SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900E and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a desktop pairing that sits in the 66th percentile overall, a position that reflects a strong mid-to-high tier system rather than an absolute flagship. The CPU, part of the Raptor Lake generation, offers a substantial core count, while the GPU delivers modern RDNA 3.0 architecture with a solid memory subsystem. This analysis examines the benchmark data to determine what this combination means for compute workloads, gaming, and professional applications, relying exclusively on the provided specifications and scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The chip features a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, providing a significant dynamic range for both efficiency and burst performance. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 36 MB shared L3 cache, which is critical for feeding the high core count in multi-threaded workloads.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a strong single-core capability and a dominant multi-core presence. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 34244 points in the multi-core test and 4834 points in the single-core test. The multi-core score is particularly notable, indicating that the 24 physical cores are well-utilized under heavy parallel loads. The Geekbench scores of 8337 multi-core and 1646 single-core corroborate this pattern, showing a balanced design that excels in both threaded and latency-sensitive tasks.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 8676, placing it in the 65th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, according to the data, are the Intel Core i7-8565U with an average score of 8665 (delta 0.1%), the Intel Core i5-8365U at 8708 (delta -0.4%), the AMD EPYC 7601 at 8619 (delta 0.7%), and the Intel Core i7-10510U at 8580 (delta 1.1%). These deltas are remarkably small, with the i9-13900E trailing the i5-8365U by just 0.4% and leading the i7-10510U by 1.1%. This suggests that despite its high core count and modern architecture, the average benchmark score places it in a tight competitive cluster with these mobile and enterprise parts, though the Cinebench multi-core results tell a different story, showing raw throughput that far exceeds those rivals.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support enabled. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, offering a fallback display solution. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core part, indicating that the "E" suffix likely denotes an embedded or efficiency-focused variant with restricted power limits, which may affect sustained multi-core performance in thermally constrained systems.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture is defined by the CPU's 65th percentile and the GPU's 67th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 66. The CPU's average benchmark score of 8676 is closely matched by its nearest rivals, with the Intel Core i5-8365U being the only one to edge it out by 0.4%. This is a tight grouping, suggesting that in average benchmark terms, the i9-13900E does not dominate its immediate competition, despite its specifications.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, presents a more distinct profile. Its average benchmark score is 22549, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals show a similar pattern of close competition: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22435 (delta 0.5%), the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729 (delta -0.8%), the RTX 2080 scores 22895 (delta -1.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 scores 22170 (delta 1.7%). The RX 7700 XT is 1.5% behind the RTX 2080 and 0.8% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile, but it leads the RX 5700 by 1.7%. These deltas indicate that the GPU is competitively positioned within its segment, though it does not break away from the pack.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the RX 7700 XT posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 138383, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 46443. Passmark results show a G3D score of 22547 and a GPU Compute score of 12912. The DX12 and Vulkan numbers suggest strong modern API performance, while the OpenCL result indicates robust compute capability for non-gaming tasks.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries. Consequently, all gaming FPS figures in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and must be treated as approximations, not measured results.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 66, placing the system above the majority of desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E has an average score of 8676, which is 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i5-8365U (8708) and 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-8565U (8665).

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E supports ECC memory, a feature often relevant for workstation and server reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing hardware configuration?

A: The RX 7700 XT has 54 RT cores, with a boost clock of 2544 MHz and a game clock of 2171 MHz.

Q: How far is the GPU behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 in average score?

A: The RX 7700 XT is 1.5% behind the RTX 2080, which has an average score of 22895 compared to 22549.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E boosts up to 5.20 GHz from a base clock of 1800 MHz.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, the following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, so treat these numbers as indicative projections rather than definitive results.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4834 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 together suggest a system capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p and solid performance at 1440p. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern titles at high settings, though the 192-bit bus may limit performance at 4K with large textures.

For esports and competitive titles, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Geekbench single-core 1646) and boost clock of 5.20 GHz provide a solid foundation for high frame rates. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 22547 indicates it can drive these games well above 144 FPS at 1080p, but the exact FPS depends on the title's optimization. At 1440p, frame rates would likely remain high but may dip below 144 FPS in more demanding scenes.

For AAA titles, the RX 7700 XT's performance relative to the RTX 2080 (1.5% behind) and RTX 4060 Mobile (0.8% behind) suggests it can handle ultra settings at 1080p with ease and high settings at 1440p. The CPU's multi-core score of 34244 in Cinebench R23 ensures that background tasks and game logic threads do not become bottlenecks, allowing the GPU to be the primary determinant of frame rate. A reasonable estimate for modern AAA games at 1440p ultra is 60-90 FPS, while 1080p ultra could see 90-120 FPS, but these are projections, not measured results.

Who Should Build It

This system is suited for gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or smooth 1440p gameplay, given the GPU's 67th percentile standing and the CPU's robust single-core performance. The 12 GB VRAM is ample for current titles, and the GPU's compute scores (OpenCL 138383) make it viable for light content creation, such as video encoding and photo editing, where the CPU's 24 cores provide substantial parallel processing power.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244, which accelerates rendering timelines. The GPU's FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS supports GPU-accelerated effects and previews. Software developers compiling large codebases will see reduced build times thanks to the 32 threads, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes.

Students and small business workstations would find this pairing overkill for basic office tasks, but the headroom allows for future expansion into more demanding workloads. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and the 245 W TDP of the GPU mean a 550 W PSU is suggested, keeping the build power-efficient relative to its performance class.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which limits upgrades to other 13th generation or compatible parts on the same socket without a motherboard change. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in choosing RAM based on budget and performance needs, though the dual-channel bus remains a fixed constraint. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring that storage and GPU bandwidth are not bottlenecks for current and near-future components.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, so there is no immediate need for a motherboard upgrade to accommodate the graphics card. The suggested PSU is 550 W, which provides headroom for minor overclocking or additional drives, but the CPU's locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) limits CPU overclocking, so a higher-wattage PSU is only necessary if the GPU is swapped for a more power-hungry model.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or speed, as the CPU's performance in multi-threaded tasks is sensitive to memory bandwidth. Alternatively, the GPU could be replaced with a higher-tier Radeon RX 7000 series part, but the current RX 7700 XT's 67th percentile means such an upgrade would yield diminishing returns unless targeting 4K gaming or heavy compute workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is relatively even, with the CPU at the 65th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-core strength (Geekbench single-core 1646) is likely sufficient to feed the GPU, but the GPU's performance relative to rivals suggests it will be the limiting factor in frame rate, especially at higher resolutions. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3316 indicates it is not a top-tier part, so in CPU-light games, the GPU will cap performance.

In multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 is a standout, but the GPU's compute scores (OpenCL 138383) also contribute. Here, the balance shifts: the CPU excels at tasks that are not easily parallelized on the GPU, while the GPU handles rasterization and compute shaders. The deltaPct values show the CPU is within 1.1% of its rivals, meaning a slower CPU would not significantly change multi-threaded performance, but a slower GPU would drop the system's overall percentile.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, suggests that at 1080p, the GPU's 67th percentile will deliver playable frame rates, but the CPU's 65th percentile could become a bottleneck in esports titles where frame rates exceed 200 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as the CPU has more headroom to process game logic while the GPU struggles with pixel fill rates.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900E with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. The system sits in the 66th combined percentile, indicating a mid-to-high tier configuration that is above average but not flagship. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 12 GB RDNA 3.0 card with a 245 W TDP and a suggested 550 W PSU.

The pairing is well-matched for a performance desktop that prioritizes multi-threaded compute and 1440p gaming. The CPU's high core count and the GPU's modern architecture work together to deliver strong results in benchmarks, but the tight rival deltas (e.g., CPU within 1.1% of the i7-10510U) suggest that the system does not dramatically outperform cheaper alternatives in average scores, though it does excel in specific multi-core tests. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier from the percentiles is solidly mid-range, suitable for a wide range of tasks without the premium cost of top-tier components.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. It has a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The GPU features 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, along with 54 RT cores for ray tracing. Its compute capabilities include 35.17 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s. The absence of tensor cores is notable, meaning AI-accelerated tasks rely on the standard compute units.

Benchmark scores show the GPU's strengths: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 46443 indicate solid modern API performance, while the Passmark G3D score of 22547 places it in the 67th percentile. The nearest rival comparisons show it is 1.5% behind the RTX 2080 and 1.7% ahead of the RX 5700, suggesting it competes with previous-generation high-end cards. For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 performance at 35.17 TFLOPS is substantial, making it suitable for real-time rendering and GPU-accelerated effects, though the 12 GB VRAM may be a limitation for very large scenes or 4K texture sets.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's boost clock of 5.20 GHz and Geekbench single-core score of 1646 ensure high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 67th percentile (Passmark G3D 22547) can push 1080p displays beyond 144 Hz in many games, though the exact FPS is estimated.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core 34244) handle encoding and game logic simultaneously without contention, while the GPU's 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 supports hardware-accelerated encoding and overlays.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core performance accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 138383 assists with effects and color grading. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14382 and R23 score of 34244 dominate CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's FP32 and FP16 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS provides a strong path for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray.

Software development: The 32 threads compile code quickly, and the ECC memory support reduces error risk in long-running builds. The GPU is not a bottleneck for development, but its compute scores can accelerate machine learning prototyping.

Student and office work: This system is overprovisioned for word processing and spreadsheets, but the headroom means it will not struggle with multitasking or heavy browser workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps idle power low, while the GPU remains idle until needed.