SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7700 — Desktop Build Analysis

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake processor with AMD's RDNA 3.0 graphics card, landing at the 62nd percentile overall against all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU holds a 65th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 58th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a balanced mid-to-upper tier configuration. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this CPU+GPU pairing, all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and the CPU's single-thread capabilities. The Radeon RX 7700's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 and PassMark G3D score of 20974 place it in a position where 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings should be the primary targets. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for modern game assets at those resolutions.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RX 7700's 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 236.1 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest strong performance in esports and competitive titles, where frame rates in the high triple digits are plausible. The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and 4834 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensure that even the most CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions will not create significant bottlenecks. For 1440p ultra, the GPU's 393.4 GTexel/s texture rate and 40 RT cores indicate that demanding AAA titles should run comfortably above 60 FPS in most cases, though ray tracing workloads will reduce headroom.

At 4K ultra, the data suggests this pairing will struggle to maintain high refresh rates. The GPU's 58th percentile standing among all GPUs places it below the top tier of graphics cards, and the 2865 Steel Nomad score reflects a card designed for mainstream high-refresh gaming rather than 4K flagship duty. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 4K textures, but the raw compute throughput of 25.18 TFLOPS will likely limit 4K ultra to 30-60 FPS depending on the title and optimization level.

The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial margin for gaming workloads that increasingly utilize multiple threads, but the 65th percentile CPU ranking shows that this is not a top-tier gaming processor by raw benchmark averages. For competitive shooters and fast-paced titles where frames above 144 FPS matter, the combination of the 5.20 GHz single-core boost and the GPU's 2041 MHz game clock should deliver the responsiveness needed, but players seeking 240 FPS+ in the most demanding esports titles may need to lower settings.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900E delivers strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244, placing it in the upper echelon for productivity workloads. The single-core score of 4834 in the same test confirms excellent per-thread capability, which is critical for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench scores of 8337 multi-core and 1646 single-core reinforce this pattern, showing balanced performance across different benchmark methodologies. The CPU's average benchmark score of 8676 sits at the 65th percentile, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i7-8565U at 8665 (0.1% difference) — a notable comparison since the i7-8565U is a low-power mobile chip, while the i9-13900E is a desktop part with 24 cores.

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865, which is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark reflecting current gaming workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 20974 and GPU Compute score of 10963 indicate solid rasterization and compute capabilities. The GPU's average benchmark score of 15852 places it at the 58th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862 (-0.1% difference). The GPU also sits within 1.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129) and 1% below the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16014), indicating this card performs in the same class as those established mid-range options.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative percentile terms — 65th versus 58th. This suggests the processor has more headroom than the graphics card, meaning CPU-bound workloads will benefit more from this pairing than GPU-bound tasks. The combined percentile of 62 reflects this modest gap, positioning the build as a balanced but slightly CPU-leaning configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance compared to its multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E scores 4834 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 34244 in multi-core, a ratio of roughly 7:1, reflecting its 24-core, 32-thread design. The single-core score of 4834 is substantial for gaming and everyday responsiveness, while the multi-core score dominates in rendering and compilation workloads.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700's average benchmark score of 15852 is 1.7% below the RTX 3060 Ti's 16129, making them close competitors. The RX 7700 offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory compared to the RTX 3060 Ti's typical 8 GB, which provides more VRAM headroom for high-resolution textures and larger datasets.

Q: Is this build suitable for ray tracing?

A: The RX 7700 includes 40 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, the GPU's 58th percentile ranking and 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest ray tracing performance will be moderate rather than class-leading, with more significant frame rate impacts compared to rasterized rendering.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the actual bandwidth figures are not specified in the data.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RX 7700 has 624.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 2438 MHz memory clock (19.5 Gbps effective). This bandwidth is well-matched to the GPU's compute capabilities, supporting high-resolution textures and smooth performance at 1440p without memory starvation.

Q: How does the CPU's power consumption compare to its performance?

A: The i9-13900E has a TDP of 65 W, which is modest for a 24-core processor. Despite this low power envelope, it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244, indicating excellent performance-per-watt for multi-threaded workloads.

Q: Does this build support PCIe 5.0?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the system supports PCIe 5.0 for storage and other devices, but the graphics card operates at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which does not bottleneck the RX 7700's performance.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets desktop users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity while maintaining solid 1080p and 1440p gaming capability. The 24-core i9-13900E with its 34244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score makes this build well-suited for content creators handling video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation — tasks that scale across many threads. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth support large texture sets and GPU-accelerated rendering tasks, though the 58th percentile GPU ranking means it is not a workstation-class compute card.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find this pairing capable, with the CPU's 4834 single-core score ensuring high frame rates in CPU-bound titles and the GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS handling graphics workloads. Developers and students working on multi-threaded codebases will benefit from the 32 threads for parallel builds, while the 65 W TDP keeps power requirements reasonable for a desktop workstation. Small business users running virtualization or database workloads will appreciate the 24 cores and 32 threads, though the ECC memory support is limited to DDR4 or DDR5 configurations that support it.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates this build has a CPU-leaning balance, where the processor outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The CPU's 65th percentile versus the GPU's 58th percentile creates a scenario where multi-threaded CPU workloads will hit their potential before the GPU becomes the limiting factor in graphics-heavy tasks. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance (4834 Cinebench R23) means the GPU will likely be the bottleneck, with the RX 7700's 2865 Steel Nomad score determining frame rates. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as the limiting factor, and the CPU's extra headroom goes unused.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the obvious driver — the 34244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score means rendering, encoding, and compilation tasks will scale well across all 24 cores. The GPU's compute score of 10963 in PassMark GPU Compute provides additional acceleration for supported tasks, but the CPU will handle most general-purpose workloads. The combined percentile of 62 suggests that neither component dramatically outperforms the other in a way that creates a severe bottleneck, but users should expect the GPU to cap gaming performance more than the CPU in most scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU operates at a 1900 MHz base clock, 2041 MHz game clock, and 2459 MHz boost clock, delivering 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for the card's performance class. The 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 96 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s.

The 40 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the GPU's 58th percentile ranking suggests it is not a top-tier ray tracing performer. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 186 versus DirectX 12 score of 96 indicates that the card performs better in legacy APIs, which is common for RDNA 3.0 architecture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 positions it as a capable 1440p gaming card, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028 shows strong compute capability for general-purpose GPU tasks. The GPU's average benchmark score of 15852 places it within 1.7% of the RTX 3060 Ti, confirming its position as a solid mid-range option.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It features a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that belies its multi-core capability. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample fast storage for frequently accessed data. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support for workstation reliability.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded performance, placing it well above typical desktop processors. The single-core score of 4834 confirms that the 5.20 GHz boost clock translates into real-world performance for lightly-threaded workloads. The Geekbench scores of 8337 multi-core and 1646 single-core provide a cross-platform reference point. The CPU's average benchmark score of 8676 places it at the 65th percentile, remarkably close to the Intel Core i7-8565U (8665, 0.1% difference) despite the vast architectural differences. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and video decoding without requiring a discrete GPU, though gaming will use the RX 7700.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs Intel's Core i9-13900E, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP and 5.20 GHz boost clock, with AMD's Radeon RX 7700, a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 graphics card with 624.1 GB/s memory bandwidth. The combined percentile of 62 places this configuration in the mid-to-upper tier of all CPU+GPU pairings, with the CPU at the 65th percentile and GPU at the 58th percentile. This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) designed for users who need substantial multi-threaded CPU performance alongside capable 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads make it a productivity powerhouse, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 25.18 TFLOPS provide solid graphics performance. The 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP combine for a system that requires a 550 W suggested PSU, making it a reasonable power profile for the performance delivered.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's 4834 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 2865 Steel Nomad score supports 144Hz-class performance in most games at high settings. The 16 GB VRAM prevents memory-related stuttering in modern titles.

Streaming: The 24-core, 32-thread CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay, with the 34244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score ensuring smooth stream encoding on the CPU side. The GPU's 106028 Geekbench OpenCL score offers additional hardware encoding options.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core dominance (34244 Cinebench R23) accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth handle GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. The 16 GB VRAM supports large 4K timelines.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will scale well across 24 cores, and the GPU's 10963 PassMark Compute score provides acceleration for GPU-rendered frames. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for complex scenes.

Software development: The 32 threads dramatically reduce compile times for large codebases, and the 65 W TDP keeps power costs manageable for always-on development machines. The ECC memory support adds reliability for critical builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance of 4834 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU's 1206 PassMark G2D score handles 2D desktop acceleration efficiently. The 65 W CPU TDP makes this a relatively energy-efficient system for daily use.