SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900E and AMD Radeon RX 7600 form a desktop pairing that presents a striking contrast in compute capability. The CPU is a 24-core Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 6 nm RDNA 3.0 card with 8 GB of VRAM. The benchmark data shows a significant imbalance: the processor sits at the 65th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card ranks at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. This delta suggests the CPU is the stronger component in absolute terms, but the real-world bottleneck depends entirely on the workload, as the CPU's multi-threaded might is often irrelevant in GPU-bound scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU occupy different performance tiers. The i9-13900E's average benchmark score is 8676, placing it at the 65th percentile, while the RX 7600's average score is 15171, at the 57th percentile. In raw compute, the CPU is clearly the superior part relative to its peers, but this does not automatically translate to balanced gaming performance. For gaming at standard resolutions, the GPU is almost always the limiting factor, as the RX 7600's 57th percentile rank is below the CPU's 65th percentile rank, indicating the GPU will saturate before the CPU in most graphically intensive scenarios.

The bottleneck shifts dramatically in productivity workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 16634 shows moderate graphics capability. In video encoding or 3D rendering tasks that leverage the CPU, the i9-13900E will be the primary driver, with the GPU playing a supporting role. Conversely, in GPU-accelerated rendering using OpenCL or Vulkan, the RX 7600's scores of 88051 and 34401 respectively become the limiting factor, as these tasks rely on the graphics card's compute units.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that in gaming, the RX 7600 will be the bottleneck at 1080p and 1440p, as its 57th percentile ranking is below the CPU's 65th percentile. The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 1646, is more than adequate to feed the GPU's frame output. However, in CPU-intensive simulations or physics calculations, the i9-13900E's 24 cores and 32 threads will dominate, potentially leaving the GPU idle. This is a system where the user must be aware of the workload to understand which component is being pushed to its limits.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7600's 57th percentile ranking and the absence of measured FPS data mean this is an estimate, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle 1080p high-refresh gaming. The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and strong single-core score of 4834 in Cinebench R23 ensure it won't hold back frame rates in most titles, though the GPU will likely cap performance below the highest settings at 1440p.

Streaming: The i9-13900E's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU offers a fallback for Quick Sync encoding, but the RX 7600's hardware encoders (implied by RDNA 3.0) can handle the stream. The CPU's 65th percentile rank means it outperforms 65% of all CPUs, making it a robust platform for simultaneous gaming and encoding without stutter.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 indicates serious rendering power for export times. The GPU's OpenCL score of 88051 can accelerate effects and playback in compatible software, but the CPU will be the workhorse for timeline operations and final renders. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large project files, and DDR4/DDR5 memory support offers flexibility.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the i9-13900E's 34244 Cinebench R23 multicore score is exceptional, placing it well above the 65th percentile. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance is respectable, but its 57th percentile rank means it will fall behind in GPU-accelerated renderers compared to higher-tier cards. The 8 GB VRAM may also limit scene complexity in GPU rendering.

Software development: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads excel at parallel compilation, with a Geekbench multicore score of 8337 indicating strong throughput. The 65 W TDP is remarkably efficient for this core count, allowing for sustained all-core loads without thermal throttling. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU's 65th percentile rank ensures snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets and documents. The i9-13900E's base clock of 1800 MHz keeps power draw low during idle, while the boost clock of 5.20 GHz handles bursty workloads. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup if the discrete GPU is not needed, saving power.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. Cinebench R15 multicore scored 3451, R20 multicore scored 14382, and R23 multicore scored 34244, demonstrating consistent scaling across versions. Single-core scores are equally strong: R15 at 487, R20 at 2030, and R23 at 4834. Geekbench results show 8337 multicore and 1646 single-core, indicating a balanced architecture. The average benchmark score of 8676 places the CPU at the 65th percentile, with nearest rivals like the Intel Core i7-8565U at 8665 (0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i5-8365U at 8708 (-0.4% delta).

The GPU's benchmark performance is more modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2310, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 88051 and Vulkan scores 34401. Passmark results show DirectX 9 at 226, DirectX 10 at 84, DirectX 11 at 172, DirectX 12 at 58, G2D at 984, G3D at 16634, and GPU Compute at 8790. The average benchmark score of 15171 places the GPU at the 57th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 15199 (-0.2% delta) and the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (-0.7% delta).

The combined percentile for this build is 61, reflecting the CPU's higher standing pulling up the GPU's lower position. The data shows a system where the CPU is clearly the stronger component, but the GPU is still competent for 1080p gaming. The CPU's 0.1% delta to the Core i7-8565U suggests they are statistically equivalent in average score, though the i9's 24-core architecture will vastly outperform in multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU's -0.2% delta to the RTX 3050 OEM indicates near-parity with that card.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who need heavy CPU compute for productivity but only moderate GPU performance for gaming. Gamers at 1080p will find the RX 7600 sufficient for high settings, with the CPU ensuring consistent frame pacing. The 57th GPU percentile means 1440p gaming will require lower settings, but the CPU's 65th percentile ensures no CPU bottleneck at any resolution where the GPU can keep up.

Content creators working with video or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 34244 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which dramatically reduces render times. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 1080p video editing timelines, but 4K projects may struggle with the memory capacity. Developers will appreciate the 24 cores for parallel builds and the ECC memory support for data integrity.

Students and office workers will find this system vastly overpowered, but the 65 W TDP makes it efficient for a desktop. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 allows the discrete GPU to idle, reducing power consumption. Small business workstations that run database queries or virtualization will leverage the 32 threads, while the GPU provides acceleration for any graphical tasks. The 65th CPU percentile and 57th GPU percentile mean this is a mid-to-upper tier build, not a top-tier gaming rig, but a strong productivity workstation.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 61, with the CPU at 65 and the GPU at 57.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The i9-13900E scores 8676, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-8565U at 8665.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity?

A: The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900E supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop parts.

Q: What is the GPU's boost clock speed?

A: The RX 7600 has a boost clock of 2655 MHz and a game clock of 2250 MHz.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so all gaming performance estimates are derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and foundry?

A: The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC's 6 nm process.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rates discussed are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The RX 7600's 57th percentile rank and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2310 suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance is solid for rasterization, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in newer games.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4834 ensures the i9-13900E will not be a bottleneck, allowing the GPU to reach its full potential. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 16634, which is -0.2% from the RTX 3050 OEM, suggests performance comparable to that card. At 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, with the 57th percentile rank indicating it will struggle at ultra settings.

The absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores provide a reliable baseline. The GPU's 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p, but the 128-bit bus may cause performance drops in high-resolution textures. The 32 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, though the 57th GPU percentile suggests RT performance will be modest, with lower frame rates in RT-enabled titles.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the Navi 33 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 32 RT cores for ray tracing. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The clock speeds are 1720 MHz base, 2250 MHz game, and 2655 MHz boost, providing a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU's benchmark scores place it at the 57th percentile, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2310 indicating solid DX12 performance.

The Passmark G3D score of 16634 is -0.2% from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, suggesting near-parity in rasterization. The OpenCL score of 88051 shows strong compute capability, while the Vulkan score of 34401 indicates good API optimization. The 32 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, but the 57th percentile rank suggests performance will be below dedicated RT cards. The GPU has a TDP of 165 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W and a single 8-pin power connector.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900E and AMD Radeon RX 7600, with a combined percentile of 61. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 6 nm RDNA 3.0 card with a 165 W TDP. The pairing represents a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU, creating a system that prioritizes compute over graphics.

The 65th CPU percentile means the processor outperforms 65% of all CPUs, while the 57th GPU percentile means the graphics card outperforms 57% of all GPUs. This asymmetry defines the build's character: it is a productivity powerhouse with adequate gaming capability. The system is best suited for users who spend most of their time in multi-threaded applications and occasionally game at 1080p.

The overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the CPU being the standout component. The 61 combined percentile reflects the GPU's lower rank pulling the average down. This is not a balanced gaming rig, but rather a workstation with a discrete GPU added for graphical tasks. The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p gaming, but not for high-end 1440p or 4K.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 1800 MHz, boosting up to 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory enabled.

The CPU's benchmark scores are exceptional for multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R23 multicore scored 34244, which is a strong result for a 65 W part, while single-core scored 4834. The Geekbench multicore score of 8337 and single-core of 1646 confirm balanced performance. The average benchmark score of 8676 places it at the 65th percentile, with nearest rivals being mobile parts like the Core i7-8565U, indicating this desktop CPU is comparable to high-end mobile chips in average score.

The 24 cores and 32 threads are ideal for rendering, compilation, and virtualization. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads, while the 65 W TDP allows for efficient sustained operation. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a display output and basic acceleration, useful for troubleshooting or power-saving. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not officially supported, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is already high.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports 13th Gen Raptor Lake processors. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving users flexibility in choosing RAM. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU's 65 W TDP means most motherboards can handle it without exotic VRM cooling, and the suggested PSU of 450 W for the GPU indicates a modest power supply requirement.

The upgrade path is limited by the Socket 1700 platform, which is not forward-compatible with newer Intel generations. The most sensible upgrade would be to a higher-tier GPU, as the RX 7600's 57th percentile is the weaker link. The CPU's 65th percentile leaves headroom for GPU improvements, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus would be the primary bottlenecks. A GPU with more VRAM and higher bandwidth would balance the system.

For memory, the dual-channel DDR5 support allows for high-bandwidth configurations, though the lack of a memory bandwidth figure in the data means specific performance gains cannot be quantified. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes are available for NVMe storage, ensuring fast load times. The 65 W CPU TDP and 165 W GPU TDP mean a 450 W PSU is sufficient, but users adding more drives or peripherals should consider a higher-wattage unit. The next logical upgrade would be a GPU with better than 57th percentile performance to match the CPU's 65th percentile.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds