SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i9-13900E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 form a desktop pairing where the GPU is decisively the dominant component. The RTX 4090 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the i9-13900E rests at the 65th percentile among all CPUs. That 23-point gap indicates the processor is not in the same performance tier as the graphics card. In most gaming workloads, the RTX 4090 will be waiting on the CPU to feed it data, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the limiting factor.

The CPU's benchmark profile reinforces this imbalance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34,244 is respectable, but its Geekbench multicore score of 8,337 places it in the company of mobile and older server parts. The nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i7-8565U (0.1% ahead), the AMD EPYC 7601 (0.7% ahead), and the Intel Core i5-8365U (0.4% behind). This is not a high-end desktop processor by modern standards; it is a 65W part with a 1,800 MHz base clock that boosts to 5.20 GHz. The single-core performance is stronger, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,834, which helps in lightly threaded games, but the multicore headroom is limited.

The GPU, by contrast, is an absolute monster. Its Passmark G3D score of 38,194 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 place it firmly in the top tier. The nearest GPU rivals are the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (0.3% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (2.5% behind). The RTX 4090's average benchmark score of 60,347 dwarfs the CPU's average of 8,676. In any workload that scales with GPU compute—ray tracing, 3D rendering, high-resolution gaming—the bottleneck will be the CPU's ability to issue draw calls and physics calculations, not the GPU's raw throughput.

For gaming, the practical effect is that at 1080p or even 1440p, the i9-13900E will likely cap frame rates well below what the RTX 4090 could deliver on its own. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor in most titles, and the pairing becomes more balanced. For productivity, the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads are adequate for moderate multi-threaded work, but the GPU's 16,384 shading units and 512 tensor cores will accelerate any compute-heavy task far more dramatically. The data shows a system where the GPU is the star, and the CPU is a capable but not exceptional supporting actor.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's performance metrics are mixed. In Cinebench R23, it scores 34,244 multicore and 4,834 single-core. The R20 scores are 14,382 multicore and 2,030 single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 8,337 multicore and 1,646 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 8,676, which places it at the 65th percentile. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-8565U, is essentially tied at 0.1% delta, and the AMD EPYC 7601 is 0.7% ahead. This is a mid-pack result for a desktop CPU, which is surprising given the Core i9 branding, but the 65W TDP and 1,800 MHz base clock explain why it falls behind unlocked or higher-TDP parts.

The GPU's benchmark results are far more impressive. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 9,223. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 255,416, and in Vulkan, it scores 271,631. The Passmark G3D score is 38,194, with a GPU compute score of 26,613. The average benchmark score is 60,347, placing it at the 88th percentile. The nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro A60, is at a 0% delta, meaning the RTX 4090 is effectively tied with it in average score—but the RTX 4090 has vastly more memory bandwidth (1.01 TB/s vs. what the Arc Pro A60 likely has) and a much higher transistor count (76,300 million). The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 2.5% behind, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 2.9% behind.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 77, which reflects the GPU pulling the average up. The CPU's 65th percentile drags it down from what a pure GPU-based assessment would suggest. In practice, the benchmark data indicates that this system's overall performance in GPU-bound tasks will be near the top of the charts, while CPU-bound tasks will see more modest results. The Cinebench R15 scores of 3,451 multicore and 487 single-core are old but consistent with the newer tests. The Geekbench single-core score of 1,646 is low for a 5.20 GHz part, suggesting that the architecture or memory configuration is not maximizing single-thread throughput. The picture is clear: this is a GPU-first build where the CPU is adequate but not elite.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the RTX 4090 is overkill for most titles, but the i9-13900E's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,834) will be the limiting factor. Expect frame rates to be high but not maxed out on a 360Hz monitor. At 4K, the GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will carry the load, and frame rates will be consistently high.

Streaming: The RTX 4090's 512 tensor cores and NVENC hardware (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) can handle encoding with minimal CPU overhead. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads are sufficient for running a game and encoding simultaneously, but the 65W TDP means sustained multi-threaded loads will be limited.

Video editing: The GPU's 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth will accelerate timeline scrubbing and effects rendering. The CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache help with decode and encode tasks, but the multicore score of 34,244 in Cinebench R23 means final export times will be slower than a higher-end desktop CPU.

3D rendering: The RTX 4090's 16,384 shading units and 128 RT cores will dominate in GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane. The CPU's 32 threads will handle CPU-based rendering adequately, but the 65th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier render node.

Software development: Compilation tasks will use the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, and the R20 multicore score of 14,382 indicates decent parallel throughput. The GPU is irrelevant for most code compilation, but the system's overall responsiveness will be good. The 1,646 Geekbench single-core score suggests that single-threaded build steps will be slower than expected.

Student and office work: This is massively overprovisioned. The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 is enough for office tasks, and the RTX 4090 will sit idle. The 65W TDP means the system will be relatively efficient at idle, but the GPU's 450W TDP is wasteful for spreadsheet and web browsing.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing is for users who prioritize GPU compute over CPU throughput. Gamers targeting 4K resolution with maxed-out settings will benefit most, as the RTX 4090's 88th-percentile ranking ensures it can handle any title. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated renderers, video editors using hardware encoding, and 3D artists who rely on RTX ray tracing will see the most value. The 24 GB VRAM is suited for large textures and complex scenes, and the 512 tensor cores accelerate AI-based tools like DLSS and denoising.

Software developers who work on multi-threaded codebases will find the CPU adequate but not exceptional; the 65th percentile ranking means it is outclassed by cheaper or more powerful desktop parts. Students and office workers should avoid this build unless they also game or render, as the GPU's cost and power draw are unjustified. Small business workstations that run GPU-accelerated simulations or machine learning inference will benefit from the CUDA cores and tensor cores, but the CPU's 65W TDP and modest multicore scores may bottleneck training workloads. This is a specialist's build, not a general-purpose machine.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a Raptor Lake-S part built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It packs 24 cores and 32 threads, which implies a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores, though the exact split is not in the data. The base clock is 1,800 MHz, which is low, but the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz. The 65W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core part, which explains the modest benchmark scores. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L3 is 36 MB shared. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is supported, making it suitable for entry-level servers or workstations.

The benchmark scores tell a story of a CPU that is clocked conservatively. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34,244 is about half of what a fully unlocked 24-core Raptor Lake part could achieve, and the Geekbench multicore score of 8,337 is surprisingly low. The single-core scores are better—the R23 single-core score of 4,834 is competitive with other 5.0 GHz parts—but the multicore results suffer from the 1,800 MHz base clock and the 65W power limit. The nearest rivals include mobile ultrabook CPUs like the Core i7-8565U and i5-8365U, which indicates that the i9-13900E's average benchmark score is not representative of a high-end desktop part. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes is a plus for modern GPUs and NVMe drives, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 is basic. The production status is active, and it was released on January 3, 2023. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not possible, so the 5.20 GHz boost is the ceiling.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The transistor density is 125.3M per mm², which is high. The GPU has 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. It features 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI compute. The base clock is 2,235 MHz, and the boost clock is 2,520 MHz. The memory is 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. The memory clock is 1,313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. The pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 and FP16 throughput are both 82.58 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 ratio.

The benchmark scores are exceptional. The Passmark G3D score of 38,194 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 271,631 place it in the top tier of GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 is strong. The average benchmark score of 60,347 is 88th percentile, and the nearest rivals in the database are professional workstation cards like the Intel Arc Pro A60 and AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which have similar average scores but far less memory bandwidth and compute throughput. The RTX 4090's TDP is 450W, and it requires a 16-pin power connector and an 850W power supply. It is a triple-slot card, 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 61 mm wide. It uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The production status is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. The launch MSRP was 1,599 USD.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows are present. Therefore, all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

At 4K resolution with ultra settings, the RTX 4090's 88th-percentile ranking suggests it will run most AAA titles at frame rates well above 60 FPS. The GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 24 GB VRAM are more than sufficient for 4K textures and ray-traced effects. The CPU's single-core performance, indicated by the Cinebench R23 score of 4,834, will not bottleneck at 4K in GPU-bound scenes, but open-world games with heavy CPU physics may see occasional dips.

At 1440p, the CPU becomes more relevant. The i9-13900E's 65th-percentile multicore ranking and 1,800 MHz base clock may cause frame rate drops in multiplayer titles that rely on high CPU thread counts. The 32 threads help, but the low base clock hurts sustained performance. Expect high but variable frame rates.

At 1080p, the CPU is the clear bottleneck. The RTX 4090 will often be idle waiting for the CPU to process draw calls. The single-core score of 4,834 in Cinebench R23 is decent, but not enough to feed a GPU of this caliber. Frame rates will be high, but not as high as with a stronger CPU. The estimated figures are that 1080p ultra will see frame rates in the 200-300 FPS range in esports titles, but competitive games like CS:GO or Valorant may not reach their full potential due to CPU limits.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The combined percentile is 77, which places the overall system in the upper tier of all configurations. The CPU is a 65W, 24-core part with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and 65th-percentile ranking. The GPU is a 450W, 24 GB VRAM monster with an 88th-percentile ranking. The disparity in performance tiers means this is a GPU-centric build.

The class is desktop, and the socket is Intel Socket 1700. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The system is best described as a high-end GPU attached to a mid-range CPU. For gaming at 4K and GPU-accelerated productivity, it will excel. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation or high-thread-count rendering, it will underperform relative to the GPU's capabilities. The pair is not balanced, but for the right workload, it is incredibly capable.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 77, which places it above most systems but below the top-tier CPU-GPU combinations.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck in gaming?

A: The CPU is the bottleneck at lower resolutions like 1080p and 1440p due to its 65th-percentile ranking and 1,800 MHz base clock. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4090 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s.

Q: Does the i9-13900E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop part and makes it suitable for entry-level workstations.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 4090?

A: The launch MSRP is 1,599 USD. The CPU has no listed launch MSRP in the data.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The i9-13900E has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a base clock of 1,800 MHz.

Q: Is the RTX 4090 still in production?

A: No, the production status is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series listed as its successor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds