SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

13,543 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT — Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with AMD's RDNA 4 flagship GPU in a desktop-class build. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false — so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from synthetic benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay data. The CPU sits at the 65th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 55th percentile among all graphics cards, and the combined build lands at the 60th percentile overall.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements. The GPU's synthetic results provide the primary basis for frame rate expectations: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7260, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 65879, and a Passmark G3D score of 26795. These numbers indicate a GPU that should handle modern titles at high settings, though the exact FPS at any resolution cannot be stated as fact.

The CPU's single-core performance — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1646 — suggests strong frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios, which matters for high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions where the processor often becomes the limiting factor. The multi-core results (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 34244 and Geekbench multi-core of 8337) indicate that background tasks running during gameplay, such as streaming or voice chat, would have ample headroom without stealing frames from the game itself.

For 1080p and 1440p gaming, the combination of a strong single-core CPU and a GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth should provide smooth high-refresh experiences, though again these are estimates. At 4K, the GPU's 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 380.2 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest the graphics card becomes the dominant factor, and the CPU's role diminishes — but without measured data, precise frame counts cannot be provided.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, meaning high-bandwidth devices like the RX 9070 XT — which uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface — can be fully utilized without lane-sharing bottlenecks. The platform also supports ECC memory, a feature relevant for workstation reliability.

The suggested PSU for this build is 700 W, while the GPU alone has a TDP of 304 W and the CPU has a 65 W TDP. This leaves substantial headroom for the rest of the system, including drives, cooling, and peripherals, even under sustained multi-threaded loads. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot form factor, so the case must accommodate both the physical length and the power cabling.

A sensible next upgrade path on this platform would involve adding more DDR4 or DDR5 memory — the dual-channel bus supports both types, and the memory bandwidth figure is not specified in the data, but the dual-channel configuration is standard for mainstream desktop builds. The CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide a solid foundation, and since the multiplier is not unlocked, overclocking is not the intended upgrade route; instead, users would look to the next socket generation for CPU improvements. The GPU's PCIe 5.0 interface means it will carry forward to future platforms without throughput loss, making the graphics card a longer-lived component than the CPU in this build.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834 and Geekbench single-core score of 1646 indicate strong per-thread performance that should keep frame times consistent in competitive titles, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7260 and Passmark G3D score of 26795 suggest enough rendering power for high refresh at 1080p and likely 1440p — though these are estimates without measured FPS.

Streaming: The 24-core, 32-thread configuration with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 provides substantial parallel headroom for encoding and broadcast software to run alongside games without competing for the same cores. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM also allows for GPU-accelerated encoding workloads without exhausting memory.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 8337 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14382 indicate strong multi-threaded rendering performance for timeline playback and export tasks. The GPU's 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth support large frame buffers and effects processing, while the 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute handles GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3451 and R23 multi-core score of 34244 place it well for CPU-based rendering workloads, while the GPU's Passmark GPU Compute score of 15864 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 17428 suggest it can accelerate GPU renderers and viewport interactions. The 64 RT cores on the GPU provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities, though the RT core count is the only RT-specific data available.

Software development: The 24 cores and 32 threads handle parallel compilation tasks effectively, as indicated by the multi-core benchmark scores. The dual-channel memory supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility in platform choice, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds or development servers.

Student and office work: This build is significantly over-provisioned for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's single-core performance ensures responsive application switching, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can serve as a fallback display output, but the discrete GPU's 16 GB VRAM and high compute throughput are far beyond what word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing require — the data shows this is a performance-oriented pairing rather than a value-oriented one.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 60 sits close to the CPU's individual percentile of 65 and the GPU's 55, indicating a relatively balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 8676 places it within 1% of several rivals — the Intel Core i7-8565U at 8665 (0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-8365U at 8708 (-0.4%), and the AMD EPYC 7601 at 8619 (0.7%) — which suggests that in multi-threaded workloads, the 13900E performs in line with these very different processors, though its 24-core configuration gives it an advantage in highly parallel tasks.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 13543 is within 1% of the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (13536, 0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (13515, 0.2%), and NVIDIA P106-090 (13470, 0.5%) — a surprising comparison given the RX 9070 XT's modern architecture and 16 GB VRAM. This narrow delta suggests that the average benchmark score may not fully capture the GPU's capabilities in modern APIs, where its DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility would matter more than in legacy workloads.

In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 4834) becomes the limiting factor for achieving maximum frame rates, since the GPU has enough headroom to render frames faster than the CPU can feed it. At higher resolutions, the GPU's rendering load increases, and the 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth become the constraints, with the CPU's role diminishing. The FPS scaling between resolutions cannot be quantified without measured data, but the benchmark scores indicate this shift in balance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename) using Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It has a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5200 MHz, with a 65 W TDP — a notably modest power envelope for a 24-core part, suggesting power management is a design priority. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. Single-core scores of 487 in Cinebench R15, 2030 in Cinebench R20, and 4834 in Cinebench R23 indicate competitive per-thread performance for the 13th-generation architecture. Multi-core scores of 3451 in R15, 14382 in R20, and 34244 in R23 demonstrate the benefit of the 24-core design — the multi-core R23 score is roughly 7 times the single-core score, which is consistent with the 32 threads efficiently utilising available cores.

The Geekbench scores tell a similar story: 1646 single-core and 8337 multi-core, a ratio of about 5:1, which reflects the thread scaling in that workload. The CPU's percentile of 65 among all CPUs means it outperforms 65% of processors in the database, though its nearest rivals are all lower-core-count parts (the i7-8565U, i5-8365U, and i7-10510U are all mobile processors, and the EPYC 7601 is a server part), indicating that the 13900E's average score is comparable to those very different chips despite its higher core count.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support — a combination that suits both mainstream and workstation builds. It has an integrated UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a diagnostic or fallback display adapter. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an intended feature. The 10 nm process node and Intel as the foundry are the only manufacturing details provided.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need both strong single-threaded performance for everyday responsiveness and substantial multi-threaded throughput for content creation. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions would benefit from the CPU's high single-core scores and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM, which provides headroom for texture-heavy titles. The GPU's 55th percentile and the CPU's 65th percentile suggest a system that sits above the midpoint of the database, making it suitable for enthusiasts rather than entry-level users.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the 24-core CPU and the GPU's compute capabilities (48.66 TFLOPS FP32, Passmark GPU Compute score of 15864) well-matched to parallel workloads. Software developers compiling large codebases would benefit from the 32 threads, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes. Students and office workers would find this build over-specified for their needs, but the CPU's single-core performance ensures a responsive desktop experience — the data simply shows this is more hardware than such tasks require.

Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications, such as simulation software or batch processing tools, would leverage the CPU's 34244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score effectively. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM also supports large dataset visualisation without memory swapping. The 700 W suggested PSU and dual-slot GPU form factor are reasonable for a workstation chassis.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture (Navi 48 chip) using TSMC's 4 nm process, with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die — a transistor density of 151.0 million transistors per mm². It has a base clock of 1660 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2970 MHz, with memory running at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory operates on a 256-bit bus, delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute configuration includes 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, 128 render output units, and 64 RT cores. The GPU achieves a pixel rate of 380.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 760.3 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 compute both rated at 48.66 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The TDP is 304 W, requiring a 700 W suggested PSU and two 8-pin power connectors, in a dual-slot form factor.

Benchmark scores show strong API-specific performance: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7260, Geekbench Vulkan score of 65879, and Geekbench OpenCL score of 17428. Passmark scores include G3D at 26795, GPU Compute at 15864, DirectX 10 at 154, DirectX 11 at 292, DirectX 12 at 78, DirectX 9 at 353, and G2D at 1328 — the legacy DirectX scores are low relative to the modern API results, which is consistent with a modern architecture prioritising current APIs. The GPU's percentile of 55 among all GPUs means it outperforms 55% of the database, and its nearest rivals by average score are all older or lower-tier cards, which indicates the RX 9070 XT's average score does not fully reflect its modern API performance.

The 64 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing capability, though no specific RT benchmark scores exist in the data. The 16 GB VRAM is substantial for high-resolution textures and large workloads, and the 644.6 GB/s bandwidth supports the 256-bit memory interface. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface ensures full bandwidth with compatible platforms.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 60, meaning this build performs better than 60% of configurations in the database.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types does the Intel Core i9-13900E support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 304 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 700 W.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM size and memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 644.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its single-core performance?

A: In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 34244 versus 4834 single-core, a ratio of about 7:1, which reflects the 24-core/32-thread configuration.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display output or for basic tasks without the discrete GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistent across workloads: Cinebench R15 multicore 3451, R15 single-core 487, R20 multicore 14382, R20 single-core 2030, R23 multicore 34244, R23 single-core 4834, Geekbench multicore 8337, and Geekbench single-core 1646. The average benchmark score is 8676, placing it at the 65th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals by average score are the Intel Core i7-8565U (8665, 0.1% delta), Intel Core i5-8365U (8708, -0.4%), AMD EPYC 7601 (8619, 0.7%), and Intel Core i7-10510U (8580, 1.1%) — all within 1.1% of the 13900E's average, despite the 13900E having significantly more cores.

The GPU's benchmark scores show a wide spread: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 7260, Geekbench OpenCL 17428, Geekbench Vulkan 65879, Passmark G3D 26795, Passmark GPU Compute 15864, and legacy DirectX scores ranging from 78 (DX12) to 353 (DX9). The average benchmark score is 13543, placing it at the 55th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals by average score are the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (13536, 0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (13515, 0.2%), NVIDIA P106-090 (13470, 0.5%), and AMD Radeon Pro 555 (13407, 1%) — all legacy or lower-tier cards, which suggests the RX 9070 XT's average score underrepresents its modern API performance.

The combined picture is a CPU that sits above the GPU in percentile terms (65 vs 55), with the build's combined percentile of 60 falling between the two. The CPU's multi-threaded strength (34244 in R23) complements the GPU's modern API capabilities (65879 in Vulkan), creating a system that should handle both CPU-intensive productivity and GPU-intensive rendering tasks without one component dramatically bottlenecking the other.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900E — a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor on Socket 1700 with a 65 W TDP — with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, a 16 GB RDNA 4.0 GPU with a 304 W TDP. The CPU's average benchmark score of 8676 places it at the 65th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 13543 places it at the 55th percentile, and the combined percentile is 60.

The 13900E is an active, production-status desktop processor released in January 2023, with no launch MSRP listed. The RX 9070 XT is an active, production-status GPU released in March 2025 with a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The build supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU and PCIe 5.0 x16 for the GPU, and requires a 700 W PSU.

Overall, this build occupies the upper-middle tier of the database — not a flagship configuration, but comfortably above the median. The CPU's strength in multi-threaded workloads (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 34244) and the GPU's strong modern API performance (3DMark Steel Nomad of 7260, Vulkan of 65879) make it a capable general-purpose desktop for gaming, content creation, and development, with the caveat that all gaming FPS figures are estimates since no measured data exists for this combination.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds