SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i9-13900E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti pairing presents an interesting balance of compute resources, but the data reveals distinct workload-dependent bottlenecks. The CPU sits at the 65th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. This 18-point gap suggests the graphics card is the stronger component in this pairing, making it the primary driver of performance in graphics-bound scenarios.

For gaming workloads, the RTX 3080 Ti’s higher percentile ranking indicates that it will be the limiting factor in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial headroom for background tasks, streaming, and game logic, but the GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth will dictate frame rates in graphically intense titles. Benchmark results show the GPU achieving a Passmark G3D score of 26896, a figure that places it well above the CPU’s average benchmark score of 8676, reinforcing the GPU-centric nature of gaming performance.

However, the CPU becomes the bottleneck in compute-heavy, single-threaded tasks. The i9-13900E’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834, while respectable, trails its multi-core score of 34244 by a factor of roughly 7x. This disparity indicates that workloads relying on single-thread performance, such as legacy software or lightly threaded applications, will not fully utilize the CPU’s core count, leaving performance on the table. Conversely, multi-threaded workloads like video rendering or 3D modeling will see the CPU stretch its legs, with the 24-core configuration providing substantial parallel throughput.

FPS scaling data is absent for this exact combination, as no measured FPS rows exist in the FACT PACK. The data shows that frame rates must be inferred from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. Based on the GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and the CPU’s 65th percentile, the system should exhibit GPU-bound behavior at 4K resolution, with the CPU becoming more relevant at 1080p where lower GPU load allows the processor to influence frame pacing. The combined percentile of 74 indicates a well-matched pair, but the CPU’s lower percentile suggests it will cap performance in CPU-limited scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions and high refresh rates.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this pairing reveals a clear performance hierarchy. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 8676, placing it at the 65th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-8565U, scores 8665, a delta of 0.1%, meaning the i9-13900E is essentially tied with that mobile chip in aggregate performance. The AMD EPYC 7601 trails by 0.7% with a score of 8619, while the i9-13900E leads the Intel Core i7-10510U by 1.1%. This clustering around the 65th percentile suggests the CPU’s average score is competitive but not exceptional, given its 24-core configuration.

Delving into specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 stands out as the strongest result, while the single-core score of 4834 is comparatively modest. Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 8337 and a single-core score of 1646, reinforcing the pattern of strong multi-threaded performance relative to single-threaded. The Cinebench R20 scores follow suit: multi-core at 14382 and single-core at 2030. Older Cinebench R15 results show 3451 multi-core and 487 single-core. These figures indicate that the CPU excels in parallel workloads, with multi-core scores roughly 7x their single-core counterparts across most tests.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are substantially higher in absolute terms. The average benchmark score is 41187, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, scores 40870, a delta of 0.8% in favor of the RTX 3080 Ti. The NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB scores 41707, putting the RTX 3080 Ti 1.2% behind, while the Tesla M40 scores 41897, a 1.7% deficit. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 scores 40377, leaving the RTX 3080 Ti 2% ahead. This tight competition around the 83rd percentile highlights the GPU’s strong standing, though newer architectures like the RTX 5070 are closing the gap.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 5077, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores reach 170037 and 192697, respectively. Passmark results show a G3D score of 26896 and a GPU compute score of 15282. The combined picture is one of a high-performing GPU paired with a mid-to-upper-tier CPU. The CPU’s 65th percentile and GPU’s 83rd percentile produce a combined percentile of 74, indicating that the system as a whole performs above average but is held back by the CPU’s relatively lower standing. For users prioritizing graphics performance, this pairing delivers, but CPU-bound tasks will not reach the same heights.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel’s foundry, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 1800 MHz, boosting up to 5.20 GHz, though the multiplier is locked, preventing manual overclocking. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache pool helps mitigate memory latency, particularly in multi-threaded workloads where data sharing between cores is frequent. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes (CPU only) offers high bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, though the RTX 3080 Ti uses PCIe 4.0, which remains backward compatible.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a mixed profile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 is strong, placing it in the upper echelon for multi-threaded rendering tasks. However, the single-core score of 4834 is less impressive, indicating that the architecture prioritizes core count over per-core speed. The Geekbench multi-core score of 8337 and single-core score of 1646 follow a similar pattern. The average benchmark score of 8676, while ranking at the 65th percentile, is dragged down by the relatively modest single-threaded performance. For real workloads, this means the CPU excels in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation where all 24 cores are engaged. In contrast, gaming and office tasks that rely on one or two cores will see performance closer to the single-core scores, which are competitive but not top-tier.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in the benchmark database are all lower-core-count parts, including the Intel Core i7-8565U and i5-8365U, as well as the AMD EPYC 7601. The fact that the i9-13900E’s average score is within 1% of these parts suggests that raw core count does not always translate to a higher average score, as single-threaded performance and workload efficiency play significant roles. The locked multiplier and 65 W TDP indicate a focus on power efficiency rather than extreme overclocking, making it a sensible choice for pre-built systems and workstations where stability is paramount.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i9-13900E paired with the RTX 3080 Ti targets users who need a balance of multi-threaded CPU power and high-end GPU performance. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking, as the RTX 3080 Ti is well-suited for high-fidelity gaming at those resolutions. The CPU’s 65th percentile is sufficient to avoid severe bottlenecks at these resolutions, where the GPU is typically the limiting factor. Measured FPS data is unavailable for this exact combination, but the benchmark scores indicate that the GPU will drive frame rates, with the CPU providing adequate support.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or animation will find the CPU’s 24 cores advantageous. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 suggests strong performance in rendering tasks, while the GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the multi-core throughput, while the GPU’s compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute score of 15282) support parallel processing tasks like machine learning inference.

Students and small business workstations may also find this pairing suitable, though the GPU’s 350 W TDP and suggested 750 W PSU requirement make it a power-hungry choice. The CPU’s ECC memory support and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide flexibility for workstation tasks that require memory error correction or a backup display. However, for office workloads that are largely single-threaded, the CPU’s modest single-core scores may not justify the cost of the 24-core configuration. This build is best reserved for users who can leverage both the CPU’s multi-threading and the GPU’s graphics and compute power.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and the CPU’s 65th percentile suggest that gaming performance will be strong, particularly at higher resolutions. The RTX 3080 Ti’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for 4K textures and high-detail settings. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 26896 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 indicate excellent DirectX 12 performance, which is relevant for modern game titles.

At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core performance may become a limiting factor in CPU-bound games, as the i9-13900E’s single-core scores are not exceptional. However, the 24 cores ensure that background processes do not interfere with gameplay, and the 5.20 GHz boost clock helps maintain decent single-threaded performance. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, and the system should deliver high frame rates at ultra settings, assuming the GPU’s 83rd percentile holds up in real-world scenarios. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores support a positive outlook for gaming.

The GPU’s ray tracing and DLSS capabilities, enabled by 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, further enhance gaming performance in supported titles. The 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides raw compute power, while the tensor cores accelerate AI-based upscaling, allowing for higher frame rates at lower internal resolutions. Overall, this pairing is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1440p and solid 4K performance, with the CPU providing enough headroom to avoid major bottlenecks.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture, using the GA102 chip manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. The die is massive at 628 mm², housing 28,300 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 45.1M per mm². The GPU features 10240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units, providing substantial rasterization throughput. The base clock is 1365 MHz, boosting to 1665 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration is a highlight: 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth. This high bandwidth is critical for 4K gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, where large texture sets and buffer transfers can saturate narrower memory interfaces. The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x16, offering sufficient bandwidth for its capabilities, and includes 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads. The FP32 performance is 34.10 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1), making it a strong performer for compute tasks.

Benchmark scores for the GPU are robust. The Passmark G3D score of 26896 places it at the 83rd percentile, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 170037 and Vulkan score of 192697 indicate strong compute and graphics API performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 demonstrates modern DirectX 12 capabilities. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 41187 is nearly 5x the CPU’s average, underscoring its dominance in this pairing. However, the GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 40 series, and its nearest rivals include the RTX 5070, which is 2% slower in average score, indicating that the 3080 Ti remains competitive. For rendering workloads, the 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerates 3D rendering, while the 912.4 GB/s bandwidth ensures efficient data movement. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for most current titles, though future games may demand more.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3080 Ti’s 83rd percentile ranking and 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance support high frame rates at 1440p, with the CPU’s 5.20 GHz boost clock providing adequate single-threaded performance. At 1080p, the CPU may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s raw power ensures a smooth experience in most games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads handle encoding and background tasks without significant impact on gaming performance. The GPU’s NVENC encoder, though not detailed in the FACT PACK, benefits from the tensor cores, allowing for efficient streaming at high bitrates.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 accelerates video encoding and effects processing, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K timelines and GPU-accelerated effects in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-core performance and the GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 provide a balanced rendering platform. The GPU’s 80 RT cores support ray-traced rendering, while the 112 ROPs ensure efficient pixel output.

Software development: The 24-core CPU speeds up compilation, while the GPU’s compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute score of 15282) support parallel testing and machine learning workloads. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback, but the CPU’s single-core scores are modest, making this overkill for basic tasks. The 65 W TDP and locked multiplier suggest stability, but the GPU’s 350 W TDP makes this a power-hungry choice for typical office environments.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, indicating above-average performance relative to all desktop builds.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900E compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The i9-13900E scores 8676, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-8565U (8665) and 0.7% higher than the AMD EPYC 7601 (8619).

Q: What is the RTX 3080 Ti’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation applications.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 41187, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this exact CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this pairing, so gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and core count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a base clock of 1800 MHz.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900E, a 24-core desktop processor from the Raptor Lake generation, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, a high-end Ampere architecture GPU. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 74 places it in the upper-middle tier of all systems. The CPU, released in January 2023, is still in active production, while the GPU, released in May 2021, is end-of-life.

The CPU’s 65th percentile ranking, driven by an average benchmark score of 8676, is respectable but not top-tier, with its multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 34244) being the primary strength. The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking, with an average score of 41187, makes it the dominant component, offering strong graphics and compute performance. The RTX 3080 Ti’s launch MSRP was 1,199 USD, though this figure is provided for reference only.

Overall, this is a capable desktop workstation and gaming system, with the GPU leading gaming performance and the CPU providing substantial multi-threaded muscle. The lack of measured FPS data means specific frame rates are estimates, but the benchmark scores indicate a well-balanced pairing for 1440p gaming and content creation, with the GPU’s high percentile ensuring long-term relevance in graphics-bound tasks.