SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

77 Score

Top 23% Ranking

77 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 23% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-13900E pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM in a desktop configuration that ranks at the 58th percentile overall, with the CPU landing at the 65th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile. The processor delivers strong multi-threaded performance in synthetic benchmarks but sits near mid-pack in the broader CPU landscape, while the graphics card is positioned exactly at the median. This combination produces a balanced system for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though the lack of measured frame rate data means all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from component benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It packs 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5200 MHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample data locality for demanding workloads. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and integrates UHD Graphics 770 for basic display output. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the chip's TDP is rated at 65 W.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 34244 points in multi-core and 4834 in single-core, indicating exceptional parallel performance capabilities. The Cinebench R20 scores of 14382 multi-core and 2030 single-core follow the same pattern, while Cinebench R15 shows 3451 multi-core and 487 single-core. Geekbench results are more modest, with 8337 multi-core and 1646 single-core scores. The average benchmark score across all tests is 8676, placing the CPU at the 65th percentile of all processors.

When compared to nearest rivals, the i9-13900E shows minimal separation. It sits 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-8565U's average score of 8665, 0.7% above the AMD EPYC 7601's 8619, and 1.1% above the Intel Core i7-10510U's 8580. Against the Intel Core i5-8365U, it trails by 0.4% (8708 vs. 8676). These deltas are negligible, meaning the processor's real-world performance will be indistinguishable from these competitors in most applications, despite the i9-13900E's significantly higher core count and thread count. This suggests that the benchmark average is heavily weighted by single-threaded tasks or that these rivals punch well above their apparent class.

The 65% percentile ranking indicates the CPU outperforms roughly two-thirds of all processors in the database. For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 suggests strong performance in video rendering, 3D modeling, and other heavily threaded tasks. The single-core score of 4834 is solid for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications, though not class-leading. The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 24-core processor, making it efficient for sustained workloads in thermally constrained environments.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of both components. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, confirming the absence of direct testing. Frame rate expectations should be treated as projections rather than verified results.

The RTX 3070 TiM carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings. The GPU's fp32 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS suggests it can handle modern titles at these resolutions, though the 50th percentile ranking indicates average performance relative to all GPUs. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834 prevents significant bottlenecking in most gaming scenarios, as games typically rely on one to four cores.

At 1080p ultra settings, the combination should deliver high frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, likely exceeding 200 FPS given the CPU's strong single-core performance. For AAA titles such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, 1080p ultra estimates range from 80-120 FPS depending on the game's optimization. Moving to 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, with estimates of 60-90 FPS in demanding titles and 120-150 FPS in lighter games. At 4K ultra, the 8 GB VRAM capacity and 50th percentile GPU ranking suggest frame rates drop to 30-60 FPS, making 4K gaming playable only in less demanding titles or with settings reduced.

The lack of measured data means these figures carry uncertainty. The CPU's 65th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile suggests the processor provides adequate headroom for the graphics card at lower resolutions, but at higher resolutions the GPU's limitations become apparent. Ray tracing performance would be moderate given the RTX 3070 TiM's 46 RT cores, with playable frame rates at 1080p but noticeable performance hits at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4834 and the GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS fp32 performance combine for strong 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, though competitive titles at 1440p with high refresh rates may approach memory limits in the most demanding scenes.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample encoding headroom for game streaming, with the CPU handling both game and stream encoding without significant frame loss. The i9-13900E's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 34244 ensures simultaneous gaming and x264 encoding remains smooth.

Video editing: The multi-core performance shines here, with the Cinebench R23 score of 34244 enabling fast exports and rendering in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The 36 MB L3 cache and 32 threads accelerate timeline scrubbing and effect-heavy edits, though the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit complex 4K timelines with heavy color grading.

3D rendering: Blender and similar CPU-based renderers will fully utilize all 32 threads, and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14382 reflects strong render throughput. GPU-accelerated rendering via CUDA cores benefits from the RTX 3070 TiM's 5888 shading units, though the 8 GB VRAM constrains scene complexity at high resolutions.

Software development: The 24-core configuration with 32 threads accelerates compilation times, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build processes. The CPU's 65th percentile ranking ensures responsiveness during code editing, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides fallback display output.

Student and office work: The processor's 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for office workloads, and the integrated graphics handle productivity tasks without needing the discrete GPU. The 1800 MHz base clock and 5200 MHz boost clock deliver snappy application loading, while the multi-core performance handles spreadsheet calculations and virtual machines with ease.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. This platform offers flexibility in memory selection, though the CPU's ECC support is a distinguishing feature for workstation use. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future GPU upgrades, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 serves as a backup display output.

The RTX 3070 TiM connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, running at Gen 4 speeds without bottleneck. The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, while the CPU's TDP is 65 W, giving a combined system power draw well within most mid-range power supplies. The 220 W GPU TDP is modest for a 30-series card, and the 1x 8-pin power connector simplifies cabling.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 65th percentile ranking provides headroom above the GPU's 50th percentile. Moving to a GPU with higher VRAM capacity would address the 8 GB limitation at 4K resolutions. Alternatively, adding more memory bandwidth by selecting DDR5 over DDR4 could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the CPU's dual-channel bus limits total bandwidth. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage upgrades, and the 65 W CPU TDP allows for larger coolers to be repurposed if a higher-TDP processor is installed later.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a CPU at the 65th percentile against all CPUs and a GPU at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, with an overall combined percentile of 58. The CPU's average benchmark score is 8676, while the GPU has an average benchmark score of 0, meaning the GPU's performance is not quantified in this dataset.

Looking at the CPU's individual scores, Cinebench R23 multi-core leads with 34244, followed by Cinebench R20 multi-core at 14382, Geekbench multi-core at 8337, Cinebench R15 multi-core at 3451, and single-core scores of 4834 (R23), 2030 (R20), 1646 (Geekbench), and 487 (R15). These scores indicate a processor optimized for multi-threaded workloads, with single-core performance that is adequate but not exceptional for its class.

The nearest rivals comparison shows the i9-13900E is nearly identical in average score to the Intel Core i7-8565U (8676 vs. 8665, 0.1% delta), Intel Core i5-8365U (8708, -0.4%), AMD EPYC 7601 (8619, 0.7%), and Intel Core i7-10510U (8580, 1.1%). This clustering suggests that despite the i9-13900E's high core count, its benchmark average places it in the same performance tier as significantly lower-core-count mobile and server processors, indicating that the average score is dragged down by single-threaded performance or that these rivals are more efficient per core.

The GPU's empty benchmark array and zero average score mean its percentile ranking of 50 is based on external data not present in this pack. The combined percentile of 58 reflects a system that sits slightly above the median, driven primarily by the CPU's stronger showing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E scores 34244 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it at the 65th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 TiM have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900E supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop processor and beneficial for workstation stability.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and suggested PSU?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has a TDP of 220 W, and NVIDIA suggests a 550 W power supply for systems using this card.

Q: What socket does the i9-13900E use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing; all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-13900E's average benchmark score of 8676 is 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-8565U and 1.1% above the Intel Core i7-10510U, but 0.4% below the Intel Core i5-8365U.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the CPU outpaces the GPU in relative performance, with the CPU at the 65th percentile versus the GPU's 50th percentile. This gap means the GPU will be the primary limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, particularly at higher resolutions where the 8 GB VRAM and 16.60 TFLOPS fp32 performance become constraints. In CPU-bound scenarios like 3D rendering or video encoding, the processor's multi-core strength dominates, and the GPU's mid-tier performance becomes secondary.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would show this imbalance clearly. At 1080p, the CPU's single-core score of 4834 in Cinebench R23 should keep frame rates high, with the GPU likely reaching its maximum output. At 1440p, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking becomes the bottleneck, with frame rates scaling down proportionally. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM capacity is the hard limit, and the GPU's performance drops significantly relative to the CPU's capability.

For mixed workloads like gaming while streaming, the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads handle both tasks without bottlenecking the GPU. The 65 W CPU TDP versus the 220 W GPU TDP also indicates the power budget favors the graphics card, reinforcing that the GPU is the more power-hungry and performance-limiting component. The GPU's end-of-life production status and PCIe 4.0 interface further suggest that it is the older component in this pairing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900E, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, an Ampere-architecture GPU. The system ranks at the 58th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 65th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile. This places the overall system slightly above the median of all desktop configurations in the database.

The CPU is a current-generation desktop processor with active production status, released on 2023-01-03, while the GPU is end-of-life with no release date or launch MSRP provided. The CPU's 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die size contrast with the GPU's 8 nm Samsung process and 392 mm² die with 17,400 million transistors. Neither component has a launch MSRP listed, so no pricing information is available.

The pairing represents a workstation-class CPU with a mid-range enthusiast GPU. The CPU's 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache suit professional workloads, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 5888 shading units handle 1080p and 1440p gaming effectively. The 65 W CPU TDP and 220 W GPU TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU indicate a power-efficient system relative to its performance class. The triple-slot GPU cooler and 270 mm length require a roomy case, and the 1x 8-pin power connector simplifies installation.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p at high settings will find this build suitable, as the CPU's single-core score of 4834 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS fp32 performance deliver smooth frame rates in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for these resolutions, though 4K gamers should look elsewhere or reduce settings.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-core muscle, with the Cinebench R23 score of 34244 accelerating export times. The ECC memory support makes this a viable workstation for developers running long compilation jobs or data processing tasks, where memory errors could corrupt results.

Students and office workers get an overprovisioned but efficient system, with the 65 W CPU TDP keeping energy costs low and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 providing a fallback if the discrete GPU fails. Small business workstations handling virtual machines, database queries, or simulation workloads will appreciate the 32 threads and 65th percentile CPU ranking, though the GPU is unnecessary for such tasks.

The build is less suitable for enthusiasts seeking top-tier gaming performance, as the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM limit high-refresh 1440p and 4K gaming. Those prioritizing single-threaded performance in lightly threaded applications may find the CPU's 65th percentile ranking underwhelming for its core count. The system's sweet spot is as a balanced desktop for mixed productivity and gaming at mainstream resolutions.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds