SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace flagship GPU, creating a desktop-class system that sits at the 76th percentile overall when compared to all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU alone reaches the 65th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a configuration where the graphics component is the stronger half of the pair. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that positions it as an efficiency-oriented variant within the Core i9 family. The chip uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and carries a die size of 257 mm². Cache is organized as 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show a processor with strong multi-threaded capability but modest single-thread scores relative to its core count. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 34244 in multi-core and 4834 in single-core, a ratio that highlights its parallel-processing strength. The Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern: 14382 multi-core and 2030 single-core. Geekbench scores are notably lower at 8337 multi-core and 1646 single-core, which pulls the average benchmark score down to 8676.

The percentile placement at 65th among all CPUs is telling. The nearest rivals in the database are all low-power mobile or older server parts — the Intel Core i7-8565U (avg score 8665, delta +0.1%), Intel Core i5-8365U (avg score 8708, delta -0.4%), AMD EPYC 7601 (avg score 8619, delta +0.7%), and Intel Core i7-10510U (avg score 8580, delta +1.1%). This clustering around the 8600-8700 average score range suggests that while the 13900E has massive multi-core potential in Cinebench, its overall benchmark average is dragged down by weaker single-core and Geekbench performance. The data indicates a processor that excels in heavily threaded rendering workloads such as Cinebench R23 multi-core, where its 24 cores deliver a score nearly double that of its single-core result — but one that does not lead the pack in lighter, latency-sensitive tasks.

For real workloads, the 34244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggests strong capability in video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks that scale across cores. The 4834 single-core score is adequate for daily responsiveness but not class-leading. The 65 W TDP combined with the 5.20 GHz boost clock indicates a chip that can reach high frequencies when needed while maintaining a relatively modest thermal envelope, though the locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) means overclocking headroom is not available.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4080's 86th percentile GPU standing and the 13900E's single-core score of 4834 in Cinebench R23 together support estimated high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, where the GPU becomes the primary driver. The CPU's 24 cores ensure background tasks do not interfere with game performance.

Streaming: The 32 threads of the 13900E provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The GPU's 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores can offload encoding tasks, while the CPU's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 34244 indicates it can handle encoding software without bottlenecking the game itself.

Video editing: The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 24 cores deliver strong performance in multi-threaded export and rendering tasks, as evidenced by the 34244 multi-core Cinebench R23 score. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with 716.8 GB/s bandwidth accelerates timeline scrubbing and effect rendering.

3D rendering: This is the strongest scenario for the pairing. The CPU's 24 cores produce a 14382 Cinebench R20 multi-core score, while the GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 761.5 GTexel/s texture rate provide substantial GPU-accelerated rendering capability. The 304 tensor cores further accelerate AI-based denoising and upscaling in modern renderers.

Software development: The 32 threads handle parallel compilation efficiently, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases. The 8337 Geekbench multi-core score, while lower than Cinebench results, still indicates competent performance for build servers and IDE workloads.

Student and office work: The 4834 single-core Cinebench R23 score handles document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing with ease. The 65 W TDP keeps power draw modest for a desktop system, though the 700 W suggested PSU for the GPU makes the overall build more substantial than typical office machines.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation use. PCIe connectivity is provided through Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering high bandwidth for modern storage and expansion cards.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and hardware encode/decode capabilities, which is useful for troubleshooting or secondary display configurations. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest for a 24-core part, leaving thermal headroom within most Socket 1700 motherboards.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and requires a 700 W suggested PSU. The RTX 4080 uses a 1x 16-pin power connector and occupies a triple-slot width, measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. This physical footprint requires a case with adequate clearance.

A sensible next upgrade within this platform would focus on the GPU, as the RTX 4080 is marked end-of-life with a successor in the GeForce 50 series. The CPU's 65th percentile ranking indicates it remains a competent partner for current and near-future workloads, so users could extend system life by upgrading the GPU first. Memory could also be upgraded to DDR5 if the motherboard and current configuration use DDR4, since the memory controller supports both.

Who Should Build It

The 76th combined percentile positions this system for users who need strong GPU performance and adequate CPU throughput. Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolutions benefit most, as the RTX 4080's 86th percentile ranking ensures high frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios while the CPU's 24 cores prevent bottlenecks in open-world titles with many NPCs.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering software will find the combination of 34244 multi-core Cinebench R23 score and 48.74 TFLOPS GPU compute suitable for professional workloads. The ECC memory support on the CPU side adds reliability for long render sessions.

Software developers compiling large projects benefit from 32 threads and 36 MB of L3 cache, while the 5.20 GHz boost clock keeps single-threaded tooling responsive. Students and small business workstations gain from the balanced performance, though the 320 W GPU TDP and 700 W PSU requirement make this a power-hungry system compared to typical office machines.

The locked multiplier on the CPU means users seeking overclocking should look elsewhere, but those needing a stable, high-core-count workhorse with strong GPU acceleration will find this pairing well-matched.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a GPU-heavy balance. The RTX 4080 sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 65th percentile among all CPUs. This 21-percentage-point gap indicates the GPU is the stronger component and will be the limiting factor in CPU-light, GPU-heavy workloads. Conversely, the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads mean it will rarely be the bottleneck in multi-threaded tasks.

In gaming, the estimated bottleneck shifts by resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's single-core score of 4834 in Cinebench R23 may limit frame rates in esports titles, though the 5.20 GHz boost clock mitigates this. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's rendering load increases, and the RTX 4080's 86th percentile performance becomes the primary determinant of frame rates.

For productivity, the 34244 multi-core Cinebench R23 score indicates the CPU can feed the GPU for most rendering tasks. However, the Geekbench multi-core score of 8337 is notably lower than the Cinebench results, suggesting some workloads that rely on different instruction patterns may not scale as well. The nearest rival comparisons — with the 13900E within 1.1% of several low-power mobile CPUs in average benchmark score — indicate that, despite its core count, the processor does not dramatically outclass far smaller parts in aggregate performance.

The 65 W CPU TDP versus the 320 W GPU TDP creates a system where the GPU dominates power draw. The 700 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom for both components plus system peripherals. The 16 GB of GPU memory is unlikely to bottleneck at 1440p or 4K in current titles, while the CPU's 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory bandwidth pressure.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-13900E support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so the CPU cannot be overclocked beyond its factory boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4080's average benchmark score is 54247, which is within 0.1% of the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209) and ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, delta -1.1%) and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, delta -2.6%).

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component in this build?

A: The GPU is stronger, ranking at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 65th percentile among all CPUs. The combined percentile is 76th.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 716.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E includes UHD Graphics 770, which provides display output and basic graphics capability without a discrete GPU.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 8676, placing it at the 65th percentile among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 34244, with a single-core score of 4834. Cinebench R20 results are 14382 multi-core and 2030 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3451 multi-core and 487 single-core. Geekbench scores are 8337 multi-core and 1646 single-core.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 54247, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6567. Geekbench OpenCL yields 214739, and Geekbench Vulkan yields 263779. Passmark scores include 34457 for G3D, 20671 for GPU compute, 1239 for G2D, and legacy DirectX tests at 370 (DX9), 314 (DX11), 204 (DX10), and 132 (DX12).

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 76th. The CPU's nearest rivals in average score are the Intel Core i7-8565U (8665, +0.1%), Intel Core i5-8365U (8708, -0.4%), AMD EPYC 7601 (8619, +0.7%), and Intel Core i7-10510U (8580, +1.1%). The GPU's nearest rivals are the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209, +0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, -1.1%), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, -2.6%), and AMD Radeon 8060S (55757, -2.7%).

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU contributes significantly more to overall capability than the CPU. The 86th percentile GPU performance drives the combined 76th percentile ranking upward, while the CPU's 65th percentile provides adequate support without being a standout component.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900E, a Raptor Lake processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, an Ada Lovelace GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 320 W TDP, requiring a 700 W suggested PSU.

The overall tier from the percentiles places this system in the upper-middle range: 76th combined percentile, with the GPU at 86th and the CPU at 65th. This is a configuration where the GPU is clearly the dominant component, and the CPU provides sufficient multi-threaded throughput for most applications without matching the GPU's relative strength.

The RTX 4080 is end-of-life as a production product, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor and a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The CPU remains active in production and was released on 2023-01-03. The GPU measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, occupying a triple-slot form factor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified measurements.

The RTX 4080's 86th percentile GPU ranking and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest strong 1440p and 4K gaming capability. The 16 GB of VRAM with 716.8 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The 76 RT cores accelerate ray-traced effects, while the 304 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based upscaling.

The CPU's 4834 single-core Cinebench R23 score and 5.20 GHz boost clock should prevent significant CPU bottlenecks at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU may become the limiting factor in esports titles where frame rates exceed the CPU's per-core throughput, but the 24-core design ensures consistent frame pacing in demanding open-world games.

For 1440p gaming, the estimated performance is excellent, with the GPU's 86th percentile ranking placing it above the majority of installed graphics cards. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth support high-detail settings, and the 320 W TDP indicates substantial sustained power delivery for demanding scenes.

The GPU's nearest rival comparisons show it performing within 0.1% of the RTX 4080 SUPER, making it effectively equivalent to that card in average benchmark performance. This places the RTX 4080 at the upper end of the current GPU hierarchy, with only the 86th percentile ranking and the few cards above it offering more performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with a chip designated AD103. The GPU contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The base clock is 2205 MHz with a boost clock of 2505 MHz, and memory runs at 1400 MHz with 22.4 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration consists of 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, providing 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 76 dedicated RT cores, while 304 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. The pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 761.5 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 performance both at 48.74 TFLOPS.

The 86th percentile GPU ranking reflects strong but not top-tier performance. The nearest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER with an average score of 54209, a delta of just 0.1% — effectively identical performance. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, -1.1%), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, -2.6%), and AMD Radeon 8060S (55757, -2.7%) all sit close in average score, indicating a competitive segment.

For rendering workloads, the 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 761.5 GTexel/s texture rate provide substantial compute capability. The 304 tensor cores accelerate AI-based rendering features such as DLSS and neural denoising, while the 76 RT cores handle ray-traced effects. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K texture sets in current titles, and the 716.8 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution framebuffers and large scene data.

The GPU's TDP of 320 W requires a 700 W suggested PSU, and the triple-slot cooler demands adequate case airflow. The 1x 16-pin power connector is the sole power input. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor configurations. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.