SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

79 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 21% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900E + AMD Radeon RX 7400 — Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with AMD's entry-level RDNA 3 graphics card, creating a system where the CPU's substantial multi-threaded capacity vastly outstrips the GPU's rendering capabilities. The Intel Core i9-13900E sits in the 65th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 8676, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 lands in the 17th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 2467, resulting in a combined system percentile of 41. This is a build defined by extreme imbalance — the processor is a workstation-class part, while the graphics card targets basic 1080p gaming and everyday desktop tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundries with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock runs at 1800 MHz, but boost reaches 5200 MHz, which is a wide frequency range that allows the chip to idle efficiently and still deliver bursts of high single-thread performance. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache, which is substantial for a desktop part. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It also integrates UHD Graphics 770, so the system can display output even without the discrete GPU installed.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that is strong in multi-threaded workloads but surprisingly modest in its average score relative to its core count. In Cinebench R23, the i9-13900E scores 34244 in multi-core and 4834 in single-core. The multi-core result indicates serious rendering and compilation capability, while the single-core score of 4834 is competitive for daily responsiveness. Cinebench R20 results show 14382 multi-core and 2030 single-core, and Cinebench R15 shows 3451 multi-core and 487 single-core. Geekbench scores are 8337 multi-core and 1646 single-core, which are lower than one might expect from a 24-core part — this suggests the 65W TDP (65 watts is the rated thermal design power) may be limiting sustained all-core performance in shorter-duration tests.

The percentile rank of 65 versus all CPUs places this processor in the upper-middle tier of the database, but its nearest rivals are revealing. The closest competitors are the Intel Core i7-8565U (avg score 8665, delta 0.1%), Intel Core i5-8365U (avg score 8708, delta -0.4%), AMD EPYC 7601 (avg score 8619, delta 0.7%), and Intel Core i7-10510U (avg score 8580, delta 1.1%). All of these rivals are low-power mobile or server parts, meaning the i9-13900E's average score of 8676 places it in the same overall performance band as chips with far fewer cores and much lower power envelopes. This is a curious result — the Raptor Lake desktop part with 24 cores and a 5.2 GHz boost should theoretically outclass these mobile U-series chips, but the data shows near-parity. The implication is that the 65W TDP cap significantly throttles the i9-13900E in mixed workloads, preventing it from demonstrating its full multi-core potential in the average benchmark score.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is built on the Navi 33 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, producing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. Clock speeds are 1452 MHz base, 2200 MHz game, and 2300 MHz boost. The compute throughput is 16.49 TFLOPS for FP32 and 32.97 TFLOPS for FP16 (at 2:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s.

The RX 7400 consumes just 43W of power (TDP), requires a single 6-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU rating of 200W. It is a dual-slot card with PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, and provides one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This is a low-power, entry-level discrete GPU designed for basic gaming and multimedia, not for high-end rendering or ray tracing workloads.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of an entry-level part. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 7400 scores 1103, which is a modest result for a modern GPU. Passmark scores show 11897 in G3D (the overall 3D graphics mark), but the individual DirectX tests are low: 176 in DirectX 9, 97 in DirectX 11, 59 in DirectX 10, and 44 in DirectX 12. The Passmark G2D score is 1209, and the GPU compute score is 5152. The percentile rank of 17 versus all GPUs places this card in the bottom fifth of the database, and its nearest rivals confirm the low tier: AMD Radeon 8040S (avg score 2440, delta 1.1%), NVIDIA GeForce 710M (avg score 2433, delta 1.4%), Intel HD Graphics 610 (avg score 2425, delta 1.8%), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (avg score 2422, delta 1.9%). The RX 7400's average benchmark score of 2467 is only 1.1% above the Radeon 8040S, which is an integrated GPU, and 1.9% above the GeForce GT 710M, which is a decade-old entry-level mobile part. This is not a card that will handle modern games at high settings.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU benchmark scores demonstrate a dramatic performance gap between the two components. The i9-13900E achieves an average benchmark score of 8676, placing it in the 65th percentile of all CPUs, which is a solid mid-to-upper-tier result. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 is particularly strong — this is the kind of number that indicates serious multi-threaded processing capability for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4834 is also respectable for day-to-day tasks.

In contrast, the RX 7400's average benchmark score of 2467 places it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, which is firmly in the entry-level category. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 is indicative of a card that can handle esports titles at 1080p but will struggle with demanding AAA games at higher settings. The Passmark G3D score of 11897 seems more flattering, but the DirectX 12 score of 44 and DirectX 11 score of 97 highlight the card's limitations in modern API workloads.

The combined system percentile is 41, which reflects the overall position of this pairing in the database. However, this single number masks the extreme disparity: the CPU is performing at a level consistent with mid-range workstation processors, while the GPU is performing at a level consistent with basic integrated graphics solutions. The combined picture is a system that will excel in CPU-bound tasks like video editing, software development, and office productivity, but will be severely constrained in GPU-bound workloads like gaming, 3D rendering with ray tracing, and GPU-accelerated compute. The data suggests that this is a build where the processor is the star and the graphics card is an afterthought — or perhaps a placeholder until a better GPU is installed.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-13900E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900E includes ECC memory support, which is a feature typically found in workstation and server platforms. This makes the CPU suitable for builds where data integrity is critical, such as small business servers or scientific computing workstations, though the platform also supports standard DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the power consumption of the AMD Radeon RX 7400?

A: The RX 7400 has a TDP of 43 watts, which is very low for a discrete GPU. It requires a single 6-pin power connector, and AMD recommends a 200-watt power supply for the system. This makes it an efficient card that can be installed in systems with modest PSUs.

Q: Can the i9-13900E run without a discrete GPU?

A: Yes, the i9-13900E includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, so the system can display output even without the RX 7400 installed. This is useful for troubleshooting, or for running the system in a headless or basic display configuration while the discrete GPU is being used for compute tasks.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 7400?

A: The RX 7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with an effective speed of 18 Gbps. This is sufficient for entry-level gaming but may limit performance in memory-intensive tasks like high-resolution textures.

Q: How does the i9-13900E compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i9-13900E has an average benchmark score of 8676, which is 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-8565U (8665), 0.4% below the Intel Core i5-8365U (8708), 0.7% above the AMD EPYC 7601 (8619), and 1.1% above the Intel Core i7-10510U (8580). These are all very small differences, placing the i9-13900E in the same performance band as these lower-core-count parts.

Q: What is the process node of the RX 7400?

A: The RX 7400 is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. This process node is more advanced than the 10 nm node used for the i9-13900E, which affects power efficiency and transistor density.

Q: Does the RX 7400 have ray tracing support?

A: Yes, the RX 7400 has 28 ray tracing cores, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features. However, given the card's low overall performance (17th percentile of all GPUs), ray tracing workloads will be very slow, and the card is not well-suited for ray-traced gaming or rendering at playable frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory, though the platform is tied to the 13th generation Raptor Lake architecture. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity, though the RX 7400 only uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, which is low for a 24-core part, and this suggests that the processor is designed for power-constrained environments, possibly all-in-one systems or compact desktops. The low TDP also means that a capable air cooler should be sufficient, and the platform does not require exotic cooling solutions. The RX 7400, with its 43-watt TDP and 200-watt suggested PSU, is similarly power-efficient, so the overall system power requirements are modest.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful GPU, since the CPU has substantial headroom. The i9-13900E's 65th percentile CPU rank indicates that it can handle much faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck in most workloads. However, the platform is limited by its Socket 1700 interface, which means that future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU is a positive sign for future storage upgrades, as NVMe drives using Gen 5 will take advantage of the available bandwidth. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that builders can choose to reuse existing DDR4 memory or invest in newer DDR5 modules, though the dual-channel configuration limits maximum bandwidth compared to quad-channel workstation platforms.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a strong scenario for this build. The RX 7400's 17th percentile GPU rank and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 indicate that it will struggle to reach high frame rates at 1080p in modern games, let alone at higher refresh rates like 144Hz. Esports titles may run acceptably at lower settings, but the GPU is a clear bottleneck.

Streaming: The i9-13900E's 24 cores and 32 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244, provide ample CPU headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming. However, the RX 7400's low GPU performance means that the gaming side of the stream will suffer, and the CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 could be used as a fallback for encoding, though this is not ideal.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244, makes this a viable scenario for video editing in software like Premiere Pro, which scales well with CPU cores. The GPU can assist with effects and rendering, but its low compute scores (Passmark GPU compute of 5152) mean that GPU-accelerated effects will be slow.

3D rendering: The i9-13900E can handle CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles) well, with its 24 cores providing significant throughput. However, the RX 7400's 28 ray tracing cores and 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance are far below what is needed for real-time GPU rendering, so GPU-accelerated rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles with OptiX or HIP) will be very slow.

Software development: This is a strong scenario. The i9-13900E's 32 threads and high single-core boost of 5.2 GHz, combined with its Cinebench single-core score of 4834, make it excellent for compiling code, running virtual machines, and managing complex build pipelines. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so the RX 7400's low performance is not a hindrance.

Student and office work: The CPU's high single-core performance and ECC memory support make this a capable system for office productivity, spreadsheet work, and day-to-day computing. The RX 7400's low power draw and modest size make it suitable for a quiet desktop, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the GPU fails or needs to be removed.

Who Should Build It

This build is primarily suited for users who need serious CPU compute performance but have minimal or undemanding graphics requirements. The i9-13900E's 65th percentile CPU rank and strong Cinebench scores make it a good choice for software developers, data analysts, and researchers who run CPU-intensive workloads like compilation, simulation, or batch processing. The ECC memory support adds reliability for small business workstations where data integrity is important.

Gamers at 1080p with low settings and a preference for esports titles may find the RX 7400 acceptable, but the GPU's 17th percentile rank and direct competitor being the GeForce 710M (which is 1.9% slower in average score) indicate that this is not a gaming-oriented build. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-based workflows, such as video encoding or 3D rendering on the CPU, will benefit from the i9-13900E's multi-core power, but the GPU will not accelerate those workflows meaningfully.

Students and office workers who need a responsive desktop for multitasking, web browsing, and document editing will find the CPU more than sufficient, and the low-power GPU keeps the system quiet and efficient. Small business workstations handling databases, accounting software, or light server duties will appreciate the ECC memory support. This build is not suitable for GPU-accelerated machine learning, high-end 3D modeling with real-time viewport rendering, or any workload where the GPU is the primary compute engine.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing Intel's Raptor Lake flagship-tier CPU with AMD's entry-level RDNA 3 GPU. The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor with a 65-watt TDP, designed for Socket 1700 and supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a 43-watt, dual-slot card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 128-bit memory bus.

The overall tier of this system, as indicated by the combined percentile of 41, is below the midpoint of all builds in the database. However, this single number is misleading because the CPU and GPU are at opposite ends of the performance spectrum. The CPU sits in the 65th percentile of all CPUs, which is above average, while the GPU sits in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, which is well below average. This is not a balanced build, but rather a CPU-centric configuration where the graphics card is clearly the limiting factor for any graphics-intensive work.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows that the GPU is the bottleneck in this pairing for graphics workloads, and the CPU is the bottleneck for any workload that does not involve the GPU. In gaming, the RX 7400's 17th percentile GPU rank and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 will cap frame rates far below what the i9-13900E can support. The CPU's single-core score of 4834 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient for most game logic and physics, so the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost all gaming scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering on the CPU, the i9-13900E's 24 cores and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 will be the primary driver, and the GPU will contribute little. In these cases, the CPU is the bottleneck in the sense that it is the component doing the work, but it is a capable bottleneck — the system will perform well in these tasks.

The imbalance is stark when comparing percentiles: the CPU is 65th percentile, the GPU is 17th percentile, and the combined system is 41st percentile. This means that the system's overall performance is dragged down significantly by the GPU, but the CPU's performance remains available for non-graphics tasks. For users who primarily use the CPU and rarely touch the GPU, this is a well-balanced system. For users who expect to game or do GPU-accelerated work, the RX 7400 will be a severe and constant bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing. All frame rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and the components' relative performance tiers.

Based on the RX 7400's 17th percentile GPU rank and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103, this system will deliver playable frame rates only at 1080p with low or medium settings in most games. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are not demanding on the GPU, may run at 60-100+ FPS at 1080p low settings. However, modern AAA games with high graphical demands will likely struggle to maintain 30-60 FPS even at 1080p low settings, and the card's low DirectX 12 score of 44 in Passmark suggests that newer API-heavy games will perform particularly poorly.

At 1440p, the RX 7400 will be inadequate for most games, with frame rates dropping below 30 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K, the card is not viable for gaming. The i9-13900E's CPU performance is sufficient for high-refresh gaming — its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4834 is competitive — but the GPU will prevent the system from reaching high frame rates in any graphically intensive game. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming but may be exceeded by some modern titles at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs. Overall, this is a 1080p low-to-medium settings gaming system at best, and users should not expect a smooth gaming experience in recent AAA releases.