SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

19,410 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i9-13900E and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX pairing presents an intriguing imbalance in benchmark-derived performance tiers. The CPU sits at the 65th percentile among all processors, while the GPU also lands at the 64th percentile among all graphics cards, with a combined system percentile of 65. This near-identical percentile placement suggests the two components are broadly matched in overall capability, but the nature of their workloads diverges sharply.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 8676 places it within 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-8565U (8665) and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-8365U (8708). These rival comparisons are revealing: the i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor, yet its aggregate benchmark average sits alongside mobile and low-power parts. This is a direct consequence of the benchmark suite weighting — the Geekbench multicore score of 8337 and single-core score of 1646 are far lower than what the core count would suggest. Meanwhile, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 and single-core score of 4834 demonstrate substantial raw compute capability that the average-based percentile ranking obscures.

The GPU, by contrast, shows a more consistent profile. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6841, Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612, and Passmark G3D score of 31238 all indicate strong rasterization performance. The nearest rival comparisons — within 0.4% of the GTX 1060 3GB (19334), 1% behind the Quadro K5200 (19602), and 1.2% ahead of the TITAN Xp (19177) — again reflect the averaging methodology rather than peak capability. The RX 7900 XTX has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth, figures that dwarf those older rivals, but the percentile data treats them as comparable.

Bottleneck analysis from this data suggests the CPU becomes the limiting factor in gaming scenarios at high refresh rates. The i9-13900E’s base clock of 1800 MHz is notably low for a desktop part, even with a 5.20 GHz boost clock. This wide clock delta implies the processor relies heavily on boost behavior to deliver performance, and sustained workloads may see clocks settle well below peak. The GPU, with a boost clock of 2498 MHz and game clock of 2365 MHz, operates at a more consistent frequency envelope. In CPU-bound scenarios — esports titles at 1080p, simulation games, or heavily threaded strategy titles — the processor’s relatively modest single-thread benchmark scores (Cinebench R15 single-core 487, R20 2030, R23 4834) will likely constrain frame rates before the GPU reaches its limits.

Conversely, at 4K resolution or in GPU-intensive workloads like ray tracing, the RX 7900 XTX becomes the bottleneck. The GPU’s 96 RT cores and 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are substantial, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6841 indicates the card’s absolute ceiling. The combined percentile of 65 suggests the system performs above the median but not at the enthusiast tier — a configuration where neither component consistently dominates the other, but where workload-specific bottlenecks emerge based on thread utilization and graphics load.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Consequently, all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6841 and Passmark G3D score of 31238 provide the basis for these projections, but actual in-game performance will vary based on driver optimization, game engine, and CPU overhead.

Based on the GPU’s raw compute metrics — 61.39 TFLOPS FP32, 959.2 GTexel/s texture rate, and 479.6 GPixel/s pixel rate — the RX 7900 XTX should deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles. The 24 GB VRAM capacity eliminates memory capacity concerns at any resolution currently in use, and the 960.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high texture detail settings. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 suggests adequate thread throughput for modern game engines that leverage multiple cores, while the single-core score of 4834 indicates competent per-thread performance for game logic.

At 1080p, the CPU becomes the primary constraint. The i9-13900E’s boost clock of 5.20 GHz is competitive, but the low base clock of 1800 MHz and the benchmark-derived single-thread scores (Geekbench single-core 1646, Cinebench R15 single-core 487) suggest that frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios may fall short of what the GPU could otherwise deliver. The processor’s 65th percentile ranking among all CPUs, compared to the GPU’s 64th percentile, reinforces this balance — neither component is dramatically faster than the other, so bottleneck behavior will shift with resolution and game type.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The RX 7900 XTX’s 64th percentile ranking and its nearest rivals — the GTX 1060 3GB, Quadro K5200, and TITAN Xp — indicate that while this is a capable card, it is not at the absolute top of the performance hierarchy. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6841, when contextualized against the card’s specifications, suggests it will handle ultra settings at 1440p comfortably but may require settings adjustments for 4K in the most demanding titles. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 131 and DirectX 11 score of 356 provide additional reference points, though these legacy benchmarks may not fully reflect modern game performance.

These estimates should be treated as directional rather than precise. The absence of measured FPS data for this exact pairing means that real-world performance could deviate from these projections, particularly in titles with unusual optimization characteristics or in CPU-heavy scenes where the processor’s 32 threads may or may not be fully utilized.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S) using Intel’s 10 nm process node. The die size measures 257 mm², and the chip features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are handled by the UHD Graphics 770.

Clock behavior is notable: a base clock of 1800 MHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz. This 3.4 GHz delta is unusually wide, indicating the processor is designed to aggressively boost under load while maintaining low idle and lightly-threaded frequencies. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking flexibility is limited. The processor was released on 2023-01-03 and remains in active production.

Benchmark results paint a complex picture. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 and R20 multicore score of 14382 demonstrate strong multi-threaded throughput, consistent with the 24-core configuration. The R15 multicore score of 3451 is comparatively lower relative to the newer tests, likely reflecting the benchmark’s scaling characteristics. Single-core scores — Cinebench R23 4834, R20 2030, and R15 487 — are respectable but not class-leading. The Geekbench multicore score of 8337 and single-core score of 1646 are notably lower than the Cinebench results would suggest, possibly due to the benchmark’s memory latency sensitivity or frequency behavior.

The average benchmark score of 8676 places the CPU at the 65th percentile among all processors. The nearest rivals — Intel Core i7-8565U (0.1% ahead), Intel Core i5-8365U (0.4% ahead), AMD EPYC 7601 (0.7% behind), and Intel Core i7-10510U (1.1% behind) — are all lower-core-count or mobile parts. This indicates that the averaging methodology does not fully capture the i9-13900E’s multi-threaded strengths. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration with 36 MB L3 cache is built for heavily parallel workloads — video rendering, software compilation, scientific computing, and multi-VM environments. The low TDP of 65 watts is remarkable for this core count, suggesting the processor is engineered for power efficiency rather than raw sustained throughput.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 positions this CPU as capable of handling demanding production tasks. The single-core scores, while lower, are still adequate for everyday responsiveness. The locked multiplier and 65 W TDP suggest this is a workstation-oriented part rather than an enthusiast overclocking chip — it prioritizes consistent, efficient performance across many threads over maximum single-thread speed.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need a balanced desktop system with strong multi-threaded CPU performance and capable high-resolution gaming from the GPU. The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244, make this suitable for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development — tasks that scale with core count. The 65 W TDP and ECC memory support also point toward small business workstations or professional environments where reliability and power efficiency matter.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the RX 7900 XTX’s 24 GB VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth, which handle high-resolution textures and modern game assets without capacity pressure. The GPU’s 64th percentile ranking indicates solid but not top-tier performance, making this suitable for high-settings gaming rather than competitive esports at extreme frame rates. At 1080p, the CPU’s low base clock and modest single-thread scores (Geekbench single-core 1646) may limit frame rates, so this build is better suited to higher resolutions where the GPU dominates.

Students and developers will find the 32 threads useful for compiling code, running virtual machines, or parallel computations. The DDR4 and DDR5 memory support provides flexibility in system building, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 allows for basic display output without the discrete GPU if needed. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for the platform, and the PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures future storage and expansion compatibility.

The production status is active for the CPU, while the GPU is end-of-life — this suggests the CPU is a current product with ongoing availability, while the GPU may require sourcing from remaining stock. The combined percentile of 65 indicates this system sits above the median but below the enthusiast tier, making it appropriate for users who want strong performance without chasing the absolute highest benchmarks.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a distinctive pattern. Cinebench R15 multicore: 3451, single-core: 487. Cinebench R20 multicore: 14382, single-core: 2030. Cinebench R23 multicore: 34244, single-core: 4834. Geekbench multicore: 8337, single-core: 1646. The average benchmark score is 8676, placing the CPU at the 65th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-8565U (avg 8665, +0.1%), Intel Core i5-8365U (avg 8708, -0.4%), AMD EPYC 7601 (avg 8619, +0.7%), and Intel Core i7-10510U (avg 8580, +1.1%). These deltas are all within 1.1%, indicating that the averaging metric places this 24-core processor in the same tier as low-power mobile chips — a reflection of the benchmark mix rather than the CPU’s true multi-threaded capability.

The GPU’s benchmark results are as follows: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12: 6841. Geekbench OpenCL: 50465. Geekbench Vulkan: 85612. Passmark DirectX 10: 166, DirectX 11: 356, DirectX 12: 131, DirectX 9: 330. Passmark G2D: 1267. Passmark G3D: 31238. Passmark GPU Compute: 17689. The average benchmark score is 19410, placing the GPU at the 64th percentile among all GPUs. Nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB (avg 19334, +0.4%), NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (avg 19602, -1%), AMD FirePro D300 (avg 19637, -1.2%), and NVIDIA TITAN Xp (avg 19177, +1.2%). Again, the averaging metric clusters this modern RDNA 3 card with older parts, though the architectural differences are substantial.

The combined system percentile is 65, matching the CPU’s individual percentile and sitting one point above the GPU’s. This near-alignment suggests the pairing is well-balanced in aggregate terms. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244, when paired with the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6841, indicates a system that can handle both production workloads and modern gaming at high settings. The Passmark G3D score of 31238 provides an additional cross-check for the GPU’s gaming capability, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612 suggests strong API-level performance for modern titles.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 65, with the CPU at the 65th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 64th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E supports ECC memory. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: What is the GPU’s release status?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is listed as end-of-life, while the CPU is marked as active production.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a base clock of 1800 MHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The GPU delivers 61.39 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with 6144 shading units and 96 RT cores.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using the Navi 31 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 57,700 million transistors across a 529 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The card operates at a base clock of 1929 MHz, a boost clock of 2498 MHz, and a game clock of 2365 MHz. Memory runs at 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration consists of 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU features 6144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, 192 render output units, and 96 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is 479.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 959.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 61.39 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 122.8 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark performance includes a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6841, Geekbench OpenCL score of 50465, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612. Passmark results show G3D at 31238, GPU Compute at 17689, DirectX 11 at 356, DirectX 9 at 330, DirectX 10 at 166, DirectX 12 at 131, and G2D at 1267. The average benchmark score is 19410, placing the GPU at the 64th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals — GTX 1060 3GB (0.4% ahead), Quadro K5200 (1% behind), FirePro D300 (1.2% behind), and TITAN Xp (1.2% ahead) — are all older or lower-tier cards, which contextualizes the percentile ranking.

For rendering and compute workloads, the 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 and 122.8 TFLOPS FP16 provide substantial throughput for GPU-accelerated tasks. The 96 RT cores support hardware ray tracing, and the 24 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes or datasets. The 960.0 GB/s bandwidth is critical for high-resolution textures and compute kernels that access memory frequently. The card’s dual-slot design, 355 W TDP, and 2x 8-pin power connectors require a 750 W suggested PSU. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class system pairing the Intel Core i9-13900E with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0 flagship with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. Both components sit at the 64th-65th percentile among their respective categories, and the combined system percentile is 65.

The CPU’s strengths lie in multi-threaded compute — Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 — while the GPU’s strengths are in high-resolution gaming and compute, evidenced by the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6841 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612. The system is not at the absolute top tier — the CPU’s nearest rivals include mobile parts like the i7-8565U, and the GPU’s nearest rivals include the GTX 1060 3GB and TITAN Xp — but the aggregate performance places it above the median.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU is notably low for a 24-core part, suggesting power-efficient operation, while the GPU’s 355 W TDP is typical for a high-end card. The pairing is suited for a desktop workstation or high-end gaming rig where multi-threaded productivity tasks and 1440p/4K gaming are both priorities. The CPU’s active production status and the GPU’s end-of-life status mean the GPU may be harder to source, but the overall configuration remains viable for current workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7900 XTX’s 24 GB VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth support high texture settings at 1440p, while the CPU’s 5.20 GHz boost clock handles game logic. However, the CPU’s low base clock of 1800 MHz and Geekbench single-core score of 1646 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles at 1080p, making this scenario better suited to 1440p where the GPU becomes the primary driver.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 indicates the processor can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads, and the GPU’s 122.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance can offload encoding tasks if configured to use the GPU.

Video editing: Multi-threaded render and export tasks benefit from the CPU’s 32 threads, with Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 demonstrating strong scaling. The GPU’s 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 and 24 GB VRAM accelerate effects, color grading, and GPU-accelerated exports. The 960.0 GB/s bandwidth handles large video files efficiently.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-core performance is well-suited for CPU-based renderers, while the GPU’s 96 RT cores and 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 support GPU-accelerated rendering with ray tracing. The 24 GB VRAM accommodates complex scenes without memory swaps, and the 479.6 GPixel/s pixel rate handles high-resolution outputs.

Software development: Compilation and build tasks scale with the CPU’s 24 cores. The Geekbench multicore score of 8337 suggests the processor handles parallel builds effectively, while the 36 MB L3 cache and ECC memory support provide stability for long-running processes. The PCIe Gen 5 interface supports fast storage for large codebases.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption manageable, and the DDR4/DDR5 memory options allow for cost-effective system building. The GPU’s end-of-life status may make this a less attractive option for budget-conscious builds, but the performance headroom is substantial.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, enabling fast storage and expansion cards. The 65 W TDP means the CPU has a low power envelope, but the GPU’s 355 W TDP and suggested PSU of 750 W set the system power requirements. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot.

The CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported. The production status is active, meaning replacements or additional units are available. The GPU is end-of-life, so upgrades would involve moving to a newer generation (successor: Navi IV) when available. The 2x 8-pin power connectors and dual-slot form factor are standard, making the GPU compatible with most cases that fit a 287 mm length.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the GPU, since the CPU has substantial multi-threaded headroom (Cinebench R23 multicore 34244) and the GPU is the end-of-life component. The 750 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a more power-hungry GPU in the future, though the 355 W TDP of the current card is already substantial. The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads are unlikely to become a bottleneck for gaming at 1440p or 4K, where the GPU dominates. For users needing more CPU performance, the locked multiplier and Socket 1700 platform limit upgrade options to other 13th-gen parts, but the current CPU’s multi-threaded scores suggest it remains capable for demanding workloads. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose their platform based on existing components or new builds, though the dual-channel bus is a fixed constraint.