SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900E paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a desktop build defined by a stark contrast: an efficiency-focused 65 W processor sitting alongside a high-throughput RDNA 4 graphics card. The data shows a GPU that sits in the 69th percentile of all tracked GPUs and a CPU in the 65th percentile of all tracked CPUs, giving a combined percentile of 67 — an upper-mid-tier pairing. The unusual wrinkle is that the i9-13900E is a locked, low-TDP enterprise-oriented part whose benchmark average lands within a fraction of a percent of much older mobile and server rivals, which shapes what this build can and cannot do. Note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die. Its hybrid design spans eight performance cores and sixteen efficiency cores in the Raptor Lake topology, and the spec sheet reflects that split: a low 1800 MHz base clock against a 5.20 GHz boost clock, all contained within a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial — 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB slab of L3 — and memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory supported. That ECC flag, combined with the locked multiplier and the "E" suffix, marks this as a part aimed at stable, efficiency-conscious desktops rather than enthusiast tuning.

The benchmark results tell a nuanced story. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 34244 in multi-core and 4834 in single-core; in Cinebench R20 it posts 14382 multi-core and 2030 single-core; and in R15 it records 3451 multi-core and 487 single-core. Geekbench lands at 8337 multi-core and 1646 single-core. Those single-core figures are competitive and confirm the 5.20 GHz boost is doing real work — responsiveness in lightly threaded applications will not be a weakness. The multi-core scores, while high in absolute terms, are held back by the 65 W envelope; sustained all-core rendering will run below what the same silicon could achieve with a higher power limit.

The percentile and rival data frame the picture precisely. The i9-13900E sits in the 65th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 8676. Its nearest rivals by average score are an odd cohort: the Intel Core i7-8565U at 8665 (a delta of just 0.1 percent), the Intel Core i5-8365U at 8708 (0.4 percent ahead of it), the AMD EPYC 7601 at 8619 (0.7 percent behind), and the Intel Core i7-10510U at 8580 (1.1 percent behind). Landing within roughly one percent of these parts means the aggregate score blends strong single-thread results with throttled multi-thread throughput. The EPYC 7601 comparison is the instructive one: a many-core server processor from an earlier era ends up statistically tied with this efficiency desktop part, which means the 13900E's multi-core muscle is genuine — it simply is not flagship-tier under its power cap.

For real workloads, the interpretation is straightforward. Bursty, latency-sensitive work — application launches, browser tabs, IDE indexing, game logic — benefits from the 5.20 GHz boost and large L3 cache. Sustained parallel work — long video encodes, code compiles, batch renders — draws on all 32 threads and will complete quickly, just not at unlocked-i9 pace. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes ensures the RX 9070's host connection is never a constraint.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With a single-core Geekbench score of 1646 and a 5.20 GHz boost, the CPU can feed fast game logic, and the RX 9070's GPU-side scores (covered below) indicate strong 1440p capability. Expect the pairing to be comfortably suitable for high-refresh play at 1440p, with 4K viable at somewhat lower refresh targets — these are estimates, not measured figures.

Streaming. The 32 threads provide headroom to run an encoder alongside gameplay without starving the game of cores, and the 36 MB of shared L3 helps both workloads coexist. A CPU in the 65th percentile paired with a GPU in the 69th percentile is a reasonable single-PC streaming configuration, though the 65 W limit means heavy simultaneous encode plus gameplay will pull boost clocks down over long sessions.

Video editing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 indicates timeline scrubbing and export throughput well above entry level, and the RX 9070's 16 GB of GDDR6 with 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth gives video workloads plenty of frame-buffer room. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539 confirms substantial GPU-assisted compute for effects and color work.

3D rendering. GPU rendering leans on the RX 9070's 36.13 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and the Vulkan score of 58705; CPU rendering leans on the R23 multi score of 34244. Both are upper-mid-tier results, making this a capable but not workstation-class rendering box.

Software development. Compiling is exactly where 24 cores and 32 threads shine, and the 2030 single-core Cinebench R20 score keeps single-file builds and interpreter workloads snappy. ECC support adds a layer of memory-integrity confidence for long-running build servers or verification-sensitive work.

Student and office work. For documents, browsing, video calls, and coursework, this CPU is overkill in the best way — the single-core numbers guarantee snappiness, the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a display fallback, and the 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool under light loads.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 9070 is the modern half of this pairing. Built on the Navi 48 die at TSMC's 4 nm node, it packs 53,900 million transistors into 357 mm² — a density of 151.0 million transistors per square millimeter. RDNA 4.0 brings 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units, alongside 56 RT cores for hardware ray tracing. The clock structure spans a 1330 MHz base, a 2520 MHz boost, and a 2070 MHz game clock, with memory running at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem is a strength: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. That capacity-and-bandwidth combination matters at 1440p and 4K, where texture-heavy scenes and ray-traced effects consume frame buffer aggressively. Throughput figures back this up — a pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s, and FP32/FP16 both at 36.13 TFLOPS (a 1:1 ratio). There are no dedicated tensor cores listed, so AI-assisted workloads run on the shader array rather than fixed-function accelerators.

Benchmark results place this card clearly. 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) returns 6290; Geekbench OpenCL reaches 131539 and Vulkan 58705; PassMark G3D scores 25381 and GPU Compute 14737. The PassMark DirectX sub-scores (343 for DX9, 281 for DX11, 141 for DX10, 74 for DX12) reflect scaling with API generation and test structure rather than raw capability. API support is current: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, with one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a outputs over a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

The 69th percentile placement with an average score of 23877 sits the RX 9070 statistically alongside the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (23736, 0.6 percent behind it), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (24063, 0.8 percent ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile (23628, 1.1 percent behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (24170, 1.2 percent ahead). Being fractionally ahead of a TITAN Z and an RTX 3080 Mobile in aggregate, while trading blows with an RTX 2080 SUPER, defines this as a firmly upper-mainstream card whose 16 GB buffer and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth give it an edge in memory-hungry modern titles and rendering workloads. Its launch MSRP was 549 USD. Power draw is rated at 220 W through two 8-pin connectors on a dual-slot card, with a suggested 550 W PSU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data describes a GPU-forward build. The RX 9070 occupies the 69th percentile among all GPUs while the i9-13900E occupies the 65th percentile among all CPUs, and the combined percentile of 67 sits between them — closer to the GPU. That arithmetic, plus the CPU's 65 W TDP versus the GPU's 220 W, tells you where the performance emphasis lies: the graphics card is the performance engine, and the processor is an efficient, capable feeder.

At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiter by design — 4K rendering saturates the 3584 shading units and the 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth well before the CPU's 32 threads are exhausted. At 1080p, especially in competitive, high-frame-rate titles, the balance can flip: the 65 W power envelope and the throttling behavior implied by the rival comparisons (statistically tied with mobile-class parts in aggregate) mean the CPU can become the ceiling when frame times get very short. The 5.20 GHz boost and 4834-point R23 single-core score keep that ceiling reasonably high, but it exists. For GPU compute workloads — OpenCL rendering at 131539, GPU compute at 14737 — the CPU's role is largely orchestration, and its PCIe Gen 5, 16-lane link ensures data transfer to the card is not a secondary bottleneck.

Benchmark Performance

The complete CPU scorecard: Cinebench R15 multi-core 3451, single-core 487; Cinebench R20 multi-core 14382, single-core 2030; Cinebench R23 multi-core 34244, single-core 4834; Geekbench multi-core 8337, single-core 1646. The average benchmark score is 8676, placing the chip in the 65th percentile of all CPUs.

The complete GPU scorecard: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 6290, Geekbench OpenCL at 131539, Geekbench Vulkan at 58705, PassMark G3D at 25381, PassMark GPU Compute at 14737, PassMark G2D at 1280, and the DirectX sub-scores of 343 (DX9), 281 (DX11), 141 (DX10), and 74 (DX12). The average benchmark score is 23877, placing the card in the 69th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined picture is coherent: a 67th-percentile desktop where both halves sit within four percentile points of each other. Neither component dramatically overshadows the other in aggregate terms, though the GPU holds the higher performance rank and carries the gaming and rendering load. Against its nearest rivals the CPU trades within about one percent, and the GPU does the same against its own rival set — this is a balanced pairing with a slight GPU lean.

FAQ

Q: Does this build have measured FPS data in the database?

A: No. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion on this page is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

Q: Is the Core i9-13900E good for gaming?

A: Yes, within limits. Its 4834 single-core Cinebench R23 score and 5.20 GHz boost handle game logic well, but its 65 W TDP means it will not sustain the clocks of higher-power unlocked chips in extended all-core loads.

Q: Can the RX 9070 handle 1440p gaming?

A: Its 69th-percentile GPU ranking, 16 GB of GDDR6, and 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth indicate strong 1440p performance, with 4K playable at reduced settings in demanding titles. These are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, consistent with the efficiency-focused "E" positioning of this part.

Q: How much memory can this platform use, and does it support ECC?

A: The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — a plus for stability-sensitive workstations.

Q: What power supply does the GPU require?

A: The card has a 220 W TDP fed by two 8-pin connectors, and the suggested PSU rating is 550 W.

Q: How does the RX 9070 compare to its rivals?

A: It sits 0.6 percent ahead of the GTX TITAN Z, 0.8 percent behind the RX 6800S, 1.1 percent ahead of the RTX 3080 Mobile, and 1.2 percent behind the RTX 2080 SUPER in average benchmark score.

Gaming Performance

As stated, no measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact combination, so the figures discussed here are estimates inferred from the benchmark scores rather than measured results. The RX 9070's Steel Nomad score of 6290, its PassMark G3D result of 25381, and its 69th-percentile standing collectively indicate a card built for high-refresh 1440p gaming: at that resolution the 3584 shading units, 128 ROPs, and 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth should deliver high frame rates in modern AAA titles at ultra settings, with the 56 RT cores allowing ray-traced effects to remain usable. At 4K, expect the card to remain capable but to lean on its 16 GB buffer as resolutions climb, with frame rates landing in comfortable rather than exceptional territory for the most demanding engines. At 1080p, the GPU is rarely the constraint; the i9-13900E's 65 W envelope becomes the more likely limiter in competitive titles targeting very high refresh rates. Esports-class and lighter titles should run essentially without GPU limitation given the pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s. Treat all of these frame expectations as score-derived estimates, not measurements.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, and its tier is upper-mainstream: a 65th-percentile CPU, a 69th-percentile GPU, and a combined 67th percentile. The Intel Core i9-13900E brings 24 cores, 32 threads, DDR4/DDR5 flexibility with ECC, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and integrated UHD Graphics 770 as a display fallback, all under a 65 W TDP on Socket 1700. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 brings RDNA 4.0 on a 4 nm Navi 48 die, 16 GB of GDDR6 across a 256-bit bus, 56 RT cores, PCIe 5.0 x16, and a 220 W dual-slot profile with modern display outputs (HDMI 2.1b plus three DisplayPort 2.1a). The pairing is deliberately asymmetric in power — an efficiency-first processor driving a performance-first graphics card — and the combined percentile confirms the result is a coherent upper-mid-tier machine rather than a flagship or an entry build.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1440p are the primary audience: the RX 9070's 69th-percentile ranking and 16 GB frame buffer are matched to that resolution, and the CPU's single-core scores keep frame pacing intact. Content creators benefit doubly — the Cinebench R23 multi score of 34244 handles encodes and compiles, while the OpenCL score of 131539 and Vulkan score of 58705 put real GPU compute within reach for effects, color grading, and GPU rendering. Developers get 32 threads for parallel builds, strong single-thread responsiveness for IDEs and interpreters, and ECC support for long-running stability. Students and office users will find the machine vastly overprovisioned for everyday tasks, which translates to longevity and quiet operation under the 65 W CPU envelope. Small businesses building workstations for design, light rendering, or analysis will appreciate the ECC support, the locked platform's consistency, the integrated graphics fallback, and a suggested 550 W PSU that keeps total system demands modest. It is not the build for unlocked-overclock enthusiasts or extreme 4K-maximum gaming, but for efficient upper-mainstream performance with a GPU-forward bias, the data supports it cleanly.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

AMD Radeon RX 9070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds