SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

77 Score

Top 23% Ranking

77 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 23% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 represents a high-performance desktop configuration with a stark contrast in component capabilities. The CPU holds a 65th percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile among all graphics cards, making the combined system percentile of 58 a figure that leans heavily on the processor’s strength. This pairing is defined by a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads, paired with a graphics card that provides balanced 1080p and 1440p gaming capability, though the data shows a significant imbalance in raw compute potential between the two.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It features a base clock of 1800.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, operating within a 65 W TDP envelope. The processor is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for keeping the 24 cores fed with data during multi-threaded operations.

Benchmark results for the i9-13900E show a processor that scales exceptionally well with multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 34244 in multi-core and 4834 in single-core, indicating a strong ratio of parallel to single-thread performance. The Cinebench R20 scores of 14382 multi-core and 2030 single-core reinforce this pattern, as does the Cinebench R15 result of 3451 multi-core versus 487 single-core. Geekbench results are more modest, with a multi-core score of 8337 and a single-core score of 1646, which suggests that the processor’s performance is heavily dependent on the workload’s ability to utilize all 24 cores effectively.

The average benchmark score for the i9-13900E is 8676, placing it at the 65th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in this metric are the Intel Core i7-8565U with an average score of 8665 (a delta of 0.1%), the Intel Core i5-8365U at 8708 (delta -0.4%), the AMD EPYC 7601 at 8619 (delta 0.7%), and the Intel Core i7-10510U at 8580 (delta 1.1%). The data shows that the i9-13900E is only marginally ahead of or behind these lower-tier mobile and server processors in average score, which is surprising given its core count. This underscores that the average benchmark metric does not fully capture the i9-13900E’s peak multi-core capability, as its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is over 3.5 times higher than its average score suggests typical performance.

For real workloads, the 24-core configuration with a 5.20 GHz boost clock means the i9-13900E is exceptionally well-suited for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation tasks that can distribute work across all threads. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, indicating efficient power delivery, but the benchmark data shows that sustained all-core loads will produce scores far above what the average metric implies. Single-core performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient for responsive everyday use and gaming, as evidenced by the 4834 score in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i9-13900E and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor’s 65th percentile ranking across all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking across all GPUs, and the combined system percentile of 58 reflects this CPU-led configuration. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions must be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

The CPU’s multi-core performance, as demonstrated by the 34244 score in Cinebench R23, indicates that it will not be a limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The GPU, with its average benchmark score of 0 and no measured FPS data, presents a more ambiguous picture. However, the RTX 4070 AD103’s 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth suggest it is capable of driving modern games at high settings. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics-heavy games or simulation titles, the i9-13900E’s 24 cores and 5.20 GHz boost clock will ensure that the GPU is fed with enough data to maintain high frame rates. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions, the RTX 4070 AD103 will become the limiting factor, as its 50th percentile ranking suggests it is an average performer relative to the entire GPU landscape.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU versus the 200 W TDP of the GPU further highlights the imbalance, with the GPU drawing over three times the power of the CPU under load. This suggests that the system’s power delivery and cooling requirements are driven primarily by the graphics card, and the CPU’s efficiency allows for significant headroom in system power budgets. The data indicates that for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (4834 in Cinebench R23) will likely keep pace with the GPU, but at 4K resolution, the GPU’s compute capabilities will be the primary constraint on frame rates.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark performance of this configuration is defined by the CPU’s strong multi-core showing and the GPU’s lack of direct benchmark data. The Intel Core i9-13900E achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244, which is a clear indicator of its capability in rendering and content creation workloads. Its single-core score of 4834 in the same test shows that it also handles lightly threaded tasks competently. In Geekbench, the CPU scores 8337 multi-core and 1646 single-core, which are more conservative figures but still place it at the 65th percentile of all CPUs.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 has no benchmark scores listed in the data, and its average benchmark score is 0, placing it at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This lack of measured data means that the GPU’s performance cannot be directly compared to rivals, and the combined picture must rely on the CPU’s metrics and the GPU’s specifications. The GPU’s FP32 compute of 29.15 TFLOPS and memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s are the key figures for estimating gaming performance, but without benchmark scores, these remain theoretical.

The combined percentile of 58 for this system indicates that it performs better than 58% of all CPU and GPU pairings tracked in the database. This is a mid-to-upper-tier result, driven almost entirely by the CPU’s 65th percentile ranking, while the GPU’s 50th percentile drags the overall score down. The data shows a configuration that will excel in CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering and video editing, while gaming performance will be respectable but not class-leading, given the GPU’s average standing.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is well-suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over extreme gaming performance. The Intel Core i9-13900E’s 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with its 34244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, make it an excellent choice for content creators, video editors, and 3D artists who rely on multi-threaded rendering engines. Software developers compiling large codebases will also benefit from the high core count, as compilation tasks scale well with parallel processing.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolutions will find this system capable, with the CPU’s 4834 single-core score in Cinebench R23 ensuring that frame rates are not bottlenecked by the processor in most titles. However, the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking suggests that it is not designed for extreme 4K gaming or maximum ray tracing settings. Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and light productivity tasks will find the system more than adequate, though the 24-core CPU is overkill for such workloads. The 65 W TDP of the CPU also makes this an efficient platform for workstation use where power consumption is a concern.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E scores 34244 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a strong result for a 24-core processor and supports heavy rendering workloads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900E has an average benchmark score of 8676, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-8565U, 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-8365U, 0.7% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7601, and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10510U.

Q: Does the GPU have any benchmark scores available?

A: No, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0, so its performance is based on specifications rather than measured results.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 AD103 features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 58, placing this system above 58% of all tracked configurations, with the CPU at the 65th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile.

Q: How much power does the CPU consume?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E has a TDP of 65 W, which is notably efficient for a 24-core processor.

Q: What is the GPU’s suggested power supply rating?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4070 AD103 is 550 W, with the GPU itself having a TDP of 200 W.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process node, with a die size of 379 mm² and 45,900 million transistors. The GPU features 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. Its base clock is 1920 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz, and the memory operates at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 192-bit bus width is a limiting factor for higher resolutions. The GPU’s compute capabilities include 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1) performance, which is solid for rasterized rendering but not exceptional for ray tracing workloads, despite the presence of 46 dedicated RT cores.

The pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s, indicating balanced rasterization throughput. The GPU has a TDP of 200 W and requires a 550 W power supply, which is modest for its performance class. With a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, the RTX 4070 AD103 is an average performer, and its lack of benchmark scores means that its real-world gaming performance must be inferred from these specifications. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern games at high settings, but the 192-bit bus may cause performance drops in VRAM-heavy titles at 4K.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for high-bandwidth storage and graphics cards. The CPU also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output without a discrete GPU.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the 200 W TDP of the GPU with a suggested PSU of 550 W leaves ample headroom for additional components. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means that the overall system power draw is dominated by the GPU, and the 550 W PSU suggestion accounts for this. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 65th percentile ranking is likely to outlast the GPU’s 50th percentile in terms of relative performance.

The socket 1700 platform supports the 13th Gen Core series, and while the i9-13900E is not multiplier-unlocked, its 5.20 GHz boost clock is already high. Memory upgrades to faster DDR5 modules could improve bandwidth-sensitive tasks, but the dual-channel configuration is standard. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future graphics cards and NVMe drives will not be bottlenecked by the platform interface.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900E, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103, an Ada Lovelace graphics card. The CPU holds the 65th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 50th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 58. The system is CPU-dominant, with the processor’s multi-core capabilities far exceeding the GPU’s mid-tier standing.

The i9-13900E’s 34244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is the standout figure, indicating that this build is optimized for productivity and content creation rather than extreme gaming. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide a competent gaming experience at 1080p and 1440p, but the lack of benchmark scores means that its position is based solely on hardware specifications. Overall, this is a balanced workstation-class desktop with a strong CPU and a mid-range GPU, suitable for users who need high core counts for professional workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With the CPU’s 4834 single-core score in Cinebench R23, frame rates at 1080p will be largely CPU-limited, but the GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS ensures that the RTX 4070 AD103 can push high frame rates in esports titles, though the 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests 144Hz+ performance may require lower settings.

Streaming: The 24-core CPU with 32 threads can handle encoding and streaming simultaneously without impacting gaming performance, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 provides ample headroom for software encoding alongside game rendering.

Video editing: The i9-13900E’s 24 cores accelerate rendering and export times, with the GPU’s 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores assisting with effects and AI-based tools in editing suites, though the 12 GB VRAM may limit very complex timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 is ideal for CPU-based rendering engines, and the GPU’s 46 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible renderers, making this a capable dual-purpose rendering workstation.

Software development: The 24 cores and 32 threads of the i9-13900E will significantly reduce compile times for large projects, as compilation is highly parallel, and the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low during long build sessions.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, and the CPU’s efficiency makes it a silent and cool-running system for general productivity tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds