SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. This is a fixed-multiplier part (not unlocked), which suggests it is designed for stable, power-conscious deployments rather than enthusiast overclocking. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for workloads that repeatedly access large datasets.

Benchmark results position this CPU at the 65th percentile among all processors, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the tested CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 34,244 points, while the single-core score is 4,834 points. The multi-core result indicates strong parallel throughput, suitable for rendering, compilation, and simulation tasks. The single-core score is comparatively modest for a Core i9-class part, which reflects the 1800 MHz base clock; however, the 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures that lightly-threaded applications can still achieve high responsiveness when the workload demands it.

In Geekbench, the CPU scores 8,337 multi-core and 1,646 single-core. The delta between the multi-core and single-core scores (a ratio of about 5:1) highlights that the processor's strength lies in scaling across its 32 threads, rather than in raw per-core speed. The nearest rivals in the database—Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i5-8365U, AMD EPYC 7601, and Intel Core i7-10510U—have average benchmark scores ranging from 8,580 to 8,708. The i9-13900E's average benchmark score is 8,676, putting it within 0.1% of the i7-8565U and 1.1% ahead of the i7-10510U. This clustering is notable: despite being a 24-core desktop part, its average score is comparable to several mobile and older enterprise CPUs, which suggests that the benchmark average is heavily weighted by the single-core and lower-thread tests, where the i9-13900E does not dominate.

The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported, which is a feature typically associated with workstation or server reliability. Integrated graphics are provided via UHD Graphics 770, so the system can output display without a discrete GPU. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern NVMe storage and GPUs, though the RTX 3060 Ti in this build uses PCIe 4.0.

For real workloads, the multi-core Cinebench scores translate to efficient handling of video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core scores are adequate for everyday productivity and gaming, but they do not place the CPU at the top tier for latency-sensitive tasks. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with gaming and database workloads, reducing memory access penalties. The 65 W TDP is low for a 24-core part, implying that power delivery and cooling requirements are modest, which is beneficial for small-form-factor or office builds.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a wide spread across tests. Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 3,451, and single-core 487. Cinebench R20 multi-core reaches 14,382, with single-core at 2,030. The R23 scores (34,244 multi-core, 4,834 single-core) are the most recent and representative of modern rendering workloads. Geekbench scores are 8,337 multi-core and 1,646 single-core. The average benchmark score across all CPU tests is 8,676, and the CPU is at the 65th percentile vs. all CPUs.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, is at the 59th percentile vs. all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 16,129. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,626. Geekbench OpenCL scores 78,927, and Vulkan scores 47,784. PassMark tests show G3D at 20,349, GPU compute at 10,006, and DirectX 11 at 163, DirectX 12 at 78, DirectX 10 at 132, and DirectX 9 at 234. The nearest GPU rivals include AMD Radeon RX 9060 (0.7% higher average score), AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (1.4% lower), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (1.4% lower), and AMD Radeon R9 370X (1.7% higher). This places the RTX 3060 Ti in a tight performance band around these cards, with the RX 9060 being the closest competitor at a marginal 0.7% advantage.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 62, indicating that the system as a whole sits above average but not in the top tier. The CPU's 65th percentile is slightly higher than the GPU's 59th percentile, suggesting that the processor has a slight edge in relative performance. However, the average CPU benchmark score (8,676) is heavily influenced by the single-core tests, which drag down the average compared to the multi-core strong showings. The GPU's average score (16,129) is pulled up by the OpenCL and G3D results, which are strong for its class.

It is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4,834 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,626 provide a basis for estimating that the system can handle modern titles at high settings in 1080p, with the CPU not bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E is at the 65th percentile among all CPUs. This means it outperforms 65% of tested processors, indicating a solid mid-to-high tier position, but it is not a top-tier enthusiast part.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The i9-13900E has an average benchmark score of 8,676. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-8565U (8,665), 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-8365U (8,708), 0.7% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7601 (8,619), and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10510U (8,580).

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM and memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop CPUs and makes it suitable for workstation or server-like reliability scenarios. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing and tensor core configuration?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores, based on the Ampere architecture. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16,129. It is 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16,014) and 1.4% behind both the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16,351) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361). It is 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15,862).

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 62, which indicates that the system as a whole performs better than 62% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations, but it is not in the top tier.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th and 13th generation Core processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more widely available DDR4 modules or newer, faster DDR5. ECC memory support is a differentiator, allowing for error-correcting memory in workstation builds. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for high-speed storage and GPUs, though the RTX 3060 Ti in this system uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it will run at full bandwidth without issue.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is remarkably low for a 24-core processor. This means a capable air cooler is sufficient for most workloads, and the system's power supply requirements are modest. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 200 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. This suggests that a power supply in the 550 W range is the minimum, with headroom for the rest of the system. The GPU requires a single 12-pin power connector, and it is a dual-slot card measuring 242 mm in length (9.5 inches) and 112 mm in height (4.4 inches). Builders should verify case clearance, but the dimensions are standard for a mid-tower.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the more limiting component for gaming. The CPU's 65th percentile is higher than the GPU's 59th percentile, so upgrading to a more powerful GPU would likely yield better gaming performance without the CPU becoming a bottleneck. The motherboard socket and memory support are current enough that the CPU does not need an immediate upgrade; the 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for multi-threaded tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 support also means that future high-speed NVMe drives can be added without changing the platform.

The production status of the CPU is Active, meaning it is still in production and available for new builds. The GPU is End-of-life, so its availability may diminish over time, but it remains a viable option for this generation. The release dates are 2023-01-03 for the CPU and 2020-11-30 for the GPU, so the CPU is significantly newer. The GPU's launch MSRP is 399 USD, which can be stated once, but no further pricing discussion is warranted.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i9-13900E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop build that targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and solid 1080p to 1440p gaming capability. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a 34,244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, make it an excellent choice for content creators who render video, process photos in batch, or work with 3D models. The 36 MB L3 cache and ECC memory support also make it suitable for software developers who compile large codebases and need memory reliability for long-running build processes.

For gamers, the system is positioned for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,626 and the CPU's single-core performance. The CPU is not a top-tier gaming processor in terms of single-core speed (4,834 in Cinebench R23 single-core), but it is more than adequate for most titles. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for current games at 1080p and 1440p, but it may become a limitation for texture-heavy mods or future titles at 4K.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU's low 65 W TDP, which allows for quieter cooling and lower power bills. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed for a specific task, and the ECC memory support enables data integrity for financial or engineering applications. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means that builders can choose memory based on budget or availability without changing the motherboard.

The system's combined percentile of 62 indicates it is above average but not top-tier. This makes it a "sensible mid-range" build for users who want a balance of CPU throughput and GPU performance without stepping into enthusiast territory. The data does not support using this system for 4K gaming at ultra settings, as the GPU's performance percentile (59th) is not high enough for that workload, but it is well-suited for competitive gaming at lower resolutions where high frame rates matter.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture, using the GA104 chip fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. The die size is 392 mm², and it contains 17,400 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 44.4 million per mm². The GPU has 4,864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 80 raster output units (ROPs). It features 38 RT cores for ray tracing and 152 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 1410 MHz, and the boost clock is 1665 MHz.

Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 253.1 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 16.20 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1), which means the GPU does not have a separate half-precision boost, making it better suited for FP32 compute tasks.

In benchmarks, the GPU scores 2,626 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modern DirectX 12 test. Geekbench OpenCL scores 78,927, and Vulkan scores 47,784. The PassMark G3D score is 20,349, and the GPU compute score is 10,006. The DirectX 9 score is 234, DirectX 10 is 132, DirectX 11 is 163, and DirectX 12 is 78. The G2D score is 989, which is a measure of 2D graphics performance and is less relevant for gaming.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 16,129, placing it at the 59th percentile. Its nearest rivals are within a tight band: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is 0.7% higher, the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M is 1.4% lower, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is 1.4% lower, and the AMD Radeon R9 370X is 1.7% higher. This indicates that the RTX 3060 Ti is a well-balanced card for its generation, offering performance that is competitive with, but not clearly superior to, several AMD options.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 16.20 TFLOPS is solid for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane, though it is not a top-tier card. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for large scenes or high-resolution textures, but for 1080p and 1440p rendering, it is workable. The tensor cores provide acceleration for DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported games, and the RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates in many titles, though the 59th percentile suggests that ray tracing at high settings may require compromises.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile terms, but the CPU has a slight edge. The CPU is at the 65th percentile vs. all CPUs, and the GPU is at the 59th percentile vs. all GPUs. The combined percentile is 62, which is between the two, indicating that neither component is severely holding back the other.

For gaming workloads, the CPU's single-core performance is the key metric. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,834 is adequate but not exceptional. In games that are CPU-bound, such as simulation or strategy titles, the CPU may be the limiting factor at high frame rates. However, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,626 suggests that the GPU will be the bottleneck in most graphically intensive titles, especially at higher resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM is a potential constraint for texture-heavy games, but it is not a bottleneck for most 1080p and 1440p titles.

For multi-threaded workloads like rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the CPU is clearly the stronger component. The 34,244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is far above the GPU's compute score of 10,006 in PassMark, so the CPU will not bottleneck these tasks. The GPU's FP32 performance of 16.20 TFLOPS is useful for GPU-accelerated compute, but the CPU's 24 cores will handle CPU-bound tasks efficiently.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this combination. Based on the benchmark scores, the likely bottleneck scenario is that the GPU limits frame rates in most games at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, while the CPU provides enough headroom to avoid stuttering or frame drops in CPU-heavy scenes. At lower resolutions or with lower graphics settings, the CPU's single-core performance may become the limiting factor, as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can feed it.

The power balance also matters. The CPU's 65 W TDP is low, so it does not demand significant cooling or power delivery. The GPU's 200 W TDP and the 550 W suggested PSU mean that the system has sufficient power headroom, and the CPU is unlikely to cause power throttling that affects GPU performance.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The build class is desktop, indicating a stationary, full-size system. The combined percentile of 62 places it above average among all tested CPU+GPU combinations, but it is not a top-tier enthusiast system. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 200 W TDP.

The system is designed for users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity and content creation, along with capable 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU's 65th percentile and the GPU's 59th percentile indicate that the system is well-balanced, with the CPU slightly ahead in relative performance. The 65 W CPU TDP makes this a power-efficient build for a 24-core processor, which is notable for office or workstation environments where heat and noise are concerns.

The GPU is end-of-life, and its launch MSRP is 399 USD. The CPU is active in production, and the platform (Socket 1700) supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility. The overall tier from the percentiles is mid-to-high, meaning the system can handle most tasks without major compromises, but it will not excel at 4K gaming or extreme compute workloads. The build is best suited for a professional or power user who values CPU throughput and wants a reliable, well-rounded GPU for gaming and light rendering.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the Intel Core i9-13900E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4,834 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,626 provide a basis for estimating gaming performance. For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, this system is expected to deliver high frame rates in most titles, likely exceeding 60 FPS in AAA games and reaching 100+ FPS in competitive shooters. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p, but textures may need to be lowered in some modern games that exceed 8 GB usage.

For 1440p gaming, the system is expected to handle ultra settings in less demanding titles, but may require medium or high settings in graphically intensive games to maintain 60 FPS. The GPU's 59th percentile suggests it is a mid-range card in the current landscape, so 1440p is the practical ceiling for smooth gameplay. At 4K, the system is expected to struggle, with frame rates dropping below 60 FPS in most games, even at medium settings, due to the 8 GB VRAM and the GPU's overall compute performance.

The CPU is not expected to be a bottleneck at 1080p and 1440p, as its single-core performance is adequate for feeding the GPU. However, in CPU-intensive games like strategy titles or simulations, the CPU's 4,834 single-core score may limit frame rates to around 60-80 FPS, even if the GPU can render faster. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization. The data indicates a capable 1080p gaming system with decent 1440p potential, but not a 4K powerhouse.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds