SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

87%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

11,627 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT: A Desktop Duo with Mismatched Ambitions

The pairing of Intel’s 24-core Core i9-13900E with AMD’s Radeon RX 7800 XT creates an intriguing desktop configuration that sits at the 58th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded throughput with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU offers 16 GB of VRAM and RDNA 3.0 architecture. However, benchmark data reveals a significant imbalance: the processor ranks at the 65th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card sits at the 51st percentile among all GPUs. This gap suggests the CPU is the more capable partner in most workloads, though the GPU holds its own in specific rendering and compute tasks. The following analysis breaks down each component’s strengths, the measured performance data, and what this combination means for real-world users.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5200 MHz, which is notable for a chip with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configurations, and the CPU supports ECC memory—a feature that appeals to workstation users. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, though the discrete GPU handles demanding graphics tasks.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s multi-threaded prowess. In Cinebench R23, it scores 34,244 points in multi-core and 4,834 in single-core. Cinebench R20 yields 14,382 multi-core and 2,030 single-core, while the older R15 test produces 3,451 multi-core and 487 single-core. Geekbench results are more modest at 8,337 multi-core and 1,646 single-core. These figures place the i9-13900E at the 65th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8,676. The nearest rivals in the database are surprisingly low-power mobile chips: the Intel Core i7-8565U (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i5-8365U (0.4% behind), the AMD EPYC 7601 (0.7% ahead), and the Intel Core i7-10510U (1.1% ahead). This clustering indicates the i9-13900E’s average score is competitive with older, lower-tier parts, despite its high core count.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 suggests strong rendering capability for video encoding, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The single-core score of 4,834 indicates solid responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core part, which points to efficient power management under sustained loads. However, the Geekbench scores (8,337 multi-core) are lower than what the Cinebench results might imply, hinting that the chip’s performance varies significantly by workload type. The 36 MB L3 cache benefits data-heavy tasks, while the dual-channel memory bus (with both DDR4 and DDR5 support) provides flexibility for different system builds.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is built on the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The die contains 28,100 million transistors across a 346 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1295 MHz, a game clock of 2124 MHz, and a boost clock of 2430 MHz. Memory runs at 2438 MHz, translating to 19.5 Gbps effective, across a 256-bit bus. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory delivers 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth—a substantial pool for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

The shader configuration includes 3,840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. There are 60 ray accelerators (RT cores) for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but no dedicated tensor cores. The pixel rate is 233.3 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 583.2 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance reaches 37.32 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The card has a TDP of 263 W, requires a 600 W power supply, and uses dual 8-pin power connectors. It is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connections, supporting modern high-refresh-rate monitors.

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 4,157. Geekbench OpenCL yields 18,290, while Vulkan reaches 54,228. Passmark results vary widely: G3D scores 24,176, GPU Compute scores 13,473, G2D scores 1,177, and older DirectX tests return 304 (DX9), 249 (DX11), 121 (DX10), and 93 (DX12). The average benchmark score is 11,627, placing the RX 7800 XT at the 51st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (0.5% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro 5500M (0.9% behind), NVIDIA Tesla K20c (1.3% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT (1.8% ahead). This clustering around older or lower-tier cards suggests the RX 7800 XT’s average score underperforms its modern specifications.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are strong assets for 4K texture sets and GPU-accelerated compositing. The 60 RT cores enable ray-traced effects in supported titles, though the lack of tensor cores means AI-accelerated features rely on shader-based implementations. The 37.32 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports scientific compute and machine learning inference, albeit without the dedicated tensor hardware found in competing architectures.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart in relative terms. The i9-13900E’s 65th percentile among all CPUs exceeds the RX 7800 XT’s 51st percentile among all GPUs. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 8,676 is within 1.1% of its nearest rivals, while the GPU’s average score of 11,627 falls within 1.8% of its competitors. This narrow deltaPct values indicate that both components are closely matched to their respective peers, but the CPU holds a higher overall standing.

In CPU-specific tests, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 stands out as a strong result, placing the chip in a competitive position for multi-threaded workloads. The single-core score of 4,834 is respectable but not class-leading. The Geekbench multi-core score of 8,337 is comparatively lower, suggesting that some workloads may not scale as well across the 24 cores. For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,157 reflects modern DX12 gaming performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 54,228 indicates strong compute throughput in Vulkan-based applications. The Passmark G3D score of 24,176 provides a broader view of DirectX performance across multiple versions.

The combined 58th percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing suggests that, together, they perform better than most other combinations in the database, but not exceptionally so. The discrepancy between the CPU’s 65th percentile and the GPU’s 51st percentile means the GPU is the weaker link in most scenarios. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation or rendering, the i9-13900E will shine; for GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the RX 7800 XT will be the limiting factor. This imbalance defines the character of the build and influences which workloads it handles best.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance favoring the CPU. The i9-13900E’s 65th percentile versus the RX 7800 XT’s 51st percentile means the GPU is more likely to become the bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming scenarios, this would manifest as the CPU waiting on the GPU to render frames, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. Conversely, in productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that rely heavily on CPU cores, the i9-13900E’s 24 cores and 32 threads will drive performance, with the GPU playing a supporting role.

The CPU’s TDP of 65 W is remarkably low for a 24-core part, suggesting the chip can sustain high boost clocks without overwhelming thermal solutions. The GPU’s 263 W TDP, however, requires robust cooling and a 600 W power supply. This power differential means the system’s overall thermal profile is dominated by the GPU, which could influence case airflow and cooling choices. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU provides 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16—a mismatch that has minimal practical impact on performance but highlights the platform’s forward-looking design.

For frame rate scaling, the absence of measured FPS data means we cannot quantify exact scaling. However, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle high-resolution textures without running out of memory, which is a common bottleneck in modern games. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 4,834 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can feed the GPU efficiently at lower resolutions, where CPU overhead is more significant. At higher resolutions (1440p and above), the GPU’s 51st percentile ranking will likely cap performance, making the CPU’s headroom less relevant.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The i9-13900E scores 4,834 points in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is strong for everyday responsiveness.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7800 XT has 60 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i9-13900E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configurations, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s boost clock?

A: The RX 7800 XT boosts up to 2430 MHz, with a game clock of 2124 MHz and a base clock of 1295 MHz.

Q: How does the CPU’s percentile rank compare to the GPU’s?

A: The CPU ranks at the 65th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 51st percentile among all GPUs, indicating the CPU is relatively stronger.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the Intel Core i9-13900E paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications.

Based on the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,157 and its Passmark G3D score of 24,176, the RX 7800 XT should handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high to ultra settings in most titles. The 16 GB VRAM ensures that texture-heavy games at 1440p or 4K will not run out of memory, which is a common cause of stuttering. The GPU’s 51st percentile ranking suggests it performs similarly to older cards like the GTX 1660 in average benchmark terms, but its modern features (RT cores, higher bandwidth) may offer better results in newer titles that leverage these capabilities.

At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core score (4,834 in Cinebench R23) will likely keep frame rates high, as the GPU is less likely to be the bottleneck at lower resolutions. At 1440p, the GPU’s load increases, and its 51st percentile ranking will begin to cap performance. At 4K, the GPU will be the primary limiter, with the CPU having ample headroom. For esports titles at 1080p with competitive settings, the combination should deliver high frame rates, though the GPU’s average benchmark score suggests it is not a top-tier performer. These are estimates; actual performance depends on game optimization, drivers, and system configuration.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads while still needing capable graphics. The i9-13900E’s 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with its 65 W TDP, make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, video editors rendering timelines, and 3D artists running multi-threaded renderers. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 indicates strong performance in these tasks, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation environments.

For gamers, the RX 7800 XT’s 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth handle 1440p gaming with high texture settings, and the 60 RT cores enable ray-traced effects in supported titles. However, the GPU’s 51st percentile ranking suggests it is not a top-tier choice for 4K gaming at maximum settings. This build is better suited for gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and value the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities for streaming or recording gameplay simultaneously.

Students and small business users will benefit from the CPU’s efficiency (65 W TDP) and the GPU’s compute performance (37.32 TFLOPS FP32) for tasks like machine learning inference, data analysis, and CAD work. The dual memory support (DDR4 and DDR5) allows for flexible system builds, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface provides future-proofing for high-speed storage. This is not a budget build; it is a balanced workstation-gaming hybrid for users who need both strong CPU throughput and decent graphics.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses the LGA 1700 socket, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the motherboard must have a PCIe Gen 5 slot for the CPU’s full lane allocation, though the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds without issue. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a consideration for workstation builds where data integrity is critical.

The GPU’s suggested power supply is 600 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so a 600 W PSU provides ample headroom for the entire system under load. The GPU uses dual 8-pin power connectors, which is standard for modern cards. The RX 7800 XT has a 263 W TDP, so a quality 600 W PSU from a reputable brand is sufficient, though a higher-wattage unit would allow for future upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 65th percentile ranking indicates it has headroom to feed faster graphics cards. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 34,244) means it will not bottleneck a higher-tier GPU in most scenarios. Alternatively, adding more memory (the CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5) could benefit memory-intensive workloads. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support also allows for future high-speed NVMe SSDs, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0.

Build Overview

This desktop pairing combines Intel’s 24-core Core i9-13900E with AMD’s Radeon RX 7800 XT, creating a system that sits at the 58th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairs. The CPU is the stronger component, ranking at the 65th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 51st percentile among all GPUs. This makes the build a CPU-first configuration, where the processor drives performance in multi-threaded workloads, and the GPU provides adequate graphics for gaming and compute tasks.

The i9-13900E is a Raptor Lake part with 24 cores and 32 threads, a boost clock of 5.2 GHz, and a 65 W TDP, making it both powerful and efficient. The RX 7800 XT offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, 3,840 shading units, and 60 RT cores, with a 2430 MHz boost clock and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 11,627 places it near older cards like the GTX 1660, but its modern architecture and VRAM capacity give it advantages in newer titles.

Overall, this is a desktop build for users who need heavy CPU compute with solid, not exceptional, graphics performance. It is well-suited for developers, content creators, and professionals who run CPU-intensive applications and play games at 1080p or 1440p. The combination’s 58th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms most other pairings, but the GPU’s lower percentile limits its ceiling in graphics-bound scenarios. For those who prioritize CPU throughput and want a capable GPU as a secondary component, this pairing delivers a balanced, if slightly lopsided, experience.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds