SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti represents a high-end desktop configuration that blends a 24-core productivity powerhouse with a fast Ampere-generation GPU. This analysis is based strictly on the provided benchmark data, which shows a system sitting at the 70th percentile overall. While the CPU is a top-tier Raptor Lake part, its average benchmark score places it in a specific performance tier that is distinct from its core count, and the GPU delivers strong rasterization performance. The data indicates a versatile machine capable of handling demanding workloads, though the pairing shows a significant imbalance in certain scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a substantial cache hierarchy, including 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, alongside 36 MB of shared L3 cache. With a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, this chip is designed to scale from power-efficient operation to high-frequency bursts. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, includes ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark scores reveal a nuanced performance profile. In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves a multi-core score of 34244 and a single-core score of 4834, indicating exceptional multi-threaded throughput and strong single-thread performance. The multi-core result is particularly notable; it suggests that the 24 cores are highly effective in heavily parallelized workloads like 3D rendering and video encoding. The single-core score of 4834 in R23 ensures that the processor also excels in tasks that rely on fewer threads, such as legacy applications or certain game physics.

However, the average benchmark score of 8676, which includes Geekbench results (8337 multi-core, 1646 single-core), places the CPU in the 65th percentile of all CPUs. This is a curious data point. The nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i5-8365U, AMD EPYC 7601, and Intel Core i7-10510U, with delta percentages of 0.1%, -0.4%, 0.7%, and 1.1%, respectively. These rivals are primarily low-power mobile or older enterprise parts. The data suggests that while the i9-13900E has immense peak throughput as seen in Cinebench, its average score across all benchmarks is dragged down by workloads where its high core count is not fully utilized or where its 65 W TDP limits sustained all-core boosts. The 0.1% delta against the Core i7-8565U, a 4-core mobile chip, is a stark illustration of this variance, showing that the average score is heavily influenced by the benchmark suite's composition rather than pure multi-core capability.

The 65 W TDP is a defining characteristic. This power envelope is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, suggesting that the "E" variant is tuned for efficiency and potentially constrained power delivery. In real workloads, this means the CPU can deliver massive burst performance but may throttle under sustained all-core loads, preventing it from matching the raw performance of higher-TDP desktop i9 parts. The architecture is Raptor Lake, which offers a hybrid design, though the specific P-core and E-core configuration is not detailed in the data. The 36 MB L3 cache is ample for gaming and productivity, reducing memory latency and improving data throughput. For software development, the 32 threads allow for fast compilation times, while the high single-core boost clock ensures snappy responsiveness in IDEs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a clear split between multi-core and single-core capability. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3451 and R20 multi-core score of 14382 reinforce the R23 result, confirming strong scaling across generations of the test. The R15 single-core score of 487 and R20 single-core score of 2030 are respectable but not class-leading. The Geekbench scores (8337 multi, 1646 single) are moderate, and when averaged with the Cinebench results, they produce the 8676 average score. This places the CPU at the 65th percentile, meaning it outperforms 65% of all CPUs in the database, but the nearest rivals—which are mostly ultra-low-power mobile chips—indicate that the average score is not representative of its peak multi-core might.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, delivers a different performance story. It achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 and a Passmark G3D score of 23356. Its average benchmark score is 29945, placing it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 6800 (deltaPct -0.5%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (deltaPct 0.5%), and AMD Radeon RX 6700 (deltaPct -1.6%). This indicates that the RTX 3070 Ti's average performance is nearly identical to these cards, with a variance of less than 2%. The GPU is a solid mid-to-high-end performer, sitting just ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti and slightly behind the RX 6800 in average terms. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 119718 and Vulkan score of 139541 further demonstrate strong compute capabilities.

The combined picture is a system with a CPU that has high peak multi-core performance but a modest average score, paired with a GPU that is consistently strong across benchmarks. The combined percentile of 70 suggests that this pairing is well above average overall, but the CPU is the weaker link in terms of percentile ranking (65th vs. 75th for the GPU). This means that in scenarios where both components are stressed, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor for overall system performance, as it sits higher in its respective percentile distribution.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Given the GPU's 75th percentile ranking and its strong Passmark G3D score of 23356, this system is expected to handle modern games at high settings. The CPU's high single-core boost clock of 5.20 GHz and strong Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834 suggest it can feed the GPU effectively in most gaming scenarios. For competitive titles at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance should allow for very high frame rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS in many esports titles, though this is an estimate. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth should be sufficient for high-refresh gaming, with frame rates expected to be in the 100-144 FPS range for most AAA games at ultra settings, based on the GPU's performance tier. At 4K, the RTX 3070 Ti will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding games at ultra settings, requiring settings adjustments to achieve smooth gameplay.

The CPU's 65 W TDP may cause performance dips in CPU-bound games if the processor throttles under sustained load. However, the 24 cores are rarely fully utilized in gaming, so the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is likely to be maintained on the active cores, ensuring consistent frame pacing. The combination is balanced for 1440p gaming, where the GPU is the primary driver and the CPU has enough headroom. The absence of measured FPS data means these figures should be treated as directional estimates, not guarantees.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a distinct performance imbalance. The CPU's 65th percentile ranking is significantly lower than the GPU's 75th percentile, indicating that the CPU is the weaker component in this pairing. However, the nature of the bottleneck depends on the workload. In multi-threaded productivity tasks, the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads are the dominant force, and the GPU may sit idle waiting for data. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 shows the CPU can handle massive parallel workloads, but the 65 W TDP may cause it to throttle, potentially slowing down the entire system in sustained rendering tasks.

In gaming, the bottleneck is more nuanced. The GPU's high percentile and strong scores suggest it is the primary driver of frame rates. The CPU's low average score relative to its core count suggests that in lightly-threaded games, the CPU may not be a limiting factor, as its single-core boost clock is high. However, in games that utilize more than 8 cores, the CPU's power constraints could lead to lower sustained clocks, potentially causing the GPU to wait for data. The FPS scaling evidence is missing, but the percentile difference of 10 points suggests that the GPU is more capable relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its peers. This means that for a balanced upgrade, the CPU would be the first component to replace, as it is more likely to hold back the GPU in both gaming and productivity scenarios.

The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is another potential bottleneck in modern games at 4K, where memory capacity can limit texture quality. The CPU's support for PCIe Gen 5 ensures that the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is not a bottleneck for data transfer. The system is well-balanced for 1440p gaming and heavy productivity, but for 4K gaming or extreme multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's power limit and the GPU's VRAM capacity are the primary constraints.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. It contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 44.4M per mm². The GPU features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It is equipped with 48 dedicated ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. The memory clock is 1188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. This high bandwidth is crucial for 1440p gaming and compute tasks. The GPU has a base clock of 1575 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz. Its compute capabilities are notable: it delivers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 21.75 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1), making it a capable card for general compute and AI workloads. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s.

Benchmark scores confirm its strong performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 and Passmark G3D score of 23356 place it in the 75th percentile. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 139541 is particularly high, indicating excellent performance in modern graphics APIs. The GPU's average score of 29945 is nearly identical to the RTX 5070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.1%) and slightly ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti (deltaPct 0.5%). This places it in a competitive tier with modern mid-range and previous-generation high-end cards. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 11601 suggests strong compute performance for rendering and scientific workloads.

The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for 4K texture-heavy workloads, but for 1080p and 1440p, it is sufficient. The RTX 3070 Ti is an end-of-life product, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. It requires a 600 W power supply and uses a 12-pin power connector. The dual-slot design and 267 mm length make it compatible with most mid-tower cases. Overall, the GPU is a high-performance part for 1440p gaming and professional rendering, with its ray tracing and tensor cores providing advanced features.

Who Should Build It

This system is suited for users who need a balance of high-core-count CPU performance and strong GPU acceleration. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads make it ideal for content creators, 3D renderers, and software developers who compile large codebases. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 indicates it can handle complex rendering tasks, though the 65 W TDP may limit sustained all-core boosts. The GPU's 75th percentile ranking makes it a strong choice for gamers targeting 1440p at high refresh rates, where its 8 GB VRAM and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth are well-matched.

For gamers, the system is best suited for 1440p high-refresh gaming. The GPU is powerful enough for ultra settings in most titles, and the CPU's high single-core boost of 5.20 GHz ensures smooth performance in CPU-bound scenarios. For 4K gaming, the GPU may be a limiting factor due to VRAM capacity, so users should consider a more powerful GPU. For content creators, this pairing is excellent for video editing and 3D rendering, as the CPU provides the multi-core muscle and the GPU accelerates effects and rendering via CUDA. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p video editing, but 4K editing may require more memory.

Students and small business workstations will benefit from the CPU's ECC memory support and the GPU's compute capabilities, making it suitable for data analysis and light AI workloads. However, the 65 W TDP and the need for a 600 W PSU suggest it is not a typical office machine. The system is a high-performance workstation that can handle demanding tasks, but it is not the most efficient choice for basic office work. The GPU's end-of-life status means it lacks the latest features of the GeForce 40 series, but it remains a capable performer in its class.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p, the RTX 3070 Ti's 75th percentile ranking and high Passmark G3D score of 23356 indicate it can drive frame rates well above 100 FPS in most titles. The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and strong single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4834 ensure the GPU is fed with data, making this a solid choice for competitive and AAA gaming.

Streaming: The CPU's 32 threads are more than sufficient for encoding a stream while gaming, and the GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by the tensor cores) can offload this task. The 65 W TDP may cause slight performance dips under full load, but the overall system is capable of handling streaming at 1080p without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 accelerates video exports and rendering, while the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance speeds up effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1440p timelines, and the 608.3 GB/s bandwidth ensures smooth playback of high-bitrate footage.

3D rendering: In applications like Blender or Maya, the CPU's 24 cores will handle physics and simulation, while the GPU's CUDA cores and 48 RT cores accelerate final frame rendering. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14382 and the Passmark GPU Compute score of 11601 indicate strong performance in this area, though the CPU's 65 W TDP may cause longer render times in sustained workloads.

Software development: The 24 cores and 32 threads dramatically reduce compile times for large codebases, and the high boost clock ensures fast single-threaded operations in IDEs. The ECC memory support is a bonus for server-side development, and the GPU can be used for local testing of graphics applications.

Student and office work: This system is overpowered for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing. The CPU's low average benchmark score of 8676, relative to its core count, suggests it may not be the most efficient choice for light workloads, and the GPU's 290 W TDP makes it power-hungry for office use. It is more suited for engineering students or small business users running simulations or CAD software.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70, indicating that this system outperforms 70% of all CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average score of 8676 is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-8565U, 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i5-8365U, 0.7% higher than the AMD EPYC 7601, and 1.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-10510U.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6800?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti is in the 75th percentile, and its average score is 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6800, which is one of its nearest rivals.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what does it imply for cooling?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 24-core processor, implying that a capable air cooler is sufficient for most workloads, but sustained all-core loads may cause throttling.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. The CPU is a 24-core Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 8 GB of GDDR6X memory. The system achieves a combined percentile of 70, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of all possible configurations. The CPU's 65th percentile and the GPU's 75th percentile indicate that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. This is a high-performance workstation and gaming rig, designed for users who need the CPU's multi-core power for productivity and the GPU's rendering capabilities for gaming and creative work. It is not an extreme enthusiast build, but it is a well-rounded system that excels in 1440p gaming and multi-threaded applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, as well as PCIe Gen 5. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for the primary GPU and storage devices. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the system supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the interface will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

The system requires a PSU with at least 600 W capacity, as suggested by the GPU's power requirements. The GPU has a TDP of 290 W and requires a 12-pin power connector, so the PSU must have the appropriate cable. The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves ample headroom for future upgrades, but the GPU's 290 W TDP is the primary power consumer. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a newer, more powerful model, such as one from the GeForce 40 series, to improve 4K gaming performance. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads are likely sufficient for several years, but a higher-TDP CPU on the same socket could be considered if sustained multi-core performance is needed. The upgrade path is straightforward, with the socket being a mature platform, though it is not forward-compatible with newer Intel sockets.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds