SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen family and features a base clock of 1800 MHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The chip's cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This configuration positions it as a high-core-count workhorse, though its modest 65 W TDP suggests power efficiency was prioritized over raw sustained clocks.

Benchmark data shows the i9-13900E achieving 34,244 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 14,382 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 3,451 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Single-core scores are equally telling: 4,834 in R23, 2,030 in R20, and 487 in R15. Geekbench results show 8,337 multi-core and 1,646 single-core. The multi-core figures are strong for productivity tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while the single-core numbers indicate solid responsiveness in everyday applications and lightly threaded workloads.

However, the CPU's average benchmark score of 8,676 places it at the 65th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals — the Intel Core i7-8565U (average score 8,665, deltaPct 0.1%), the Intel Core i5-8365U (8,708, deltaPct -0.4%), the AMD EPYC 7601 (8,619, deltaPct 0.7%), and the Intel Core i7-10510U (8,580, deltaPct 1.1%) — are notably lower-tier parts. This is a curious comparison set: the i9-13900E outperforms these mobile and older server chips by margins of 0.1% to 1.1%, but the deltas are tiny. The data suggests that while the i9-13900E has immense multi-core headroom in Cinebench, its average benchmark score is dragged down by other factors, possibly thermal constraints or the 65 W TDP limiting sustained performance across a broader test suite.

The architecture itself is Raptor Lake-S, with support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. ECC memory is supported, which is a boon for workstation builds. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes enables fast NVMe storage and current-generation GPUs. The chip is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking headroom is restricted, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock already delivers competitive single-thread performance.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 indicates strong throughput in heavily threaded tasks like video rendering or batch photo processing. The single-core R23 score of 4,834 suggests snappy application launches and fluid browser performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 8,337 is lower than expected for a 24-core chip, which hints that the 65 W TDP may throttle sustained all-core loads. In practice, this CPU behaves like a high-efficiency workstation chip that excels in bursty multi-threaded work but may not sustain peak all-core clocks indefinitely.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the Intel Core i9-13900E and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080.

The RTX 3080 is a formidable GPU. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and PassMark G3D score of 25,086 place it at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU's compute performance — 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 and 465.1 GTexel/s texture rate — indicates it can drive high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions, provided the CPU can keep up. The i9-13900E's single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,834, is more than adequate for feeding the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

At 1080p, where CPU overhead is more pronounced, the i9-13900E's strong single-threaded scores should allow the RTX 3080 to reach its full potential in esports titles and older games. Expect frame rates well above 144 FPS in competitive shooters at high settings, though these are estimates. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory with 760.3 GB/s bandwidth should sustain high frame rates in AAA titles with ray tracing enabled. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the CPU's 65 W TDP is unlikely to constrain performance.

The RTX 3080's nearest rivals — the NVIDIA P106-100 (avg score 23,249, deltaPct -0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23,250, deltaPct -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23,273, deltaPct -0.4%), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23,276, deltaPct -0.4%) — are all within 0.4% of its average score. This is a tight cluster, but those rivals are lower-tier GPUs in different performance classes; the RTX 3080's 68th percentile ranking underscores that it outperforms the majority of GPUs in the database. In gaming, this means the RTX 3080 should deliver high ultra-settings frame rates at 1440p, with playable 4K performance in most titles, assuming the CPU does not bottleneck.

Given the lack of measured FPS data, these figures should be treated as directional estimates. The benchmark scores indicate a pairing capable of high-refresh 1440p gaming and solid 4K performance, but actual frame rates will vary by title and driver optimization.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The i9-13900E's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4,834 and the RTX 3080's 3DMark score of 4,407 suggest the pair can drive 144 Hz monitors at 1440p in most titles. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking indicates it outpaces the majority of graphics cards, making it suitable for competitive gaming where frame rates above 144 FPS are desirable.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 shows the CPU can handle simultaneous game rendering and x264 encoding without significant frame drops, though the 65 W TDP may limit sustained all-core loads during long streams.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14,382 and Geekbench multi-core score of 8,337 point to solid performance in timeline scrubbing, export rendering, and effects processing. The RTX 3080's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and encoding, making this a capable editing rig for 4K footage.

3D Rendering: The CPU's R23 multi-core score of 34,244 is strong for CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray, while the GPU's PassMark GPU Compute score of 14,397 supports GPU-accelerated rendering. The combination handles both render paths effectively, though the CPU's 65 W TDP may cause longer render times than a higher-TDP chip.

Software Development: The 32 threads and Geekbench multi-core score of 8,337 facilitate parallel compilation and testing. Single-core performance of 1,646 in Geekbench ensures snappy IDE responsiveness. The ECC memory support is a reliability bonus for long-running builds.

Student and Office Work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 and the CPU's efficient 65 W TDP make this an economical choice for everyday tasks. Single-core R23 score of 4,834 ensures fluid web browsing and office applications, while the 24 cores provide future-proofing for occasional multi-threaded workloads like data analysis.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing for most workloads, with the GPU being the primary limiter in gaming. The RTX 3080's 68th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 65th percentile suggests the GPU slightly outpaces the CPU in overall performance standing. In gaming at 1440p and above, the RTX 3080's 10 GB memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth become the bottleneck, as the GPU is tasked with rendering complex scenes. The CPU's single-core performance is sufficient to avoid becoming a limiting factor at these resolutions.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation or AI-driven game logic, the i9-13900E's 65 W TDP may throttle sustained all-core clocks, creating a CPU bottleneck. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 is strong, but the Geekbench multi-core score of 8,337 is comparatively lower, suggesting that some workloads do not scale perfectly across the 24 cores. The nearest rival data reinforces this: the i9-13900E's average benchmark score of 8,676 is only 0.1% above the Core i7-8565U, a low-power mobile chip. This suggests that in average mixed workloads, the CPU does not dramatically outperform far cheaper parts, despite its core count.

The FPS scaling between resolutions, though estimated, shows the GPU becoming more dominant as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance matters more, while at 4K, the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors. The RTX 3080's pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s are sufficient for high-resolution gaming, but the 10 GB VRAM may be a constraint in future titles with heavy texture packs.

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-13900E's core and thread count?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the FACT PACK data.

Q: What is the RTX 3080's memory configuration?

A: The GPU features 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-core benchmarks?

A: The i9-13900E scores 34,244 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 14,382 in R20 multi-core, indicating strong throughput for multi-threaded tasks.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing; all FPS figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's compute capability?

A: The RTX 3080 delivers 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance and has a PassMark GPU Compute score of 14,397.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900E supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The i9-13900E uses Intel Socket 1700, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who want a high-core-count CPU for productivity and a strong GPU for gaming or creative work. The i9-13900E's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with its 65 W TDP, make it suitable for small business workstations that need multi-threaded performance without excessive power draw. The RTX 3080's 68th percentile ranking means it can handle 1440p gaming at high refresh rates and 4K gaming at playable frame rates, appealing to gamers with high-resolution monitors.

Content creators working with 4K video or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 and the GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS compute. The ECC memory support is a draw for developers running long validation suites or financial simulations. Students in engineering or data science programs will appreciate the 32 threads for parallel workloads, though the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display tasks if the GPU is not needed.

The 65 W CPU TDP and the GPU's 320 W TDP mean this is not an energy-sipping build, but it is not a power-hungry monster either. The CPU's efficiency makes it viable for office environments where sustained all-core loads are rare, while the GPU's 10 GB VRAM is adequate for current game textures and moderate 3D workloads. This build is not ideal for budget-conscious builders, but for users who need both multi-threaded CPU performance and high-end GPU acceleration, it is a strong fit.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 8,676, placing it at the 65th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Core i7-8565U (deltaPct 0.1%), Core i5-8365U (deltaPct -0.4%), EPYC 7601 (deltaPct 0.7%), and Core i7-10510U (deltaPct 1.1%). These deltas are minimal, indicating the i9-13900E does not drastically outperform its closest competitors in average mixed workloads, though it excels in specific multi-core tests.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 23,172, placing it at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals — the P106-100, Radeon Pro Vega 16, Radeon RX 6600M, and Radeon R9 M290X — are all within 0.4% of its score, showing a tight cluster. The RTX 3080's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and PassMark G3D score of 25,086 highlight its gaming strength.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 67, meaning the CPU+GPU combination outperforms roughly two-thirds of all build configurations in the database. The CPU's 65th percentile and GPU's 68th percentile are closely matched, suggesting a balanced system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The RTX 3080's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 and the i9-13900E's 34,244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score together form a capable duo for both gaming and productivity, though the CPU's average score is pulled down by less favorable results in other benchmarks.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 65 W TDP and a 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 10 GB GDDR6X memory and a 320 W TDP. The combined percentile of 67 indicates this system sits above the median in performance, making it a high-midrange to upper-tier configuration.

The RTX 3080 has a launch MSRP of 699 USD, though it is now end-of-life. The CPU is still active in production. The GPU's 68th percentile and the CPU's 65th percentile are close, meaning neither component is a clear weak link. For a desktop build, this pairing is well-suited for high-refresh 1440p gaming, 4K gaming at reduced settings, and demanding productivity tasks like video editing and 3D rendering. The CPU's efficiency (65 W TDP) contrasts with the GPU's power draw (320 W TDP), but the system's overall tier is solidly above average.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and current-generation GPUs. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

The suggested PSU for the RTX 3080 is 700 W, which provides adequate headroom for the GPU's 320 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, though the i9-13900E is already near the top of the Raptor Lake stack. Alternatively, a GPU upgrade to a newer generation would be straightforward, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and 700 W PSU are sufficient for most current high-end cards. The motherboard's memory support for DDR5 allows for a future memory speed upgrade, though the current dual-channel setup is already adequate for most workloads.

The CPU's ECC memory support is a unique feature that can be leveraged in workstation builds, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output if the GPU is removed or fails. The platform's longevity is tied to the Socket 1700, which is not expected to support future Intel generations beyond Raptor Lake, but the current setup offers a stable base for several years of use.