GPU in most scenarios.

Q: What resolution is this system best suited for?

A: Based on the GPU’s 8 GB memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, the system is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming, with 1440p being playable but not optimal. 4K gaming is not recommended, as the GPU’s performance will be insufficient.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900E has ECC memory support, which makes it a viable option for workstation builds where data integrity is critical. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility.

Q: What is the power requirement for this system?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 145 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 300 W for the GPU. A system with a 500 W power supply would have ample headroom, but a 650 W unit is recommended for overclocking headroom.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5060’s average benchmark score of 26331 is within 1.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, which scores 26011. This indicates that the RTX 5060 is competitive with a previous-generation mid-range card.

Q: Is the CPU overkill for gaming?

A: For gaming, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834 is more than sufficient, and the 24 cores are underutilized. However, the CPU’s 65 W TDP means it is efficient, and the extra cores are useful for productivity tasks.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5060?

A: The launch MSRP of the RTX 5060 is 299 USD, which is a single data point and does not reflect current market pricing.

Who Should Build It

This system is for gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh gaming and want the flexibility to do productivity work. The RTX 5060’s performance, as measured by its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628, is sufficient for esports titles at 144 FPS, and the CPU’s 24 cores ensure that background tasks like streaming will not impact frame rates. Content creators working with 4K video will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244, which accelerates rendering and export times. Software developers will appreciate the 32 threads for parallel compilation, with the Geekbench multicore score of 8337 indicating strong performance in multi-threaded build tools. Students and office workers will find this system overkill, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 allows for silent, low-power operation when the discrete GPU is not needed. Small business workstations that run virtualization or database workloads will leverage the CPU’s ECC memory support and 36 MB L3 cache. The system is not for 4K gamers or those doing heavy GPU compute, as the 8 GB memory and 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 will be limiting. The sweet spot is a desktop for a power user who plays games at 1080p and also runs demanding CPU workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i9-13900E, a 24-core Raptor Lake-S processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The combined percentile of 69 places this system in the upper-midrange tier, with the CPU at the 65th percentile and the GPU at the 72nd percentile. The CPU is a 10 nm Intel part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 5 nm TSMC part with a 145 W TDP. The system’s performance is characterized by a strong CPU that excels in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244, and a GPU that is competitive with previous-generation mid-range cards, as shown by its average benchmark score of 26331. The RTX 5060’s 8 GB GDDR7 memory and PCIe 5.0 x8 interface are modern, but the memory capacity is the primary limitation for future games. The i9-13900E’s socket 1700 platform supports DDR4 and DDR5, but it is a dead end for future CPU upgrades. This is a balanced build for 1080p gaming and productivity, but it is not a high-end system by current standards.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 1800.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that is remarkably low for a 24-core part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for reducing memory latency. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, as well as ECC memory, making it a versatile choice for both consumer and workstation builds. The benchmark scores show a processor that scales well with multi-threaded workloads: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 is approximately 7 times the single-core score of 4834, indicating excellent core utilization. However, the Geekbench multicore score of 8337 is lower than expected, suggesting that the 65 W TDP limits sustained all-core boost clocks. The CPU’s percentile of 65 places it slightly above average, but its nearest rivals are all low-power mobile parts like the Intel Core i7-8565U, which scores 8665 on average, indicating that the i9-13900E’s performance is comparable to a high-end ultrabook CPU in some benchmarks. This is a desktop part that is designed for efficiency over raw speed, making it suitable for systems that prioritize low power consumption. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, but the discrete RTX 5060 will be used for any graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU’s 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide a high-bandwidth connection to the GPU, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock is the key feature for gaming, as single-threaded performance is critical for frame pacing.